Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

1108810891091109310941580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭floorpie


    I agree precisely with the authors findings, in fact I pasted them above so you can read, and compare to their narrative discussion of the same findings.



  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    I'd say Leo made quite sure he was confident about uptick in cases. I hope I'm wrong, but can see zero reason why we won't have a surge in cases when it appears to happen everywhere else. The big question is the hospitalisations. If they don't ultimately surge, the current restrictions must be lifted in early January.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,752 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    nothing to see here

    regular jabs of a private company product so as to allow a bit of travel

    sure who could have a problem with that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭floorpie


    Right, so people can throw out any kind of negative claim that want to, and you won't look for substantiation. They didn't just not definitely prove a negative, but provide any support or justification whatsoever for the sweeping claim. Really? Pull the other one. There is a burden of justification for such sweeping claims, or it is a licence for fake news.

    Of course, someone can't just throw out any hypothesis and claim that it's true without evidence but if there are two opposing claims (e.g. vaccines reduce transmission, vaccines don't reduce transmission) then it makes more sense to prove that they do. In fact the statistical tests used for these studies only work in this way (i.e. they can only "prove" that they reduce transmission, and not the opposite). I'm not just trying to be obstinate.

    As does the studies I have cited.

    The study I pasted is the one your news article cited. It shows no difference in rates of transmission from unvacc->vacc, vacc->vacc, vacc->unvacc. It only shows slightly higher transmission for unvacc->unvacc. I pasted the relevant part from the paper above, and linked to the paper.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,127 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Because of a rise in cases in a school or class? No there isn't. Many parents are trying to be cautious in the run up to Christmas.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,585 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The findings show a secondary infection rate of 13% from a vaccinated index case to unvaccinated contacts versus a 22% secondary infection rate from an unvaccinated index case to unvaccinated contacts.

    So whether the index case was vaccinated or unvaccinated made a significant difference to how many people the infection was transmitted to.

    I don't know what basis you make the claim that transmission from unvaccinated to unvaccinated is not relevant, especially as the discussion was related to covid pass.

    Even if Omicron changes the picture somewhat, that picture may change with future variants again - but it establishes the general principle that vaccines have an effect which can reduce transmission, and it is false to claim the contrary.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    I wonder will we see true figures from the UK? There will always be limits on testing capacity.

    I know of one person living in London, trying to come back to Dublin later this week for Christmas, and they can't get an appointment anywhere for a PCR test, so they may have to abandon their trip.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,420 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Because NPHET recommendations also have an impact on people's mental health. Why would you object to a mental health expert/representative being in NPHET?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 477 ✭✭glitterIsland


    I feel sorry for my local hotel. I know the owner well and he's a good man. The place is often quite at the best of times. I like going there myself. There's no issue with social distancing there because the place does not get packed out.

    I don't agree with last Fridays guidelines of an 8pm curfew for hospitality.


    I think hospitality should have been allowed to run at reduced capacity.


    I also think there should be a lockdown for the unvaccinated. Inforce the covid pass every where and make it illegal with heavy penalties to falsify the document or borrow someone else's covid pass.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,860 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    They also have an impact on the economy. But I dont think they should have an economist in there.

    Thats the governments job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭floorpie


    The findings show a secondary infection rate of 13% from a vaccinated index case to unvaccinated contacts versus a 22% secondary infection rate from an unvaccinated index case to unvaccinated contacts.

    Yeah, that's what I said. The only increase in transmission they find is from unvacc -> unvacc, which isn't relevant in any EU country anymore. Even then, it's a marginal difference. As such, the line that "vaccines reduce transmission" should not be used to justify any restrictions based on vaccination status now, e.g. the covid cert. Rates of transmission in the real world (i.e. where 90+% of adults are vaccinated) are the same whether vaccinated or unvaccinated, now.



  • Posts: 8,647 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You keep saying that unvaccinated to unvaccinated but if omicron can bypass prior delta infection. Doesn't that mean that loads of the people who had delta/whatever are essentially unvaccinated against omicron. So would be relevant?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,107 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I don't know if there is but there is a huge difference in clinical mental health issues and celebrity inspired "issues" which amount little more than "I don't like this"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,780 ✭✭✭✭ninebeanrows


    I think we need to question about what our motives are here?


    Is it a situation where the amount of testing is actually causing the issues but not the virus?


    The reason why lots of operations are being cancelled is due to non sick staff members getting a positive test.


    Is the potential crisis to do with the virus or to do with our measures we are taking due to the virus?


    These are now very real questions that need to be made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    A few questions for the boardsies:

    1. Is there somewhere I can find figures on where recent outbreaks have occurred - i.e. in hospitality, gyms, household, work, whatever? I ask because I heard on the radio someone saying there was no transmission of covid recorded in pubs over the past three weeks. I caught covid in a pub three weeks ago, but was never asked either online or over the phone where I may have got it from.
    2. I am hoping to go to the UK on the 27th, returning on 2nd January. I know I need a professionally administered antigen test within 48 hours of returning. The only places doing them are certain pharmacies, like some Boots/Lloyds etc, I'm sort of scuppered as so many pharmacies are not doing them on New Years Eve/New Years Day, and we will be driving for 8 hours back to the boat on Sunday 2 January. If anyone knows anywhere in Cornwall that will be doing "fit to fly" antigen tests on 31 Dec/1 Jan I'd love to know where. Even somewhere in Bristol or Cardiff that might do them on 2 January would be helpful.
    3. I'm worried that a "professionally administered" antigen test will be more sensitive than a home taken antigen test and, similar to a PCR test, might lead to the some vestiges of my infection three weeks ago showing up in the results. How sensitive are the antigen test carried out in pharmacies? Am I going to be left in a situation where we have to drive to Scotland and get the boat to Belfast in order to get home? Should I just bloody cancel the holiday (for the 4th time)?

    Thanks!



  • Posts: 8,647 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't think you want a patient getting the virus in the post recovery phase if I'm honest. The problem will come when 10/20% of hospital staff test positive for covid when they test everybody in one day to check prevalence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭Shilock


    I don't think that's a good idea locking down the unvaccinated and taking their livelihoods from them.

    Would you not think of kid's who need a roof over their heads and their parents to be earning a few euro's.

    I'm vaccinated myself but if I'm going to start villifying people who rightfully have a choice, I might as well say that people who don't contribute to society should be homeless or worse just left to fend for themselves.

    Sure why stop there, shouldn't we start taxing social welfare and cut back on medical card's and scrap the doctor card too...

    We live in a good society and we don't need people suggesting people should loose the right to work, feed themselves and their kids.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,780 ✭✭✭✭ninebeanrows


    Which is bizarre, it is like they are pre planning shutting their wards


    If the sick patients are triple vaxxed youd expect the risk to them is similar to what the risk was pre covid of catching flu, post surgery infection etc. Especially if the hospital staff take the needed precautions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,347 ✭✭✭Wombatman


    We have had 660K cases. Assuming a reasonable confirmed case to undetected infection ratio of one to ten, wouldn't most of us have had it by now?

    The NLF suspended their intensive testing regime because most of the positive cases (85%) simply weren't sick. These cases would rarely detected be in the wider community because asymptomatic people don't generally present for a test.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    UK once again in and around 90K, at 90,629 new cases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,585 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    No, that isn't what you said. It directly contradicts what you said, you don't seem to register this?

    To state that "The only increase in transmission they find is from unvacc -> unvacc" is simply untrue. It is not stated in the linked article, it is your misunderstanding of the article.

    It's not a marginal difference. If you were vaccinated you were 63% less likely to pass on infection to an unvaccinated person you were living with than if you were unvaccinated. Do you realise what that means?

    It's completely relevant as to why governments across Europe don't want unvaccinated mingling in high risk environments, and is the basis for covid pass systems. Whether it is 10% here or 30% in other countries, the unvaccinated are having a disproportionate impact on hospitals. So state they are not relevant is utterly without foundation no matter how many times you repeat it.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭Apothic_Red


    Saw that, looks like a plateau

    That's about 7k cases day pro rata for us.

    That 13k in Denmark must be down to their massive testing numbers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭ClaudeVercetti


    Sorry if this is the wrong forum to ask - are many of ye keeping a low profile until Christmas day? I've cancelled a few things bar a lunch with the brother before Christmas, feels really sad to be doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,151 ✭✭✭mollser


    We all know the hospitals have minimal discharges over the weekends, and they spend most of Monday and Tuesday getting through them.

    What's the deal at Christmas... is this issue exaggerated such that there's minimal discharges until 4th Jan? And is this a key reason as to why our hospitals are in a mess in January, I.e. it takes them that long to get on top of it?

    Hopefully this will be monitored by a em journalist or something lol, covid will exaggerate and be blamed for this no doubt, but if that's the real reason for shutting down parts of society it's not great really tbh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Does anyone know if these accounts include income from state supports? Nothing mentioned about it here...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 813 ✭✭✭minitrue


    For those who would actually like to read the relevant paragraph from the study in full and in order without floorpie's editing to omit mentioning the confounding factors and the actual effectiveness against transmission to vaccinated household contacts.

    floorpie-study.jpg

    So ignoring the fact 12% is already higher that 11% there's also the pesky little fact that those crude figures are skewed by age and once that is corrected for the gap widens significantly to show a 40% vaccine effectiveness against transmission to the vaccinated along with the 63% when dealing with transmission to unvaccinated contacts.

    I don't know about you but 40% let alone 63% is not marginal.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭MarkHenderson




Advertisement