Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

People who reluctantly got vaccinated, how has your life been affected?

Options
124

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,924 ✭✭✭✭Strumms





  • Registered Users Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭bokale


    CT stuff gets a lot of likes here so it's probably the place for it ha



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,481 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It does seem to be proliferating again, every few weeks a bunch of posters disappear and new ones appear with the same talking points and post thanking :)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There's nothing CT about people being concerned about technology, in this case digital passports, being used in other ways. It's a perfectly rational view to hold. In a normal country with a proper media these kinds of things would be discussed and debated. Governments do bad things. Have throughout history. And in today's digital world it is perfectly rational to believe that there could be other kinds of digital passports for things such as one's carbon footprint (a certain number of credits per month, for example), or digital currencies (restrictions on what people can buy). In England the Bank of England called for digital cash to be programmed: Bank of England tells ministers to intervene on digital currency 'programming' (telegraph.co.uk). It's not CT stuff. Such discussions are taking place all around the world in banks, among bankers etc. I'm off topic here, so I won't labour the point, but it is wrong to say it's CT stuff. I don't say it will happen, but it's perfectly reasonable for people to be concerned about it and people should be allowed to discuss it without being told to go to that horrible CT thread. Technology has never been as advanced or sophisticated as it is today. Bad actors could easily take advantage of it. And I say could, not will. And no, not lizard people before that's lazily thrown out there.


    But anyway, back to the topic under discussion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,481 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The poster was saying that the plan was to make the population obey, that is a conspiracy with no basis in reality. Things happening are not a conspiracy, things happening for some ulterior motive you have no proof of is a conspiracy theory and that's where most of these conversations end up going.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well, the population is being forced to obey. That's not a conspiracy theory. It's being forced to use vaccine passports, businesses are being forced to close every 5 minutes (5 o'clock closing time the latest), people are being forced to obey testing rules.


    And to link this to the topic of the thread, I would say that people who reluctantly got vaccinated find themselves facing even more restrictions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    I think we'll see massive push back if they start deactivating people's covid certs if they haven't had a booster recently. Two years in now, I think 2022 will be a turning point. Interesting to see what happens

    Post edited by Markus Antonius on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    He was saying the government are rushing to take the credit for the work Omicron will do to give people natural immunity seeing as it spreads so fast and potentially is a milder strain. Sounds exactly like government behaviour. Kinda like how Shane Ross coached Katie Taylor to olympic gold.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,481 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Kinda like how Shane Ross coached Katie Taylor to olympic gold.

    I'm sure, in your reality, this is what actually happened.

    You've spent over 350 pages talking on the CT forum but can't say who is gaining from it or why this is happening, all these events occurred during previous pandemics and will happen again in future pandemics, no taking control from people, it's called managing a health crisis.



  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭aidoh


    I'd hope so but I'm really not so confident.

    My better half was in Germany a few weeks ago. They already had boosters added to the digital cert over there, so to get into a pub/nightclub hassle-free you either had to be at least triple jabbed, or if you were 'only' double-jabbed you also had to show negative PCR test result.

    The negative PCR result makes more sense in terms of stopping spread than proof of vaccine anyway. But over there you need both unless boosted. You couldn't e.g. get in somewhere with a negative test if unvaxxed (which is counter-intuitive and I believe against the supposed purpose of the digital pass in the first place).

    Point is, everyone just goes along with it over there because at the end of the day, what else are they going to do?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    They could start voting with their feet and walk away if anyone gets refused entry for whatever reason. I think pubs have too much of a bind on people's lives anyway. Something else that won't prove to be a bureaucratic nightmare (such as private/beach/open air venues) will take their place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    It's certainly possible - the key difference here is that I will accept that finding if scientific research supports it.

    But anti-vaxers have no time for science, or don't understand it, or regard it as a conspiracy against them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    One other thing to call out here: there are at least 5 COVID vaccines in use in Ireland. Each one is different to the others, and there are even completely different mechanisms whereby they create immunity.

    So it is odd* that the anti-vaxxer propaganda talks about 'THE vaccine' as if there is only one, and that it is terribly dangerous or risky. It's almost as if they want to gloss over the facts to try to make people scared to take any of the COVID vaccine options.

    *well, not really. Honesty is not really the strong suit of the anti-everything weirdos.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,106 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Nope. Not any more. Now we have two, both mRNA in action. If you want to take a vaccine or booster, but want to chose any other type for whatever reasons, you have no choice in the matter in Ireland for the moment. It may as well be "THE vaccine".

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,802 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I'm reluctantly partially vaccinated, one shot of Pfizer. As things stand, not intending to get the second shot, never mind the booster. Apart from not being able to go to the pub, which I would have done regularly, and travel being more of a hassle/expensive, day to day to life has not been affected.

    Ended up half vaxxed, as I was not keen on mRNA and was already skeptical watching cases climb as vaccination rates increased, but reluctantly signed up because a) have had some health issues in the past which would not be covid friendly and b) I know wife, whilst not applying pressure, really wanted me to do it.

    Had first shot without much drama, and turned up for second appointment. Standing in queue, I read the do you have any of these symptoms - cough etc. Yes I had two or three of them, and told the person who asked me when booking in. She didn't really know what to do, and asked me did I want to go ahead to which I replied I had no idea, was it safe to do so? She summoned a doctor who basically said the same thing, did I want to have the vaccine despite having the symptoms? Again I said I had no idea, is it safe to do so? He was pretty non committal and was not able to give me any info or advice, other than saying it was up to me. Eventually I said I would do whatever he specifically recommended, at which point he said not to get second shot, go away get a PCR and set up another appointment. None of it inspired confidence.

    First rescheduled appointment was a clash, and by the time I got the next one the nonsense had really ramped up - covid certs, the pandemic of the unvaccinated, former health ministers blaming the unvaxxed for full ICUs etc etc.

    The more of this bullying and discrimination I heard, the more I thought "Feck it, I'm not getting the second shot."

    A good friend of mine shared with me his strong opinions about the importance of getting vaccinated. He's a very smart guy, well informed and a critical thinker who in the past has more often been right than wrong. I reminded him that when a successful vaccine was first announced, pre approval, he raised concerns about the speed of development etc and expressed some misgivings about taking it. At the time I was the one who was pro getting vaccinated.

    After having had the vaccine his capacity for independent thought on the subject seemed to have vanished. Ultimately his argument for taking the vaccine came down to "Antivaxxers are loons. I'd rather be on the side of those who trust science than the mad conspiracy theorists who are worried about 5G microchips."

    This amazed me. Even this guy had boiled it down to what side are you on. It should not be about "sides" but if it must, I will always be on the other side of those who are enthusiastically calling for covid passports and the ostracisation of their fellow citizens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    But people have been railing against 'the vaccine' since we have had or will have Pfizer, Moderna, Oxford AZ, J&J and Janssen. Entirely different products. Do you not agree that there seems to be some deliberate obfuscation by anti-vaxxers, who with their huge vaccine expertise must be aware of this?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,106 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    J&J and Janssen are the same vaccine. AZ and J&J are viral vectors, Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vectors. The "huge vaccine expertise" stuff is present on all sides to be fair.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    Right, so there have been at least 4 vaccines, soon be more, in use in Ireland, in addition to another rake of vaccines from other manufacturers not even available in this country. So why do anti-vaxxers talk about 'the vaccine'?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,106 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    You seem to be the one talking about "the vaccine" the most. You also seem confused about the number that were available here and conflated J&J and Janssen which is the same company. Without running to Prof. Google do you know the difference between viral vector and mRNA vaccines? I suspect not. General ignorance while certainly present to a strong degree in them is hardly exclusive to the anti vaxxers.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    I'm not sure why you are attacking me, as I don't profess the medical knowledge required to make decisions on the usefulness of the vaccine: I entrust that to medical experts. And the medical experts have weighed in, as you may have heard at some point over the last year or two.

    Anti-vaxxers do profess to have knowledge about this, to the degree that they actively discourage people from getting these life-saving vaccines and have now even started block booking vaccine appointments to prevent others getting them.

    Why do they pretend all the vaccines are the same? And why do you refuse to answer this simple question?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,106 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Maybe climb down off your cross for a moment. I'm not "attacking" you. I'm not refusing to answer your question either. There were four vaccines in use in Ireland. There aren't "at least five". Two were viral vector, now not available, two were mRNA based, at the moment the only choice in town. As for anti vaxxers, I have zero clue, nor care what some muppet on facebook thinks about 5g/microsoft/quantum vaccines, so can't answer for them. I merely responded to your post stating that there were "at least five" vaccines in use in Ireland where the reality is that there is only one choice of type of vaccine in Ireland today. Simple as that.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    There are two available - they happen to use the same technology. If you can buy a hybrid from Toyota and another hybrid from Ford, is there only one car available for sale?

    So you're wrong there for a start. In addition, 2 others have been used by the state (with another different technology). And more have been approved will be used in the future.

    Not sure what your agenda is in trying to obfuscate this. It's black and white.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,106 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    There are two available - they happen to use the same technology. If you can buy a hybrid from Toyota and another hybrid from Ford, is there only one car available for sale?

    So you're wrong there for a start.

    Your confidence is inspiring, if misguided. If you can only buy a hybrid from Toyota and another hybrid from Ford in Ireland, then you can only buy a hybrid car in Ireland. If you want a full EV, or an ICE car you're right outa luck. I'm really not sure what point you're struggling to make here?

    Not sure what your agenda is in trying to obfuscate this. It's black and white.

    Good god man, you're running with "agendas" now? I am being black and white and precise and clear about which vaccines were and are available and the differences between them. You're the one who came out of the gate even unsure about the number of them.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    The point you are struggling to understand is that a Ford hybrid and a Toyota hybrid are not the same car. They are different cars, and even have different engines that use the same basic technology, but implemented in different ways. I'm not sure I can make it any simpler for you. If you still think this is one car, I genuinely feel sorry for you.

    I am asking why the anti-vax movement tries to pretend there is a single vaccine when there must be nearly a dozen different vaccines worldwide at this point. If you have no view on why this is so, that is fine. But perhaps you should add to your 55,000+ posts addressing a different topic?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,802 ✭✭✭hometruths


    One other thing to call out here: there are at least 5 COVID vaccines in use in Ireland. Each one is different to the others, and there are even completely different mechanisms whereby they create immunity.

    Bit of a stretch to call the protection they offer "immunity" to be honest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,481 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    To be fair, that's a misunderstanding on your part of what vaccine immunity means. Barring the very rare blood clotting issue with the Adenovector vaccines (where the mechanism of how it happens is understood and future versions should be able to eliminate it) there's been no "surprising" side effects from the vaccines after billions given. Myocarditis is very rare but also occurs with other vaccines that stimulate the immune system (which means it's generally more likely for the person if they contract COVID itself), allergies are also rare but happen with all medicines.

    To be honest, it does seen you have an issue with it, I would advise to talk to your own GP about it as it sounds like those at the MVC weren't prepared to give advice (which is fair as they don't know your medical history), we're not quite at the "babying" stage for people (and with 93% adult take up, it probably isn't necessary, offering a free burger is unlikely to change minds).

    The COVID pass will remain as long as the unvaccinated use of the health service remains disproportionate and the health service is under pressure, it's beyond it's use as a stick, the few remaining will howl about it, but there is a safe, simple option for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    It is immunity. Immunity in a medical/scientific sense does not mean that you are completely invulnerable to something. This is one of the problems when specialised topics with a body of research behind them are in the public domain: words do not always have the same meaning in both contexts.

    The Wikipedia definition for example:

    >In biology, immunity is the capability of multicellular organisms to resist harmful microorganisms.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,802 ✭✭✭hometruths


    To be fair, that's a misunderstanding on your part of what vaccine immunity means.

    I'm consistently amazed at how many people, this time last year, understood that being immune to a disease meant not ending up in ICU or whatever the latest definition is.

    I always understood that if you were immune to a disease, you were unlikely to suffer from it, and hence spread it.

    Must have been too many years I spent studying languages and etymology and not enough time reading Wikipedia.

    Here's a question for those who understand the concept of immunity better than I:

    What does herd immunity mean? And why don't we have it if the vaccines are granting immunity and we have 93% of adults vaccinated? Are we ever likely to get herd immunity via vaccination?



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,481 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Herd immunity is based on the ability of the vaccinated/infected population to reduce transmission to reduce R below 1 (then the virus dies out), the vaccines seem to do this post vaccination but as immunity wanes, R increases and allows the virus to continue to circulate (same as measles is still in circulation despite Ireland being at herd immunity levels for it).

    A high starting R number means more of the population need to be vaccinated for herd immunity to be achieved, it may not be fully possible with COVID (similar to Flu vaccination but for different reasons), we are currently at about 75% vaccinated (whole population) which is too low a % for herd immunity to be achieved.

    If we could vaccinate everyone in the world in the same 2 month period, we'd probably see it die out, but for logistical reasons, that's impossible, so the best thing to do is get as many as possible vaccinated and then manage the impact on the health system on the basis that infections and vaccinations should get us to herd immunity, but that takes time.

    And yes, if you are vaccinated, you are very unlikely to suffer from it, but at high numbers, unlikely means that a few still get it and have severe side effects (up to and including death) from SARS-COV2.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,802 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Thanks for that detailed explanation. Interesting that the immunity referred to in "herd immunity" appears to mean that the bulk of people in the herd are not infected/transmitting whereas mere immunity simply means protected from severe outcomes such as ICU.

    No wonder I misunderstand these things!



Advertisement