Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Formula 1 Round 22 Abu Dhabi GP

17476787980

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    So reinstate the gaps after a safety car, so after a red flag too so? That means Hamilton finishes maybe 7th or 8th in Imola which means Max didn't need to pass Hamilton on Sunday in the last lap .......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,629 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Hard disagree.

    Remove the safety car strategy and then it’s just fastest car wins(your solution probably favours the lead car even more as having everyone else stop and wait means they’ll lose more tire temp)

    What was interesting going into last week is that if Hamilton and Verstappen were at all close, Verstappen had one advantage, which was that he could afford contact - which shaped Mercedes race strategy, avoid racing Verstappen if at all possible, which meant maintaining track position and distance, and gambling that there’d be no safety car.

    Mercedes could have pitted and given track position to Max and chased him down. Would have meant they were in a much better position should a late safety car happen but Verstappen would have made it difficult to pass and they’d be kicking themselves if they ended in a DNF(but really had that happened they’d be in a much better position to get RB penalised and the result overturned).

    All of the decisions made between Mercedes, Red Bull and Masi contributed to that finale was saw.

    Having a system to maintain distances between cars would remove that element of strategy and would mean track position is king, and you’re completely safe once you’re out in front, and races wouldn’t be worth watching to the end.

    So I can understand people being unhappy with drama being created outside of the teams and drivers, but a lot of these suggestions just serve to remove any enjoyment from racing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    I don’t have a preference for any driver, but watching that it was a joke , for many reasons.

    I didn’t follow the season and haven’t for many years.

    A red flag is a race stoppage isn’t it? So a restart is necessary? How many races a year are red flagged?

    safety cars seem to be plentiful, particularly around tracks of the same ilk as Monaco , Saudi.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    Is it really an element of strategy if it is pot luck wether some dude smashes into a wall? And brings out a safety car?

    and the luck of wether that Masi didn’t decide what he decided?

    If people want this because it brings excitement then the rest of the sport has issues.

    and just your comment about favouring the lead driver, well that’s what being in the lead is , there has got be some incentive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Imola, Baku, Silverstone, Jeddah all had red flags


    Red flags are a race stoppage. At Imola Hamilton binned it, spent 2 minutes trying to get out of a gravel trap and was lapped before Bottas and Russell crashed bringing out a red flag. Hamilton limped back to the pits, got damage repaired abd tyres changed, and then unlapped himself under the red flag and finished second


    Max 25/Hamilton 6 if no red flag

    Max 25/Hamilton 18 because of the red flag


    So you cannot argue against cars closing up under a SC and ignore what happens under red flag situation IMO


    Hamilton caused a crash at Silverstone and the Merc team gambled on a red flag being needed and repaired his car under that red flag. Hamilton and Wolff pushing the robbed/disillusioned agenda is utter crap. We never heard a word out of them about this when the SC or Red Flags fell their way to huge advantage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,629 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Of course it is. Had Hamilton decided to go on fresh tires earlier the safety car is largely irrelevant. He chose not to do that to stay away from Max.

    Safety cars are known entities that strategies are built around. It doesn’t automatically hand the race to the driver behind you.

    If you want to have races without any strategy or incident at all then why don’t we just have teams do a few practice laps and then AWS can tell us who the race winner will be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,629 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I’ve heard multiple times that apparently anything up to this point doesn’t matter, this is what decided the championship. Convenient nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    Look, I don’t watch F1 so not really up to speed, but watching that race the weekend it’s obvious the sport is broken.

    my comment about safety cars was just a quick thought.

    the most exciting things going in that race was TOTO crying on the radio like a baby, and whatever else was going on around the track bar the racing itself.

    its obvious something needs to be done, but how the race finished was a joke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    OK, regardless of the finish on Sunday do you accept that earlier in the season Hamilton made huge gains in similar circumstances when there was a crash involving other cars. And that if the rules were more aligned with your thinking, then the last lap on Sunday would have been irrelevent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭donspeekinglesh


    They used to do that, but people found aggregate racing too confusing... See Suzuka 1994 for an an example.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    I didn’t watch the earlier season, as I said I haven’t watched it for many years.

    that very well may be the truth?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Eh its actually what happened. Your making a judgement on 6 laps of Race 22. If your logic applied, Max carries a 12 point lead into Sundays race. So that last lap under green is irrelevant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    Yea that’s great?

    can you not see how the whole end of that race was a farce, regardless of what happened in the rest of the season?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    No I don't. Safety cars are part of the sport. What exactly was a farce, that the race director got the race back underway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    No. As far as I've seen, you're the only one to bring up racism in this whole issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    That the race director just decided whatever he wanted?

    nobody knew what was happening.

    the commentators were shocked when the safety came in when it did.

    the other points in the season where you say Hamilton gained an advantage were rules and procedures followed or was discretion applied?

    nobody knew if cars were gonna unlap themselves,

    nobody knew if the safety car would come in.

    why did Masi decide it was only first and second that could fight and why didn’t he let 3rd place close up?

    did he make a mockery of the rules in all the other races throughout the year?

    a lot of issues there, anyway I don’t have the knowledge of F1 and the season to be really debating it.

    i may be wrong I may not be.

    just from watching that it was a bit ridiculous that the top tier in motorsport racing can end in a sh*tshow like that.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    The race director got the race underway at the first opportunity. That's his job. Once it's safe to race, bring the SC in. That's what happened.


    What the commentators think is irrelevant.


    You can't complain about something you clearly know fcuk all about. Drivers all the last few weeks when asked about the title race kept saying they didn't want to get involved.


    Michael Masi is the race director. He has the discretion to make decisions in order to get the race back under way. That's what he did. So no he didn't make a mockery of the rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    The decision to only clear the cars between max and Lewis wasn't about getting the green flag. That decision was very unusual and it was all about the drama.

    I'm happy with the outcome as I was supporting Max, but I think you need to acknowledge that the decision to only clear the cars between max and Lewis was all about showbiz. If it was all about getting the race underway and finishing under green flag, then not clearing any cars would have been simpler and faster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Maybe, maybe not. But when other drivers have spent weeks saying they don't want to get involved in the title race, what difference does it make. Lando was even speaking about being scared to be so close to the front after Quali on the Saturday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    So there are no rules then basically?

    whatever the race director says is what happens.

    it was a sh*tshow relying on pitlane drama , Toto crying and the drama of not knowing what the race director is gonna do to make it exciting.

    anything bar the racing itself.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    What's the other driver's attitude got to do with anything?

    If it was just about getting back to green flag, as you said it was, then why did they only clear the cars between max and Lewis?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It was a combination of serendipitous crash and the need for safety car, manufactured drama AND racing. I don't think it was about "anything bar the racing itself".

    There are rules and procedures. It turns out the race director can override the rules if they want to. I certainly didn't know that and I think most others didn't know that either. It almost never comes up. But it came up in this instance and it resulted in the most dramatic finish to the season finale in decades



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,455 ✭✭✭tanko


    The last lap of the race was one of the most exciting sporting moments of all time, it will be remembered for decades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    That’s a bit of a stretch ,

    “sporting moments of all time”

    maybe

    “manufactured sporting moments of all time”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It was a greats sports event. It had an element of manufacturing in it but I'm fine with how it worked out. Once the safety car was needed there were no options that wouldn't have amounted to manufactured drama, except for finishing the race under the safety car which would have been an intervention in itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    Well the safety car would have been an intervention within the rules, I just can’t get my head around the race director making stuff up.

    maybe they will learn something from it .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,143 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'd say they learned it was the most exciting finale in years and it got more international coverage than any finale in decades.

    It was an extraordinary set of circumstances. I doubt they'll be trying to manufacture these scenarios from nothing. They just took advantage of the situation that arose. I doubt there's a lot more to learn from it than that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,594 ✭✭✭Harika


    Overall it's Toto's fault. He could have told bottas at the restart to park the car in the middle of the track. Safety car cannot end, Lewis is champion. Multi 21 ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭glen123


    Schumacher parked his car in Monaco during qualifying. That didn't end well at all for him. They can check telemetry to see what really happened to the car so just stopping for no reason isn't an option.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,854 ✭✭✭SureYWouldntYa


    What if Bottas was to stop the car cause of a crippling migraine and he couldnt go on?

    Surely there’s nothing that could be done in that case



Advertisement