Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

199499599799910001581

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 348 ✭✭Timmy O Toole


    Listening to Simon Harris earlier on Newstalk. He talked alot of sense. We have to get on with life now. He said 2020 lockdown was to give hospitals time to prepare with ppe ect. 2021 lockdown was to give them time to roll out the vaccines. We can't lockdown again in 2022.

    He also corrected the host who said England seem to be panicking and have brought in tight restrictions, he said even with their tighter restrictions there alot looser than hours have been all year.

    If we still had him and Leo rather than Martin and Donnely I think we'd be in a better position now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    We all need to start getting comfortable with an acceptable level of deaths. The Irish notion that even 1 covid death is an unspeakable tragedy and any/all restrictions are justified if they save one life is not sustainable.


    We are looking at 300k job losses next year. Suicides will increase. We are facing unknown amounts of deaths from missed diagnoses.


    We cant keep destroying every other facet of irish life under the notion that we might prevent a single covid death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,201 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    Thats one of the worst things ive ever read....

    "SUBSCRIBE TO BOARDS YOU TIGHT CÙNT".....Plato 400 B.C



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭AxleAddict


    You're reading WAAAAAAY too much into what I said, which was basically just to consider being a bit more tactful (irrespective of the number of deaths). Thats it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭cheezums


    Ah come on, FG are playing games there, distancing themselves from FF for the inevitable break up. It's all politics.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,291 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Exactly, both Simon and Leo have been making noises the last couple of weeks going against the grain. Doesn't mean what they're saying isn't right though. The irony of course is, if it wasn't for Harris, we wouldn't be where we are now, it was the motion of no confidence against him that caused the election which gave us the shambles of 3 party government we have now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,291 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Okay, I suppose it also means they can give the vulnerable their 2nd boosters in January/February.

    Once they don't link the vaccine cert to expiry date within 3 months it shouldn't be an issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,502 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    I've no idea what your referring to. The only people getting a 4th dose currently are those who are immunocompromised. For example my uncle who's having cancer treatment got a booster a good while ago, if his consultant recommends then he'll be in line for a 4th dose, that's just because his immune system is shot with the treatment.

    I'm not sure what your referring to by 2nd boosters and a 3 month vaccine cert expiry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,291 ✭✭✭prunudo


    You said they're now allowing a 3 month gap between vaccine and boosters, therefore surely it means that those that need a 4th vaccine could in theory be getting them in January/February seeing as our boosters were starting to roll out in October.


    Regarding the vaccine cert, I was just saying that I hope they don't link the vaccine certs to expiry after 3 months. As has been shown time and time again throughout this, you can never say never when it comes to them introducing rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    For a while I thought you were using reasoning for a lockdown when it really seems to be a level of panic or doom. As always the UK data needs to be taken with a mountain of salt. The Tories are really bigging up the whole spread of it for a variety of reasons to do with the state of their party and a need to justify Plan B. We are still at the don't know point with Omicron although more data out of SA is nudging us towards a lower risk. We should finally begin to see some conclusions on it in the next week or so.

    Another lockdown here, apart from being completely pointless to stop a fast spreading variant, is up there with schools as a sacred cow for government. They will push back very hard against it and NPHET will need to come up with an awful more than grim made-up numbers to justify it. That kind of scenario is hospitals heading for 2,000 and above but not pessimistic projections that they will.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    A 4th booster puts these vaccines right on the edge of usefulness, especially if a 5th or 6th could theoretically be applied within a calendar year. They have done their jobs well in providing a level of protection but if they start to look as helpful as a multivitamin they need to be reviewed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Where are you getting the 300k job losses figure from? In an economy that's growing nearly too fast and the likelihood of completely reopening next Spring, what will have 300k people on the dole?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 541 ✭✭✭agoodpunt


    If the booster is flooring some people a lot more than the second what number booster will be an actual higher threat than the virus itself



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    Cabinet were briefed on it yesterday.

    https://m.independent.ie/news/cabinet-secretly-briefed-on-massive-job-losses-41142255.html


    This "fast growing economy " is massively and artificially jnflated by money the government borrowed, paid to hospitality and other businesses to stay shut who in turn had to return up to half that amount back to the government as taxes.


    When those supports are removed up to 25k businesses could be going to the wall.


    We are massively in debt, we have destroyed the service industry and to top it off have some of the highest covid infection rates in Europe (the world at various points). Not a great return.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,977 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What!? Harris was a terrible health minister. Like Leo, he achieved nothing. His ineptitude eventually brought down the government in January 2020. Did anyone ask him about the Children's hospital?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,404 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Thanks for that. Very doom-mongery though. It assumes that every single business on financial supports will collapse and close when those supports are taken away. Goes without saying that's virtually an impossibility. Many businesses are claiming EWSS because they're entitled to it, not because they couldn't survive without it.

    There will likely be a period of turmoil, but it won't have 300k hospitality employees turfed onto the street with no jobs to go to. "Tens of thousands of job may be lost", is true. "Every one of the 300k jobs reliant on EWSS could be lost" is not.

    The service industry operates as a function of demand. Whatever businesses close will be replaced by new ones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,065 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    I think the biggest issue will be staff. We already had that but with travel being so difficult now, might not get the foreign workers who went home back in. Some businesses will likely go to the wall, but ya, no chance it's all of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    So "just" tens of thousands of jobs being lost? Not really the sign of a "fast growing economy " though is it.


    And what benefit did we reep from destroying these businesses other than covid waves that followed the pattern of every other country on earth just 3 months later due to our fantastic "abundance of caution" approach. "Just" tens of thousands of jobs gone but ending up in the same position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,800 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Ah yes Gauteng.

    An area smaller than Munster but a with a population of 12 million people.

    Lombardy is to far in the past to use it any more I suppose.

    Pretty worrying indeed



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,053 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    So mountain of salt for UK data, but happy to rely on SA data with a much more dissimilar demographic?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,065 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    70% against hospitalisation is quite decent tbh. Was expecting less with how much people were going on about it. If you're in a group that isn't likely to require hospitalisation anyway, 2 doses is fine there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,067 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    You would want to be a right mug to go near a job in the hospitality sector, it has been shown very clearly that the NPHET government considers such people to be dirt on their heels.

    "Allowed" to go back to work and then 2 weeks later have the rug pulled again, but sure who cares, its only tens of thousands of people, there will always be new ones to replace them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,493 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    @landofthetree wrote

    30% of people will need hospital care

    That's not what "70% protection against hospitalisation" means.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,464 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,444 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41




  • Posts: 18,046 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is the stupidest thing I've ever read on this site. Possibly in my entire life.

    It reminds me of early on in the pandemic, one of the guys was sure Covid-19 had a 50% death rate because only 50% of people had recovered. We tried and tried to explain how the number of recovered would rise but he was adamant. 50% death rate.

    Some people can't do Maths. Their strengths lie in other areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 644 ✭✭✭Apothic_Red


    Anyone panicing yet

    I know MM alluded to the 40/60 detected/undetected split.

    With the UK currently detecting 50k cases a day they assume a 25/75 split.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭Terence Rattigan




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,693 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Thats not how efficacy works

    70% less people need hospitalised than if they were unvaccinated - it does NOT mean 30% of people who catch it go to hospital!

    Based on analysis by Discovery's clinical research and actuarial teams, and in collaboration with South Africa's Medical Research Council (SAMRC), the study calculated that two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech offered 70% protection against hospitalisation compared with the unvaccinated during the recent surge in cases and 33% protection against infection.


    If it were so mild that it didnt cause anyone unvaccinated to go to hospital, then the vaccine efficacy against same would be 0% - these figures cannot be taken in isolation to determine how many people will be admitted to hospital.



Advertisement