Bagrat Kudzievi

She is being named publicly because she waived her right to anonymity.

She doesn't need to "save her reputation" because the jury unanimously found him guilty after reviewing all of the evidence, most of which you are either ignoring or you are not aware of.

Heaven forbid if you ever have any daughters with a disgraceful, victim-blaming attitude like that.

What is with you and demanding links to evidence of a trial?

Until you have seen the videos yourself, you're going to think this scumbag was hard done by?

Pathetic.

EDIT: Second time in a few weeks you have entered a thread about a woman being sexually assaulted and your take is to suggest there is nothing to see here, and the first one was where the guy actually pled guilty!

What is your problem with women who are victims of sexual assault and your desire to downplay what happened, just because you aren't in court to see the evidence yourself?

Now you want to see videos of a woman being sexually assaulted so you can find other ways to defend scummy bastards? It's so weird. Even a few of those who were questioning this verdict have backed off coming to their senses that maybe, just maybe there was something sinister here.

I didn't misquote you. You said:

"Still waiting for someone to post a link to these promising videos which could clear up some of the disagreement on thread."

You have suggested that there was nothing to see here and questioned the verdict, now you're demanding links to videos showing a woman being sexually assaulted and being a smart arse about it in the process.

You know there are no links, and you will use that to 'raise questions' about the verdict of a trial you weren't in attendance for and, therefore, you have no idea about the evidence that was presented to the jury.

Don't even attempt to dress this up any other way than what it is. You have form for this and the people here with a bit of common sense can see you for what you are.

Those women can count themselves very lucky that legislation which bans the sharing of videos like this weren’t in place two years ago.

Now it is. So you’re asking someone to commit a crime.

You can pretend to be interested for insightful reasons but you’re looking for a video of a man committing sexual assault (tried and convicted unanimously by a jury of his peers) and that, to me, is weird behaviour.