Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Transport Aircraft

191012141560

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Any Irish being evacuated would simply need to go as far as Kenya, not all the way to Ireland, in the same way that evacuees from Afghanistan were taken to Oman. They could even go to Eritrea,whose people are bitter enemies of the Tigreans. Somalia,for obvious reasons,is a no-go,so South it is. We have friendly relations with Kenya.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    It’s quite embarrassing to be so over reliant on other nation to assist us in all forms of defence



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    It’s been the choice by the nation since it’s founding…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    An before that we even had the french and spanish at various times in our history trying to help us



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    exactly!…pressure from PESCO or UK is definitely in the pipeline. It’s horrendous situation which will boil over eventually. It excepted that if purchase or lease a fit for purpose aircraft, the certain TDs may stand at Baldonnel like they did at Shannon.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    There is zero pressure from PESCO and there never will be. The U.K. has to cover us because they can’t afford not to but after a hundred years I’m sure they’ve given up hoping we might step up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    Well in 2017 it was highlighted and questions were asked as to the reasons why spending dropped from 1.1bln to 997mln “This has seen the Defence Forces under pressure to maintain numbers across the forces to ensure the security and operability of our forces within Ireland and their missions abroad.” The view from Pesco is we need to spending more comparing us from a neutrality perspective to Sweden. We have the same opt-in pact as Sweden but if we cannot spend on our own forces then we cannot participate in projects so there will be pressure eventually. You correct on the uk point, hope it will give them a kick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I slightly disagree with you and think 2/3 Casa 295 Military spec would be ideal for us for day to day transport needs. It makes sensce ecomically pilots, crew and maintaince. If we wanted heavy air lift we should give the germans a call about joining there A400M program

    https://www.janes.com/amp/germany-to-form-a400m-multinational-air-transport-unit-with-hungary/ZnlJK3dHVU9mZ28xajRJVkc5dVI5VFp1cVMwPQ2



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I'm not talking about heavy lift. An A400 would be a white elephant for us. Who knows, maybe post Defence Commission we might end up in a multi-national airlift agreement that operates the 400, but thats a long way off yet.

    I'm talking about the global standard for tactical utility airlifters, the super flexible, super available, super reliable, mid-size, C-130 Hercules. When you absolutely, positively have to rescue everyone in the room - accept no substitute.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    Repatriation flights now needed for Irish citizens in morocco, id hate to be the civil servant making the begging phone calls to the France/UK



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Hope they kept the contacts from the last time, but sure nobody could have seen this coming... Those campaigning for putting some of the SAR back into the AC would be better spent arguing about getting some air lift rather than SAR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    More than likely the UK pumas will be replaced by the AW149 otherwise lenonardo will close there yeoivil plant. So the british governenment will be forced to buy them. So i wonder would there be an oppertunity for the defence forces to add to that order for replacing the air corps 139s in the future?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Far too early in their service life for that. It'll be at least ten years before replacements in the medium-lift category are contemplated.

    Unless, of course, some SAR fudge is arrived at which sees the Air Corps performing the service, in part. I hope that doesn't happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I taught i read in the examiner or times a while back that 139 fleet life span had being halfed due to the 112 role and firefighting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I missed that piece myself.

    Doesn't say much for the type, if true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭sparky42


    That would require thinking of course…

    Though honest question was the fire fighting role even considered when the helicopters were bought? I could well imagine the weight and heat conditions burning through the lifespan of them given the level of usage they seem to get nowadays for firefighting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    There must be sone strain on the 139 fleet doing the role of 112. They seam to be going to call outs a few times a day and landing in rough spots where damage and extra wear and tear will happen compare to landing on nice concrete heli pads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Would there be a better helicopter for both firefighting and air ambulance ?

    Cos I don't have a problem with them being used to do an essential job - and if that essential job wears the tool out more quickly ,well it's essential , essential jobs are why I have that tool in the first place ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    I notice possibly no IAC around today? R116 from Dublin did a tasking from Cork Airport to Newcastle in the UK.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Well it's Saturday, isn't it, the Air Corps is a 9-5 Monday to Thursday and 4.30 on a Friday type deal.

    Don't come at me, I do jest. Mostly.

    But seriously, its a good point made above that at peak there were 14 or 15 helicopters of 3 types on the Air Corps roster.

    Perhaps the heavier capability of the AW139 was intended to replace the work of 10 aircraft with 6, but maybe it wasn't quite that simple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Not sure that matters. Our DoD would never buy the 'M' version of anything, because a) they know it will never be deployed in theatre and b) they don't want to enrage the wets that sit in tents outside the Shannon Airport perimeter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭spark23


    I believe there was options around the time of the AW139 buy and that two were exercised to bring it up to six but the last two never taken out, I believe there was two options for EC135 also which could have possibly led to a fleet of 4 plus 8



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 826 ✭✭✭newcavanman


    We should have bought Blackhawks. Ministers like being flown around in AW139s, it reminds them of the ubiquitous A109s of the Celtiic Tiger days. Don't think they would be so fond of a proper support helicopter like a Blackhawk



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    I believe that has created another problem as ministers are flying via airline to midlands airports and expensing the flight ticket. There is very little that can be done in relation to ministerial travel as they have multiple ways of clawing it back at the expense of the taxpayer. The Merlins were a big runner with the AC when but when civvies got there calculators out they rejected it but and the lower maintenance requirements of the 139s won out.

    Post edited by Sgt. Bilko 09 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    lol, I couldn't be exact about that date i believe a few months after purchase and with the doors falling off and the winch not working from time to time, the problems were there at the start, but we saved money....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,758 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    They had massive issues with those helos, they've ordered black hawks. I doubt they would pass any type of saftey test give the issues and they are second hand.

    https://www.flightglobal.com/helicopters/australia-plans-early-retirement-for-nh90-helicopters-as-it-lines-up-black-hawk-order/146797.article



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The NH90 has long been a problem child. A helicopter well and truly designed by committee and a plague on all the houses of European aircraft builders.

    I expect the Air Corps to buy 6.



Advertisement
Advertisement