Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

TFI Fare Revisions from 28th November 2022 Including New 90 Minute Fare.

245

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    To people asking about the measuring system for the new <3km fare on the city buses:

    The distance fares are going to be based on some sort of a hexagonal grid overlaying Dublin city and the shortest route possible between any two given points on the network. What that means is that if there are two or more routes connecting two particular stops and one meanders around, the fare will be the lowest fare possible by any service. To take an existing example, somebody going from say Sutton Cross to Harbour Road in Howth should be paying the same fare regardless of whether they take the H3 or the 6, and that fare should be as per the H3 as it offers the shortest distance connection.

    Personally I wholeheartedly agree with the approach to offer the lowest possible fare regardless of route taken, and it's something I respect from my experiences of the Japanese railway system which works just like that. However, it's unclear whether this means the shortest distance possible by any mode, or just on the bus network...

    In areas where BusConnects services dominate the network but old network services still remain, those old services will be converted to the new system, dropping the stages. Elsewhere where there are no BC services yet, the old stages will continue to apply, and the short distance fare will cover 1-3 stages.

    So yes, a price increase for anything on the old network.

    I for one would prefer the €2.30 price be the standard price and not just the promotional fare, but eh, fuel ain't gonna pay for itself I guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,018 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Possibly yes especially when you factor in all the zone 1 only tourists or people making short trips from station to office or pub to pub or those lucky enough to live close to work.

    But if you were to compare people who require a bus to commute London would be longer I reckon. I was just looking at it a different way and thinking only about people who need the bus rather than an overall figure



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    "I understand what you are saying, however there is another group of people who are vastly better off, namely though who use more than one mode of transport, it used to be vastly expensive before multi modal caps and transfers for people who did that compared to what t is now."

    Sure, but realistically how many of them are there? I'd be shocked if was more then single digits. Even with the introduction of the much needed orbital routes, I'd be shocked if it goes over 10% of journeys.

    So the vast majority of us are being asked to subside this tiny minority at 10 times inflation!

    "The tickets you are comparing from 2012 to now are not exactly the same because there are now caps and transfers which didn't exist then and whilst they may not work that ell for the bus only customer they are vastly cheaper for those who are using more than one method, you can't overlook that I'm afraid."

    All of that is completely irrelevant to me and the vast majority of people who travel in on one bus. All we see is our fares going up at 10 times inflation for no gain for most of us. This is going to be incredibly unpopular with most people.

    And it all could easily have been avoided if they had simply choosen to go with the Amsterdam style, tag-on, tag-off system. You pay for the distance you travel, free transfers, much more fair.

    Instead we get this terrible hybrid model. Sort of like a flat fare, but not really as there are two fares and there will still be driver interaction and to set the fare at the highest amount possible. Worst of all worlds basically.

    It is going to look really bad when the newspaper articles start coming out, pointing out that the NTA have increased fares by 10 times inflation over the past 10 years.

    A lot of people are still driving to work due to Covid. I don't see screwing every one over with a €2.50 fare is going to attract many of them back to public transport.

    The NTA have shown themselves to be quiet incompetent with the choices they have made with these fares.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,465 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Don't know where you're getting that figure from, yes inflation was low for years but in the 12 months to October it was 5.1%

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2021/1111/1259251-cso-inflation-figures/

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭Stevek101




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    No idea. Charts for every route under the new system are meant to be made, but no clue whether they'll remain internal documentation or be made public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    "And it all could easily have been avoided if they had simply choosen to go with the Amsterdam style, tag-on, tag-off system. You pay for the distance you travel, free transfers, much more fair."

    Have seen tag-on / tag-off systems work beautifully. Is there any solid reason for not doing this?

    Tag-on front door entry only, tag-off rear door exit only works really well and would ease congestion within the bus. Road traffic congestion is only half the battle!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Cost and time it would take to add a second validator to over 1,000 vehicles is an obvious one, as well as the fact that I don't think the heavily life expired current ticketing machines would be able to power such functionality even before the second validator is added on the centre doors, so they'll need to be replaced as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    Thanks. That's quite do-able really. More Bus Connects than this fare revision, which is complex but don't have any issue with.

    (For another day but 2,000 validators and an up to date system seems a lot less than the CBCs and new buses)



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,693 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    Sure the dwell time decrease will be worth it. Buses will be zooming around on time🙂

    I read the press release/information in the OP on the DB website and gave up. It needs examples and associated cost, old v new, maybe a map of fare 'zones', rather than the block of text. Perhaps the sneaky price increase would be exposed though...



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    To determine where short fares would apply, Dublin has been divided into a lattice of contiguous zones (hexagonal in shape) approximately 1km in diameter. Within each zone, all origin and destination stops on bus, Luas and rail are assigned a zonal reference. Short fare journeys are then defined as those traversing three or less hexagons in a straight line in any direction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    now that 4-13 and 13+ stage fares are combined does that mean that bus users can now tag on using the right hand validator?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭Stevek101


    Correct so it should speed things up. Unless the validator is slower with this 90 minute lark.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,465 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    They need to be replaced anyway. So when are they going to be replaced?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    When the next generation ticketing system is implemented.

    ETA on that (per Anne Graham at the Oireachtas Transport Committee on 4 November) is two to three years away per the link below.

    https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/joint_committee_on_transport_and_communications/2021-11-03/2/#



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    Thanks, it was extremely unclear from the document I had at hand as to how exactly the fare would be established - whether by the road or as a straight line.

    I used the example of the H3 and 6 on the previous page, but this could honestly have a hilarious result of a route going to a higher fare for a number of stops before returning to a lower fare again because the route "loops back" into a <3km distance from the same stop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    They've been talking about new validators since the launch of Leap ...and yet they wonder why they're accused of being slow on progressing things. This isn't even a big project in the scheme of things.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    It's not just about the validators though. They're switching to account based ticketing too. They have to set all that up first. They started very very late and it's taking and age. The winning bid won't be selected until late 2022 and then it probably will take over a year to set up the back-end. An interim measure of using phones as Leap cards is being looked at but that won't speed up much other than maybe converting more people to Leap.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    It'll be interesting alright. I have no idea how it's going to work in practice. How would drivers know the distances?

    "How many hexagons is it to O'Connell Street, bud?"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    The TGX150 machines have a mode of displaying every destination stage as opposed to the simplified three fares used by DB all the time (in fact, some GAI drivers prefer to have the full list even on the city routes, I assume to help them with learning the routes better, and of course BE use it as the only mode), so I wouldn't be surprised if on some routes drivers would switch to the "all destinations" mode.

    Other than that, I had read that new fare charts would be prepared for every route anyway, or at least for the BC routes and any old routes that have much in common with new routes. It'd be best if these fare charts were made public, as cumbersome as I expect them to be with the amount of stops on every route...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well given that GAI fares are like the third secret of Fatima (unless you have the old DB stages) I’m not holding my breath on the NTA making that info public!

    Incidentally, for some bizarre reason the 175 eastbound stages and westbound stages don’t match up (if the journey planner is to be believed) resulting in some journeys being cheaper in one direction than the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭billyhead


    Sorry if it's a stupid question but if the trip is more than 90 minutes but you tagged on various modes of transport i.e Luas, train than bus within 90 minutes does that come under this new standard fare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Anything you tagged onto up to the 90 minute mark (from the first instance of tagging on) will fall under the same fare - If you then tag on to another service after the 90 minute mark, it will be a new charge.

    Basically, the "timer" isn't reset after each time you tag on.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    "How many hexagons is it to O'Connell Street, bud?"

    LOL, it does sound way over-complicated!

    Seriously, tag-on, tag-off, pay per km travelled, not rocket science.

    I believe all the double door buses are already pre-wired for a second validator at the rear door, which would be the most difficult part. So you would just be talkng about buying 1,000 extra validators, a drop in the ocean in the context of a project like Busconnects. You wouldn't even need new ticket machines. The validators are newer anyway and just communicate with the drivers ticket machine.

    Sure there are some single door buses, just tag-off on the way out. Not as nice as dual door buses, but I'd bet it would still be quicker then having half the passengers asking the driver for a short fare anyway, specially once you dump cash.

    This all seems like such a missed opportunity.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    You're going to need new ticket machines really with another validator, as it is now when someone is using the right hand validator it makes the wayfarer go even slower when the driver is using it, or the validator can be slower if you happen to just tag on at the same time that a driver is processing a transaction on a Leap Card. If you add another validator in which is going to be dependent on the ticket machine things are going to get slower soon.

    Imagine the issues when at a busy stop a load of people are getting on and off and the lag on the validators is going to actually add to dwell time rather than reduce it because of the lag that's going to happen. You're not going to see tap on and beep straight away and get off, you're likely to see a few seconds lag I would imagine. if one person tried to tag on with one validator at the same time as someone else tried to tag on, I can imagine one of those people will have a noticeable lag.

    Then you've got the issue of where you can log the relevant data since the Wayfarer isn't going to have the capacity to store all the tag on and offs with it's very little amount of memory. The whole backend systems and ticketing machine equipment has for too long had sticking plaster type solutions to it, to make it do more and more and more to avoid having to bite the inevitable bullet. Trying to throw more validators slaving off already struggling and slow equipment would just be yet another reason to push the replacing of it a few more years down the line.

    The whole system needs ripping out and replaced with modern and up to date equipment and a modern backend rather than a sticking plaster solution to push more and more out of life expired equipment and systems. Certainly it's not happening as quick as I would like, but that is not going to be a quick job to be honest and will be a large and complicated project. But they really should be further along the road than they are right now.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Then rip out the old ticket machines and replace them, it is a decade overdue.

    It really wouldn't be that complicated or even that expensive for a thousand new machines in the context of a 2bn project.

    Changing how you do fares is something you only change every few decades. We really need to get it right now and it would be mad to feck it up for another 10+ years just because you couldn't be bothered replacing ancient ticket machines.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    The difference between €2.50 and €2.30 is only €14m in additional funding per annum. This was always going to require additional exchequer funding. By trying to raise the fare to €2.50, they're trying to get away with only committing a €5.8m increase in funding and getting the short and medium journey passengers to subsidise the transferring passengers.


    Ignore the €1.55 thing here. Must be an old table. This is two weeks of Leap data from six bus routes in Dublin. It doesn't look like it includes tickets loaded onto Leap.

    Based on that, I calculated these for the current system:

    And the new system:

    In the new system, a third of all Leap fares will be short fares and will require driver interaction. This is much higher than I expected but it's much lower than the current system which requires 79% of Leap passengers to interact with the driver. Plus some of the 13+ stages passengers would have interacted with the driver. And obviously all the cash passengers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭Fizzy Duck


    It would have been much better if there were a €2 flat fare for leap and €3 cash. It's been a pain the past few weeks at the Airport as the ticket machines are either empty or off. So passengers have to go into the Airport to get change, which is impossible at certain hours.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,684 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    Single flat fare vs transfer and short fare

    But then the people on the short hops would (rightfully) be seriously unhappy by a pretty hefty hike. The trouble with fare simplification and amalgamation to a totally single flat fare is that whilst some people see their fares go down, others are going to have to see theirs go up unless there are vastly increased amounts of government funding, over and beyond the large amount they've given during COVID-19 which lets face it, won't be happening .

    Ticket Machines at Dublin Airport

    On the subject of ticket machines at the airport, I have to say that the photo of that machine shows a machine that looks a little unloved to be honest. It's not exactly in a hugely presentable state.

    Promotional Fare

    On the subject of the promotional period for the 90 minute fare, I believe that originally this was due to run until the end of January originally and it was only shortly before the decisions were published that the decision was made to extend it to the end of March. I believe even some literature was printed with the January date on!

    We can hope that if the roll out of this goes well, that the political pressure may be there to get the extra funding given to the NTA to make it permanent and it will not rise to €2.50. Maybe that might be the plan all along and this is just about getting leverage over those who hold the purse strings.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭Fizzy Duck


    That is true. I do agree that TFI 90 will probably be more useful. Though it's not gonna help when tourists keep presenting with €20 and €50 notes.

    The machines were maintained for a while but the past 2 months they seem to be empty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    But then the people on the short hops would (rightfully) be seriously unhappy by a pretty hefty hike. The trouble with fare simplification and amalgamation to a totally single flat fare is that whilst some people see their fares go down, others are going to have to see theirs go up unless there are vastly increased amounts of government funding, over and beyond the large amount they've given during COVID-19 which lets face it, won't be happening .

    going by the figures somebody posted above it would effect a quarter of passengers. this latest change is a fare increase for half of all passengers. how is that better?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,465 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I don't care about the short fare passengers tbh

    They are taking up seats and increasing dwell time when they can use other options like walking or cycling much more easily than those with long journeys.

    Priority should be getting people out of their cars and that means a faster service - with a seat - on the medium and long trips.

    One-third of Leap card holders still interacting with the driver after restructuring the fares is mad tbh, as is still accepting cash.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    What a narrow minded attitude.

    I don’t think that it is for you to decide who should and should not use the bus service - it’s there for everyone.

    Many people (including myself) use the bus for short journeys, for example coming home from doing a weekly food shop and where walking/cycling isn’t a realistic option.

    I live at one end of a long steep hill and the bus is essential - I don’t drive. The shops are almost 3km away and I certainly don’t see why I should have to pay more than the lowest fare for that trip home.

    Similarly are you suggesting everyone going to Heuston Station with suitcases from the city centre should walk or cycle?

    There are all sorts of reasons why people use the bus for short trips. Many of those people may also be doing it instead of driving.

    The bus service is there for everyone, not just people going from one end of the route to the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,123 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    My typical LUAS journey will cost 6 cents more for a round trip



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    "Single flat fare vs transfer and short fare

    But then the people on the short hops would (rightfully) be seriously unhappy by a pretty hefty hike. The trouble with fare simplification and amalgamation to a totally single flat fare is that whilst some people see their fares go down, others are going to have to see theirs go up unless there are vastly increased amounts of government funding, over and beyond the large amount they've given during COVID-19 which lets face it, won't be happening ."

    I think you are missing an important point here. You talk of them needing to increase the subsidy to make a cheaper fares work, but there is a real danger that they will have to do that regardless and perhaps even worse.

    The danger is that they set the fare too high and it discourages people from using public transport and the passenger numbers fall, which results in the fare revenues dropping, which they would need to make up with increased subsidies anyway given the new contracts.

    Only worse now as you have driven people away from public transport and back into cars and it will be much harder to win them back!

    How much money will they waste on advertising to try and win these people back!

    Passenger numbers still haven't recovered to pre-covid levels. They need to do everything possible to attract people back onto public transport. Frankly increasing the fares by so much for the majority of passengers, for no benefit for them, at this time, is insane.

    This decision could have real, long term, damaging impact on the attractiveness of public transport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,465 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    @lxflyer you're unlikely to be doing your weekly food shop during peak commuter hours though are you? Maybe what's really needed is a peak time minimum fare. But yeah I find the complaining about the short fare going up to be a bit much. A flat fare structure would have a lot of benefits.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,465 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    If the majority of fares really are short fares then overriding must be absolutely rampant

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Actually, I would generally make that particular journey between 5pm and 7pm on a weekday.

    But that was but one example, but there are plenty of valid reasons why people may make short journeys by bus right across the network. People use the bus to get between lots of other places other than the city centre, short and long trips, and for all sorts of reasons, given the dominant role that the bus plays in Dublin’s transport.

    Just because you don’t make short journeys, doesn’t mean you have the right to tell other people that they should be paying a significantly higher fare because you’re they are allegedly delaying you.

    It is the most ridiculous argument that I’ve heard in ages frankly.

    As I said, the bus service is there to serve everyone.

    Minimum fares used to apply on longer distance routes at peak periods to protect people who had no other alternatives. They still apply on Xpresso routes. It would be very difficult to apply on Spine routes given their integrated nature.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,465 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Just because you don’t make short journeys, doesn’t mean you have the right to tell other people that they should be paying a significantly higher fare because you’re they are allegedly delaying you.

    and where did I say I had the right to do anything? 🙄 All anyone is doing here is putting forward an opinion.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭xper


    I am delighted to see the 90 minute fare coming in at last and I think that it will make a huge difference to how people utilise public transport once everyone gets the idea. Personally, this will make a big diffrence for me now, being located close to two modes and having ditched the annual bus-only ticket due to Covid home working.

    A question:

    The full fare determination document states that Xpresso Leap fare at €3.00 will include "enabling free onward transfer for all passengers within 90 minutes". If an Xpresso route is the second part of a multi-part journey, will you simply be charged a €0.50 top-up fare after initially being charged €2.50 on your first tag-on? I would assume so but it doesn't appear to explicitly state this anywhere.

    An observation:

    The disconnect betwen the Irish Rail 90-minute limit and the bus network is ridiculous. At the very least, any location served by both rail and bus should be able to avail of the 90 minute fare regardless of what mode or modes are used. Its is absurd that, for example, one can travel from Dublin City Centre to Greystones by a single DART journey and be charged €4.90 but if you hop off at Bray and on to a 84/184 to complete the journey to the very same spot, you'll only pay €2.30.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    If someone uses the short fare, but then uses another mode of transport within 90 minutes - will there be capping?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Not clear yet. I think, if a short made and then another (long) made within 90mins from the initial tap, the initial 1.60 Euro should jump to a total of 2.30 Euro. So, first tap 1.60 Euro and second tap 0.70 Euro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,996 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Was the 90 minute transfer not already in place? Maybe it was just for each mode separately. I have a LEAP card that I use now and then and I certainly recall getting a reduction on fare no.2 within 90 minutes of fare no 1. Cannot remember if it applied to bus and LUAS but am guessing it just applied to the first mode used i.e. bus first, no reduction unless you take another bus (not Luas/Dart) within 90 minutes. Is that right?

    Am out of practice with PT since WFH and Covid etc.

    Edit, just read OP again doh! 90 min transfers to apply across all modes now. Apologies for wasting time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Exactly! 90 minutes fare isn't the same as the existing Leap 90 discount: https://about.leapcard.ie/leap-90



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,465 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I am delighted to see the 90 minute fare coming in at last and I think that it will make a huge difference to how people utilise public transport once everyone gets the idea. 

    It's amazing how many people still don't get the idea of Leap card. Lots of slow learners about and they greatly increase dwell times for everyone else.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Seen citymapper just implemented this new feature for Dublin, in perfect time for the launch of the new fare system!

    It currently only displays the adult fare, and doesn't separate the fare for each bus if taking multiple trips unfortunately - although that's understandable given the limited resources they would have had to build this data set with.




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The above doesn't seem to be accurate. It is saying that a particular route I'd often take is €2.50, however according to the Dublin Bus fare calculator it is only €2.25 (and which all bus drivers have charged). The route is only 6 stages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    It seems like they're basing it on the Right-hand validator fare (aka the max fare) from seeing the prices it gives



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,417 ✭✭✭.G.


    Anyone know will local routes like the L51 on the C spine of Busconnects be operating both fares or short fare only? IMO regardless of the distance the actually travel they should be short fare only, no merssing about going to drivers just tag on and away you go. Might encourage more use of them too rather than using a C1 or C2 to get to Liffey Valley for example.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement