Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hi vis discussion thread (read post #1)

18485878990101

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,908 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,650 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,653 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    As has been pointed out , the "hi viz" bit doesn't work at night. The retro reflective bit is what works at night in other vehicles headlights*. An old fashioned browne belt is as, or perhaps even more, effective as all the builders vests and expensive jackets.

    My main "night" time cycling is commuting, and I do use Polaris RBS and ProViz 360 jackets. Not because I really think they're more effective than my lights - it's just I don't want a some motorist getting even partly off the hook should they hit me by our fecked up judiciary!

    *If they're fully functioning and/or not just driving around on DLR's in dusk/ dark!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,908 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    I have a soft spot for Sam Brownes, as I've said here before. At least they fold up and go in your pocket or a bag very neatly, and they allow you to have much the same clothes for cycling as for other everyday activities and still have reflective strips about your torso (if that's what you want). They're a lot more expensive than builders vests though. I've said it before, but given those vests have no seams, no arms and close with simple velcro, it might cost only about a euro to produce one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I just have my dipped lights on - done that for the last 25 years odd - all cars now have drls now anyway -

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,653 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    The amount of cars driving after lighting up time on DLR's is part of what makes a nonsense of the "hi viz to be more visible" argument.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,237 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    and the funny thing is rear lights are very often not included in DRL functionality, so you can sometimes see people driving around thinking they've their lights on, but only the front lights are on. though it's not as common as it used to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Saw that last week in foggy conditions on the dual carrigeway, no back lights at all ...

    Road works vehicles tend to have huge hi-viz and reflective chevrons on the back so they stand out in relation to faster moving traffic ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Saw one of the funniest things ever this morning. I shouldnt laugh but it did. Traffic was light enough and it was dark and raining.

    Cyclist passed me out (I didnt even see him til he was right beside me even though i had just checked behind me a couple of seconds before) and turned right. Next thing you hear this shout and a bang.

    I went over to see if he was ok. Himself and another cyclist crashed head on. Both bikes mangled. One of them was bleeding a bit but they were both ok. Theres bikes will never ride again though.

    What I did observe was, they both had lights on their bikes, now smashed, but one of them was still on. But against the glare of the traffic you couldnt see these guys even when you were right beside them.

    Motorbike cop arrived then and the first thing he said was, "You never heard of a hi vis vest lads, no?".

    Im 100% sure that he was right and hi vis vests would have prevented that accident.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,371 ✭✭✭cletus


    2/10



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,653 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    As said many times on this thread, fluorescent material doesn't work in the dark. So science says no, it wouldn't have prevented it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,650 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You can see the value of hiviz panels for all cars, to compensate for idiot drivers like this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    What ? Like the large reflective lights and areas of glass on most vehicles - yeah pretty much -

    Even so ,It doesn't help though when grey Is the most common colour and it's a grey day -

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭Wildly Boaring


    You realise glass is seethrough and in no way reflective or "Hi-viz"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,908 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Yes, the fluorescent material in that video is pretty much invisible or not very conspicuous, but the reflector bands are nore visible. Just as was said.


    There's no controversy here. The reflective strips are added to those vests because after the sun has set, there isn't enough UV light around for the green/yellow/orange material to fluoresce.


    The point is, people on bikes already have lights on their bikes (or should have), and frequently have reflectors on the bike and on their bike luggage, and you can see in that video that the car headlights shine far more at a level below the torso, so those other reflectors are better positioned.


    A few of those scenarios show quite well how limited even the reflective strips are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,465 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    I think that's generous towards a known shitstirrer.

    What part of a nasty accident is 'funny'?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,371 ✭✭✭cletus


    I wasn't actually giving him a genuine score. It was a comment meant to show that I didn't believe his story, and it was, in general, a poor attempt.


    I don't believe that I suggested the accident was funny, and I don't believe that any of my previous posts in this forum would suggest that either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    But , but , but - if you close your eyes the guy with the hi-viz is no more visable than the guy without -

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,908 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    This is a reasonably good illustration of how meager the effectiveness of even the reflective strips are from some angles. Car headlights are angled to the footpath side, and approaching a car from the other side results in quite a small amount of reflection. The green part is, as said already, doing effectively nothing.

    poor_efficacy_angle_hiviz.png


    Lights are way better, and if you have very good lights, these €1 builders vests don't add much value at all. If your lights already make you conspicuous, what's the added value of that sort of reflection?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,650 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Reflective lights are only at the rear - what about the other three sides? How could you possibly be expected to see a black or navy or burgandy car when you're approaching from the front or side? What's the big resistance to making cars visible? When are drivers going to start taking responsibility for their own safety? Are they afraid that they won't look cool or something?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Markcheese




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    This thread could easily be called the Darwin awards thread at this rate.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,846 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Why? Because some people believe that focus should be towards lights and driver observation rather than at the amount of yellow stuff the vulnerable person is wearing?

    Given the common belief that in order to protect ones self, a vulnerable user needs to wear high-viz (which has been shown to be less effective than proper lights), why aren't cars painted in high-viz given the amount of drivers that manage to crash into other cars?

    It isn't as simple as saying that cyclists need to wear this or that (despite our courts placing a portion of blame on the victim). High-viz is no good if the driver is not being observant. Lights are a better way of getting attention, from a greater distance, than what is touted as high-viz. However, the law does not legislate for light quality and you have the likes of the RSA giving away LED lights that shine pretty much no light. However, the RSA are very quick to send out high-viz and say that the vulnerable road user should wear it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,908 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    If you see someone with good lights (and you will if you're looking in their direction at all), and you decide that they have to dress up like a canary or a binman on top of that, you're either a total neurotic, or you just want to punish people for being different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,908 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    (If you yourself want to dress up that way, absolutely fine. You can just spare everyone else the homilies.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,653 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    More the Evidence/ Science thread, given the numbers that pop in to claim fluorescent material works in the dark and dispute the studies that show that wearing it does not vulnerable roads users safer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Ah would you stop.

    Its simple. The better you light yourself up, the better your chances of being seen.

    Dont understand why people get so anal about it. Its a simple step to make yourself safer. So you can decide personally whether you want to take it or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,908 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Randy Swart agrees with you.


    http://www.helmets.org/lights.htm

    Summary: One cyclist's approach to being seen at night.


    --I am now using neon orange bikes, and may go to neon lime green.

    --For headlights I use a car light.

    --For tail lights I started with two leg lights, showing red to the rear and white to the front.

    --I added yellow blinkers, starting with a 7 inch barricade light.

    --After the barricade light I added smaller yellow blinkers. The best was something called the Far Out Flasher, sold by Schwinn stores in the 80's and by the late Ed Kearny (Bicycle Lighting Systems). The Belt Beacon was another, and I used those on my helmet, mounted with Velcro, juiced up by adding chrome tape to make a reflector behind the bulb.

    --Beginning about 1990 I added the now-standard red LED blinkers [...] I had one on my helmet, mounted with hook-and-loop. [...] I bought a very large LED flasher being test-marketed at a Chinese exporter's booth designed for use by cars as an emergency road flasher, and packaged as a "Highway Safety Light." It is 4" x 6", and has 18 extremely bright LED's in three rows.

    --I have replaced the incandescent blinking Far Out Flasher on my helmet with an Innova 24/7 led blinker. This is an octagonal light about 2" by 3" (50mm by 75mm) that velcros on well. [...] The light has a rectangular LED area with a rotating switch that selects different blink patterns and colors of LEDs. I use the one that flashes rapid red then white then yellow and looks vaguely like a police car flasher.

    --I got a sample at Interbike of a single yellow led that screws onto a shraeder valve and goes around. [...] At present I am using an Inova 24/7 light on my helmet. It has red and white leds that blink in a very bright emergency light pattern, and runs happily for months on one CR2 photo battery.

    --In general, I believe in redundancy

    --I also like to "layer" my tail lights, with one at the level of the wheel axle, one under the saddle, and one on the helmet. The more I observe about urban light clutter the more I favor big, big lights and lights that have a signature. You will find this concept better developed on Ken Kifer's Web page discussion of the Flashing Neon Light Display, although I would not favor his use of a diesel generator to power the array.

    (Ken Kifer's Flashing Neon Light Display is a parody of obsessive hyper-illumination, but the joke seems to have passed Randy Swart by, despite the humorous suggestion of using a diesel generator on a bike purely to generate light.)

    --In 2010 the battery powering my car light failed once again and I bought a new Magicshine system from Geoman Gear.

    --For reflectors I use the hottest 3M product I can lay my hands on to add reflectivity to pedals, shoes, cranks (flashes as the cranks go around), panniers, clothing, helmet, anywhere else. 3M markets a "snake" in Europe that weaves around the spoke nipples, and under headlights looks like a ring of white, identifying the bike immediately. [...] I am trying a similar product now from a company called Techflex. [...] I am using one on the front wheel of my night bike, but my panniers obstruct it in the rear.

    --You can find 3M Scotchlite in many local stores, but for their hotter stuff, you have to go to the Web to places like Itendi-tape. [...] I use it on helmets and some other spots



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,908 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    I sincerely hope you're going at least as far as Randy Swart. After all, we have to reduce risk *as much as possible*. Any less gets a Darwin Award.



Advertisement