Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Climate Bolloxolgy.

1222325272882

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Agriculture is 33% of emissions according to 2018 data, so it's one third of the problem.

    There's two thirds non agriculture.

    The horse has bolted on this one and unfortunately farmers will be badly affected. I hope they will be properly compensated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,004 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    What the hell is any of that got to do with what I replied?

    1. No one is questioning Irelands past with emigration. Don't know what that has to do with anything but sure if emigration is an issue then the majority of the world needs to work together to keep people in their home country
    2. Yer speaking like farmers are some sort of alien entity. They need food too, and need to get food in the shop. you mentioned the discounters specifically, and not supermarkets. Hence my reply. Where would you like farmers to shop out of interest or are you expecting them to only eat what they produce (everyone should do that. Would be great for world population)
    3. The IFA campaign to me was a bit stupid alright. I didn't get the reason for it aside from having "dairies" on the bottle when said dairies don't exist. Glanbia do the same sure with Avonmore brand, but it doesn't say dairy so I guess that was OK. Nevertheless, the High Court agreed with the IFA that they weren't defaming the retailers (https://www.irishtimes.com/business/retail-and-services/lidl-fails-to-get-injunction-over-ads-published-by-ifa-1.4584378)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Easten


    If you don't want the compo you can hand it back



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Ah yes where is the economic value in agriculture and food production.


    Sure you can create enough jobs with facefook, google, pfizer, Boston Scientific to replace the 4.43% of the workforce directly employed in agri sector.

    And sure all those new jobs in places like Greater Dublin, Galway, etc will help keep all those businesses in small towns and villages going.

    Or is the grand plan that you do a clearance of rural Ireland ala the Highland Clearances.

    Sure then you can enjoy your cycles in your garish outfits out into the countryside without having to be discommoded by the natives living and working there.🙄

    There is huge fooking hatred for all things native Irish from some now in Ireland.

    Native Irish people must be displaced by foreign imports so that we can become multicultural.

    Native Irish industry, ala agri sector, must be displaced so that we can rely solely on foreigners for our food and foreign owned mutlinationals for the crumbs they let fall as they use so to avoid paying taxes on their global income.

    Ever think if we stop producing beef and dairy that someone else somewhere else with much less stable grass growth fills that gap.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    I'm not getting lost in someone else's pedantry, but I was responding to:

    • a question to the effect of why I'd feel it's safe to note that e/migration was a significant feature of rural life; in the context of a scenario of a couple in their sixties, with no obvious successor
    • A question to the effect that I'd need statistics to prove that farmers need supermarkets, same as everyone else


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,475 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    That's gas isn't it,pardon the pun.yet agri accounts for 22 % of the world.so we have alot of cows per capita is it.but India with nearly a billion cows agri only accounts for 16 % of its emissions.cant quiet get to bottom of these stats there something not right.does the fact that agri accounts for 33%in ireland mean the rest of the population is doing shag all.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,004 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Again, you are reading things that aren't there.

    1. Who said there was no successor - obvious or not? I don't know how your tying emigration to that.
    2. Statistics to prove "Like most Irish farmers, I get my food in Lidl and Aldi". You have no stats only common sense that farmers have to shop like everyone else. Nothing to back up that it's in Aldi or Lidl


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    This isn't a thread on the history of Ireland. Are you trying to get around to a debate you think you can win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭endainoz


    I think it's time to stop feeding the troll at this stage, contributing absolutely nothing.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If a farmer is already operating an extensive system using minimal fertiliser then surely they won’t need to make stock cuts?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Methane is a far more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 (over 20X) so if a cow takes in grass sequestered CO2 and emits CH4 it actually amplifies the greenhouse effect of the CO2 by 20x. Basic science lads.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I can see it now, spring 2022, Eamon Ryan sends window boxes and poly tunnels to every home in Ireland to grow their own.


    A new iodine tablets moment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,428 ✭✭✭endainoz


    I'd be happy to take a free poly tunnel in fairness.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,475 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    On most farms it takes an acre at least to keep a cow for the year and to be honest on alot of farms she has the use of 2 acres. But for the sake of argument we ll keep it simple .can you tell me how much co2 does an acre of grass take in (not sequestration) in the year to grow the feed for the cow.then can subtract that from the ch4 that she expels .anyone



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The planet took millions of years to sequester carbon in fossil fuels. That carbon was completely out of the picture until we started burning it and releasing those millions of years worth of carbon, we did so in just 200years. So the analogy is more bolloxology from someone who doesn't understand the basic science.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    We've a very small amount of manufacturing industry here and that means low emissions. That's one of the reasons that data centres stand out so much - other countries need lots of energy to power steel plants and the like, but that's quite a small element of our energy consumption - we don't make steel at all. Most of the stuff we make money out of has a relatively low energy content.

    On the other hand, India is the world's second largest producer of steel. (Just for instance).

    In agriculture, we concentrate on livestock - I think folk know the contention that goes with that.

    While India is world's second largest producer of veg.



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It would take some time to do the research and perform the basic calculations and I feel certain someone has already done them and put them up on the internet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    The reason agri produces higher percentage in Ireland is because we have less heavy industry, no fracking, no coal and oil.

    So we produce methane and thus a green house gas through the production of food.

    This whole thing is a shyteshow where farming and agriculture are being fooking sacrificed so that the real big polluters continue as is.


    In 2019 only 10% of greenhouse gas emmissions were methane, i.e. some of which could be hung on animals and farming.

    80% were down to CO2.

    And what do the powers that be decide to tackle, the thing that produces food for us to eat.

    Meanwhile India, China and US continue as normal, creating new coal fired power stations, belching out yet more fumes on cars, etc...

    Oh yeah the refrain about China investing heavily in renewables is exactly the same shyte greenwashing that Shell carries out when they do fancy ads about how they are investing 900 million in renewables with absolutely nothing about the billions they are investing in yet more fossil fuels extraction.

    It is a fooking joke where the likes of Ireland, and the Irish stooges who want to look good, will decimate their only indigenous industry that produces food for people to supposedly save the world, while yanks swan around in big cars with aircon everywhere, Chinese industry belches out billions more tonnes of coal fired smoke and India does likewise.

    Oh and the other shyte continously spewed out about going electric vehicles in a large number of cases is just changing from where the CO2 is emitted, coal/gas electricity generation versus diesel/petrol combustion.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    Here's some basic science too called the carbon cycle. Apparently that carbon goes around in circles.




  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Indeed it does but that doesn't change the fact that whilst the methane is in the air it is doing far more damage (x20) than the CO2 which was used in growing the grass. Two different things happening there.


    Here's a useful analog to illustrate my point. Cyanide is made up of carbon and nitrogen - both absolutely harmless by themselves - but deadly when combined in even tiny quantities.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Yes .. but co² is permanent , and cumulative in the atmosphere

    Methane breaks down in the atmosphere -(into co²)

    That co² CAN ( not alwAys) be absorbed by the grasslands that produce the feedstock for the cows in the first place -

    The methane emissions of today are replacing the methane of 10 / 20 years ago

    The co² emited today is adding to the CO² of 20 years ago of 200 ago

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    That doesn't mean we can't try reduce the methane emission ,as well as the co² and the Nox - and its coming ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    Yes but can you show methane from animal sources has increased over the last 50 years.

    There was always methane produced so there was always methane in the atmosphere. It would take additional methane to cause damage.

    Now explain your cyanide analogy in this context because it's a poor analogy as you've set it out.

    Let me help you it begins with the initial levels naturally occurring cyanide is okay but when combined with........



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Naturally occuring cyanide is not OK and if you disagree with this I invite you to try eating some - see you in the morgue.

    Increased stock numbers means increased methane production. Also the move from deep litter or outstocking to slatted sheds creates perfect conditions for the production of more methane and sulpher dioxide (another greenhouse gas). So everything about the changes in Irish beef production has caused an increase in Irish methane emissions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,004 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Yer right of course. More animals means more methane. Same as more people mean more waste and energy needs. Before slatted sheds they were housed indoors too but not to the same scale of course. Normally on straw beds. With no manure management whatsoever unlike today. Is straw bedding better than slats?



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Massively better. Methane is formed in the absence of air which is the very definition of a slatted shed slurry tank. Deep litter is relatively shallow, dryish and with reasonably good air circulation throughout its depth - encouraging aerobic decomposition which produces predominantly CO2. You only have to smell the difference between slurry and deep litter to understand the difference.


    Slatted sheds were a necessity to increase stocking rates - but the wastes they produce are absolutely terrible compared to what came before. They are the main reason why Ireland is missing its targets on the Water Framework directive so badly - and the main reason Ireland will eventually be hit by massive fines for missing those targets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,083 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Do they have many cattle in India our a mostly vegan diet...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,316 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    The government bringing in the straw chopping scheme has put the price of straw up. Doing so is making more turn away from straw bedding and to cubicles. It was always about price why people went with cubicles and slats but it's even moreso now that those still hanging on buying straw are finally having to give in and go for concrete.

    Dung heaps are not immune either. You'll lose your carbon in an uncovered dungheap and especially aerated with compost turners to co2 emissions. Only hope you'd have is cover with a sheet of plastic and anaerobically save by making bokashi.

    Slurry is not the worst either Teagasc have done a trial and used commercially available Slurry bugs and different treatments. They didn't name the available bugs but there were big differences. Farmers who have used some bugs have reported no smell after treatments (sulphur dioxide and methane).



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I would say that dealing with slurry in an environmentally sensitive way will put many farmers out of business.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,083 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    You haven't a notion of what your on about, whats the commercial value of a 1000 gallons of good quality slurry at the minute, go and google it and see what you come back with....



Advertisement