Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Luas Finglas

Options
1101113151623

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭bleaks


    Cheers, would you be fairly confident of it actually happening and not having the rug pulled from under it, like the metro?



  • Registered Users Posts: 195 ✭✭Bsharp


    I'd back Luas Finglas getting completed ahead of any other ongoing PT corridor projects across the GDA.

    It's on the path of least resistance; broad political and community support, technically straight forward, costs and delivery issues reasonably well known from previous schemes, and not too expensive.

    Like the Luas Cross City, it will be pushed through to have completed something.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan




  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,399 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Sadly, no. The Draft GDA Transport Strategy will be published in a week which will give an idea of the updated timeline after taking the new NDP into account. It's likely that any Luas Finglas updates won't happen before that. They don't seem to be in a rush because they've been talking about it since June.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,275 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I should probably start taking bets that a new study on extending luas finglas to the airport is going to be undertaken as part of a metrolink 'spending review'. The narrative writes its self, throw in a covid blurb and boom you're all set for a metrolink postponement/cancellation.


    The tabloids will say wELl luAs tO dE aIrPorT is beTteR dAn nuthIn



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, if Luas gets to Finglas, it should get across the M50 for a P&R so making it a reasonable option for commuters coming down the N2, and thereabouts. The Luas would then be only, what, 5 km across green fields. Perhaps it could be justified in a business case with a few wacky assumptions, but many other options would trump it, without wacky assumptions, both in feasibility and in utility.

    But it would not be enough to replace the Metrolink. No-one would propose a cycle lane would be adequate to replace a motorway, and Luas is no Metrolink - however you cut it. Just the journey time alone shows that Luas is totally inadequate to carry even a tiny number of the likely demand from air travellers, and they are only part of the intended Metrolink passenger demand.

    I am continually disappointed in our Minister for Transport that he is not shouting from the rooftops to get Metrolink moved up the agenda, and moved up the urgent list. It is the greenest, and Greenest, project in the state for a generation. Why does he not get the various activities to get it built into action now. If necessary, get it legislated for so it can bypass any road blocks.

    He should get it started now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That’s not how government works in Ireland Sam.

    Ministers bring papers/proposals to cabinet meetings for discussion and approval - they don’t go shouting from the rooftops outside cabinet. That’s the set up we have.

    There is a process to be followed with regards to investment projects and that is being followed for Metrolink. Any delays so far would seem to be down to the NTA.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I know how Gov works* - they have been talking about the equivalent of the Dart extension since the 1970s - that is 50 years ago, and all we got was an existing line electrified, and report after report, and proposal after proposal - but nothing to actually carry passengers. For a century, the Phoenix Park Tunnel could not carry passenger traffic, but suddenly it could.

    They had approval for Metro North a decade ago and binned it. Metrolink was supposed to open in 2027, but now it is being spoken about by our Minister for Transport as likely to be 2030 to 2034 - even that is not a certain time line.

    There is nothing stopping him from taking whatever action needed to get the Metrolink moved up the agenda - he just is not doing it. The process is under political control (because everything is), and so is the NTA.

    *or doesn't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,851 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    The current MoT isn’t in a ML constituency.

    That’s ultimately it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, he is. Metroink goes through the western side of Dublin Bay South. It is so important for the constituency that he sided with the NYMBIES about Dunville Avenue. Not a good look for a Green Party TD looking to foster public transport.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Exactly how does he move it up the pecking order?

    There is a specific statutory process to be followed for major capital investment projects and the project is following that.

    The issue that I have is that every date that the NTA have quoted, post-the redesign to become Swords-Charlemont has been missed for whatever reason.

    The real question is why has that happened. The NTA need to explain that, as that has more to do with their processes than with the Minister.

    From recent comments by the Minister, the NTA still have not submitted the business case to the Department for approval, which is the key to set the planning application in train.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Dunville Avenue didn’t delay the project though.

    The sewer along the Grand Canal that the NTA inexplicably missed was the reason for that.

    With respect Sam, you’re fixating on the wrong person. I think you should be focussing on the NTA and asking why it’s taking them so long.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Whether Dunvile delayed he project is irrelevant - what I am getting at is that ER, as a Green Party TD, opposed the Metrolink, and suggested it be diverted to Tallaght or maybe the Dublin Mountains because some of his constituents did not want the access road the their favourite emporium changed. If he was listened to, it would have delayed the project and possibly have it terminate at SSG. It was always intended that the GL would be upgraded to metro, and the future housing developments out that direction makes that upgrade more pressing.

    As Minister he should be pressing for an earlier finish date - not approving of a decade or more before it is likely to open. Just from a cost point of view, the quicker the better. It is a Green project - and the greenest one on the table at the moment. I cannot understand why he is not pushing it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,275 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Maybe he could talk about it more instead of gas-bagging about High speed trains from tuam to donegal at the party conference



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,399 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    You keep saying this. Pushing whom? Could you elaborate on what you mean? If he's pressuring the NTA and TII, you wouldn't know about it. He's hardly going to call them out in the media. They're his agencies. The Mail on Sunday reported that he's lobbying cabinet colleagues to commit to the project and that he seems to be the only person in cabinet doing it.

    Since the delays don't seem to be related to funding (we can talk about resourcing from 2017 onwards) and seem to be delays in design and construction, who exactly should he be "pushing"? The project management has gone disastrously wrong.

    For the last month, I've been trying to figure out where the issue is an and how to speed things up. I wish it was as simple as Ryan pushing for it or having someone like a minister not releasing funds to blame.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,542 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Sam, I want to see it happen as fast you do but let’s be honest, the NTA’s handling and communication of the original plans were, like that of many of their projects, poor and flawed to say the least. Most of the delays stem from their own issues rather than the DoT.

    You fixate on Dunville Avenue, but I seem to recall Ryan’s questioning of alternatives was driven more by a different issue.

    I can recall posting here that after one of the first consultation meetings that it was apparent to me that significant sections of the Green Line would have to have extended closures during the construction, only for several posters to tell me that I was talking through my behind.

    Incredibly it took several more consultations before the fact the line would be closed for extended periods was explained in detail by the NTA, but, I will add, with no real explanation of how all those thousands of passengers would be dealt with on the roads of South Dublin.

    That was what I recall the main reason behind ER’s questioning of the proposed route. Few if any of the public or politicians had even remotely realised that sections of the Green Line would have to be closed for months, some more than others.

    The rights of way need to be dealt with too - they are issues of importance to communities along the line which deserve attention, as much as Metrolink being in place is important to others further out.

    In that regard I tend not to listen to the more extreme loud voices who deal in hyperbole, such as what you seem to focus on, which are the ones sadly that get the news coverage, and which you fixate on, but rather listened to some of the more reasoned explanations of issues that people have that I heard at a couple of public meetings.

    Like everything transport related, sadly the Irish media tend to focus on extreme stories that aren’t the real issues, and the real issues get ignored.

    The unexpected sewer rendered the Dunville Avenue issue as irrelevant.

    The northern part of Metrolink needs to happen but again, I have to ask, what’s happening within the NTA? Why haven’t they made a single one of their own deadlines? That’s the question to be asked.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭strassenwo!f


    It is certainly curious that discussion of Dunville Avenue was stopped recently by a moderator, on the 'Metrolink south of Charlemont' thread, where one would think it is very relevant, with this comment:

    Can we leave Dunville Ave to its fate. It is dragging this thread down a rabbit hole.

    Yet the very same moderator brings up the issue of Dunville Avenue on this 'LUAS Finglas' thread, a discussion of the proposed LUAS line to Finglas, where the relevance of Dunville Avenue would seem to be, at best, peripheral.

    I am puzzled.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    ER undoubtedly caused damage to the metrolink project as a TD but his utterly shameless support of a redirect of the line through his constituency that would have caused a delay of years, if not decades.

    Don't really there is much to point at now though. I don't think he is responsible for the delays and the projects continues to tick along albeit a bit slower than we'd like.



  • Registered Users Posts: 154 ✭✭Kevtherev1


    Just read and confirmed Luas Finglas is postponed from 2028 completion to post 2031 completion. Very shoddy the project could have been shovel ready by 2025, likely construction now in 2028. This government postponing everything because they using covid not to spend the money. Will be voting against this government in the 2025 election.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,275 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It looks like the plan is that in 2025 there will be simultaneous construction on metrolink, DART+, bus connects corridors and some cycling schemes. The state is running the risk of causing rapid inflation of construction costs by running so many massive simultaneous projects while we also have to deliver 50,000 housing units annually. Adding another project at the same time probably isn't sustainable and thats before you consider the public expenditure element



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,399 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    There was never a 2028 completion date given for Luas Finglas.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,399 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    The public consultation on the preferred route is due to start on December 7.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,275 ✭✭✭cgcsb




  • Registered Users Posts: 244 ✭✭Frank11




  • Registered Users Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭Shedite27




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Is the Luas Green Line going to become the longest tram line in existence once this is done? I feel like trams aren't meant for such long journeys.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,736 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I don't imagine many people will be going all the way from Finglas to Cherrywood.

    (their route map still shows Charlemont-Sandyford being upgraded to Metro, do they know something we don't)



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,399 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    The walking and cycling route is gone.

    Slight detour around a pitch at St Helena's.

    Mellowes Crescent route changed.

    The stop at Mellowes Park has been moved to the St. Margaret's Road side of the junction as reported a few months ago.

    The Park & Ride will now be where the Lidl is in a new multi-purpose building.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    If I recall correctly, there's potential plans for a turn-back facility at Stephens Green for trams to go northbound to help increase capacity on the current line during the peak - it is a separate thing to Luas Finglas though. If that was put in place, I would imagine when the Finglas extension is eventually opened, the line could potentially be split like:

    • Brides Glen/Sandyford to Parnell/Broombridge (as it is currently)
    • Finglas to Stephen's Green


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,650 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Turnback at Charlemont rather than SSG is what was proposed; I think.



Advertisement