Madeleine McCann

Hellokitty1212 wrote: »

I could never decide between the brother or the father for poor Jonbenet.

Madeleine McCann I believe was taken by an opportunist abductor - the parent in me wants to believe she’s safe and will be found like Elizabeth Smart or others. I fear the worst though.

I was torn with Amy Fitzpatrick; I thought once that the stepfather killed her. Other times that she simply ran away. A confusing case.

What links them all are grieving parents and they have my sympathy.

When Amy's brother, Dean, was killed by their stepfather, the idea of silencing Dean being a motive doesn't make sense because Dean, if he had suspected his stepfather, would've put as much distance as possible between them and would've told the Gardaí long before he was killed.

The Madeline situation is so weird... there hasn’t been a shred of new evidence since the abduction... no new arrests.. no real leads...it’s actually like she did disappear into thin air...I’d say she’s been killed though...I’m 100%... she’d be an adult now, 18/19.... she’d remember her previous life, her parents, being abducted, her face all over the media, that eye thing too... she just can’t be alive... no possibility..

political analyst wrote: »

JonBenét's parents were worse - they didn't murder her but they put her in harm's way by submitting her to "beauty pageant", thus making her a sitting duck for predatory paedophiles (as opposed to those paedophiles who resist the urge). If it wasn't for her parents, her murderer would've have heard of her and so she wouldn't have been at any greater risk than any other child would have been.

While I abhor the whole concept of beauty pageants for kids, I think your point lacks in the legal concept of "remoteness". It is still and always is, the paedophile's fault.

fantaiscool wrote: »

The JonBenet case is very odd. An intruder comes in while they are sleeping and spends several minutes writing a ransom note with paper and utensils from the house? Very odd indeed. I think there were so many strange things about that case that you couldn't help but think that something wasn't right.

From memory of that case three different investigating detectives resigned over it. The parents look guilty as hell in having involvement in it but they seem to have power over people for some reason.

TallyRand wrote: »

Compares to the vitriol the McCanns get especially.
Somehow yer one gets away with it despite the on par level of care at the time with many of Amy’s friends mothers saying she was like an abandoned child for months crashing in friends houses. Seem like the mother and the killer fella were a right pair of beauts

Oh ok. Yeah that one was a strange one alright, always got the impression there was more going on there.

Antares35 wrote: »

I'm sorry I'm not sure what your point is.

That Amy's mother was given a free pass while Madeleine's parents were pilloried.

MoonUnit75 wrote: »

15-20 minutes after the father brought his daughter’s dead body upstairs a detective overheard him on the phone to the pilot of their private aircraft telling him to prepare to fly as soon as possible. He tried to explain it away saying he knew the house would be sealed off. He’s on public record admitting to this in TV interviews.

The woman detective said the father looked into her eyes after laying her body down and she saw something in his face that made her check her gun holster was in place and she then called twice for backup.

Yeah it's a crazy case when you look into it. There's a video floating on youtube of Patsy Ramsey being questioned about her handwriting being similar to the note and she's asked if she can recognize her own handwriting on some family photos she took and she struggles to recognize it. The more I looked into that case the more infuriated I became. How can you not recognize your own handwriting, especially on your own photos. Poor Jonbenet

Watch the video and judge for yourself

ShineOn7 wrote: »

https://www.dublinlive.ie/news/dublin-news/madeleine-mccann-hazel-behan-rape-20512928





Today also marks the 14th year of Madeleine's disappearance

14 years ? Jesus the time doesn’t be long going. I was just finishing college that summer and it was a shocking story.

Strumms wrote: »

Just not going to get solved... unless a person who actually has access to hard verifiable evidence comes forward or a witness or witnesses blow the whistle but I’m thinking if they had have kept stum for that length of time it’s unlikely to be chomping away at their conscience, nor will it ever.

You never know. Plenty of deathbed confessions out there. And didn’t we get ‘this’ far because someone spoke out. Different police force, different jurisdiction, different approach.

God help that poor family - unimaginable. And even more horrific than anyone could haVe ever imagined the subject & suggested outcome. Horrific.

I’m sure all the Ballymaloe & Darina &Ted Allen convicted paedophile apologists will just shrug their shoulders like they are doing in another thread & say child rapist predators and supporters of online child rape photos are ‘just looking’ and there’s no real harm in looking. Suspended sentences for everyone.

Revolting.

punchdrunk wrote: »

New evidence in case!

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14937774/madeleine-mccann-cops-new-evidence-christian-b/

Concrete evidence with new circumstantial evidence.

Shouldn't be too much longer now.........

punchdrunk wrote: »

I really don’t think Wolters is talkin ****e, to repeatedly state that he has evidence and then to say a year on that he has more circumstantial evidence would be career suicide if he didn’t have a case- prosecutors tend to be very smart people
I really think we’re going to see this solved.

Lets hope so

I'm not sure this bastard would have the decency to do so.