Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

To Mask or not to two - Mask Megathread cont.

1166167169171172290

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    This "untold psychological damage" to the hundreds of thousands, is this for all children under 13?



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ALL children should be maskless based on the lack of risks to their demographic. I would be more than happy to "Risk" long Covid.

    Back in 2019, were you happy for children to be maskless when Flu was circulating? The data shows that the risks are much the same. Flu may even be more dangerous. So why were you not campaigning for masks back then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    The real "hysteria" came from the Anti-mask crowd and still does.....try not to confuse concern with hysteria.

    What exactly are "all the other actions" your flapping about when it comes to primary school children?

    Until vaccination is available, end of Jan would be a short and sensible approach.

    Let's not get into the decades nonesense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭Spudman_20000


    Well, let's see here, other actions include at the moment open windows, hand sanitiser at every door and in classrooms, pods, classes of the same year not allowed to mix, staggered pick up and drop off times for different classes. Is that enough "flapping" for you?

    But I assume you know this already as you must have kids in primary school given your concern level? Otherwise your obsession with masking kids is a little unusual in my opinion. Are the rest of us parents morons who are putting all our kids in harms way?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    Ah gwan outa dat, you list "pods" 😂 that's just a fancy word for table, you do realise that, it's not an action.

    Hand sanitiser is an action but is it a more critical action than masking, no, it's a secondary action. It does nothing to control air input or output. Good hand hygiene is important in life and should never be viewed as "other actions". Neither should "open windows", each child does not have to go opening windows now do they. Open windows help reduce risk when it comes to Covid-19 but not so much when it comes to close range, which there is a lot of as Irish primary schools are the most crowded in Europe. The 5-12 year olds need more protecting, at least for a few months.

    R4mYcbbt.png medium.png




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We have a total of 4 deaths under the age of 25. And even at that, the report on the hpsc shows the age range of deaths as 16 - 105.

    Speaks for itself. Absolutely zero reason for ANY kids to be wearing masks other than pure hysteria from hypochondriac parents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭Spudman_20000


    Agreed, the last 18 months has shown us EXACTLY what and whom kids need protection from, and it sure ain't Covid.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Children down to pre-school ages would have been getting vaccinated for flu back in 2019.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    What about the children who have and are suffering with long covid, what do you say to those "hypochondriac parents"?

    There is a lot more at play than just deaths in children and seeing this is an entirely preventable disease, there is reason to mask the children for the now.

    For the second time of asking, What exactly are "all the other actions" your flapping about when it comes to primary school children?

    Once again, Mask Hysteria started and ends with the Anti-maskers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    Good case to raise the minumum age for wearing masks from 13 to 16.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    We might as well raise the minimum age for mask wearing to 25 year olds, cause sure there were only 4 deaths.

    Screen Shot 2021-10-07 at 20.42.33.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,571 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Some may even suggest we do away with it altogether.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    Is there any expectation that masks indoors will go ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    If it ain't Covid maybe it's Long Covid then. Letting children infect themselves and others from an entirely preventable disease is wrong. We should be doing more to protect children from Long Covid.

    SEPTEMBER UPDATE Long Covid in Children, ONS study.

    • 53,000 UK children aged 2-16 currently experience #LongCovidKids
    • That has increased by +15,000 since August
    • 11,000 of them have experienced it for at least 12 MONTHS.
    FBFYyztXIAIeZio.jpg


    FBFVmvlWEAIA09X.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,046 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Not any time soon it seems to be one of the few measures to remain post 22nd October

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭VG31


    They'll no longer be mandatory in many situations from the 22nd (seemingly anyway, it's pretty vague). At least that's a step in the right direction.

    Which is more than can be said of Italy, Spain and Portugal who have no plans to drop masks despite their high vaccination rates.



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    “Long” Covid is a load of nonsense. They had a lad on RTÉ there recently claiming he had bad long Covid and wasn’t able to party as much as he used to…

    It seems anyone who is feeling even a bit tired is putting it down to long Covid.

    Either way, thousands of kids shouldn’t be forced to wear masks because a few might get a bit sick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    While some people have undoubtedly had some very bad after-effects, it's a post-viral reaction, something that is very common. These things can take a while to go anyway. It just never had a name before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    Your cherry picking is dangerous.

    Dismissing Long Covid as a "load of nonsense" belongs in Conspiracy Theory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    Children’s Hospital in Murdoch, children’s research institute recommended going back to school with the 3 V’s, Vaccinate, Ventilate and Vital cover safe steps. Masking is one of these vital safe steps.

    Jane's entire speech at today's @VicGovDH Covid-19 press conference was excellent, and well worth watching: Fantastic to have government health officials speaking to the public so clearly and honestly about why we need masks, vaccines and #SafeIndoorAir.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    We should not be looking to a country with some of the most extreme enforced restrictions for our own guidance. Pretty sure we don't mask the under 13s so that’s a NPHET/NIAC issue. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    The findings of the Childrens research insitute has zilch to do with the "extreme" enforcing(just cause AGS didn't do the heavy work) and anyway Australia is is the country that our Pandemic Influenza Expert Group developed our playbook on. Name one other country that has had more influence on our pandemic process.

    The masking or non masking of our under 13s is an Expert Advisory Group thing first and foremost and then they present their opinions/research? to HIQA for a glorified rubberstamp before being presented to NPHET.

    If you've never read or even glanced at both plans side by side, it's worth it. PDFhttps://www.lenus.ie/handle/10147/46714 LNKS below. Martin's "Expert Group" pretty much plagarized the Australian plan from 1999.

    aus-irl.gif

    AUSTRALIA

    IRELAND



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    I have no great issue with HIQA or NPHET rubberstamping anything. They have the expertise and they are making a call that doesn't involve personal feelings. Their decision involves what they believe is suitable for Ireland. Your own view on masks has been very clear for the last year and a half and that's fine. It doesn't mean it's going to be one we'll adopt and we still should not be looking to Australia for any opinions on things.

    We know most plans of pandemic preparedness are not worth the paper they are written on and I'm referring to what's taken place during the COVID.

    As for AGS GSOC and the public would not let them away with the type of behaviour that Australian police have got up to. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    Your conveniently side stepping the EAG there. They and they alone are presenting the argument to not mask under 13s to NPHET via HIQA.

    It's impossoble for you to say that the EAG "have the expertise" and are making a call that "doesn't involve personal feelings" etc. The EAG did not produce any supporting evidence when making their original decision on 11th MAY 2020.

    E9qLAwfX0AgdzLh.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    Screen Shot 2021-10-08 at 17.37.22.png covidexpress.png

    **



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Nope, I've been pointing out we really don't care what Australia do or say. The EAG feed into NPHET, who have ultimately made the calls on advice to government and the fact is we don't advise it as policy so it's all moot in terms of our lives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    "Expertise" swallowed hook line and sinker by HIQA.

    On Tuesday 2nd March there was discussion among several members of the EAG regarding the potential for a general recommendation for face mask use specific to children from age 11 or older or pupils in 5th and 6th classes in primary school. Children of this age-group were perceived to have the ability to use face masks appropriately and without assistance, and it was considered that such children may feel empowered by being able to adopt this intervention. Also, such a recommendation would bring Ireland’s guidance more in line with that in place in many European countries and in the US and Canada. Furthermore, adoption would be in keeping with the precautionary principle.

    concerns.gif

    How much furthermore "confusing" is an eleven year old child wearing a mask in retail settigns or on public transport when compared to a 13 year old child, using that as a backup to the original objection that if pupils in 5th and 6th in primary schools wore mask it would prove confusing is extraordinary.

    These members weren't calling to lower the mandatory age, just calling for a "general recommendation". It's aso worthy to note that for these few members to get their point across they had to put up with the percieved inability for children younger than 11 to wear masks appropriately and without assistance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Seanergy


    Nope.

    Screen Shot 2021-10-08 at 22.40.25.png

    From September 2020, HIQA provides "evidence based advice" in response to requests from NPHET. The advice provided to NPHET is informed by research evidence developed by HIQA’s COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team and with expert input from HIQA’s COVID-19 Expert Advisory Group (EAG).

    The original decision from May2020 was not evidence based and it is not all moot in terms of our lives as cases will keep showing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,260 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    And remember getting ill helps their immune systems, we will see a huge epidemic of childhood illnesses over the next few years with these bubbles kids are being kept in.

    Already happening in New Zealand afaik...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,391 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    So you are saying that forcing masks on children will be short and sensible approach until vaccination is available?

    Somehow I doubt it, in light of what already happened with adults. We were told this is only temporary until vaccines come and yet this temporary "advice" changed to semi permanent with fines attached. Even though vaccines are here for quite some time.

    I can see new revenue stream for schools where teachers can fine little John for taking off or wearing his mask incorrectly. What an excellent idea to give our underpaid and overworked teachers and underfinanced schools a little boost. Two crows with one stone type of stuff...



Advertisement
Advertisement