FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) No trading

Just checking if anyone here has sample answers they can share for Equity. I've got quite a lot of random documents/grids etc. (Some slightly out of date up to 2019) for most of the FE1s so happy to share what I have too.

Could anyone give me their opinion on this:

"Laura lived out in the country in a large house with extensive mature gardens. On the western side of her property, she had a line of about twenty conifers that had grown to around 30 feet high. After the latest storm, Laura realised that they needed to be cut down. Although there was no danger of them falling onto the road or on any house or building, the way that they had swayed and bent during the storm was frightening her children. Unfortunately, Laura could not afford to pay for them to be removed, but her next door neighbour Tony offered to cut them for free provided that he could keep the timber. Laura was delighted. Tony got to work carefully and slowly, removing one tree at a time. Tony was about half way through and was now confident that he was an expert in this tree felling business. He began to fell the trees quicker and quicker, chopping them into firewood and hauling them away. As he was cutting the final conifer, the tree fell in an unexpected direction across some overhead electrical wires that he had not noticed. As the tree fell on the wires it pulled the electricity poles supporting it, causing them to swing downwards . Annette, who was driving along the road outside of Shane's house, saw the electric pole coming down on her and swerved to avoid it, crashing into the ditch and injuring herself quite badly. Advise Annette as to any potential action in tort against Laura in this situation"

Would Laura be liable here under vicarious liability here? It could be said that the relationship between Laura and Tony was akin to employment as he was receiving payment in the form of timber. It's just the question after this on the paper also deals with vicarious liability and wouldn't think it would come up twice on the paper. If not, why would Laura be liable for Tony's actions?

hi all, was a recent company law grid shared by any chance?

I’ve just added res ispa loquiter just incase

I answered it on DOC, economic loss, causation and remoteness and got a decent score. Had zero VL case law!

Tort -

Is anyone leaving out Nuisance and just focusing on RVF? I was going to do both but Nuisance came up by itself as an essay in March, so i'm thinking of eliminating it. Would love some opinions?

Excellent thanks!

I know but Public and Private Nuisance came up as whole essay question in March '21 so i'm conflicted. Surely R V F is due a run.

What are people concentrating on for Equity and/or Property??

For Property I have covered

1. Succession
2. Co - Ownership
3. Easements
4. Findings
5. Mortgages
6. Adverse Possession

Are people covering illegal contracts for contract exam? My grid says it hasn’t been up since October 2016 so definitely due a run but it’s so long I’d love to avoid it

It won't let me post the link to them but yes they are released already!

Equity: As mareva came up last time, is anyone else feeling safe to leave it out?

Has anyone an opinion on what Injunctions may be worth doing (equity) really wanted to avoid them but realised its not possible :)))

Interlocutory would be my advice