Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

F1 2021 Round 15:Russian Grand Prix 2021

1234568

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,547 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I've been saying he's an average driver for a while. He seemed to be performing a bit above that level early in the season but he's regressed to his mean since then. Nice guy, likeable, very gentle on tyres most times, very poor in qualifying almost all the time, has an odd good performances here and there, bang average overall. I'll bet he's delighted he signed a contract for next year when he did. He's been poor since then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    I know it would suck for Lando if he was penalised on top of everything else, but he really should have been. It’s a very clear black and white rule, one of the most straightforward in the rule book. The fact that he only broke it by accident doesn’t come into it. Aston Martin didn’t intentionally fail to provide enough fuel at the end of Hungary and they were disqualified, there is simply no consistency.


    These sort of grey areas where the stewards are free to make it up as they go along and choose whether or not they want to penalise a clear infraction just further damage trust and leaves you with that niggling feeling that they keep leaving the door open for further controversies and further manipulation of results in the stewards room.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    We often give out about rules in F1 being enforced strictly in black and white but this was one where I think the got it right! Had another car been coming around turn 17 then yeah a pen is fair but he impacted nobody and the slide was completely out of his control. His speed was even half the speed limit at the pit enternce… fair cop I’d say!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    Tsunoda got a time penalty and penalty points for this earlier this season:


    The rules need to be applied consistently or it just makes a mockery of the sport. If the rule is now "actually crossing the white line is ok as long as it wasn't intentional" then make that clear for everyone going forward and don't penalise anyone else for what Tsunoda did in future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    In Tsunodas case it was dry and he just drove over it! Today for Norris it was a deluge

    I agree that rules need to be applied consistently but there has to be a point where a reaction to human response comes into it! Maybe we need to agree to disagree on it and that’s cool, but for me I think they got it right… the circumstance was so extenuating and Norris could demonstrate he done more than normal to avoid it and at the end of the day, no harm was caused to any other drivers time or race!



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,794 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    Schumacher, Senna, Prost....

    This is not a new phenomenon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    Imagine if in football the ref decided not to give a corner after a defender knocked the ball over the line because it was wet and he slipped.

    Either the rules apply or they don’t. In a racing incident where two cars collide there are myriad things to consider and there is room for subjectivity. But crossing a white line is crossing a white line. Either it’s allowed or it isn’t.

    I fail to see how Norris sliding all the way over it is in any way less severe than Tsunoda slightly misplacing his car by about half a metre. No harm was caused to other drivers in either case.

    I just don’t like the way the FIA are so inconsistent so often and Stewards are left to completely arbitrarily decide whether punish an incident or not on a whim, because it opens the door for them to make very dubious decisions when the rules are left so vague and open to interpretation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,547 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah, it would have been worse to stay on slicks in the wet weather for another lap. I'm fine with applying a bit of cop on too. Rules for rules sake would have penalised Lando and I think that would have been silly. He crossed the line because he was on the wrong tyre for the conditions. He was coming into the pits to get on the correct (and safe) tyre. I'm fine with the decision.

    Post edited by El_Duderino 09 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,010 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    100% should have been a penalty for Norris, wet weather or not he broke the rules



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,163 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    You could make the point that numerous other cars entered the pit lane without incident while conditions were wet albeit not as bad as when Norris attempted to do so. Still, a top F1 driver ought to accomplish such a manoeuvre irrespective of tyres or weather conditions. He was going too fast entering the pit road. That's all. The stewards decision is a joke. You cannot apply the rules selectively just to suit particular circumstances. He crossed the white line (twice) and should have been punished.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,547 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Disagree. He was unable to control the car because he was on the wrong tyre.

    He made a brave decision which proved to be the wrong choice. It gave us the "will he, won't he" for those few laps while we waited to see if the track would get drier or wetter and drivers should be encouraged to make brave decisions.

    Applying rules like a jobsworth, without common sense in unusual circumstances, is the opposite to what they should do. They made the right decision, taking the track conditions into consideration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    Just because he was "brave" and provided some entertainment doesn't give him an exemption to the rules - as was pointed out every other driver on track managed to pit correctly in the conditions. It's not about being a "jobsworth", it's about being consistent and fair. At the moment the FIA are happy to have really vague application of the rules so they can decide who they want to punish and who they want to turn a blind eye to, and it makes a mockery of the sport.

    We've seen some really egregious penalties handed out for little or nothing this year, while major offences have gone barely punished. And now they're even taking the most uncontroversial and simple black-and-white rule in the book and setting the precedent that the stewards can decide on a whim to apply that rule differently whenever they like now too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭Breezer


    I think the last time I watched a Grand Prix in its entirety, Schumie was going for title number 5 or something. I was a big fan in the late 90s/early 00s but eventually got bored. Today was incredible entertainment! It’s great to see a bunch of young, capable drivers really pushing for it. There were battles all over the field, each as good as each other. I was gutted for Norris but his time will come. Hamilton is a tour de force: I’ve consumed most of his career via news bulletins but he and Mercedes just gave a masterclass in mature racing today. Verstappen’s charge was great viewing, along with the ups and downs of Perez and Leclerc, and pit lane strategies (last time I watched, it was all about fuel). I’ve been away from the sport too long to be a fan of anyone in particular, but from a neutral perspective, this was F1 at its best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    A reprimand isn't a complete let off though. It's a sort of post race Black and White flag, the yellow card of motorsport. and as noted by the stewards in the notice posted by Jennie Gow, Lando's first offence. T'sounoda probably got reprimanded for something else earlier in the season so by the time he was wandering the pit line in Austria, that was taken into account and the penalty applied.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭oceanman


    yeah him and lewis know how to work the radio alright...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,187 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Norris had 2 options and chose the safer one, so I’m not massively bothered by the reprimand. The rules allowed him to choose to stay on slicks for the rest of the wet weather so when getting to the point where it’s nearly impossible for him to control the car and it crosses the white line, expecting him to stay out for another lap is just being harsh for the sake of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,547 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah this is it. You say "We've seen some really egregious penalties handed out for little or nothing this year", and you want to add another silly penalty to that list, without any cop on, in the name of consistency - that's what jobsworth means.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,187 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Early on in the season I thought he had shown enough to be useful to Red Bull-he can be very quick, and is happy to be considered the second driver. While he was inconsistent we had some races where he’s been in or about, and has had an impact from a strategic viewpoint. So I’m not surprised at all he secured the drive for 2022.

    But yeah, any sort of form he’s had has disappeared since then. Too busy playing catch up or making bad decisions and getting himself out of races. With the Merc dominant tracks out of the way, the home stretch this season could be hugely important for him. He needs to start qualifying consistently in the top 5 to help the team disrupt the Mercs-it could be the deciding factor in where the WDC ends up.

    If he can’t do that, he should absolutely be looking over his shoulder. Gasly in the AT has been exactly what he hasn’t been, consistent. He’s massively matured as a driver since his first RB stint IMO, and it wouldn’t be a stretch to think he’s targeting that second RB seat for 2023.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    He did have a third option. Pull up at the side and retire. Not saying it would be the correct thing to do "within the rules" but it was an option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,547 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah yeah but that's not very realistic. In truth he picked the best option. He chose to come into the pits and take the penalty they gave him and hope the penalty is sensible and not too punitive. And that's what they did. They gave him a reprimand, which is a light punishment, and he didn't lose any more places.

    Good decisions by both parties.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,187 ✭✭✭McFly85


    That still wouldn't have been the safest thing to do - you can't retire the car by pulling up and leaving it off track, it then becomes a massive hazard for the other cars that are still driving. If he did that, the race would have had to be yellow flagged while the car is moved back into the McLaren garage.

    So even if you consider it an option, after he originally lost control of the car he still made the correct, safest decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,616 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    Just looking at the data there, and McLaren really lost that race twice. When Lance Stroll broke the pack in two on Lap 12, there was the early pitting group of Russell, Stroll, Sainz - and there were the late pitters of Riccardo, Hamilton, Perez (on hards) with Lando also well ahead of this pack. The key for the late pitters of making that work was getting a pit stop ahead of the early pitters. They were relying on those early pitters (on better tires) getting stuck in traffic behind long runners - which is what happened. Pierre Gasly held them up and stopped them doing better laptimes on worse tires. While there was never a full pit stop there, the late pitters were able to emerge in and around the early pitters, but on much better tires.

    Ricciardo lost 29.5 seconds (compared to Lando) during his combined in and out lap including McL making a balls of releasing him from the pits. Hamilton lost 23 seconds pitting a few laps later. When Ricciardo emerged from the pits he was behind Ocon (half a second), Russell (4 seconds) and Stroll (9 seconds). So if he'd managed the same in and out lap as Hamilton he'd have got out behind Stroll and quickly driven up to the back of him.

    When Hamilton pitted, he emerged behind Stroll too - and to be fair to Hamilton in the critical part of the race he fairly quickly got past Stroll, Sainz and Gasly on track. But ultimately if McL didn't **** up Ricciardo's pit stop, Hamilton would have (at best) emerged alongside Ricciardo who would easily have driven up behind Stroll. Or at worst (for Hamilton) Ricciardo would have already got past Stroll and be working on Sainz and Gasly. If that's the case, McLaren have a 1-2 when the rain begins. You can't guarantee that from a different position they would have made the same decisions, but Ricciardo was one of the earliest to pit - he pit on Lap 48, same as Max and if he'd been where he could have been on track at that stage he'd have won the race.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,030 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Kimi had his best result of the season yesterday, finishing 8th and collecting 4 points. Well done Kimi.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    It's a sport, it's not a civil service department, enforcing the straightforward rules of the sport evenly is not what "jobsworth" means. If the same rule gets broken by two different drivers, they should both get the same penalty. It's a pretty straightforward principal that most other sports adhere to. No amount of mitigating circumstances change that - the right thing to do for Norris was indeed to cross back in after he missed the turn, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't have gotten a 5 second penalty like any other driver who's broken that rule has gotten.

    If the team has concerns that a car might turn into a fireball after some diagnostic tests after qualifying, then the safe thing to do is indeed to break parc ferme and replace the problem parts. But that doesn't mean they won't get penalised for it, that's not how penalties work.

    It's not the specific incident with Norris that is concerning, it's the precedent that has been set that yet another rule that should be simple and black and white (what previously was just about the most open-and-shut rule in the sport), is now open for stewards to apply as they see fit and treat different teams and drivers differently meaning there will always be doubts cast over the possibility of result manipulation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    Yeah Kimi was one of a number of unsung heroes in that race.

    Despite being up on the podium, Sainz is one who really hasn't gotten the notice he deserves. That Ferrari is not on the pace of the McLaren right now, never mind the Mercedes, yet he qualified on the front row, got a great start and led for a good chunk of the race. He also kept his head once the rain fell and ended up best of the rest behind the two title contenders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    Ricciardo was another victim of the pit stop regulation changes sadly. I really really hope they revisit that as it's causing so many problems. One other thing about that stop was that Mercedes blatantly brought their pit crew out with no intention of making a stop, just to entice McLaren to react. This is explicitly against the rules, yet Merc have done it so many times and a blind eye always gets turned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Aston Martin have a state of the art rain detection system installed in their car, watch it in action here.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭kksaints


    While I won't disagree with regards to Perez' qualifying performance, I will say that his race yesterday was quite strong and he was booked for 3rd place before the rain chaos started.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,547 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Oh for gawd sake. Like, you just said it there. It's not the civil service where rules have to be applied regardless of whether they make sense. It's sport, not real life.

    Luckily a bit of cop on was applied to the rules and common sense prevailed. He got a small punishment in the form of a reprimand and that seems to be a fairly satisfactory resolution for pretty much everyone except yourself. Why you want the stewards to be jobsworths or civil servants about it and give out a silly penalty, is beyond me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,547 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah yesterday was a reasonably solid performance. Reasonably solid performances are against the run of form he's been on recently. We'll see if he can do it again next time.

    His races are completely undefined by his abysmal quali pace. He consistently fails to get much within 4 tenths if Max. And is often outquaoifird by some of the ferrari and mclarens (who occasionally have a fast car suited to a particular circuit) but there's no excuse for being out qualified by Gasley in a car that's always slower than his Red Bull.

    Even occasionally decent race pace and usually decent tyre management, coupled with consistently very poor quality pace can only really lead to the conclusion that he's about average overall. He can never be top tier with his poor quali and occasionally decent race pace.

    Post edited by El_Duderino 09 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,491 ✭✭✭Harika


    If Perez would have gone to third and Max sixth, would Red Bull give up a podium for three more points?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,547 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    No. I don't think I've ever seen a team tell a driver to drop 2 places to let a driver get an extra place. Botas taking the engine penalty is the most I've ever seen a team do to help the main driver.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,459 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    With Hamilton reaching 100 wins, how many more will he get?

    It could be only another win or 2 depending on how they look next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,297 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Next year could be and hopefully will be the end of Mercedes dominance of the sport. I have no problem if they are still competitive and racing at the front but I hope Ferrari, Mclaren, Alpine and Red Bull will all be up there too so we will get a great year hopefully. We will just have to wait till next year to see but with Mercedes resources you can be sure they will be up at the front or still near it next year. Still this could be there year equivalent to Red Bulls year in 2014.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭donspeekinglesh


    What penalty did Hamilton get when he broke that rule in Hockenheim a few years back? And that was under team instruction, to cross the line twice. My memory is he got no penalty. So this rule has not been consistently enforced in mixed conditions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭kksaints


    Lewis got a 5 second time penalty in the 2019 German grand prix for cutting across the pit lane entrance.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,794 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    It wasn't a case like a driver or team changing their mind on the pit stop which is what the rule is for.

    The alternative is Lando goes and does another lap on slicks which would be incredibly dangerous. You can't penalise that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭kksaints


    Well Lewis got a penalty that time in Germany it was a similar weather issue and he also had a damaged front wing which was even more dangerous and he still got a penalty. While I'd have sympathy for Lando he still should have a got a 5 second time penalty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Lewis didn’t get a time penalty, he got a reprimand, the same as Lando.

    The rule itself actually states “Except in cases of force majeure.” The exception Lando got and Lewis in 2018 is built into the rules.

    https://www.racefans.net/2018/07/22/hamilton-keeps-german-gp-win-as-stewards-clear-him-of-pit-entry-violation/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭kksaints


    Wrong year. The incident I'm talking about is the 2019 German grand prix not the 2018 race.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Ah right apologies, I can’t remember the 2019 one. Regardless, the precedent for Landos reprimand is in place!

    Edit: Just had a look at the 2019 incident and it’s completely different. Hamilton intentionally entered the pits from the wrong side and the conditioners weren't the reason it happened. I don’t really think they can be compared.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭kksaints


    Certainly precedent for it, it's just annoying the inconsistencies of when it's applied.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    I think the outcome was fair tbh. If a pen had been given I don’t think he could complain tho either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭kksaints


    Yeah, it's not the worst decision to just reprimand but I do think that the stewarding standards in F1 are too inconsistent and really need to be tightened up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    You couldn't have that any more backward. The civil service is somewhere where there should be room for common sense. When it comes to sport, common sense ought to dictate that the rules are applied in the same way to everyone.

    Like I said before, in football if the ref could decided not to bother giving a corner because it was raining and the defender slipped when he hit the ball out, that would be utterly ridiculous and people would rightly be calling it a sham. There is no difference here. Either the rules apply all the time or never, if you leave it up to some people in a room to decide on a whim in secrecy, you end up with decisions that simply can never be trusted.

    As others have pointed out, they excused Hamilton another year too, basically the only precedent right now is that the driver always gets a time penalty no matter how minor the slightest infraction of one tyre going over a line might be, unless it's a British driver with a Mercedes engine who the media will whip up a frenzy about if they get penalised, in which case it's a reprimand. Which is precisely the reason why the rules ought to be black and white.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,187 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I don't think the rules need to be applied in a black and white fashion, but they do need to actually start judging them consistently.

    I think the judgement on Lando was reasonable, but the judgement on Tsunoda was ridiculously harsh. If there is a possibility of a reprimand with no actual time penalty, then that should be the default unless there was blatant intent and/or it was safer to stay out and do another lap. If a driver has been reprimanded before for a similar incident then they should be able to take that into account.

    Mainly I think that the reason you cannot really judge it in football terms is because of the high risk factor involved in F1. There should always be some leeway to allow the driver to judge the situation he's in and act in what he believes is the safest manner, and then he should be able to explain his actions to the stewards. To treat the rules as absolutes can just invite more risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Using your football analogy, we see fouls let go all the time and the ref playing advantage and then go back and book the player who committed the foul at the next break in play, it’s pretty common!

    And in this case, strictly speaking the law was followed as it explicitly states “a driver must not cross the white line… except in cases of force majeure”. The stewards judged this to be a case of force majeure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Didn't the pit entry bollard have something to do with the difference between reprimand and time penalty? As I remember it, though could be wrong, Lewis had passed the bollard indicating the start of the pit entry on the track side and then cut in to the pit entry, while on the other he had entered the pit but then hopped out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Yeah that’s it. He cut straight across the grass verge in 2019 after losing his front wing at that corner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Right, so Lando had entered the pits by staying to the right of the bollard but couldn't keep the car under control due to conditions and tyres (and I suspect a hint of red mist)and went straight on. On other tracks with similar pit entries before final turn like Barcelona or Albert Park, there's usually a barrier to keep cars funnelled in. Barriers that Kimi hit in Spa earlier this year and actually Lewis hit in Russia on the Saturday, yet no penalties or reprimands handed out for those. I think it's perfectly fair that Lando retained his 7th.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement