Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Formula 1 2021 - General Discussion Thread (Read 1st post rules)

1105106108110111143

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭Thomhic312


    The Schumacher documentary is now on Netflix.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,727 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Filed out that survey, very interesting questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,136 ✭✭✭Pen Rua


    Where are you picking this up from? I follow a bunch of reputable journo's & outlets and not one has mentioned this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    I hope not, SA are a disgrace on the planet, and their ownership would turn F1 into a joke with races in rubbish areas on rubbish tracks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    It's on a lot of second tier websites, but the original source is Roger Benoit who has good contacts and has been pretty accurate in predicting movements in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    Watched the first half at lunchtime. Brought back a lot of memories, it's essential watching for any F1 fan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    Completed the Schumacher documentary now. There were an awful lot of details and moments I expected to see featured that were glossed over or missed but I guess with a career as incredible as his there was only so much they could fit in.

    It was still a great watch and I teared up on more than a couple of occasions through it. Would thoroughly recommend it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,459 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    Didn’t think it was great. It glossed over or entirely skipped quite a lot and didn’t really capture his win-at-all-costs drive.

    The part with Mick was quite touching — hard not to root for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    BBC Sport: Aston Martin retain Sebastian Vettel and Lance Stroll for 2022.


    Vettel and Stroll signed for next year. Fair enough. No reason to change and no real options to do so either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    I called it at the time, as did Christian Horner, that the new slower pitstops the FIA mandated that were supposedly for "safety" but came completely out of the blue in response to a request from Mercedes just after Red Bull had beaten them in a race in large part due to their more efficient pitstops, have proven just the opposite of being safe and have just made mistakes more likely for the most efficient teams who now have to unnaturally and artificially slow themselves down.

    It's now been confirmed, as I thought when watching it live, that the slow pitstop for Verstappen was entirely due to the failure a new process they put in to add an artificial delay between fitting the wheel and taking off in order to comply with the ridiculous new regulation. How ironic it is that something Mercedes forced through under the guise of "safety" almost resulted in their own driver being seriously injured if not for the halo.

    Still, the rule change achieved its real goal and stopped Max stretching his lead in the championship - without it he'd have been second to Ricciardo at worst, with a great shout of winning that race.

    This was only the second race with the new regulation in place, I wonder if we'll see many more botched pitstops, it could become the story of the season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭Ultimate Gowlbag


    Fair play to Mercedes bringing in a rule that they knew a human would mess up at Red Bull,genius really!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    I know you think you're being clever with that comment but it was completely predictable, and people did predict it, for example here: https://racer.com/2021/06/25/horner-angry-at-technical-directive-to-slow-f1-pit-stops/

    I predicted it in this thread a few months ago, I'd find the post if I knew how on the new forums.

    Introducing an enforced artificial delay into a pit process that was a well oiled machine previously was always going to increase the probability of errors being made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,788 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    just think how close russel was to poll . we could have had a williams victory. hollow victory yes but still a victory



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,163 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I don't agree with these new pitstop rules either but at least it made the race more exciting and allowed another team to win and not just win but get a 1-2 which was great.

    So I suppose it worked by making the race more exciting.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,757 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Can anybody explain how the pit stops are creating errors when they don't look like there are any errors apart from the lights not releasing this car.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭barryribs


    Its a concerted effort to stop Max Verstappen winning the championship, orchestrated by Toto and Hamilton who lobbied for the rule change because red bull were faster than them at pitstops. This was the direct cause of the slow pit stop for Max in Monzo

    Or in reality is that there is a .2 second delay between the time the wheel gun is released and the light can turn green, which still means the faster teams will have faster pit stops. Horner has admitted the stop in Monza was a human error as a result of the new technical directive. What I suspect from watching it is the guy on the front right did not follow the correct procedure so the light did not turn to green after the delay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    It's a weird one, there doesn't see to be any consistency to the state of the two panels in the pit box.

    As he enters the pit box, on the panel the mechanic was holding the left light (red/stop) was illuminated and on the overhead panel the right light (green/go) was illuminated. Which would appear to be incorrect?

    When they realise something is wrong both panels go off, the jack man is signalled to drop the car and the panels come back on in the same state.


    Now, looking back on other pit stops sometimes those lights seem to be out of sequence also.

    Anyone know what that's about?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    Because the lights that didn’t release the car only exists because of the new rules. Previously Red Bull just put the tyres on and as soon as they were on they immediately got a green light and went. They were more efficient at this than their rivals, who typically had a 0.2 second or more delay in their reaction times at this point in the pitstop.

    Mercedes didn’t like that Red Bull were so quick, put in a complaint, and the rules were changed out of the blue mid season so there now needed to be a 0.2 second delay between putting the tyres on and going, or else there would be a penalty. The light that didn’t change was the one that artificially inserts that 0.2 second delay into what was previously an extremely well oiled and heavily practiced process, and for whatever reason it went wrong and didn’t update as it should have and left them stranded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,757 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    It's shitehawk stuff by Mercedes. Can't win with the same tools, so just get them to change the rules.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭barryribs


    As the sport has always been. Whether it is tyre thread width measurements, double diffusers, blown diffusers, mass dampers, blown exhausts, team radio protocols, fric suspension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    I don’t know if it’s always been the way it is now. I can imagine if Mercedes went to the FIA 10 years ago and complained about RB’s wing or pit stop speed they’d be told to just suck it up, work harder and match them. I don’t know if Bernie would stand for such sh*te. Maybe it’s since this American crowd came in but it’s definitely not the same as it used to be in that regard.

    F1 is supposed to not only be the pinnacle of racing but also the pinnacle of motor development which in the past displayed real forward thinking … for me, changing rules which effectively reduce efficiency isn’t a forward thinking mind sent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭barryribs


    The only difference is the team looking for the changes are no longer red.

    I agree with your second point, the rules at the start of the season should be binding, for better or worse. If a team gains an advantage because they are able to comply with the rules and still gain an advantage then it should be up to the other teams to deal with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭flazio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,757 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Yes, as said above by another, I also like the ingenuity aspect of F1. The more innovation, the more I'm interested. Less protests please.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ut depends on whether the innovation is visible or not though. I doubt anyone was looking at pitstops and marveling at how automates the process had become and how they had removed so much human skill and speed from the equation. All we sat was that pitstops had become very fast and pretty much the same in length to within a coupe of tenths.

    I thought it was a bit of a fuss about nothing to make the changes, but the reaction to it was a classic knee -jerk f1 fan anti-change reaction.

    In terms of the pitstops, bed bull had marginally faster pitstops. Mercedes wer ealmost exactly the same but their mean was throw out by 2 ballsed up pitstops that took 10 seconds each.

    But I'm fine with them not spending millions of pounds to automate the pitstops and make them a tenth or two faster and basically all the same. Shouldn't there be skill on the potstop and more room for human error and more room for variation between pitstop times?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Shouldn't there be a skill in driving the car and not relying on engineers telling you what to do and how to do it? So much of the human skill has been removed from driving with engineering advances.

    We already had plenty of human error in pit stops.



    Bottas/Danny Ric in Monaco

    Hamilton in Germany

    Russell in Bahrain

    Nearly every Haas stop over a few races a few years ago results in a cross thread retirement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yes. There should be less interference from the pitwall and it should be more about the driver doing their job. Likewise it should be on the pitstop people to signal when they've done their job rather than having it automated and preempting when they will have their jobs completed. There nothing for me or you to appreciate in the software doing that work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,140 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    At the end of the day it's humans who stop the car on its marks, jack it up, remove one set of wheels, attach a new set, drop the car, and take off. Seeing all that happen in under 2 seconds is impressive as hell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Well I'd agree except the FIA determined that humans can't possibly do it in under 2 seconds without the software preempting when they would have their jobs done to release the car. That was the exact point of the ruling (the point about whether they could do it in under 2 seconds without the software preempting the jobs being done).

    Now, it didn't seem to have any actual negative effect so I didn't see the need for a rule change but the point seems to have been that they have to do these jobs themselves rather than having a computer predict when the jobs will be done.

    It's similar to saying that it would be impressive to let the sprinters use whatever substances they want and see them run the 100m in 8.5 seconds. But the rules say they cant and likewise the rules say the pitcrew have to signal when their job is complete and not have a computer do it for them.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement