Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

My €100m BEAM scheme

12325272829

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,693 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    Exporting slurry IS used as part of the calculations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,693 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    Yes it is if it's used as a means to reduce your 5% nitrates figure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    You have linked to Annex 3 a few times.


    did you read it?

    Read the first paragraph below and then offer your apologies.


    0DC77E6F-ADC4-450C-93E2-4ED37BF0218B.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭DBK1


    No it is not. The only person confused here is yourself.

    You stated a few posts back that exports can’t be used and now you’re saying they can.

    Exports CANNOT be used to meet the reduction. It is solely based on what is PRODUCED on your holding.

    Nobody has to take my word for it, ask your advisors, contact the department or read the terms and conditions but I can assure the answer will be the same.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭Lime Tree Farm


    you have to read back on all the posts, starting with Tanko's post asking if he could import pig slurry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    I did.


    And the first reply from Bass said he could do what he liked and it would have no impact (positive or negative on Beam) as import/export makes no difference.


    its like two different threads here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭DBK1


    You can read every single post on the whole Boards website if you like. The answer to the question being asked by Tanko will still be the same.

    Exports or Imports are NOT used in the calculations for beam.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,693 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    Exports of slurry are calculated if you try to use it as a means to achieve the 5% reduction. I keep saying it, it's in the T&C's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    Please provide the link and the statement where this is in the T n Cs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    You refuse to read my posts. Are you able to read?


    “The reduction is measured on the Bovine livestock manure nitrogen from animals on the holding, it cannot be reduced by the exporting of slurry or by claiming additional land to offset the figure”



    793805A6-5626-4F2F-9BDF-F0B2EA094102.jpeg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,693 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    It doesn't say that slurry exports are used to calculate your nitrates but it goes without saying that you cannot export slurry in order to reduce your nitrates. If you try to do so then those figures would probably be used as a stick to beat you if you haven't achieved the 5% reduction.

    Did other people receive their letters last week confirming that they had met the requirements of the scheme. It was a good enough scheme for those who were feeding/finishing a few although the confusion over the mix up of the Balancing figure letter was unfortunate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    What are you **** on about. Exports or imports of slurry is **** nothing to do with it. You can export 100 percent of your slurry and this scheme won’t even notice or care.


    jesus you can’t argue with stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭DBK1


    I think I partly understand what you’re trying to say now but you’re describing a scenario that’s not possible to happen.

    I think what you mean is if a farmer in beam tries to declare that he has reduced his slurry by 5% by exporting slurry that the department won’t accept this and will then use the figures he has given for exports so therefore by your reckoning the export figures are then included in the calculation, is that it?

    If this is what you mean then you are describing a situation that’s impossible to be in. There is nowhere that a farmer can declare their figures or there is no method for a farmer to add in or take away amounts. The figures are calculated by the department based on your herd numbers on AIM. There is nowhere that imports or exports can be added or taken away so it is never possible for a farmer to even try and declare they have exported slurry for beam.

    To put it in plain and simple english, as we have been saying all evening, Imports and exports are not used in Beam calculations and make no difference to you production figures.

    If that’s not what you’re trying to say then I give up!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭DBK1


    That is exactly correct, you can export 100% of your slurry and Beam doesn’t know or care. You can import 100% of the slurry from every other farmer in the country if you so wish and Beam doesn’t know or care because Imports and Exports are not used in Beam calculations!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,693 ✭✭✭✭Base price


    What I am saying is that under the T&C's exporting slurry in order to reduce your nitrates isn't allowed. You, Bass and 893 stated that exports aren't calculated yet DAFM state Slurry exports are not reckonable as reduction.

    Anyway getting back to Tanko's question - BEAM T&C's only mention the reduction of Bovine slurry so therefore by my reckoning the importation of porcine slurry doesn't apply. However, I would discuss same with an Ag advisor before importing same in case it impacts on your overall nitrates figure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    exports are not calculated is equal to exports are not reckonable.


    not calculated = not reckonable


    not=not

    calculated = reckonable


    Jesus Christ



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    What are you on about.


    check with **** no one. Do what you like with slurry.


    It means **** all. it won’t help you or hinder you.

    If exporting helped base would meet it based on the shite he is spreading.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,581 ✭✭✭DBK1


    What you’ve highlighted in Bold is what we’ve been saying all day and you’re trying to tell us we are incorrect. You’ve contradicted yourself more than anyone else on this thread today I think.

    I have tried to give you an option of getting out of this with some bit of dignity left!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭ruwithme


    Reading through some posts on this thread recently,some need to go easy with their use of words.

    It ain't life or death on here just yet.or a court of law.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭Lime Tree Farm


    I think you are being very harsh - base price has always contributed very helpful and sound advice in her commentary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    I may have been. And I apologise to base if I offended them and for being aggressive in my posting .

    But it has been explained 6 or 7 times to no avail. I have an 18 month old child who can now explain that import and export of slurry is outside the scope of this scheme now at this stage.

    Post edited by 893bet on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    The past few post seem to be posters agreeing with each other but telling the other they are wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 ✭✭✭valtra2


    WOW!!!!!!!!!!! You learn something new everyday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭893bet


    Got a letter to repay the money today…..made a mistake by changing the ref period. Should have kicked it on to next year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭Lime Tree Farm


    Tell them you didn't realise you had pressed the wrong button/option until you got their letter. No skin off their noses anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,836 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    We got a letter too. Going to ring them tomorrow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,459 ✭✭✭Grueller


    How are they proposing the repayment? Taken from bps? All in one lump sum or a phased payment plan?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,836 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    It's not a big amount here. I will probably pay it in 2 bits, it was in my dad's herd number and he has no land this year, so no bps.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,451 ✭✭✭tanko


    Do you mean you made a mistake by not changing the ref period to the end of the year? (it can’t be kicked onto next year)



Advertisement