Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

17273757778102

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Getting the excuses in early and as usual, it's somebody elses fault. It's not the planning system which is the issue here, it's the step before that which decided to pursue this "all things to all men" and to hell with everything else road solution. It was never likely to survive both the planning and public spending approvals processes.

    The need for several tunnel and viaduct sections on such a short section of road should have been a red flag. That's before getting into the whole building a road to solve commuter congestion when such a road is only going to create more commuter congestion situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,115 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Even if thats the case - surely we could have had final decisions in a much shorter timeframe.

    3 years with An Bord Pleanala. No project, regardless of complexity, should take that long to reach a decision. If it's as bad as you claim (and I dont disagree btw) there should have been a swift rejection. 3 years in we still havent gotten a decision. Farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    ABP have to assess projects on the basis of the information they have received. If they receive vast amounts of information relating to huge engineering works and environmental impacts of multiple proposed viaducts and tunnels, on top of the standard volumes of information which comes with a 17km road with a major river crossing and passing several sensitive areas, then they have to give review it all and give everything due consideration.

    I don't see how it is ABPs fault that someone dumped an over-engineered mess on their desk, they just have to do their jobs and wade through it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    Exactly. You can argue about the merits of the project as you please, but the planning process should not take this long under any circumstance. The unavoidable trip through the courts will probably add another couple of years on top of ABP.

    Give ABP more resources to decide cases faster, change environmental and planning laws to simplify the process and greatly narrow the grounds for any appeal, and drastically raise the bar for courts to accept a judicial review and also to subsequently overturn permission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,115 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    IF ABP can be overwhelmed by one large application then it clearly is not fit for purpose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Who said anything about being overwhelmed?

    There is a huge amount of info to be assessed on this project, all in the context of national and European law. Vast amounts of survey and assessments which all have to be considered and taken into account in the final decision. See

    The process has to be gone through. If ABP do approve it, the decision needs to be on rock-solid grounds, anything else will just get throw out in court. They of course dont know what the decision will be until they have gone through all the documentation and given everything due consideration. Dont hate the player, hate the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    "Who said anything about being overwhelmed?"

    Three years is an unacceptable turnaround time by any measure. If ABP does not have the capacity to deliver prompt decisions on key national infrastructure projects, it is overwhelmed. I'm not sure what the point in disputing this is.

    As for hating the game, we don't have to. The Oireachtas can and should rewrite the rulebook.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Have been on a similar journey myself. It really is as bad an infrastructure idea from the outset as any in Ireland. Codology about it being the first phase of a multimodal sustainable plan shouldn't fool anyone. The projections re cycling use post construction are one of the starkest stats.

    It might blow off a bit of steam to talk about simplifying environmental laws, cutting through red tape etc, but this is not how things are done anymore, the direction of travel of policy and public opinion is thankfully towards a more enlightened view of our natural world, and our future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Lets look at the timeline and how it unfolded;

    23 October 2018 - application to ABP

    4 April 2019 - ABP issue Request for Further Information

    30 August 2019 - response to Request for Further Information

    18 February 2020 - Oral hearing gets underway

    26 March 2020 - Due to the continuing restrictions resulting from Covid-19, the oral hearing is postponed until further notice

    12 October 2020 - Oral hearing resumes

    Notice anything in there which delayed a necessary part of the process?

    And the Oireachtas can't rewrite the rulebook, much of the legislation is underpinned by EU directives. Unless you are suggesting Ireland leave the EU which is probably the most difficult, and time-consuming and less likely to succeed way of achieving what you want, not unlike the Galway Bypass really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    If ABP had decided the matter promptly, we would have known the final outcome long before Covid ever appeared. But it's overwhelmed, so we still don't know to this day.

    National legislatures are responsible for deciding how to transpose EU directives into domestic law. As other EU members don't seem to have our environmental planning problems and long, long delays, this strongly suggests there is an issue on our end. The Oireachtas needs to tidy up the legislation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    A prompt before Covid would have had to have been made in Jan 2020 at the latest, little over a year after the application was submitted. The only possible decision which could have been made at that point was to reject it as any decision to approve at that point would almost certainly get thrown out in court (not least because it wouldn't have followed the standard process). For someone who keeps telling us how necessary this road is and how it needs to go ahead, that seems a major change of tune. Had ABP just rejected it after little over a year, you'd be doing twice as much complaining and bitching about ABP

    In the 16 months between application and Covid hitting, ABP had assessed the submission and requested further information, the applicant had submitted the further information, a consultation on the further information had been held and the oral hearings had started. Everything was progressing in the standard manner until March 2020 when everything (literally the whole world) was thrown into chaos.

    Transposing EU directives into domestic law slightly differently isn't going to remove the need for the EIA and NIS, both of which are incredibly complex, as are the appropriate assessments of them. Simply changing how EU directives are transposed into domestic law doesn't solve the problem you have as challenges can still be made to EU courts and the transposition can be found to be flawed. The Aarhus Convention would also continue to exist so the need for public consultation on the significant further information which was provided.

    Anyway, keep moaning about it all you want, it doesn't change anything. You should be happy as the fact a decision hasn't yet been made keeps hope that this road might actually get built alive (for those who hope it gets build). My stated opinion on this project going back years has been that it is an over complicated and it wont happen due to costs and/or environmental grounds and that this process will ultimately be a massive waste of time. Looks like it is playing out like that.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,191 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    It's been well documented that ABP are understaffed and that the SHD process has bogged them down even further. Even an application a big and complex as this should not take this long and would not have if they had enough staff. The delay is 100% down to ABP and their staff issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Regardless of staffing issues at ABP, the oral hearings were delayed by 6 months due to Covid so no, the delay is not 100% down to ABP and their staff issues.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Personally I hope the decision gets delayed again and for as long as possible.

    The economic, political and environmental landscapes are changing rapidly making this project less and less feasible as time goes on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    If ABP were not clearly overwhelmed, the oral hearings for the bypass would have taken place long before Covid ever emerged.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The application was made later October 2018. Long before Covid ever emerged would have to be before the end of 2019, so you think they could have reviewed the application, requested further information, received the further information, held a consultation on the further information and held the oral hearings in just over a year. That just isn't realistic and doing it that way would almost certainly resulted in a rejection, or an approval which gets overturned in court. You'd have a lot more to complain about then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    "A long decision process" and "a short decision process that will almost definitely get overturned in court" is a false choice.

    If ABP were not overwhelmed, it would be able to carry out its statutory responsibilities, including reviews and oral hearings, in a prompt and efficient fashion, without an increased risk of its findings being overturned in court. We should expect this as citizens, and if it is not delivered, we should demand it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah there's a lot we should expect and demand as citizens but to be frank, rapid turnarounds by ABP wouldn't figure in a top 100 list of things for the majority of citizens



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    True, only us fans on the Roads forum need things built. Our fellow citizens don't need houses, schools, sustainable transport infrastructure etc.

    The same rules holding up the Galway bypass are impeding the mass rollout of bike lanes across Dublin and have put any further expansion elsewhere on ice. They're also preventing sustainable high-density housing developments being built across the country, and will almost certainly be used to prevent works necessary for BusConnects etc from proceeding. If you really want a national green revolution, you should be demanding reform of the planning system too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Reform of the planning system is one thing but there is no way a major and complex road like this could be approved in little over a year including oral hearings. There is a process which has to be followed and huge amounts of information which need to be adequately considered when making a decision on a project like this.

    In all honesty, a few months delay with ABP is irrelevant if they approve, it is almost certainly going to result in years of legal challenges. This was always going to be the biggest issue with this project and even if it eventually clears all the hurdles and is fully approved, it is unlikely the cost will be justifiable given the way national and global policy is going. People can complain about ABP or the planning system all they want but this project was seriously flawed from conception. ABP would be more efficient elsewhere if they didn't have to devote resources to this.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Decision deferred until October 1st.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,282 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    I’ve tried to steer clear of the car crash (pun intended) that is the Galway bypass / ring road / relief road or whatever it’s called. But after today’s farce, surely it’s time to demand answers & explanations as to what the hold up on the decision is.

    Galway is a City, supposedly. Yet it is the only City in Ireland that does not have adequate infrastructure for it to function properly. If this bypass isn’t the answer, give the planning denial now so another option can be explored.

    Without building another bridge and much more infrastructure around the city, Galway will fail to develop properly into the future. It will also prevent alternative modes of transport + travel being developed in the City as it continues to struggle to accommodate cars, buses, pedestrians & cyclists on extremely narrow one way lanes.

    The planning process in Ireland seems to be a mess. It’s fair to say a certain number of people in Galway are anti development + want to keep things as they are as it benefits them personally. This group of people will have a lot to answer for as Galway begins to be bypassed as a place to attract & sustain good jobs into the future. Limerick has a tunnel & even Mayo are getting a dual carriageway around Castlebar to Westport. Said county is also full of Greenways & I love to cycle them. Limerick also has a new Greenway built.

    It’s not a car v bike argument as some on this thread would like people to believe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,756 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Whether or not this does get approved is now less important than someone (anyone!) just making a decision on the matter. Right now, the route’s indeterminate state creates such a huge uncertainty in transport spending that it is preventing any major investment in improving transportation in Galway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If it gets approved, the uncertainty and delays in other investments are likely to remain as legal challenges look to be inevitable. Even if it survived those, this project could struggle to get approval under Public Spending Code (already expected to cost €600m with that possibly rising), government policy moving away from supporting car commuting (which this certainly does), not fitting within carbon budget, etc. Approval by ABP just kicks off new processes

    This was always going to be the issue here, they basically put all their eggs in the basket that is an extremely difficult to construct road and figure everything else out later. Even with everything running smoothly and minimal delays, the road as designed was always going to take a decade from initial design to opening to traffic. The current uncertainty in transport spending and preventing any major investment in improving transportation in Galway was accepted a long time ago, as if having everything hinging on it would somehow ease this road concept's passage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,756 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yes. If one were cynical, one might think that the M6 is now being used mainly as an excuse for inaction on any other project that might involve constructing a road. There’s a need for a bypass, for the small amount of traffic that needs to cross the Corrib without going through Galway, but that road doesn’t need to be a huge neighbourhood collector-distributor scheme like M6.

    With so much of the current city traffic being car-based commuters, if there was €600M to be spent, I’d put it into kicking off a light-rail system for the city, fed by a much-improved bus service and Park-and-ride.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    To be fair, given the condition of our planning system, the same long delays are in store for any serious transport project. It only takes one disgruntled person to set a project through years of judicial review and appeals.

    A Gluas or any ambitious BusConnects will likely be stuck in the same planning nightmare as the bypass for years to come, unless the system is radically reformed.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    True to an extent, however, the issues that any Gluas or BusConnects program would face would be of a very different kind to the ones the ring road will face. The ring road will run into issues with environmental laws that the TII simply won't be able to engineer around. A Gluas would only face issues on stuff like CPOs, etc, which is stuff that the NTA and TII have been dealing with for years, and despite the handwringing in the media, those issues aren't a showstopper for any project. They will be able to delay the project, but only once, and worst case scenario would only involve minor changes.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,864 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Add to that, an investment in public transport can show results within a year, and major results in a few years. The bypass will not be finished in a decade and could be set back to nought at any time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    I'm sure investments in public transport could show results. I doubt they would make a significant difference to Galway commuters in the near term without the sort of major modifications that would be politically contentious and require following the planning/endless-judicial-reviews pathway (see the recent cycle lane controversy in Dublin for an example of what lies ahead).

    As for bigger projects like the Gluas, it's probably helpful to remember that it took at least 8 years for the first Luas lines to be opened after the process was set in motion, and that was long before the planning laws became as onerous as they are today.

    I'm not sure if we're being realistic about how much public transport can do by itself in the near term.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,755 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The only city in Ireland not to have sufficient infrastructure? Like where do you get this from? Ever been to Dublin? Europe's largest metro-less city and Europe's largest non rail connected airport. Its not a Galway thing, all of Ireland's infrastructure is woeful for political reasons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,282 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    I agree Dublin is bad. But it does have Luas, an M50, supposedly there was supposed to be a Metro to the Airport....There are more Cycle lanes and a Greenway to Athlone now too. It's trying, making an effort.

    Galway is in limbo. A planning decision being deferred, and now others will keep objecting to future developments. There's no clear plan except deferring the road.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21




  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭tharlear




    "I'm appalled!

    I just can't believe it, I'm appalled

    it's appalling

    I don't know how else to describe it,

    its appalling"

    etc etc



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Has an ABP file ever taken this long, with so many additional delays?

    None that I am aware of



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Limerick74




  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    12th November the date where this gets delayed again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The main image for that article shows what a ludicrous idea the Galway Bypass plan is. Its an ocean of tarmac, it looks close to 50m wide, then a **** tunnel despite every PT project requiring a tunnel is considered too expensive.

    This should be the first thing dropped from the NDP, put €100m into a new section of road and bridge splitting off the existing N6 west of the N83 and connecting to the N59 (and no further west), another €100m into Galway bus and cycle improvements and you'd still have at least €400m to plug funding gaps elsewhere (particularly Metrolink).



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    While I think that our planning and legal system needs massive reform, one of the things that I've found funny over the last year is the number of people saying that it needs reforming from all sides of the political spectrum. One side saying it needs reforming to reduce the ability to object and make it easier to build houses/offices/projects, while the other is coming from the point of view that it doesn't currently take into account the environment and our emissions as much as it should do.

    I agree that it needs reform, but I'm wary of massive changes being pushed through. Road to hell, good intentions and all that....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    While I am sure that irishcycle.com has no vested interest in whether the bypass is built or not, some of the claims the author makes are a bit much. Saying that Galway is already bypassed because the N6 doesn't go directly through the city centre is like saying that we already have plenty of bus and cycle lanes all over Galway (because buses and bicycles can just travel in car lanes). And suggesting that Galwegians will switch en masse to cycling in the rain or waiting for the bus/Gluas etc to the extent that traffic is significantly reduced (even while the city gets far more inhabitants in the coming decades) seems utopian.

    @Pete_Cavan A lot of the Dublin Metro is going underground. If it's cost-effective to build the tunnel, it will be built. The image shows two lanes of traffic with merge lanes - pretty standard for high-quality roads in Ireland, and nowhere close to 50 m wide on the mainline.

    @CatInABox Reform is coming! Given the incredible political pressure to build more houses as quick and fast as possible, I would expect it to be more in that direction, although I'm sure the Greens will stick their oar in too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,397 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    The city is bypassed North-South which is what matters in terms of bypassing Galway city going from any other city/large town to another. There's no major developments out West of the city and not much traffic making that trip.

    If the bus will get you to work in a predictable 15mins and the car takes 30mins to 2hrs, then you'll see lots of people getting the bus.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's next to impossible to see how they can build the GCRR and adhere to their own climate goals




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    Just keep switching to electric cars, I suppose. It's happening right now. In ten years' time the idea that roads = carbon emissions will be obsolete, and in twenty years it will be forgotten.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,397 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    I did specify west of the city, not west of the river.

    The housing developments you're talking about are better suited for strong PT transport links than individual car based transport. Higher density living using higher density transport to get to higher density work, shopping, etc. It's just not possible to build enough road space to allow everyone to drive everywhere without congestion. There's a relatively small percentage of people and businesses that live further out that'll realistically always need something like a car due to the remote location, but we don't need to clog up all the road space they need with thousands of people driving a few km to and from work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,735 ✭✭✭✭Bobeagleburger


    Anything about this development in the announcement today?

    The longer this goes on the more I think it'll be shelved.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just that its on the list of active projects. Wouldn't expect more than that to be fair, the NDP wouldn't be the place for a lot of detail on a specific project



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Most politicians, other than the greens, want this road to happen, so I can't see any political decision to cancel it.


    I can, however, and do, foresee a legal or planning decision that basically cancels it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    A situation like the A5 maybe. Endless delays on spurious environmental grounds so that the road is never delivered. A shame for Galway, but a win for other cities in the country I guess. That funding can be diverted to the M20.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement