Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

13773783803823831580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    NPHET don't want any further relaxation of restrictions until the end of September at the earliest. They made that clear in their advice to government when they presented their models. Remember the "choice" open indoor with vaccine passports or keep them shut till the end of September at the earliest. In fact, I believe NPHET would be more than happy for the current restrictions to be left in place over the winter to protect the HSE. The government are going to have to start going against their "advice" more and more now if we are to have a path out of all restrictions.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    You've been against restrictions from the get go due to the economic repurcussions.

    Then having a go at a poster who will be working outside which is not against the restrictions as far as I can see.

    I honestly can't understand you're stance here at all, only reason I can see is to 'one up' a poster.

    Also, why do you keep referring to NPHET as nPHEt, is it something childish? If you reply saying its something to do with not recognising them as the public body responsible for public heath during this we'll that's also childish.


    I think you are definitely stretching with your posts now but sure you'll respond not addressing any of the above with 'the economy'.

    Comical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,628 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    What point are you trying to make here? It’s not particularly clear and ironically a cheap shot to “get one up on a poster”

    comical

    I get the impression you also hold others to a different standard than you hold yourself

    I use my phone and it auto corrects to that mix of cases when typing out the name, sorry for causing offence



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭wpd


    something is not adding up with government numbers i think

    155 deaths from covid since april 2021 however only 7 of these were fully vaccinated

    given that over 70% of adult pop vaccinated how can this be, were the 148 deaths in 20 something year olds??

    number of daily infections/ hospitalisations and icu numbers are as high as early Jan before mass vaccine roll out so there is no sign that

    the vaccines have slowed down the spread at all

    What am i missing, these numbers don't make sense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,621 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    The Government like to fudge the numbers, if you died and had COVID but it wasnt caused by COVID, they counted it.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    70% of adults are now fully vaccinated, they haven't been since April.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    The point is blatantly obvious but as usual you use defection rather than addressing any of it. The point is you've been against restrictions all the way through but then then call someone out on what they said ages ago and are apparently 'flouting' said restrictions which they aren't. And I'm not trying to 'one up' you, I'm genuinely curious as to why your stance has changed. If you were so anti restrictions why are you singling out a poster who can under the current restrictions work outside?

    I also don't hold anyone to any standard, that's their business, I'll look after myself.

    Also, there isn't any irony here, they are genuine questions that I don't expect you to answer.

    There is no hypocrisy in what the poster is doing.

    Also, again what's with the 'nPHEt?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭wpd


    thanks Adamd and Vicxas hadnt thought of both those points



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Johnny0toole mention on the previous page that only 8% of the adult population was vaccinated by 24th April. If that was the case, then taking April as a start point is of course going to include many people who had not had the chance to be vaccinated.

    Similar to Fauci in the states saying 99.99% of deaths were in the unvaccinated - true because it includes deaths from before vaccines were even a thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    @wpd wrote:

    155 deaths from covid since april 2021 however only 7 of these were fully vaccinated


    given that over 70% of adult pop vaccinated how can this be, were the 148 deaths in 20 something year olds??

    Well, we haven't had 70% vaccinated since April. 92% of all deaths occur in unvaccinated people 65+ and 97% of deaths are in people aged 55+. So although a considerable proportion of very old people were covered in April, the vaccine programme was really only beginning to touch on the 50+ cohort by the start of May. And you had the Astrazeneca gap issue. In reality there was a large chunk of relatively vulnerable people still waiting on full vaccination up to the start of July.

    Also, these cohorts aren't completely, 100%, fully vaccinated. Even if 99% of over-65s are vaccinated, that leaves 1% who aren't. If there are 1m in that age group, then you have 10,000 people fully unprotected.

    Up to mid-may we had 31,000 cases in over-65s, resulting in 4,400 deaths. That's about 1 in 7. If 5% of the unvaccinated 10k picked it up (500), then you stand to see 70 people die.

    This is how we have 155 deaths since April.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not at all. The last thing I do is trawl through past posts and posters to try catch them out, appearances are deceptive. I have zero idea as to what you work at or as to your profession, that's generally how questions work. I have no issue, I'm an engineer and don't see the issue in saying so and if you think I'm baiting you believe me, I've better things to do with my time. In actual fact if you were less circumspect and more logical, you'd understand that from the posts I have seen, you seem educated or well read. Ignore all you want , if that's how your process works. I asked because if somebody sounds like they know their stuff, no matter what side of the fence their on, I don't mind asking, let's just say I like to sort the WIKI wonders from those who actually understand general science even. There's loads of waffle getting thrown about by folks that don't know and organ from an organelle.

    And to be fair, it's not your personal life, it's your profession, as to the nature of my enquiry but ok, I understand, no worries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    The numbers add up alright. The majority of those deaths are from April/May when we didn't have the 55+ age groups fully covered.

    What we have now are a thankfully very small number of deaths, even with 1500/1800 cases a day. The vaccines work better than we could have hoped. Unfortunately we have a government that doesn't work and needed a little breakeen instead of issuing guidance for the summer recess.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,035 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Fair enough .

    I did not get the impression you wanted to discuss anything and were being derogatory about 'education' etc .

    ICU nurse . Dublin .

    But not for much longer if I have anything to do with it , after the last 18months .

    I only discuss what I can without revealing where I work or without breaking confidentiality of any of my patients, or colleagues .

    Just because I disagree with you or Fintan, now and again does not make my posts illogical , btw .

    We are all entitled to our opinions , but not to ridicule others or attack them for theirs .

    I think all of us have been guilty of this at times when discourse gets heated , but having the grace to apologise and accept that others have different opinions is important, at least has been on this thread if not others .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Similarly I'm dubious about the uproar over the news during the week about the low levels of fully vaccinated amongst the Rotunda's patients.

    Surely a lot of expectant mothers/parents are younger than 35, so many would only just be fully vaccinated around now. Yet it was being played out in the media as vaccine hesitancy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭irishguy1983


    Anyone got any predictions for easing of restrictions in September? Say the first week? Anything meaningful? Not hearing much in the media yet it appear 85% or more will be full vaccinated by then.....I appreciate nobody has a clue for September but no harm in guessing....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭irishguy1983


    Also when they say ‘adults’ I presume that means anyone 18 and above?? Like what about 78% of people over the age of 18 currently vaccinated?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,632 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    By the end of August they will have "a plan" - so by end of September there might be a 1000 limit at sports events, and the dancing ban will be downgraded to permit line dancing (with a mask)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,579 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    "Adults" in the context of vaccines is 16 and above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,732 ✭✭✭DebDynamite


    If I recall correctly, Bodhrandude is a musician, so has absolutely been affected by the restrictions, don’t don’t let that stop you. I think he might even be living in Galway, so maybe what he saw in Galway in April annoyed him as he felt it would just increase numbers so we’d be in a even longer lockdown. Give him a break, fgs. The manner in which some posters have gone after him is frankly bizarre.

    People are entitled to change their mindset in this ever changing situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 620 ✭✭✭aidoh


    Given the confusion between laws, guidelines and advice, I decided to read up on the actual laws that are still in place under the Health (Amendment) Act 2020.

    It turns out that the frontline heroes in An Garda Síochána are still legally permitted to enter your home so long as they say that they suspect that you're having a 'social gathering' containing people from more than 2 households (sCiEnCe) and either issue hefty fines or arrest people, or both.

    I trust that the majority of gards wouldn't be caught dead implementing such extreme and over-the-top measures. However, is it not utterly fvcked up that they very easily could if they wanted to? As in, the additional powers granted to gards are still in place, including "arrest without warrant".

    When do these emergency powers expire?

    Slippery slope, innit? For example (and I'm no fan of the man) remember when the gards arrested Paul Murphy in what looked like a political move to decapitate the water charges protests? Well now they've got even more legal backing to act similarly and get away with whatever they like, whenever they like, say, in the event that you have unacceptable political opinions, or if you have several mourners visit your house for soup and sandwiches after the funeral of a loved one for example.


    But hey, If It SaVeS jUsT oNe LiFe....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,409 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    There could be trouble with this new roadmap especially with NPHET recommending some ludicrous stuff and the government untimely rejecting it

    Will members go on twitter and complain?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,632 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Problem is most people support these measures (or at least they did at the time) - all you have to do is give people a scapegoat to direct their ire towards, and they will give you ultimate power.. in the name of "protection".

    "Who cares if the guards are raiding peoples houses without probable cause or a warrant, sure they might be gathering illegally and spreading covid!"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,284 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is it wrong to ask that randomly using upper and lower case letters in a pathetic attempt at mockery be an immediate banable offence, irrespective of the individuals opinion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    What ludicrous stuff has been recommended to come at the end of the month ? You've a habit of jumping the gun well before anything is discussed or announced.

    The last press conference they had was actually very optimistic and a drastic change of tone, more than once it was mentioned about removing restrictions and advice to government on how to move on from this now.

    Do people actually listen to what's said or just complain without listening ? There's been some god awful press conferences that have been car crashes but multiple times it was referenced advice to government on how to move on from this, that's what looks like will be coming shortly, yet here you predict trouble, magic 8 ball ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Gardaí still can't enter a private residence without a warrant for a house party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Did you read the original act and that was it or any of the amendments that followed ?

    1) Gardai can't enter your home without warrant. They can talk to you at the door as much as they want and issue fines etc at the door but unless you invite them in they can't enter because of a house party

    2) Arrest without warrant isn't a covid rule. "You may be arrested without a warrant when a Garda, with reasonable cause, suspects that an arrestable offence has been committed and that you are guilty of the offence (Section 4 of the Criminal Law Act 1997)"

    3) The definition of social gatherings is now updated https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/7894b-post-cabinet-statement-resilience-and-recovery-the-path-ahead/#family-and-social-gatherings

    4) The SI lapses in November and can be extended for a maximum of one 3 month period from that date.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 620 ✭✭✭aidoh


    Perhaps you should suggest that in the "Trivial things that annoy you" thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 620 ✭✭✭aidoh


    I possibly read out-dated SIs. Whichever were linked from citizens information website.

    Thanks for the additional links, I'm relieved by your confidence and I'll give them a read and see if my interpretation is similar.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,409 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    It was reveled that they wanted to stay at 25 for weddings and from looking at that it would not inspire confidence they would recommend anything major



Advertisement