Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

13723733753773781580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Usually arrives the next morning, it could be two days though.

    It's not valid for a week though, it'll come up invalid when it's scanned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    We may have some data on flu cases in hospital(GP's?) but we don't have mass testing using a divisively sensitive test with the numbers being announced in every news bulletin.

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    The difference is flu' is controllable. We are still learning about this and what effect it may have. For now we need to mass test. Once we've completed vaccinations should be far less need for it but the data will still be recorded. Where's the divisiveness on the test? YouTube or Facebook?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    If the public health service was bad pre-covid what's it going to be like going forward

    Waiting lists are off the charts

    I reckon the only option is private or do without



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    COIVD has had adverse effects on lots of people. Part of it is the health warning and wall to wall coverage but another part is being unable to detach yourself from the bad news. A further element is the number of experts we hear from and how easy it is to be drawn into one cult or another. I read something recently, can't remember where, which suggested that people can come out of this type of mode quite quickly once the danger has subsided.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Is it though? I mean, a bad flu session will rip through nursing homes and hospitals and there's very little we can do about it.

    I'd say flu is accepted rather than controllable.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    We know what groups are most at risk and vaccines generally take care of most people. Most cases are not serious. There is still a lot we don't know about this virus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,934 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    It's accepted and capacity in our health system is just about built in gor it.

    Problem with covid for most health services, which are usually pretty close to breaking point is its additional and not currently factored into their bau. It'll be a while before it is imo and that's when it'll be out of sight out of mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Again though, the trolley crisis every winter for the past decade or more would indicate this not to be the case. Yet, we still accept flu illnesses and deaths every year.

    One thing this pandemic has shown is the differing outcomes between countries that invest and run their health systems properly versus those that do the bare minimum and hope for the best.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Influenza is considerably less transmissible than covid. A single winter of people engaging in basic preventative measures completely eliminated it.

    It will come back because it has reservoirs in animal populations. But if the 'flu was as transmissible as Covid, you can bet your ass we'd be freaking out about the old people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,990 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Wait . I thought we got rid of Flu ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭RugbyLad11


    This is for the rapid tests which they have all over Germany (literally on street corners).

    We never even had these in the first place so I don't know how we are supposed to charge people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    'flu will come back, it's unavoidable. There's a boogeyman story going around that because nobody has had 'flu there will be a big dangerous surge of it as immune systems aren't primed for its latest mutation(s).

    I don't buy it though; if nobody has had 'flu then it's had little opportunity to mutate in any serious way, so it won't be a whole lot different from how it was in 2019/2020.

    This winter is unlikely to be a serious one, flu-wise. It still hasn't had a lot of time to seed and build in populations. 2022 will probably be the bad 'flu year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    That's not what was being discussed though. We know who is more vulnerable from COVID, we have vaccines (amazing ones at that), yet it seems to be treated like some standalone disease that we know nothing about. Therapeutics will no doubt improve as time goes by and vaccines will be tweeked to make them even better.

    It is more transmissible and has hit the older population hard, thankfully it has a negligible effect on young children which is about the only good thing you can say about this virus.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,934 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Unfortunately Seamus, we have zero idea whether this will be a good or bad flu session. The indications would suggest it may not be an issue as we will have masks, SD, limited capacity, WFH, and a raft of measures in place over this winter but who knows.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Would you mind explaining bau please? I have no idea what that stands for.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,934 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    @Jamie2k9@JRant wrote:

    That's not what was being discussed though.

    Well it is. You're basically saying that there's little difference now between 'flu and covid because we have a good handle on it and vaccines that are effective.

    But there remains a considerable difference in transmissibility. Which is why we can't just apply exactly the same "we got this" approach that we do with the 'flu. We will eventually, but this is still a moving target.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,478 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Yes. However, flu is a seasonal thing, typically only affecting 3 months of the year. The crowds in Croke Park for the All Ireland or Electric Picnic have little or no relavance to the transmission of flu. In the absence of a novel flu virus flu is much more manageable than Covid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,934 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    No, that's not what I said at all. I was very clear about what I was referring to. We know the groups most at risk and we have vaccines (which indicates a fairly good understand of the virus IMO).

    We do have this though. That's not to say that hospital's and nursing homes shouldn't have measures in place but we are reaching the point where the need for such strict restrictions on the general public are not required.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    @JRant wrote:

    we are reaching the point where the need for such strict restrictions on the general public are not required.

    We are. But we're not there yet. By mid-September we'll be effectively topping out on our vaccination rates and left with little options except to lift restrictions.

    It'd be nice to have some kind of indicative plan, being 4 weeks out, but you know, holidays and stuff. Turkeys don't vote for Xmas and politicians don't cancel their recess.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In one group of young people I know all caught covid, they have multiple friend groups and covid is rampant in those groups too.

    Most caught it in Spain and Portugal but hundreds of leaving cert students booked accomodation and holidayed together here so many would have caught covid here too.

    If you have had covid recently can you get the covid cert with one jab.

    Some of the young people have had covid barely a month ago and they are taking the pfizer to get into pubs, they will take a second jab and even a third or fourth jab as they are so sick of covid but surely if you have recovered you shouldnt be taking any vaccine at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I think we are saying the same thing so, just in different ways. We should be within sight of the finishing line. As you say though, with it being holiday season for our politicians we can't expect them to be given plans highlighting this. I can say with a huge degree of certainty that if MM had of announced his plan at the beginning of August the general mode of the population would be in a much better place and allow people the chance to mentally prepared for our reopening.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,906 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You can get the recovery version of the COVID cert with no jabs, but it expires 6 months from your test.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    @seamus wrote:

    "We are. But we're not there yet. By mid-September we'll be effectively topping out on our vaccination rates and left with little options except to lift restrictions."

    There is an alternative possibility however that, come mid-September, we'll simply carry on being concerned about rising cases, new variants arising in various parts of the world and continue with social distancing, restrictions of one sort or another indefinitely.

    At least there is a rough timescale (mid-September) here after which we can know something's wrong with the way we're thinking about the virus.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Oh make no mistake, the media will continue milking variants and clusters globally for all they're worth. Stories about mysterious illnesses in other parts of the world have been news staples for centuries, and this is just another slant on that same theme.

    Come January 2023 there'll still be a new story about a new "variant of concern" that's emerged in a remote village in Siberia.

    There's a good chance that distancing and masks may remain advisory for quite a while for people with symptoms of any illness. But it'll be just that; advisory.

    Once the statutory powers have expired, it's gone. There will likely be a weird gap of time where there's no obligation to do anything, but businesses will remain confused and will continue having mask/vaccine/distancing policies because Failte advise them to, or because they believe their insurance requires it. It'll all come apart pretty quickly though once a few businesses start packing people in again and their neighbours realise they can too.



Advertisement