Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Formula 1 2021 - General Discussion Thread (Read 1st post rules)

19091939596143

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭barryribs


    He must be some driver to be able to judge the outcome of an accident before it even happened, especially at the speeds they were going. Like someone else said, everyone else is playing checkers and Lewis must be playing 7d chess.

    Christian Horner said in Spain "Thankfully Lewis had got out of it because otherwise he would have ended up in the fence.” This time Lewis didn't get out of it and this is the result. At some point in every driver's career they come up against someone who isn't going to just move over for them. Max has been on the other end of this for a long time. Max himself has said that he wasn't aggressively defending as he didn't squeeze him in the wall - Max's definition of too aggressive is putting someone in the wall along the straight.

    As for compliant Bottas, imagine if he dropped points himself, just to take a solitary point of Max. Imagine how petty and compliant he would be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭barryribs


    He must be some driver to be able to judge the outcome of an accident before it even happened, especially at the speeds they were going. Like someone else said, everyone else is playing checkers and Lewis must be playing 7d chess.

    Christian Horner said in Spain "Thankfully Lewis had got out of it because otherwise he would have ended up in the fence.” This time Lewis didn't get out of it and this is the result. At some point in every driver's career they come up against someone who isn't going to just move over for them. Max has been on the other end of this for a long time. Max himself has said that he wasn't aggressively defending as he didn't squeeze him in the wall - Max's definition of too aggressive is putting someone in the wall along the straight.

    As for compliant Bottas, imagine if he dropped points himself, just to take a solitary point of Max. Imagine how petty and compliant he would be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,686 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Completely agree. It would also complicate the process of applying penalties during the race as the consequence of being penalised would be that the other party would be absolved and would be eligible for an engine change.

    So what might the solutions be? Maybe both parties are penalised to reflect the 60:40 nature of the crash and neither is eligible for an engine change. Or maybe they would be more reluctant to impose penalties as they will probably be challenged in court for weeks following every event. And what happens when a championship contender crashes with a customer of their championship rival? So AM, Williams and Mercedes challenge any crash with a red bull, but don't challenge any crash with another Mercedes.

    Just leave the rules as they are. Maybe some people would like the soap opera Court battles running in parallel to the racing for weeks on end, but I would just prefer the racing to be finished at the checkered flag



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,076 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭barryribs


    The appeal has been rejected. The argument was; "Red Bull used the Leclerc pass to argue Hamilton would have made contact in that move too - if he had been on the same line at the same speed as he was in the Verstappen incident." Laughable



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,323 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Hamilton will be unfazed by this you'd imagine, what will be interesting is to see is Verstappen reasonse to it as this will be his first set back in a championship challenge of his career.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,323 ✭✭✭✭klose



    Spicy stuff here, imagine the scenes if something else happens this weekend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,887 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Well, that was completely pointless.

    Makes for a fascinating weekend, though!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭Indestructable


    I hope the Red Bull car and Max haven't lost any speed. I'd imagine because of the accident last time out that they're on the back foot this weekend. Should be fascinating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Money on Hamilton sticking another tire down the inside to get Max to back out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,686 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'm happy with the decision. Penalties should be applied on the day and that should be an end to it. It would have been a terrible precedent if the appeal was taken seriously. Every decision would have been appealed.


    Red bull look petty and insecure over this incident. They were everyone's best hope for a championship battle and they wer unlucky in Silverstone. But they have spaffed a lot of that goodwill up the wall with all this childish nonsense.

    They need to move on and focus on beating Mercedes on track this weekend. End of story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,701 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    I don' think Verstappen was banking on anything at all happening. is quote in the lead up to the weekend would suggest so as well.

    Hardly a set back at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,076 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Side question, is there a new technique to embedding tweets? You used to just post the url and boards did the rest.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Well given that the "evidence" was pretty weak I don't think RB were serious about any of it and were just playing games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    i think the precedence now is worse.

    now it is that you can make a crazy overtake atempt , be nowhere near the racing line, colide with your oponent . clip them and spin them off the track with little to no consequence.


    what happens next time that happens. now the same has to happen. the die is cast. its going to lead to divers being more wreckless and more crashes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,701 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    This was our posturing by RB, they knew they wouldn't get anything changed. But it does now send a message that these kinds of accidents can be escaped with a wrap on the knuckles over a massive penalty.

    We will have drivers now positioning their overtakes just like that.

    Part of it is clever by RB, part of it is very dumb.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,686 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    What? You mean "let them race"? The mantra we hear repeated ad nauseum under normal circumstances when Hamilton isn't involved in the crash or hasn't benefited form the crash?

    Oh lads, it wasn't a terrible breech of the rules (thats the thing the penalties are given out for).

    Maybe it's time to just get over it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,686 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I agree that it's just posturing to influence future decisions. Anyone follow the Lions in South Africa will recognise the SA director of Rugby doing exactly same thing today.


    Should the change the way the give out penalties to match the consequence of the infringement and not the actual infringement itself? Or maybe they should match the penalty to the driver and car combination because penalties affect different drivers differently. Hamilton can make up a 10 second penalty in his Mercedes but a 10s penalty has a much bigger consequence for a driver in a lesser car in the midfield. And how do tou penalised a driver like Mazepin who is all alone at the back of the grid anyways? So how should the hand out penalties?

    I think they should just keep it the way it is now. No rules are perfect



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,814 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Don't think so, Hamilton tends to fold under pressure. Red Bull are right to notch it up a few decimals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    im all for letting them race. but it has to be inside the rules. your not doing your job if your not on the edge though

    hamilton was well outside the rules. . he could not make the corner without hitting max.

    i think the penalty was very light compared to other penalties. if lewis was breaking late and locked up the penalty would be far but he was no where near makeing a pass . it was a dangerous moove that was probably going to take out the driver in front. which it did



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,308 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    The battle for fifth in the Constructors Championship is tight. Alpine are on 40 points, Aston Martin are on 48 points and Alpha Tauri are on 49 points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,788 ✭✭✭dloob


    Well outside the rules? What's in your rule book always give way to Verstappen?

    No one can prove that Hamilton couldn't make that corner, especially not using an old Red Bull on hard tires with an ex F1 driver.

    If the same accident had occurred between two cars lower down the grid, if there was any penalty at all, it would have been 5 seconds at most.

    I do think it's both sad and hilarious that Red Bull delayed Albon going to DTM for a filming day in an old Red Bull driving Hamiltion's line through the corner and then tried to submit that as evidence.

    We'll see what happens this weekend now after their smack from the stewards for throwing around allegations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,686 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That's pretty much what exact what happened. He went into the corner too steep and understeered into Max. He was given a penalty which reflected that mistake.

    If now isn't the time to get over it, when do you think that time will be?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    the rule book is prity clear that you dont drive into your oponent.

    what do you mean that it cannot be proven. its a fact. that is what happened. he didnt make the corner because he hit max. if he could have made it then he would have.

    if max had done that to lewis i would say the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,788 ✭✭✭dloob


    Max could have backed out or not turned in so hard.

    I remember a certain team principle also suggesting that in the same position with Stroll his driver should be considered up the inside and the other driver should back out.

    It's hardly "well outside" the rules every time two cars touch.


    Anyway I think Lewis and Merc have moved on, Red Bull meanwhile is filing appeals and running private test days to create new evidence.

    Seems like Merc are living rent free in the Red Bull team managements heads at least, Max himself may be smarter than that.

    Either way we'll be hearing a lot more about it this weekend thanks to Red Bull.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,887 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Mercedes are the same, they’re the first team to run to the FIA to complain if they think a competitor is outside the rules.

    I’m sure RB knew the stewards wouldn’t entertain the “findings”, that whole video thing was to stop Hamilton from leaving a wheel in in a similar situation in future.

    Its a shame it has to be this way, RB have done a stellar job at taking the fight to Mercedes this season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    Hamilton proved it himself by understeering into the back of Max his car. He could not have made that turn in the position he was



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    The appeal was laughable anyway. Hopefully both teams can put away the handbags now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    max doesnt need to back out. he is ahead. its his corner. he has every right to take the racing line.

    but he does open the steering to give lewis more room but lewis is far to agresive and plows into him

    im not saying every crash is well out side the rules. but this one is. most crashs are a slight slip up and go outside the rules a little.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,076 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    This debate has done more laps then the actual Grand Prix.

    Without a Black Flag the stewards had as much power to prevent Lewis winning the Grand Prix as a referee has to prevent a 10 man team winning a match after sending a player off for a bone breaking tackle.

    This too shall pass.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement