Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Formula 1 2021 - General Discussion Thread (Read 1st post rules)

18990929495143

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Bottas is one of the slowest drivers on the grid? And you would be surprised of Mercedes replaces that slow driver? Are you serious or just saying it for the sake of discussion.

    As a matter of interest, since bottas is roughly matching Perez this year, where do you rate perez? Would you rate him similarly as one of the slowest drivers on the grid?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    The criticism of hamilton has become parodic. If he lends support to a cause, its virtue signalling. If he sets up an organisation to advance the cause, its virtue signalling. If he donates a huge chunk of money to advance the cause (literally putting his money where his mouth is), its virtue signalling.

    I don't like the guy with the shite he talks about racing, but I can't fault his activism or his driving ability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 489 ✭✭BikeRacer


    The irony of you giving out about a poster shoehorning hate of any driver when you continuously post your regurgitated anti-Hamilton drivel is beyond hilarious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    How many programs were set up and money put forward by Lewis and Merc to be inclusive, promote diversity and encourage minorities before?

    Out of interest.

    The only thing I can find about "mission 44" before 11 hours ago were to do with levels in computer games.

    I donate to various charities via contributions through work, might stick an announcement in the local paper.


    Seems now that its the "in" thing they need to jump on it and broadcast it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Well this was the first steps


    https://www.hamiltoncommission.org/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Cool, was that before his BLM stunt?

    Out of more interest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    It was hardly a stunt, and yes it predates it. Careful now, your mask is slipping



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Autosport: Has Formula 1 ever increased a penalty after an appeal?.

    Autosport article on previous penalty appeals and how they worked out. There is precedent for having a penalty overturned but no penalty for having a penalty increased by another team.

    It's not clear what RB is playing at, probably just making fuss to pit pressure on to gibe Hamilton a harsher penalty if the opportunity arises



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Had a quick Google there, the "hammilton commission" wasn't setup before he started pontificating about George Floyd.

    On my part, I'll end the Hamilton back and forth there.

    I'm not sure what you are referring to with regards a mask slipping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Has there ever even been retrospective action on anything regarding penalties in F1?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    And rightly so.... Hamilton's actions by knocking Albon of the track twice cost them a podium and an almost certain victory, and maybe even cost him his career in F1....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 50 ✭✭Tr_18


    I've just booked tickets to Spa at the end of August. Admittedly Gen DTS and it'll be my first F1 experience. We have tickets for Gold 2 on Sunday so here's hoping we get a good view out of the hairpin and up over the hill.

    Can anyone recommend a good town to stay in for the night? As we're so late booking, Maastricht looks like a good bet with shuttle buses available but open to recommendations.

    Also, any tips for visiting the track would be appreciated!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Well, the article linked shows the times that happened. Some penalties were overturned on appeal by the penalised party. Irvine had his penalty increased when he appealed it himself.

    Never has someone appealed to have a penalty increased on a third party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 50 ✭✭Tr_18


    We just have the ticket for race day but the more I read up on the circuit the more I'm inclined to spend the extra €100 for a weekend pass. Is it feasible to walk around the track in the morning and then move p to the stand for the F1 at 2pm?



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I went to Spa a while back, camped just outside Les Combes. Amazing weekend. Mates walked the entire track on the Saturday, took them a while :D It's been long enough since I was there that I don't know if it'd be the same but back then there were lorry containers in the campsites used as stages with lasers and smoke machines, people set up massive marquees with space for 50 or 60 people, great craic altogether.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    It will be a miracle if it hasn't been somehow damaged after a 51G crash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    They must be doing the sums and gambling that a 10 place grid penalty for replacing the engine, at a track which is difficult to overtake like Hungary, would hand Hamilton an even bigger advantage. But an engine failure in the race would be a nightmare.

    So they can run the engine and decide whether to replace it and take the penalty, or just gamble that it will last the weekend and replace it in Belgium.

    Aren't they allowed a certain amount of leeway to replace broken parts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,940 ✭✭✭✭skipper_G


    They have a pool of usable components and they're free to use those as they see fit. They will only take a penalty if they need to add a new component to the pool. That will come into play later in the season and won't impact them at Hungary



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    They still have a spare engine they can use, don’t they?

    Huge pressure though using their last one this early in the season.

    It all goes back to the unfairness of the original incident - anyone would take a ten second penalty for taking their main rival out of the race and potentially hampering their season. Whatever about the DNF in Silverstone, it seems mad that there wouldn’t be exceptions for an incident that wrecked one of your engines that you weren’t determined to be most at fault for-from the sports perspective it could ruin the championship.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    If an engine has to be parked due to an accident you didn't cause, an additional replacement should certainly be allowed to be run over the season without penalty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah but then what if its a 50:50 accident? or what if it's a 60:40 accident and the one who is 60% in the wrong crashes out and the other driver carries on? Your idea sounds good but it would lead to further consequences down the line in terms of legal wrangling over who was at fault, legal challenges to penalties and, naturally, teams would use any crash as an excuse to get a new engine.

    Fact is that sometimes bad things happen, bad luck strikes and sometimes bad luck even doubles up. That's all that happened in this case as max was not the most guilty party AND he was taken out of the race AND his title rival got an appropriate, but relatively lenient, penalty AND went on to win the race AND the crash might impact his engine allocation which might cause a 10 place penalty later in the year for a new engine.


    This event is just unlucky and it might rob us of a close title fight which is really disappointing, but ultimately it's just bad luck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I assume the spirit of the rule is to keep teams within a certain budget so that larger teams can’t be constantly fixing/replacing parts on the engine?

    Crashes shouldn’t be immediately included in that, I think-depending on the stewards findings on the incident, there should absolutely be leeway in repairs. You can’t say on one hand we want close, hard racing but on the other if you are involved in a crash in any circumstance you could destroy your season.

    The stewards were correct in the penalty applied to Hamilton because it’s right they just look at the incident in isolation, but any decision made off track should be including the wider context of the championship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    Needing to sacrifice practice time to check the engine, and then if it doesn't pass they'll be lining themselves up for a bigger penalty for an engine change than the penalty for taking them out was. Although worse case scenario is that they think it's ok and it fails in the race, costing them another 25 points (and still needing to be followed with a grid penalty later in the season for using too many power units)

    The rewards for dirty driving never seem to end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    The thing is that all of your ANDs were entirely predictable. Going into the corner at the angle Lewis chose to was guaranteed to take Max out of the race and cause a big crash. Mercedes told Lewis to stay out because they knew an impact that size was guaranteed to cause a red flag and they'd get a free repair. With Max out of the race, Perez at the back of the grid, Bottas playing a compliant teammate, and no other team having anything like the performance of the Merc, Hamilton was pretty much guaranteed victory with a tiny ten second penalty. And with the size of the crash he caused, the headaches Red Bull now face for the rest of the season regarding budget cap and power unit allocation were also guaranteed.

    The only thing that wasn't guaranteed was that Max Verstappen would come out alive and without life changing injuries, which is one thing we can be thankful for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,213 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    Now that's telling the Apartheid-era South African GPs to hold your bee-I mean, rose water.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    It doesn't quite work that way - they're free to run a third engine at Hungary no problem and without penalty, but they can only run three engines in the entire season and there are a lot of races to go. Red Bull's best hope now is probably covid cancelling a bunch of late-season races.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah, I think you've been reading too many tabloids and their comment sections. Over the top reaction to a racing incident that was dealt with by applying an appropriate penalty during the race and unfortunately has big repercussions for the championship.

    It's unfortunate but it wasn't all predictable before the event. Are you suggesting Hamilton intended to achieve the outcome that you outline above as "entirely predictable"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Cars that get taken out like that and receive damage should be allowed to replace engines etc if they weren't at fault in the crash that caused the damage. If the crash was their fault according to the stewards or it's 50:50 then that's tough. Amazing how this sport hamstrings itself so much with so many ridiculous rules.



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    But you can't just say if there's a 50/50 element that it's 'tough'. As highlighted already, there would be legal challenges and there would be weeks if not months spent on this and it's get tiresome and boring very quickly because teams would be looking to get extra engines.

    It sounds like a great idea in theory but legally it would be a nightmare for operations. Teams and operators would spend weeks in legal paperwork for a spare engine. I understand people are pissed off but we wouldn't be having any of these discussions if what happened to Max happened to anybody else.

    If anything, introducing a rule like this would hamstring the sport. It opens so many cans of worms that the only solutions are that either every driver that crashes gets a spare engine (fault or not fault) or none of them do. If you open up any kind of grey area it is a recipe for disaster, like we have seen many times in F1 as it is.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement