Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dublin Marathon 2021

1235717

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭geodesic


    Consonata wrote: »
    I don't have a 2021 entry currently, so I'm guessing there is little chance of me getting a hold of one out of refunds?

    Similar question asked on twitter ... https://twitter.com/dublinmarathon/status/1389917140044636164


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,923 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    FinnC wrote: »
    I can see another lottery alright between those that have an entry since last year. Anyone then that had an entry and doesn’t get selected will be able carry over until 2022 for guaranteed entry. It would be disappointing not to be selected but most reasonable people would understand I’m sure.
    Wouldn’t be surprised to see a change of route also.

    If they are considering this, would be good if they could offer the option of a deferral to 2022 first, and then if enough don't take them up on it they can thin out the crowd via a lottery.

    I'd prefer not to run it this year and wait until next year. However, if the only options I have are run it in 2021 or take a refund, then I'll run it this year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 222 ✭✭franciscanpunk


    If it a cost issue with running it with lower numbers i think they should just offer people the option of refund, defer until 2022 or pay extra to enter a lottery for a place in reduced 2021 event. if you dont get a place in the lotto, then you are back to the refund or defer option.


    If Belfast goes ahead it surely will too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,237 ✭✭✭✭event


    If they go ahead with it I'd hope a few things:

    If its reduced capacity, anyone with an entry from 2020 who doesn't get in to this one gets in to 2022.

    Anyone who is offered a place can defer themselves to 2022.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭kilns


    As an Irish person living abroad but with an entry, despite me coming back to Ireland in July for month I would be happy to accept a deferral until 2022 and for this October I would look closer to home (Paris or Frankfurt) for another option.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭sk8board


    How much of a tourist marathon is Dublin usually? 20%?
    As the marathon is a weekend city street entertainment event, the business case is also based on inbound tourist runners staying for 2-3 nights, and maybe taking their family or partners for support.
    It’s a big event for the city economy.

    If they wanted the marathon to run just for continuity reasons and have a winner, they’ll do an elite only marathon.
    A reduced size of domestic only runners would need to be heavily subsidised - and justified.
    Playing devils advocate - The covid recommendations will say that runners can run any day, all lockdown, where so many other sports couldn’t - they just can’t race.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭PCX


    sk8board wrote: »
    How much of a tourist marathon is Dublin usually? 20%?
    As the marathon is a weekend city street entertainment event, the business case is also based on inbound tourist runners staying for 2-3 nights, and maybe taking their family or partners for support.
    It’s a big event for the city economy.

    If they wanted the marathon to run just for continuity reasons and have a winner, they’ll do an elite only marathon.
    A reduced size of domestic only runners would need to be heavily subsidised - and justified.
    Playing devils advocate - The covid recommendations will say that runners can run any day, all lockdown, where so many other sports couldn’t - they just can’t race.

    We have to start getting back to normal some time even if we have to be cautious.

    Dublins economy will benefit from domestic travel to the marathon too. I'm sure many Irish runners from outside of the pale book hotels and bring family along for support. They also shop and eat meals in restaurants. Given many people will not have a foreign holiday that is even more likely to be the case this year.

    A fairly big portion of the domestic marathon runners would be raising money for charity. Cancelling the event or having it as elite only will eat into important revenue streams for charities across Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭sk8board


    PCX wrote: »
    We have to start getting back to normal some time even if we have to be cautious.

    Dublins economy will benefit from domestic travel to the marathon too. I'm sure many Irish runners from outside of the pale book hotels and bring family along for support. They also shop and eat meals in restaurants. Given many people will not have a foreign holiday that is even more likely to be the case this year.

    A fairly big portion of the domestic marathon runners would be raising money for charity. Cancelling the event or having it as elite only will eat into important revenue streams for charities across Ireland.

    Very good point about the charities. Again though, it reinforces the point that the marathon is actually far more than just the needs of 18k runners.
    In many ways, it’s an ideal large outdoor test event for reopening. We’re years away from a full house at a concert in the Point otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    sk8board wrote: »
    Very good point about the charities. Again though, it reinforces the point that the marathon is actually far more than just the needs of 18k runners.
    In many ways, it’s an ideal large outdoor test event for reopening. We’re years away from a full house at a concert in the Point otherwise.

    Govt are talking about 12-15000 at Croker or Aviva by July. if that's the case then marathon goes ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭inthehole1


    What is the story with anyone that had applied for
    the gfa entry last year,will there be a way to get an entry
    this way if the marathon goes ahead


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45 seant5215


    inthehole1 wrote: »
    What is the story with anyone that had applied for
    the gfa entry last year,will there be a way to get an entry
    this way if the marathon goes ahead

    Organisers replied to a similar question on FB and stated that all who applied for the 2020 GFA will get a entry if it goes ahead.
    Fingers crossed :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭kilns


    Considering New York have announced a 60% capacity for their marathon this year, where does that leave Dublin, considering Ireland has one of the most conservative governments when it comes to Covid in the world.

    I would suspect a marathon with 5000-7000 runners confined to laps of the Phoenix park


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 801 ✭✭✭SeeMoreBut


    kilns wrote: »
    Considering New York have announced a 60% capacity for their marathon this year, where does that leave Dublin, considering Ireland has one of the most conservative governments when it comes to Covid in the world.

    I would suspect a marathon with 5000-7000 runners confined to laps of the Phoenix park

    How do you run it in the park. Leaders coming through a group of people. I doubt they want to do that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 866 ✭✭✭jams100


    kilns wrote: »
    Considering New York have announced a 60% capacity for their marathon this year, where does that leave Dublin, considering Ireland has one of the most conservative governments when it comes to Covid in the world.

    I would suspect a marathon with 5000-7000 runners confined to laps of the Phoenix park

    New York was one of the hardest parts on the US and they've been very conservative since (like ourselves).

    We'll just have to wait and see what happens, personally I don't see why it couldn't go ahead (Being outdoors / high vaccination rate etc.) barring a new varient that doesn't work on current vaccines.

    I wouldn't be too bothered if they said no to the international racers this year either as they would be higher risk of bringing in a varient if there was to be one floating around come September/October

    Edit: There are still 33k taking part in New York marathon, which isn't a small number (60% of their 2019 capacity)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭rovers_runner


    The fact there will be around 30,000 taking part in the litigation capital of the world is a good enough sign for me.

    I'd imagine insurance and federal approval was a job to get across the line but fair play to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,884 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    kilns wrote: »
    Considering New York have announced a 60% capacity for their marathon this year, where does that leave Dublin, considering Ireland has one of the most conservative governments when it comes to Covid in the world.

    I would suspect a marathon with 5000-7000 runners confined to laps of the Phoenix park




    I think its down to more insurance costs than anything else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,884 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Govt are talking about 12-15000 at Croker or Aviva by July. if that's the case then marathon goes ahead.


    Won't be the government that is blocking it. UK is having major issues getting races going ahead, all due to insurance cost or lack of cover. Same will apply here


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,574 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    I honestly can't see it happening and would be very surprised if it does happen at all, I expect it to be a repeat of last year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45 sgal


    I don’t know much about the difficulty of insurance bar anecdotal evidence etc but if the government are considering 30k at the all Ireland in august then a large participation event like the marathon in late October must be a feasible option (insurance difficulties notwithstanding)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭ariana`


    sgal wrote: »
    I don’t know much about the difficulty of insurance bar anecdotal evidence etc but if the government are considering 30k at the all Ireland in august then a large participation event like the marathon in late October must be a feasible option (insurance difficulties notwithstanding)

    Croke Park holds over 80k so I imagine the argument will be that 30k in Croker allows for 1 metre social distancing - close the Hill and use every 2nd seat or something along those lines. It'll be hard to apply social distancing to the marathon start area :(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    ariana` wrote: »
    Croke Park holds over 80k so I imagine the argument will be that 30k in Croker allows for 1 metre social distancing - close the Hill and use every 2nd seat or something along those lines. It'll be hard to apply social distancing to the marathon start area :(

    Its outdoor.
    Known rate of infection 0.1%
    By October = Minimum 85% of population vaccinated

    We are still getting roughly 475 cases a day. Yet hospitalizations and ICU numbers are falling.

    You don't need social distancing to be rigidly enforced. DCM2019 and I walked through the corral at the start with hardly anyone near me (9.30 group)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭ariana`


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Its outdoor.
    Known rate of infection 0.1%
    By October = Minimum 85% of population vaccinated

    We are still getting roughly 475 cases a day. Yet hospitalizations and ICU numbers are falling.

    You don't need social distancing to be rigidly enforced. DCM2019 and I walked through the corral at the start with hardly anyone near me (9.30 group)

    I hear ya 100% but I find it hard to see it happening. Hopefully I'll be proved wrong, I'd like nothing more than for it to go ahead. I don't have an entry but I have a hotel booked & I'm excited at the prospect of spectating so I'll be keeping everything crossed for it :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    ariana` wrote: »
    Croke Park holds over 80k so I imagine the argument will be that 30k in Croker allows for 1 metre social distancing - close the Hill and use every 2nd seat or something along those lines. It'll be hard to apply social distancing to the marathon start area :(

    I would argue 30,000 in a stadium is riskier than 20,000 doing a marathon if starting is staggered.

    Also the 30,000 is pencilled in for August, two months later things should be even better


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭ultrapercy


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    I would argue 30,000 in a stadium is riskier than 20,000 doing a marathon if starting is staggered.

    Also the 30,000 is pencilled in for August, two months later things should be even better

    the big stumbling block for any event is confidence for the organisers. A big outlay 6 months in advanced with the risk of further variants and another lockdown is probably too risky for an event thats struggling finiancially as it is. The expo is probably a no go so thats also a massive revenue stream gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 620 ✭✭✭FinnC


    Why would the expo be a no go when shopping centres all over the country are opened now?
    I was in Liffey Valley the other day and it was jam packed, can’t see any reason why an Expo couldn’t go ahead next October.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    200 waves of 100 people..... be grand!

    Not too hopeful of it going ahead personally. Have booked Manchester 3 weeks earlier, if Dublin goes ahead it'll be a bonus.

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    ultrapercy wrote: »
    the big stumbling block for any event is confidence for the organisers. A big outlay 6 months in advanced with the risk of further variants and another lockdown is probably too risky for an event thats struggling finiancially as it is. The expo is probably a no go so thats also a massive revenue stream gone.

    That could be said for anything. Why open book shops in case of another variant, or why open gyms etc.

    We are still averaging close on 500 cases a day yet the number of people in hospital and the number of people admitted to ICU keeps falling.

    Close on 300,000 vaccines last week by all accounts. In 5 weeks time when DCM have to make a decision, another 1,000,000+ vaccines will have been administered.

    By August, anyone who wants a vaccine will have the option.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭ultrapercy


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    That could be said for anything. Why open book shops in case of another variant, or why open gyms etc.

    We are still averaging close on 500 cases a day yet the number of people in hospital and the number of people admitted to ICU keeps falling.

    Close on 300,000 vaccines last week by all accounts. In 5 weeks time when DCM have to make a decision, another 1,000,000+ vaccines will have been administered.

    By August, anyone who wants a vaccine will have the option.

    I don't think the comparrison with shoos, gyms etc is valid. They must plan and invest now for something which may be upskittled in 6 months time. They would need a very high precentage gaurantee to take the risk and Im not sure thats there. We'll probably know more by the end of the week. I think it could go ahead safely but I understand why an organiser of any event may be reluctant to take the risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    ultrapercy wrote: »

    I don't think the comparrison with shoos, gyms etc is valid. They must plan and invest now for something which may be upskittled in 6 months time. They would need a very high precentage gaurantee to take the risk and Im not sure thats there. We'll probably know more by the end of the week. I think it could go ahead safely but I understand why an organiser of any event may be reluctant to take the risk.



    80-85% of population vaccinated by then.

    Flu season didn't prevent the marathon going ahead.

    Sure snow could come on the Friday and linger for a few weeks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    5000 at large outdoor venues from august.

    That's the marathon out the window


Advertisement