Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Vaccine Megathread - See OP for threadbans

1144145147149150331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Strazdas wrote: »
    They would have to cross that bridge when they come to it. Leaving perhaps hundreds of thousands of people in their fifties waiting until mid to late June (two months away) for a first dose of a vaccine seems no sort of a solution.

    And as I said, what would happen if there was a sudden problem with delivery of the J & J doses in June and they don't arrive?

    To use your own phrase you cross that bridge when it comes to it

    Using up all four vaccines on 50-69 year olds and having half of vaccines not recommended for 49 and under is no solution either

    After vulnerable and second doses no further Pfizer and Moderna should be used in 50+

    NIAC have made life very difficult for the HSE in fairness

    I only hope it won't cause us to miss the June targets and also cause an even more drawn-out easing of restrictions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Zipppy wrote: »
    I'm very high risk, in my 50s.
    two weeks ago had vaccination cancelled as apparently I couldn't get AZ cos it wasn't safe for my age group.
    Now it appears that today we'll be told it is in fact safe..with no further data utilised except 'ah sure it'll be grand'

    So 2 weeks on, no vaccine, no word, no sign of one....pathetic shambles...

    They have had an extra 2 weeks of observation of those who got the AZ vaccine. For those that did suffer side effects how quick was it? I k ow J&J was about a week or two so they likely wanted to collect the data from those that had the vaccine without making it worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Zipppy wrote: »
    I'm very high risk, in my 50s.
    two weeks ago had vaccination cancelled as apparently I couldn't get AZ cos it wasn't safe for my age group.
    Now it appears that today we'll be told it is in fact safe..with no further data utilised except 'ah sure it'll be grand'

    So 2 weeks on, no vaccine, no word, no sign of one....pathetic shambles...
    If you're in group 4 or 7 that shouldn't apply to you. Group 4 seem to be getting Pfizer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Theboinkmaster


    Yeah, thanks funnydoggy I'm just glad to be getting a vaccination, I don't care what it is.

    Then why did you say which vaccine you received or add smiley face...
    I'm getting Pfizer. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,285 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    The longer hospital beds and HSE resources are taken up with Covid patients, the more others who are waiting for treatments lose out.

    We need to end this thing ASAP and creating a vaccine hesitancy or the "I'm getting the worst vaccine so I am not taking it" mantra is the worst way to do it.

    Even if there was significant vaccine hesitancy (which AFAIK there isn't any evidence of) vaccine hesitancy is only an issue when we are not supply constrained, which won't be until the end of the summer.

    I'm not saying it's good, but it makes little difference for now, since the doses will just move from one person to another. Claiming otherwise is hyperbolic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Theboinkmaster


    VonLuck wrote: »
    Surely they must have been saying it tongue in cheek, right? I can't even picture a scenario where someone would belittle another based on the kind of vaccine they received!

    Welcome to Ireland....my mom got AZ last week and her brother told her he got his the week before.

    He said "i got the better one - the Pfizer"

    Hardly surprising TBH, there's a lot of that going around. You'd be very naïve to think otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭crossman47


    Welcome to Ireland....my mom got AZ last week and her brother told her he got his the week before.

    He said "i got the better one - the Pfizer"

    Hardly surprising TBH, there's a lot of that going around. You'd be very naïve to think otherwise.

    The brother is just displaying his ignorance so let him at it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,414 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    titan18 wrote: »
    It would seem very unfair if you were telling 60-69 just AZ for you and nothing else but allow 50-59 get Pfizer when they have the same vaccines available to them as 60-69.

    Should split the groups imo and once groups 4 and 7 are done (probably another 3-4 weeks anyway), move on to 40-49 then with them and have 50-69 as a separate group. It likely means a 59 year is getting a vaccine sooner than original plan and a 50 year old is waiting a bit longer but so be it.

    Otherwise you need to allow for Pfizer being given to all from 50-69 and we end up with unused vaccines in June and it takes us longer to get everyone vaccinated.

    I agree on the unfairness, but targeting 600k people with one solitary vaccine when four are available could become extremely problematic - especially as it's going to take a good while for that solitary vaccine to get going with deliveries (and any subsequent problems with delivery of that vaccine would immediately cause chaos).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86 ✭✭PixieValentine


    I’m so sorry if this is the wrong thread to ask this question, or if it’s been ages back in the thread, but I’ve sort of stopped reading along religiously with the covid threads and more been dipping in and out for the old mental health’s sake, so, it’s ok if I please ask, what does one do in the case of a family member who is around the age to be registering around now for the vaccine, but doesn’t want AZ?

    I want to stress- she’s not anti vaxx in the slightest. Just, unfortunately, very very nervous about AZ. (Mind you, with the latest news about the clotting problems, I worry she might feel the same nerves about J&J, sigh. We haven’t had that conversation yet though.) She knows this means waiting a while longer, with the whole back of the queue thing, and she’s actually ok with that. She doesn’t expect to just be sailing in there and getting to have it whenever she wants, she's fine with waiting longer. I’ve tried to talk to her about how for her age the risk is so different, she should really get whatever one she can as soon as she can, etc, etc, but haven’t had much luck there so far, and I don’t really know that I will have any, in changing her mind. So anyway, sorry for rambling, I guess my question is just, should I say to her still to register around now anyway, even if she might not end up getting vaccinated for a while? Is that how they're supposed to do it, just so she’s on a list with someone, somewhere, as someone who needs to get one at some stage? Or would she be better off waiting to register and not take any slot from someone who will go off and get vaccinated tomorrow with AZ if they can!

    I’m not sure how you’re supposed to handle that situation- my apologies again if this has been addressed loads of times already, or if it's an incredibly stupid question. I just don't want to be advising her to register if that's going to mess up any systems for anyone anywhere, but obviously, wouldn't like to think of her falling through any cracks by not being on any list at any stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭Zipppy


    is_that_so wrote: »
    If you're in group 4 or 7 that shouldn't apply to you. Group 4 seem to be getting Pfizer.

    That could change after todays announcement....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭Zipppy


    Welcome to Ireland....my mom got AZ last week and her brother told her he got his the week before.

    He said "i got the better one - the Pfizer"

    Hardly surprising TBH, there's a lot of that going around. You'd be very naïve to think otherwise.

    but it is better..and safer....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Strazdas wrote: »
    I agree on the unfairness, but targeting 600k people with one solitary vaccine when four are available could become extremely problematic - especially as it's going to take a good while for that solitary vaccine to get going with deliveries (and any subsequent problems with delivery of that vaccine would immediately cause chaos).

    It'd be two vaccines though, with AZ too. That should mean everyone in those age groups who doesn't want to wait for Pfizer likely had a vaccine by mid June imo is supply is decent (big if of course there). It'll take them longer to be fully vaccinated of course due to the AZ gap but it'll be a good start.

    Pfizer and Moderna (all 10 of them we've gotten) can be used on the other age groups and vulnerable groups.

    You likely have 40-49 year olds being vaccinated before people between 50-55 I'd say but by mid June, I'd imagine all of those groups will have one dose and we're starting on 30-39 then.

    If we go the other way, I reckon we delay the 30-39 and under groups by a week or so as we use Pfizer on 50-69.

    I'd rather delay one particular age group by a small bit over delaying the whole groups.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,414 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I’m so sorry if this is the wrong thread to ask this question, or if it’s been ages back in the thread, but I’ve sort of stopped reading along religiously with the covid threads and more been dipping in and out for the old mental health’s sake, so, it’s ok if I please ask, what does one do in the case of a family member who is around the age to be registering around now for the vaccine, but doesn’t want AZ?

    I want to stress- she’s not anti vaxx in the slightest. Just, unfortunately, very very nervous about AZ. (Mind you, with the latest news about the clotting problems, I worry she might feel the same nerves about J&J, sigh. We haven’t had that conversation yet though.) She knows this means waiting a while longer, with the whole back of the queue thing, and she’s actually ok with that. She doesn’t expect to just be sailing in there and getting to have it whenever she wants, she's fine with waiting longer. I’ve tried to talk to her about how for her age the risk is so different, she should really get whatever one she can as soon as she can, etc, etc, but haven’t had much luck there so far, and I don’t really know that I will have any, in changing her mind. So anyway, sorry for rambling, I guess my question is just, should I say to her still to register around now anyway, even if she might not end up getting vaccinated for a while? Is that how they're supposed to do it, just so she’s on a list with someone, somewhere, as someone who needs to get one at some stage? Or would she be better off waiting to register and not take any slot from someone who will go off and get vaccinated tomorrow with AZ if they can!

    I’m not sure how you’re supposed to handle that situation- my apologies again if this has been addressed loads of times already, or if it's an incredibly stupid question. I just don't want to be advising her to register if that's going to mess up any systems for anyone anywhere, but obviously, wouldn't like to think of her falling through any cracks by not being on any list at any stage.

    In theory, she should be able to register on the portal at any point this summer or even early autumn and get an appointment relatively quickly afterwards, so that in itself is not an issue (she may have had good reasons for not being able to register a couple of months earlier). But having said that, if they offered her an AZ at that point, she'd be in a spot of bother I guess and back to square one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Zipppy wrote: »
    That could change after todays announcement....
    Perhaps. It's about your level of risk and all I can go on are the Group 4 people I know and what they got.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 496 ✭✭Gile_na_gile


    I’m not sure how you’re supposed to handle that situation- my apologies again if this has been addressed loads of times already, or if it's an incredibly stupid question. I just don't want to be advising her to register if that's going to mess up any systems for anyone anywhere, but obviously, wouldn't like to think of her falling through any cracks by not being on any list at any stage.


    I have an uncle in the same situation and as he has a heart condition he was offered Pfizer.... Ultimately, it is an individual choice and there is little you can do other than continue to make the case. From an objective point of view, it is a bit Audi vs VW, or Apple vs Lenovo.



    As an aside, the decisions and media spin on AZ & J&J from the States and the EU are negatively affecting people in India, such that vaccine hesitancy increased there before the current wave according to a Spanish medic talking to El Pais. We are exporting our first world problems...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Sunday:

    First dose: 998,134 (+10,453)
    Second dose: 399,927 (+1,855)
    Total: 1,398,061 (+12,308)

    7 days to Sunday was 189,602


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Sunday:

    First dose: 998,134 (+10,453)
    Second dose: 399,927 (+1,855)
    Total: 1,398,061 (+12,308)

    7 days to Sunday was 189,602

    That seems like biggest Sunday total yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    That seems like biggest Sunday total yet?

    By some margin yes.
    Highest Sunday before this was 5272 on 11 April.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,651 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    People need to stop saying "least effective vaccine". That is based on a very limited clinical trial. People take a flu jab every winter which might be 40-50% effective.
    The efficacy is based on a clinical trial. There are 3 key things which matter, does it prevent you getting it, does it prevent hospitalisation and death, and does it prevent you from spreading it. All are performing outstandingly well on all of these.

    That may well be true but it isnt the whole picture.
    Lots and lots of people that were never hospitalized but had relatively mild covid are suffering long term effects, and mild here is relative, it means not admitted to hospital, flu is no walk in the park either but most people are not hospitalised for that either.
    So why are we prioritizing the higher risk cohorts with the lower efficacy vaccines for the sake of a few weeks and when hospital numbers are declining and the most vunerable already vaccinated to a greater extent?, we are over a year into this now remember.
    I doubt most people offered Janssen or one or the mRNA vaccines would choose J&J though I think they should be given a choice of J&J sooner or wait a few more weeks for one of the the mRNA vaccines, i would choose to wait.
    It may well turn out that long covid effects the mRNA vaccinated too, but with a 95% efficacy rate i'd wager there wil be far less than J&J, time will tell.

    If the over 50's are treated like second rate citizans this time, i really hope we get a fairer shot when any booster vaccination comes around.

    Have a weather station?, why not join the Ireland Weather Network - http://irelandweather.eu/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,182 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    Sunday:

    First dose: 998,134 (+10,453)
    Second dose: 399,927 (+1,855)
    Total: 1,398,061 (+12,308)

    7 days to Sunday was 189,602

    Good to see. Hopefully get over 200k next week or this week ideally


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭sd1999


    I think the problem with over 50s waiting for a Pfizer or Moderna is that in a few months time, they could still be offered AZ or J&J. Pfizer is seeking approval for kids as young as 11 so I imagine most of our Pfizer supplies will be going to the 11-15 group once the over 16s are finished. We don’t currently have a roadmap of what is going to happen once the adult population is finished so hoping for a Pfizer vaccine once it’s finished is a gamble. That being said, CureVac coming on stream could sort these issues out for over 50s but that is still an unknown quantity and can’t be forecasted for yet and may not be ready for a few months.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As I'm 60, qualified today to apply online. I have heard it doesn't take too long from that as they have the system running quite nicely now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    As I'm 60, qualified today to apply online. I have heard it doesn't take too long from that as they have the system running quite nicely now.

    Could take a while.

    Registered my father last Monday when 65 opened and no appointment yet.

    All depends on the nearest MVC, Vaccine delvieries, demographics of the area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭zebastein


    Sunday:

    First dose: 998,134 (+10,453)
    Second dose: 399,927 (+1,855)
    Total: 1,398,061 (+12,308)

    7 days to Sunday was 189,602


    So the million mark was not reached on Sunday as announced by Micheal Martin. :rolleyes:
    Anyway, that was a really solid week!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,269 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    Sunday:

    First dose: 998,134 (+10,453)
    Second dose: 399,927 (+1,855)
    Total: 1,398,061 (+12,308)

    7 days to Sunday was 189,602

    Weren't we supposed to have hit 1m first doses on Sunday?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    zebastein wrote: »
    So the million mark was not reached on Sunday as announced by Micheal Martin. :rolleyes:

    Could well have been, numbers may still be waiting to report. Numbers tend to be updated. Tomorrow's numbers could push Sunday past 1m first dose


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,977 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Sunday:

    First dose: 998,134 (+10,453)
    Second dose: 399,927 (+1,855)
    Total: 1,398,061 (+12,308)

    7 days to Sunday was 189,602


    WAIT A MINUTE

    Martin said we hit 1 million first doses on Sunday!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,450 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    WAIT A MINUTE

    Martin said we hit 1 million first doses on Sunday!

    As above

    "Could well have been, numbers may still be waiting to report. Numbers tend to be updated. Tomorrow's numbers could push Sunday past 1m first dose"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,249 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Well I got AZ and am delighted to get any . As Prof Butler said the best vaccine is the one available and offered to you at the time . I was just pleased to know I can have a bit more confidence and meet my friends outdoors etc . If it was AZ offered then that was my best bet at the time .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68 ✭✭sd1999


    Supercell wrote: »
    That may well be true but it isnt the whole picture.
    Lots and lots of people that were never hospitalized but had relatively mild covid are suffering long term effects, and mild here is relative, it means not admitted to hospital, flu is no walk in the park either but most people are not hospitalised for that either.
    So why are we prioritizing the higher risk cohorts with the lower efficacy vaccines for the sake of a few weeks and when hospital numbers are declining and the most vunerable already vaccinated to a greater extent?, we are over a year into this now remember.
    I doubt most people offered Janssen or one or the mRNA vaccines would choose J&J though I think they should be given a choice of J&J sooner or wait a few more weeks for one of the the mRNA vaccines, i would choose to wait.
    It may well turn out that long covid effects the mRNA vaccinated too, but with a 95% efficacy rate i'd wager there wil be far less than J&J, time will tell.

    If the over 50's are treated like second rate citizans this time, i really hope we get a fairer shot when any booster vaccination comes around.

    Vaccines have already been shown to alleviate at least some long covid symptoms after the first shot so I wouldn’t take it as a given that long covid is still possible once you’re vaccinated. Over 50s are lucky to be getting a vaccine as early as they are. The 18-30 cohort have to wait until the very end despite arguably sacrificing the most due to the pandemic (e.g. losing the most jobs, paying for college they can’t physically attend, bearing the brunt of the economic impact). I have many friends who would happily take any vaccine right now if they were offered one with no complaints. All the vaccines work. Before Pfizer and Moderna came along, AZ was being lauded as a massive success for achieving ~70% efficacy. Over 50s are not being treated like second class citizens. They are literally being prioritised for life saving vaccines against a deadly disease that is more likely to kill them than a younger person. I think it needs to be stated as well that we’re extremely lucky to have the luxury of four different vaccines when the most of the rest of world is stuck with one or maybe two.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement