Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Can we have some fcuking control on the airports from high risk countries please?

1178179181183184212

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,485 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The talk I'm hearing here it'll be lockdown #4 in September


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭0lddog


    Indeed. But there arent very many people interested in just flying to Spain and back.


    Would hazard a guess that if it was an option over the summer there would be several hundred thousand takers for this :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭0lddog


    Do what you want it's a free country. Very happy to hear that you couldn't give a ****. Have you ever?


    Anyone else conflicted by the the account name and the substance of the post ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    All this has happened regularly in Australia and New Zealand where detainees acquire infection in MHQ.
    MHQ itself is actually dangerous and a source of infection.
    We knew this would happen, it was obvious that packing people into hotels would be dangerous with an airborne virus.

    Now we have the story about to hit the news of the Italian father who can't go to his sons funeral.

    The people who wanted this quarantine implemented with no thought given to those it will affect should be named and shamed for years to come.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,751 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    hmmm wrote: »
    We knew this would happen, it was obvious that packing people into hotels would be dangerous with an airborne virus.

    Now we have the story about to hit the news of the Italian father who can't go to his sons funeral.

    The people who wanted this quarantine implemented with no thought given to those it will affect should be named and shamed for years to come.


    It is dangerous that is why there is MHQ. Far better in a controlled environment than out of control in the wider community.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    The talk I'm hearing here it'll be lockdown #4 in September

    1 in 4 now vaccinated. They’re mostly the people who could die. Hate to disappoint you, but the misery is over!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,751 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Valhallapt wrote: »
    1 in 4 now vaccinated. They’re mostly the people who could die. Hate to disappoint you, but the misery is over!


    Have you any data or source on that. We aren't there yet I'd say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Valhallapt wrote: »
    1 in 4 now vaccinated. They’re mostly the people who could die. Hate to disappoint you, but the misery is over!
    End of June I'd say this ends as most people will have been offered a vaccine. End of July at the latest. We should be seeing something similar to Israel as cases decline even as society reopens.

    Vaccinated people will want to start travelling then, and good luck to the politician who is still supporting MHQ at that time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    0lddog wrote: »
    Anyone else conflicted by the the account name and the substance of the post ?

    no. but do explain. Caveat emptor just means buyer beware and reflects my interest in consumer affairs. Like false advertising or when you book a flight and it's cancelled and you don't receive a refund even though it's mandated. That kinda thing gets my goat.

    What's the meaning of your user name and how does it represent who you are?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Blut2 wrote: »
    Airports and flights have been statistically proven to not be a risk, because social distancing and mask wearing is ubiquitous, and the air is so filtered.

    Someone is far more likely to catch covid attending a social event in a house with 10 friends in Dublin than on the journey flying to Spain and back.

    One does not negate the other. And as with all international travel - it's the risks of mingling with and criss crossing paths with potentially hundreds of other travellers on transport, on flights themselves and at hotels etc

    And hardly surprisingly some of that being pushed about flights not being a risk seems to be the travel industry itself.

    Meanwhile in the real world- there is an increasing body of evidence to indicates that flying increases risk of contacting covid.
    Perhaps the most extensive research of transmission after pre-travel testing comes from the New Zealand Ministry of Health, which joined with other researchers to study seven infected people who traveled aboard Emirates Flight 448 from Dubai to Auckland on Sept. 29.

    Two of the seven were likely infected before traveling but had tested negative in Zurich, Switzerland, within 72 hours of departing on their trip. Four of the seven were likely infected in-flight, the study found, and another likely during mandatory 14-day quarantine in New Zealand required of all passengers.

    All seven people had genetically identical strains of the virus, even though the passengers had originated in five different countries. All seven sat within two rows of the presumed spreaders, and all were in aisle seats, the study reported. Travelers reported wearing masks and some wore gloves. There were 86 passengers on the Boeing 777.

    Thst said I do have to laugh at those who generally don't consider covid anything more than a type of 'flu' or similar who regardless claim that MHQ hotels themselves are unequivocally the source of infection for passengers. Funnily enough that doesn't really stand up to quarantine data to date.

    From just one known incident in Australia.
    Melbourne saw this last July when a quarantined traveller infected a hotel guard, who unwittingly took the virus into the community. The resulting outbreak accounts for over 90% of Australia's 29,000 cases and 909 deaths to date.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-55929180

    And people wonder why we have quarantine? I would hope that hotel staff in MHQ are being prioritised as frontline workers


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭meath4sam


    Why is India not on our hotel quarantine list yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    meath4sam wrote: »
    Why is India not on our hotel quarantine list yet?

    Because our list is a complete shambles and our MHQ system an embarrassment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    meath4sam wrote: »
    Why is India not on our hotel quarantine list yet?

    The Travel Group and the chief medical officer meets every two weeks. Afaik India is already up for inclusion.

    The UK only added India onto their red list - effective yesterday.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    The talk I'm hearing here it'll be lockdown #4 in September

    What an idiotic thing to say. Talk about nailing your flag to the mast.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    saabsaab wrote: »
    Have you any data or source on that. We aren't there yet I'd say.

    LOL. For someone who revels in misery and doom, do you read the news? The process on the vaccine plan is well publicised :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 Flappidyflap


    Does anyone know what sort of checks are being carried out on people who quarentine at home, flying in from UK. The journey falls under the essential criteria for travel set out. Can you go for a walk... I see the MHQ are brought out for exercise/fresh air. Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Does anyone know what sort of checks are being carried out on people who quarentine at home, flying in from UK. The journey falls under the essential criteria for travel set out. Can you go for a walk... I see the MHQ are brought out for exercise/fresh air. Thanks

    Exercise is allowed. Common sense.


  • Posts: 99 ✭✭ Zackary Scruffy Thumb


    gozunda wrote: »
    The Travel Group and the chief medical officer meets every two weeks. Afaik India is already up for inclusion.

    The UK only added India onto their red list - effective yesterday.

    id imagine some countries will be moved off it too, cant see why the US is on it, they dont meet the criteria,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    id imagine some countries will be moved off it too, cant see why the US is on it, they dont meet the criteria,

    Which criteria are they?

    Afaik were also on the US own " Do not travel" to list.


  • Posts: 99 ✭✭ Zackary Scruffy Thumb


    gozunda wrote: »
    Which criteria are they?

    Afaik were also on the US own " Do not travel" to list.

    supposed to be 2.5 X cases over 14 days vs ireland


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    supposed to be 2.5 X cases over 14 days vs ireland

    This from gov.ie
    The Expert Advisory Group on Travel (EAGT) was established on 1 March 2021 to develop a method of risk assessing States and consider all concerns COVID-19 poses for travel.

    The Group meets every two weeks to recommend amendments to the list of Designated States, taking into account:

    countries with outbreak involving known variants of concern

    countries with a very high 14-day incidence (≥500/100,000)

    countries with a high 14-day incidence (greater than 2.5 times Ireland’s 14-day incidence but <500/100,000)

    So the last one on that list?

    Do you have a link for their 14 incidence rate? Can't find one tbh


  • Posts: 99 ✭✭ Zackary Scruffy Thumb


    gozunda wrote: »
    This from gov.ie



    So the last one on that list?

    Do you have a link for their 14 incidence rate? Can't find one tbh

    https://covid19-country-overviews.ecdc.europa.eu/

    every country here, great official data set, published every week or so,

    US is bordeline, as Ireland decreased in the past 2 weeks, but they never met the 2.5x 2 weeks ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    https://covid19-country-overviews.ecdc.europa.eu/

    every country here, great official data set, published every week or so,

    US is bordeline, as Ireland decreased in the past 2 weeks, but they never met the 2.5x 2 weeks ago.

    I see it doesn't list 14 day "incidence rates" rather "notification rates"?

    Notification rates:

    USA 18 April 2021 - 291.5

    Ireland 18 April 2021 - 108

    So 2.5 times Irish rate = 270

    So yeah looks like their rate is currently is 2.5 x times over ours atm

    Not sure what the reference figure EAGT used for the initial listing was though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,797 ✭✭✭Shane St.


    gozunda wrote: »
    The Travel Group and the chief medical officer meets every two weeks. Afaik India is already up for inclusion.

    The UK only added India onto their red list - effective yesterday.

    Will they discuss exemptions to the MHQ exemptions list. I feel like people with expiring work visas should not have to quarantine in the hotel. I am in Canada and my visa is coming to an end.

    I am able to quarantine at home.

    It's a serious extra burden trying to finance this with flights on top.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,234 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    This is what our country has become. I hope everyone wanting MHQ is proud.

    https://twitter.com/peterdooleydub/status/1385613001005350918?s=21


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    This is what our country has become. I hope everyone wanting MHQ is proud.

    https://twitter.com/peterdooleydub/status/1385613001005350918?s=21

    It’s barbaric. I’m ashamed to be Irish. Not in my name.


  • Posts: 99 ✭✭ Zackary Scruffy Thumb


    Shane St. wrote: »
    Will they discuss exemptions to the MHQ exemptions list. I feel like people with expiring work visas should not have to quarantine in the hotel. I am in Canada and my visa is coming to an end.

    I am able to quarantine at home.

    It's a serious extra burden trying to finance this with flights on top.

    I think this is very valid, its not like folks off on vacation, work is REAL,


  • Posts: 5,506 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think this is very valid, its not like folks off on vacation, work is REAL,

    Right so sometime who moved abroad should be exempt.

    Who else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,751 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Valhallapt wrote: »
    It’s barbaric. I’m ashamed to be Irish. Not in my name.


    Nonsense. It is a temporary and useful public health measure. What happened before only let Covid strains in without a stop. I'm sure that it could be improved though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,234 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    saabsaab wrote: »
    Nonsense. It is a temporary and useful public health measure. What happened before only let Covid strains in without a stop. I'm sure that it could be improved though.

    It’s the 83 year olds we are supposed to be protecting, not stopping them attending their own children’s funeral.
    A bit of perspective here please.


Advertisement