Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXIV-249,437 ROI(4,906 deaths) 120,195 NI (2,145 deaths)(01/05)Read OP

1199200202204205324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,156 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    This whole forum has gone off the deep end today. Is there something in the air?

    The forum went off the deep end when the mods decided that they were going to let the place be over run with re-regs, multiple accounts holders and posters that have suddenly decided to resurrect accounts after years of inactivity.

    Consequently, the discourse is exactly as you would expect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,223 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Gael23 wrote: »

    Keeping the door open for re-imposing restrictions if things get out of hand again. Could be the possibility of reduced supply of vaccines too which is spooking leaders. They all put their trust in the vaccinations basket.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,305 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    The forum went off the deep end when the mods decided that they were going to let the place be over run with re-regs, multiple accounts holders and posters that have suddenly decided to resurrect accounts after years of inactivity.

    Consequently, the discourse is exactly as you would expect.

    Correct, And digging up the same old tripe that had bans applied previously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,777 ✭✭✭celt262


    Well I'd say a mixture of frustration and delight.

    Many are frustrated that we look like we are in never ending lockdown when they have their freedom.

    The rest are delighted as they believe England will be in lockdown again soon and are looking forward to when they can say "I told ye England would be back in lockdown again after a few months, we were right to stay in lockdown""

    Staying in lockdown to avoid lockdown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭Messi19


    celt262 wrote: »
    Staying in lockdown to avoid lockdown.

    Dog chasing it's tail


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    Good to see teams back doing a bit of training down the local park. About bloody time.
    Love strolling through the park and seeing games and training and all that activity going on.


  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    pjohnson wrote: »
    The fact things are starting to reopen here seems to be badly affecting those who wanted things to open?

    Odd but not surprising.

    What reopened? Construction that should never have being closed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭KanyeSouthEast


    pjohnson wrote: »
    The fact things are starting to reopen here seems to be badly affecting those who wanted things to open?

    Odd but not surprising.

    What reopened?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Hospital numbers at 8pm

    Total 189 (down from 203 last night)
    ICU 47 (up from 46 last night - 0 deaths)

    Lowest daily 8pm total hospital number since 9th Oct (187)

    Lowest between peak of second and third wave was 12th Dec (192)


    Last Tuesday
    Total 220
    ICU 58


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭NIAC Fanboy


    What reopened? Construction that should never have being closed.

    Construction that never really closed?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,935 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Hospital numbers at 8pm

    Total 189
    ICU 47

    Woo hoo we're under 50 in the ICU. :)

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Which is why NPHET stopped reporting the median age of death.

    More lies

    Here’s today’s press release:

    https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/adbb0-statement-from-the-national-public-health-emergency-team-tuesday-13-april/

    “The median age of those who died was 85 years and the age range was 46-102 years.”

    Seriously what do you get actually lying to people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭NIAC Fanboy


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    Correct, And digging up the same old tripe that had bans applied previously.

    Stating the fact that a lot of people who died with covid were very sick, gravely ill and dying anyway, gets people banned?

    Yet you think its ok to dismiss this fact as "crap" and "tripe" without making any effort to argue the facts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,383 ✭✭✭blackcard


    Faugheen wrote: »
    More lies

    Here’s today’s press release:

    https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/adbb0-statement-from-the-national-public-health-emergency-team-tuesday-13-april/

    “The median age of those who died was 85 years and the age range was 46-102 years.”

    Seriously what do you get actually lying to people?

    Hard to take anything from that poster seriously. Just making stuff up. Couldn't even check today's press release


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Hospital numbers at 8pm

    Total 189 (down from 203 last night)
    ICU 47 (up from 46 last night - 0 deaths)

    Lowest daily 8pm total hospital number since 9th Oct (187)

    Lowest between peak of second and third wave was 12th Dec (192)


    Last Tuesday
    Total 220
    ICU 58

    Brilliant to see


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭NIAC Fanboy


    Faugheen wrote: »
    More lies

    Here’s today’s press release:



    “The median age of those who died was 85 years and the age range was 46-102 years.”

    Seriously what do you get actually lying to people?


    Yeah buried where the general public won't go looking. A bit like reporting "those with underlying medical conditions" where is this hidden now, never hear about it in the headline information anymore either.


  • Posts: 5,422 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Professor Liam Fanning, immunologist, laying out the blunt truth on Prime Time: "We have become risk adverse. If you were concerned about the potential risk of side effects with panadol, you wouldn't take it all."
    Why drive, tucked into a steak or even get out of the bed in the morning. The risk of harm is present however minuscule, we do it anyway without second thought. And a virtually non-existent risk of blood clotting in the wider population is an acceptable one, common sense must prevail and the vaccination programme continue apace.


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Yeah buried where the general public won't go looking. A bit like reporting "those with underlying medical conditions" where is this hidden now, never hear about it in the headline information anymore either.

    You said they stopped reporting it. You have been caught out in a lie. It took me less than a minute to find that.

    Now you’ve been caught out, instead of owning it you move the goalposts.

    You just couldn’t be arsed looking for information becauae you know it doesn’t match up with your weird agenda.

    You lied. Own it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 872 ✭✭✭Sofa King Great


    Isn't the next review supposed to be the start of May? Are we really keeping non essential retail closed for another 4 weeks when we have less than 200 people in hospital?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,075 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Professor Liam Fanning, immunologist, laying out the blunt truth on Prime Time: "We have become risk adverse. If you were concerned about the potential risk of side effects with panadol, you wouldn't take it all."
    Why drive, tucked into a steak or even get out of the bed in the morning. The risk of harm is present however minuscule, we do it anyway without second thought. And a virtually non-existent risk of blood clotting in the wider population is an acceptable one, common sense must prevail and the vaccination programme continue apace.

    I think too many have become comfortable with the pandemic. Not using safe effective vaccines at this point is lunacy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,417 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    jackboy wrote: »
    I think too many have become comfortable with the pandemic. Not using safe effective vaccines at this point is lunacy.

    If I was offered AZ tomorrow I'd take it and I world say I'm not alone in that.

    Prescribing the decision of government to the people is wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 315 ✭✭Akesh


    Professor Liam Fanning, immunologist, laying out the blunt truth on Prime Time: "We have become risk adverse. If you were concerned about the potential risk of side effects with panadol, you wouldn't take it all."
    Why drive, tucked into a steak or even get out of the bed in the morning. The risk of harm is present however minuscule, we do it anyway without second thought. And a virtually non-existent risk of blood clotting in the wider population is an acceptable one, common sense must prevail and the vaccination programme continue apace.

    What has really been risk adverse is the government and NPHETs approach to Covid-19.

    People not taking vaccines is a direct result of hysteria from the scientific community. The science behind the approach to Covid-19 is akin to the science of sociology, aka just make it up as you go along.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,462 ✭✭✭✭WoollyRedHat


    For the week that's in it, has anyone mentioned that NPHET ate my baby? Because I'm pretty sure NPHET ate my baby and NIAC stole my jab.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 SilentGreenx32


    pjohnson wrote: »
    The fact things are starting to reopen here seems to be badly affecting those who wanted things to open?

    Odd but not surprising.

    Such a bull**** post.

    Definitely not surprising from yourself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    jackboy wrote: »
    I think too many have become comfortable with the pandemic. Not using safe effective vaccines at this point is lunacy.

    There’s a lot and I mean a lot of people who’ve become far too comfortable with this horror show. The mood is changing amongst the general public now.
    I always blame Nphet as they do advise the restrictions but it’s the government fault in the main as they fûcked up Xmas and will now only follow what Nphet say and to hell with the all the small businesses that’ll will be damaged for now and possibly forever.

    We’ve come accustomed to the blame game and numbed by restrictions. The vaccines had/have given us hope but this abundance of caution crap will be to the detriment of the people and we could quite possibly see more people dying or getting sersiouly I’ll due to this and thus lead us into continuing lockdown!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,202 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Cork2021 wrote: »
    We’ve come accustomed to the blame game and numbed by restrictions. The vaccines had/have given us hope but this abundance of caution crap will be to the detriment of the people and we could quite possibly see more people dying or getting sersiouly I’ll due to this and thus lead us into continuing lockdown!
    I think the mood is changing amongst the majority of the public. Not an anger thing, just an impatience. Most people think NPHET and the others have done a reasonably good job in very difficult circumstances, but they want this to end. The vaccines are seen as the main way for this to end, and people are not happy with delays.

    I think the public are willing to take a lot more risk than officials realise to accelerate this to an end. It's for the Government to provide whatever legal and professional cover is required to allow our public health people tilt the balance towards speed and away from minimising tiny risks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 746 ✭✭✭RGS


    If I was offered AZ tomorrow I'd take it and I world say I'm not alone in that.

    Prescribing the decision of government to the people is wrong.

    I'd put my arm out for AZ jab too.

    It should be offered to anyone who wants it. I'd even sign a disclaimer if asked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Professor Liam Fanning, immunologist, laying out the blunt truth on Prime Time: "We have become risk adverse. If you were concerned about the potential risk of side effects with panadol, you wouldn't take it all."
    Why drive, tucked into a steak or even get out of the bed in the morning. The risk of harm is present however minuscule, we do it anyway without second thought. And a virtually non-existent risk of blood clotting in the wider population is an acceptable one, common sense must prevail and the vaccination programme continue apace.


    Its time to open everything up - people know the risks, let them take them as they see fit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    RGS wrote: »
    I'd put my arm out for AZ jab too.

    It should be offered to anyone who wants it. I'd even sign a disclaimer if asked.

    As the next few weeks go by I can see this happening as pharmacies start dishing out the jabs. The faster we all get a jab and are willing to sign the waiver.
    I’ll be first in the queue


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,717 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    RGS wrote: »
    I'd put my arm out for AZ jab too.

    It should be offered to anyone who wants it. I'd even sign a disclaimer if asked.

    What's the point in a disclaimer when the governments have indemnified the vaccine manufacturers already to facilitate a faster rollout?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement