Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What exactly is happening with AstraZeneca?

1178179181183184225

Comments

  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Timfy wrote: »
    Mmmm... I wonder where that leaves myself and people in a similar situation.

    I'm 54 yrs old and received my first AZ jab two weeks ago (I have a fairly severe auto immune disorder)

    Will we still be called for the second dose or will we be put back on the list to await another option?

    There's still some time until your second dose is due, by then I'm sure there will be much more data on the AZ clotting risks as well as the impact of mixing vaccines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,695 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    AlekSmart wrote: »
    AFAIAA,the current HSE practice is NOT to make recipients aware of the actual Vaccine they are recieving.

    I do value having some form of say in whatever types of medications are being administered to me,however I equally agree that many people could not care less,as long as it cures the ailment or allows them renewed access to normality (of a sort yet to be decided ?)

    So yes ,this principle of "Informed Consent",without fear of imposed repercussions should be fully practiced.

    What kind of rubbish is this. Do the vaccinators hide the vial under the table while drawing a dose?
    You're told what vaccine it is, it's on the little card you get, you also get a pamphlet unique to the vaccine you have been given. I'm sure it also appears on the consent form.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,338 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    What kind of rubbish is this. Do the vaccinators hide the vial under the table while drawing a dose?
    You're told what vaccine it is, it's on the little card you get, you also get a pamphlet unique to the vaccine you have been given. I'm sure it also appears on the consent form.
    I presume the poster means that you don't get a choice (aware in advance). You get what ever they are dispensing on the day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭brendanwalsh


    This vaccine is worthless guys.

    Pfizer and moderna and ram the rest.

    Anyone who got their first Az shot left in a precarious place now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭brickster69


    So first AZ was not to be used for over 65's and now it is only to be used on over 65's. Both contrary to EMA, MHRA and WHO guidelines. What's the point of these regulators if everyone just ignores the advice they give.

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭sundodger5


    I presume the poster means that you don't get a choice (aware in advance). You get what ever they are dispensing on the day.

    It says what you are getting in the text they send with your appointment details.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 553 ✭✭✭ddarcy


    Flying Fox wrote: »
    Common sense decision and it's in line with most of our peers. I'm a bit surprised they've gone as high as 60 but clearly they feel it's warranted.

    I thought 50 would be a good starting point as it would be given time to do more research. Surprised by 60, but in fairness the 60+ cohort will probably take until mid May to complete at best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 553 ✭✭✭ddarcy


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    What kind of rubbish is this. Do the vaccinators hide the vial under the table while drawing a dose?
    You're told what vaccine it is, it's on the little card you get, you also get a pamphlet unique to the vaccine you have been given. I'm sure it also appears on the consent form.

    They used to tell you before you came in what you were getting. This is the text I got anyways, not sure if this has changed:

    “ [ddarcy], you are scheduled for the 1st dose of the AstraZeneca Covid 19 Vaccine on [date] at [location]
    Please bring photo ID, PPS Number & mobile phone number.

    Will you attend this appointment? Please reply YES or NO to this message.

    Please contact your GP if you have any queries in relation to the vaccine. Do not attend if you have any symptoms of Covid 19.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,515 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Novovax started producing round the clock last month and that should be on stream soon.

    https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/production-novavax-vaccine-gets-under-20237098
    It comes at a time when the UK is expecting to see a slowing down of the vaccination programme from next month, amid EU delays of the AstraZeneca jab.

    :rolleyes: Sigh, my laughter therapy for the day anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,263 ✭✭✭shanec1928


    ddarcy wrote: »
    They used to tell you before you came in what you were getting. This is the text I got anyways, not sure if this has changed:

    “ [ddarcy], you are scheduled for the 1st dose of the AstraZeneca Covid 19 Vaccine on [date] at [location]
    Please bring photo ID, PPS Number & mobile phone number.

    Will you attend this appointment? Please reply YES or NO to this message.

    Please contact your GP if you have any queries in relation to the vaccine. Do not attend if you have any symptoms of Covid 19.”
    they still do. i got mine today. well under 60 so interested to see where that leaves me now if this will still be in place by the time my second dose is due.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    What kind of rubbish is this. Do the vaccinators hide the vial under the table while drawing a dose?
    You're told what vaccine it is, it's on the little card you get, you also get a pamphlet unique to the vaccine you have been given. I'm sure it also appears on the consent form.

    I pretty much think its illegal not to make the recipient aware of medications they are receiving except in a medical emergency.

    Youngest got their MMR and 4-1 booster over the Easter break. It was clearly identifiable that one was manufactured by Sanofi and the other by GSK.


  • Posts: 996 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This vaccine is worthless guys.

    Pfizer and moderna and ram the rest.

    Anyone who got their first Az shot left in a precarious place now

    Sensationalist nonsense.

    There have literally been over 200 million AZ doses given worldwide.

    These clotting events have occurred in an absolutely minuscule proportion of those who received it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 263 ✭✭PatrickSmithUS


    manus35 wrote: »
    Do you think it is fair that somebody in the vulnerable group who has previously suffered an acquired brain injury and stroke is offered the AZ vaccine when they are terrified of even the slightest possibility of suffering another one,


    No definitely not fair. but today news that it might be keep to over 60s should alleviate some of that fear.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭embraer170


    This vaccine is worthless guys.

    Pfizer and moderna and ram the rest.

    Anyone who got their first Az shot left in a precarious place now

    There is some evidence to say mixing doses is good, especially against variants. A shot of AZ with a shot of something else might put people in a pretty good place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    embraer170 wrote: »
    There is some evidence to say mixing doses is good, especially against variants. A shot of AZ with a shot of something else might put people in a pretty good place.

    There's not that much evidence at all, it's only in the trial phase. It's a big risk given it's not backed by regulators at all yet and likely won't be for another while.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭brickster69


    There's not that much evidence, it's only in the trial phase. It's a big risk given it's not backed by regulators at all yet and likely won't be for another while.

    Well Macron is up for it, so it must be ok. Follow the leader :D

    https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/france-advises-vaccine-mixing-amid-clotting-fears-76971560

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭brickster69


    It's like watching a carry on film honestly. Anyway i am off for a couple of pint's down the pub.

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭brendanwalsh


    Sensationalist nonsense.

    There have literally been over 200 million AZ doses given worldwide.

    These clotting events have occurred in an absolutely minuscule proportion of those who received it.

    Tell that to the families of young healthy woman who have died of cerebral blood clots


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,993 ✭✭✭FileNotFound


    Tell that to the families of young healthy woman who have died of cerebral blood clots

    Didn't think it was entirely women no?


    I understood the reason females were prominent was that they are prominent in the groups to have received the vaccine i.e more females in health care settings etc.


    Mind you I may be misinformed on this point?


  • Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You couldnt make up the incompetence.

    Not safe for over 70s

    Not safe for under 60s.

    There goes the 80% vaccinated by June.

    They are determined not to let us recover.

    They are spinless.

    We will not have enough arms for az now.

    1 milliin doses q2.

    Too small a cohort 60s only.

    I really dislike this goernment/niac/nphet.

    This bureauracy is tolerable in normal times. Its a national emegency. One person in over 200,000 got a blood clot in brain and is recovering. Totally disproprtionate response. I could understand if we were swimming in pfzier jabs. We are not.

    We are paying for our claim culture now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭Zipppy


    I got call earlier offering vaccine in Aviva on Thursday, said a text would follow..it would have been the AZ. As I'm under 60 I assume that's postponed and TBH I am thrilled as I have issues with high platelet count and was very concerned I'd be getting the AZ one..
    I'll wait for Pfizer..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,745 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    You couldnt make up the incompetence.

    Not safe for over 70s

    Safe, but missing data on the efficacy
    Not safe for under 60s.

    Following clotting issues that were reported quickly by other EU countries, but reported slowly by the UK (for whatever reason)
    There goes the 80% vaccinated by June.

    They are determined not to let us recover.

    They are spinless.

    We will not have enough arms for az now. 1 milliin doses q2.

    Too small a cohort 60s only.

    AZ has been making up a smaller % of vaccines as time has gone on, mostly due to f*ck ups by AZ, but now due to issues with the medicine itself. Most vaccinated in Q2 will be from Pfizer.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You couldnt make up the incompetence.

    Not safe for over 70s

    Not safe for under 60s.

    There goes the 80% vaccinated by June.

    They are determined not to let us recover.

    They are spinless.

    We will not have enough arms for az now.

    1 milliin doses q2.

    Too small a cohort 60s only.

    I really dislike this goernment/niac/nphet.

    This bureauracy is tolerable in normal times. Its a national emegency. One person in over 200,000 got a blood clot in brain and isv ecovering. Totally disproprtionatecresponse. I could understand if we were swimming in pfzier jabs. We are not.

    Parklife


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Zipppy wrote: »
    I got call earlier offering vaccine in Aviva on Thursday, said a text would follow..it would have been the AZ. As I'm under 60 I assume that's postponed and TBH I am thrilled as I have issues with high platelet count and was very concerned I'd be getting the AZ one..
    I'll wait for Pfizer..

    Ironically the type of thrombosis associated with the AZ vaccine is due to an immune response that drives low platelet count


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Zipppy wrote: »
    I got call earlier offering vaccine in Aviva on Thursday, said a text would follow..it would have been the AZ. As I'm under 60 I assume that's postponed and TBH I am thrilled as I have issues with high platelet count and was very concerned I'd be getting the AZ one..
    I'll wait for Pfizer..

    You'll just have to wait for follow up contact depending on what's decided.

    They could well say for high risk that it should still be given.

    Wait and see


  • Posts: 996 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Tell that to the families of young healthy woman who have died of cerebral blood clots

    Every single medicinal agent from aspirin to advanced cancer therapies carry risks that can be difficult to predict.

    With regards to this vaccine these events are so extremely rare that clinical trials with c. 50,000 patients revealed no indications of this - it’s literally only become visible now that patients vaccinated are numbering in the hundreds of millions.

    Obviously it’s tragic that these people died but your response is over emotional and childish honestly - what do you have to say to the thousands upon thousands of people who received this vaccine with no ill effect that would otherwise have succumbed to covid 19 and died?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,821 ✭✭✭weisses


    Timfy wrote: »
    Mmmm... I wonder where that leaves myself and people in a similar situation.

    I'm 54 yrs old and received my first AZ jab two weeks ago (I have a fairly severe auto immune disorder)

    Will we still be called for the second dose or will we be put back on the list to await another option?

    AFAIK the clotting issues happened after receiving the first dose ..So in theory you should be okay for the second one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭Zipppy


    Ironically the type of thrombosis associated with the AZ vaccine is due to an immune response that drives low platelet count

    The response appears to utilise a large volume of platelets to form a clot resulting in lower level of platelets as many have bene used in clot formation process..there's still a clot and clots use platelets of which I have loads ...More research required methinks...


  • Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Every single medicinal agent from aspirin to advanced cancer therapies carry risks that can be difficult to predict.

    With regards to this vaccine these events are so extremely rare that clinical trials with c. 50,000 patients revealed no indications of this - it’s literally only become visible now that patients vaccinated are numbering in the hundreds of millions.

    Obviously it’s tragic that these people died but your response is over emotional and childish honestly - what do you have to say to the thousands upon thousands of people who received this vaccine with no ill effect that would otherwise have succumbed to covid 19 and died?

    The point is that we have other vaccines available that are not causing deaths in otherwise healthy people. Not to mention that the age groups most affected by the clotting issue are very unlikely to die from covid.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    astrofool wrote: »
    Safe, but missing data on the efficacy. Basically they made the wrong judgement call and gave wrong vaccine to wrong cohort. Uk happily gave to over 60's/70's



    Following clotting issues that were reported quickly by other EU countries, but reported slowly by the UK (for whatever reason). 19 people died of blood clots to brain. These vaccines in any given day saved multiples of this amount and will continue to.UKs slow admissions probably saved thousands of lives in their country at this time.



    AZ has been making up a smaller % of vaccines as time has gone on, mostly due to f*ck ups by AZ, but now due to issues with the medicine itself. Most vaccinated in Q2 will be from Pfizer. Unless this reversed in time, everyone will be waiting longer for a vaccine. I would take Az in morning.

    If 5 people in ireland where to die of this due to AZ limited to say over 30's, it would have saved hundreds of lives from covid, thousands of businesses. NIAC/NPHET/Govt with regards dealing with AZ, fiddling while Rome burns.[/B]


Advertisement