Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Covid 19 Part XXXIV-249,437 ROI(4,906 deaths) 120,195 NI (2,145 deaths)(01/05)Read OP

14950525455324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭Wombatman


    Normal One wrote: »
    Worst surge ever

    Yeah, but schools are closed for Easter :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    7-day averages in cases and 7 day testing number for every Monday this month.

    March 29: cases 573 tests 125,886
    March 22: cases 544 tests 98,063
    March 15: cases 526 tests 101,564
    March 8: cases 487 tests 95,604
    March 1: cases 654 tests 111,320


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    7-day averages in cases and 7 day testing number for every Monday this month.

    March 29: cases 573 tests 125,886
    March 22: cases 544 tests 98,063
    March 15: cases 526 tests 101,564
    March 8: cases 487 tests 95,604
    March 1: cases 654 tests 111,320

    So ending March with
    -more tests
    -less cases
    -more vaccinated
    -less hospitalised

    And the disease is surging.

    Very concerning


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    So ending March with
    -more tests
    -less cases
    -more vaccinated
    -less hospitalised

    And the disease is surging.

    Very concerning

    I'm not seeing a surge and don't advocate for one but the efforts to play down any suggestion with any waffle is astounding. Talk about using stats to colour an opinion. How about an increase week on week for the past four weeks?

    The extremes on this thread have left any discussion utterly pointless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    I'm not seeing a surge and don't advocate for one but the efforts to play down any suggestion with any waffle is astounding. Talk about using stats to colour an opinion. How about an increase week on week for the past four weeks?

    The extremes on this thread have left any discussion utterly pointless.

    Large increase in tests done = small increase in cases detected.

    Nothing other than that has occurred in the last few weeks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭11521323


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    So ending March with
    -more tests
    -less cases
    -more vaccinated
    -less hospitalised

    And the disease is surging.

    Very concerning

    Extremely concerning, very worrying, scary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,120 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    7-day averages in cases and 7 day testing number for every Monday this month.

    March 29: cases 573 tests 125,886
    March 22: cases 544 tests 98,063
    March 15: cases 526 tests 101,564
    March 8: cases 487 tests 95,604
    March 1: cases 654 tests 111,320

    Some increase in testing from last week.

    Another key metric is 7-day positivity average in testing

    Today - 3.4%
    Last Monday - 4%
    15/3 - 3.7%
    8/3 - 3.8%
    1/3 - 4.3%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Large increase in tests done = small increase in cases detected.

    Nothing other than that has occurred in the last few weeks.

    You know what? I couldn't care less. My point is your 'spin' including less cases leaving March than entering was ignoring week on week increases. You then switch to a reference to positivity rate - a different angle altogether.

    As I said, impossible to discuss properly here as the sides are too polarised.

    Have a Good night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    You know what? I couldn't care less. My point is your 'spin' including less cases leaving March than entering was ignoring week on week increases. You then switch to a reference to positivity rate - a different angle altogether.

    As I said, impossible to discuss properly here as the sides are too polarised.

    Have a Good night.

    4 factually correct bullet points = spin.

    Weird flex but ok.....

    Have a good night Mr. Lee


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    You know what? I couldn't care less. My point is your 'spin' including less cases leaving March than entering was ignoring week on week increases. You then switch to a reference to positivity rate - a different angle altogether.

    As I said, impossible to discuss properly here as the sides are too polarised.

    Have a Good night.

    In the interests of argument, can you post a few bullets with your 'spin' so that people can see both sides.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭Knine


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Large increase in tests done = small increase in cases detected.

    Nothing other than that has occurred in the last few weeks.

    The large increase in testing is likely due to the pop up centres


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    4 factually correct bullet points = spin.

    Weird flex but ok.....

    Have a good night Mr. Lee

    Selective use of certain facts to paint a particular picture is the very definition of spin.

    Another reason for the reduction in the positive rate could be that there is an actual surge in rhinovirus at the moment. This has resulted in far more being sent for testing, but as many of these actually have rhinovirus not Covid, the positive rate falls while the underlying Covid rate remains stable.

    No one outside a handful of sensationalist click bait style journalists is claiming it’s a surge however


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Selective use of certain facts to paint a particular picture is the very definition of spin.

    "Selective" facts such as number of tests, cases, hospitalisations and vaccinations.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    "Selective" facts such as number of tests, cases, hospitalisations and vaccinations.

    Selective interpretation then


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Selective interpretation then

    Come back with those goalposts!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,120 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    Selective use of certain facts to paint a particular picture is the very definition of spin.

    Another reason for the reduction in the positive rate could be that there is an actual surge in rhinovirus at the moment. This has resulted in far more being sent for testing, but as many of these actually have rhinovirus not Covid, the positive rate falls while the underlying Covid rate remains stable.

    No one outside a handful of sensationalist click bait style journalists is claiming it’s a surge however

    More than a handful of those journalists to be fair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,712 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Anyone seen the video of the bunch of crazies having mass?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    In the interests of argument, can you post a few bullets with your 'spin' so that people can see both sides.

    • This is the "spin" ...

    Average new case numbers have plateaued

    53nkqj.jpg


    • Currently the reproduction number is between 1 and 1.3 which Indicates the rate of infection is on the rise


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    gozunda wrote: »
    • This is the "spin" ...
    53nkqj.jpg

    • Currently the reproduction number is between 1 and 1.3 and Indicates the rate of infection is on the rise

    Looks to be trending downwards the last week.

    Things are getting better.

    Good job everyone!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Looks to be trending downwards the last week.

    Things are getting better.

    Good job everyone!

    Maybe look at the overall / average number of new cases . So no overall not "not trending downwards"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 304 ✭✭11521323


    gozunda wrote: »
    Maybe look at the average number of new cases . So no overall not "not trending downwards"

    If you look at everything in context, the extra cases relative to the extra tests is good news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    11521323 wrote: »
    If you look at everything in context, the extra cass relative to the extra tests is good news.

    Wha?

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0325/1206166-covid-figures/
    Chair of NPHET's Epidemiological Modelling Advisory Group Professor Philip Nolan said when all of the virus data is taken into account the situation is either at a very static position or one that’s increasing slowly.

    He said the reproduction number is between 1 and 1.3 and he said that the situation with cases is "volatile" and remains "at high risk".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Does anyone know if the walk in test centre are doing what they are supposed to do or are they serving as a no appointment test centre to speed up testing for close contacts and people with symptoms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭alexonhisown


    Does anyone know if the walk in test centre are doing what they are supposed to do or are they serving as a no appointment test centre to speed up testing for close contacts and people with symptoms.

    Not supposed to go to walk in test centres if you have symptoms, it’s only for asymptomatic people, don’t know if close contacts can go, probably not


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 773 ✭✭✭PmMeUrDogs


    Does anyone know if the walk in test centre are doing what they are supposed to do or are they serving as a no appointment test centre to speed up testing for close contacts and people with symptoms.

    I'd imagine close contacts are probably going.

    A user earlier said that her symptomatic child and close contact went.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,302 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    Not sure how people's expectations could be much lower tbh https://twitter.com/christinafinn8/status/1376644324071514130?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,183 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    gozunda wrote: »

    Would you class 202 more cases from 27,823 extra tests as a volatile situation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Would you class 202 more cases from 27,823 extra tests as a volatile situation?

    "202"?

    Today's figures show * 539 new cases * .

    First rule of statistics. Don't take one days data in isolation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,601 ✭✭✭bennyl10


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Not sure how people's expectations could be much lower tbh https://twitter.com/christinafinn8/status/1376644324071514130?s=19

    Lowered?
    How in gods name can they be lowered? Construction and 5k being scrapped can’t be negotiable at this point surely


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,471 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Not sure how people's expectations could be much lower tbh https://twitter.com/christinafinn8/status/1376644324071514130?s=19

    It's as expected NPHET basically want nothing, gov want to give something

    https://twitter.com/KevDoyle_Indo/status/1376645360899256322?s=19


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement