Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

1160161163165166757

Comments

  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Can any person walk into a gun shop and walk out with a gun 5 minutes later?

    Yes or no?

    Yes, you can buy one in a shop which does not have a federal license, i.e. shops that "make occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms.”

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=18-USC-1104575661-816587285&term_occur=3&term_src=title:18:part:I:chapter:44:section:921

    And as was said above, background checks in licensed stores can often be done very quickly in many states and many people just wait in the store until it's done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,019 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    The echo is the echo chamber just increased several DB.

    What a joke.

    I hope you are Considering lifting bans on conservative posters who have been much less confrontational.

    A dangerous precedent you are setting Mr Beasty.

    Funny that it's only the trumpettes who whinge that 'it's so unfair' when we're all bound by the same rules


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Yes, you can buy one in a shop which does not have a federal license, i.e. shops that "make occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms.”

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=18-USC-1104575661-816587285&term_occur=3&term_src=title:18:part:I:chapter:44:section:921

    And as was said above, background checks in licensed stores can often be done very quickly in many states and many people just wait in the store until it's done.

    I stand corrected.

    Realistically I can't see the situation changing anytime soon because a person that is intent on causing harm will get their hands on a gun be it legally or illegally obatained.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,019 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    I stand corrected.

    Realistically I can't see the situation changing anytime soon because a person that is intent on causing harm will get their hands on a gun be it legally or illegally obatained.
    'At least 68% of the guns used in US mass shootings of the last 30 years were obtained legally.'

    So that would be a 68% drop which is a good thing right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,721 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    I stand corrected.

    Realistically I can't see the situation changing anytime soon because a person that is intent on causing harm will get their hands on a gun be it legally or illegally obatained.
    And that’s a narrative that is pushed, sure it will make no difference because they’ll get the guns somehow. Whilst that might be true in the very short term as time goes by with stricter controls there would be less available making them harder to get. The big crime set ups would still be able to get them but the disgruntled teen would find it harder. It should happen to save lives in years to come even if it would make little short term difference.
    Actually just realised this Biden thread apologies.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,575 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    I stand corrected.

    Realistically I can't see the situation changing anytime soon because a person that is intent on causing harm will get their hands on a gun be it legally or illegally obatained.

    Less of the outrage in future please.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,781 ✭✭✭weisses


    biko wrote: »

    Did you had the same concern about the southern border during the previous administration ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter


    weisses wrote: »
    Did you had the same concern about the southern border during the previous administration ?

    Do you have any for what he just posted?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,150 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    biko wrote: »

    What do you think should be done about it? What do you think this administration is doing which is not working or is the wrong approach?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    biko wrote: »

    Seems that Biden is treating these illegals as humans which is an improvement on his predecessor and is bound to annoy those who view them as little more than animals and would happily let them die in the desert.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    biko wrote: »
    Do you have any for what he just posted?
    We looked at data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection to see whether there’s a “crisis” — or even a “surge,” as many news outlets have characterized it. We analyzed monthly CBP data from 2012 to now and found no crisis or surge that can be attributed to Biden administration policies. Rather, the current increase in apprehensions fits a predictable pattern of seasonal changes in undocumented immigration combined with a backlog of demand because of 2020’s coronavirus border closure...
    ... the CBP has recorded a 28 percent increase in migrants apprehended from January to February 2021, from 78,442 to 100,441. News outlets, pundits and politicians have been calling this a “surge” and a “crisis.” ... the CBP’s numbers reveal that undocumented immigration is seasonal, shifting upward this time of year. During fiscal year 2019, under the Trump administration, total apprehensions increased 31 percent during the same period, a bigger jump than we’re seeing now. We’re comparing fiscal year 2021 to 2019 because the pandemic changed the pattern in 2020. In 2018, the increase is about 25 percent from February to March — somewhat smaller but still pronounced.

    https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a35917469/no-border-surge-crisis-joe-biden/

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/03/23/theres-no-migrant-surge-us-southern-border-heres-data/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,323 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    weisses wrote: »
    Did you had the same concern about the southern border during the previous administration ?

    Now that Biden has done a press conference and they don't have that to whinge about anymore, we're back to the faux concern about the border.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭Smee_Again



    Wow, so Biden is performing better than Trump did while at the same time treating the people as actual humans.

    That’s great news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,683 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    Fair play to Biden tho for generously giving us an hour of his time for the first time in over two months since taking office... well it wasn't really a press conference if he knew exactly what questions pre-chosen reporters would ask, reporters which he had the names and the headshots of in which he planned to call on, all marked out and ready on his prepared sheet.
    ER! Welcome to 1920, that's around the time that PR, speechwriting, etc took off in earnest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    weisses wrote: »
    Did you had the same concern about the southern border during the previous administration ?

    Don't bother. Some posters have a habit of dropping in something they found on the internet, adding a line just because they must and then disappearing. You won't get a meaningful response. If you get a response.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    What do you think should be done about it? What do you think this administration is doing which is not working or is the wrong approach?
    Biden made it happen by promising US citizenship to nearly 11 million undocumented people so he needs to visit the border first and foremost and see what incredible magnet he has made his country.

    He needs to do something about the refugee cages from the days when he was VP. They are still there, Joe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    biko wrote: »
    Biden made it happen by promising US citizenship to nearly 11 million undocumented people so he needs to visit the border first and foremost and see what incredible magnet he has made his country.

    He needs to do something about the refugee cages from the days when he was VP. They are still there, Joe.


    There were "invasions" of caravans under the last regime, to the point of it being referred to as a national crisis. Seems unlikely to be just Joe that is bringing them to the US.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    So apparently the previous administrations walls in the middle of nowhere also built roads into the middle of nowhere as well to facilitate building and are now being used by immigrants to cross previously inaccessible areas. Their incompetency levels had no limit and it will take Biden a while to tidy it all up.

    trump promised a mexican wall, and ended up building them a road at the cost of army childrens education.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    Will this be Joe's next scandal?

    *Possible* secret service involvement in Hunter's alleged gun felony

    https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/25/sources-secret-service-inserted-itself-into-case-of-hunter-bidens-gun-477879

    If it were one of Trumps sons they'd have a field day on here, but seeing that it's Joe's son, there's nothing to see here. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,323 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Back to Hunter again :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    biko wrote: »

    Biden's first 100 days has been an absolute disaster on this issue. Weak leadership.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    BanditLuke wrote: »
    Biden's first 100 days has been an absolute disaster on this issue. Weak leadership.

    His year on year figures are 3% better than Trump’s.

    Biden is showing it’s possible to slow the increase in migrants while also treating them like human beings. That’s leadership.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    BanditLuke wrote: »
    Weak leadership.
    Lol at the trumpist going on about weak leadership:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,019 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Lol at the trumpist going on about weak leadership:rolleyes:

    Projection


  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    If it were one of Trumps sons they'd have a field day on here, but seeing that it's Joe's son, there's nothing to see here. :rolleyes:

    That's because Trump's sons actually worked in the White House.

    You know this, but choose to spin it into poor victimhood for a man who cared less about anyone but himself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,768 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Christy42 wrote: »
    There were "invasions" of caravans under the last regime, to the point of it being referred to as a national crisis. Seems unlikely to be just Joe that is bringing them to the US.

    yeah pretty sure Biden said in his presser that migration increased 31% while Trump was in office. That was in answer to a question that tried to cast the reason the migrants are coming as because he got elected as US President and they think he is a nice guy. Im sure the likes of Fox are trying to sell it that way too but as Biden pointed out they were coming under Trumps administration in big numbers too and that was despite his rhetoric about migrants.

    In any case I think he will get a handle on it, he said he is working with the Mexican government which presumably means he is trying to mobilise them to make sure the migrants dont get near the border at all. Ultimately the solution is to get the Mexican government to secure their southern border with Guatemala to stem the flows into Mexico in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    yeah pretty sure Biden said in his presser that migration increased 31% while Trump was in office. That was in answer to a question that tried to cast the reason the migrants are coming as because he got elected as US President and they think he is a nice guy. Im sure the likes of Fox are trying to sell it that way too but as Biden pointed out they were coming under Trumps administration in big numbers too and that was despite his rhetoric about migrants.

    In any case I think he will get a handle on it, he said he is working with the Mexican government which presumably means he is trying to mobilise them to make sure the migrants dont get near the border at all. Ultimately the solution is to get the Mexican government to secure their southern border with Guatemala to stem the flows into Mexico in the first place.

    People forget that people are travelling through another country (Mexico) to get to the border, and that cooperating with Mexico on the issue is the only way to solve the problem properly, trying to do it solely at the border is stupid (as the previous administration tried to do).

    To tie it over to this side of the pond, after Brexit, the Dutch and French have no impetus to stop migrants heading to the UK anymore, so they'll happily let them through if the UK is the final destination, which will end up with more, rather then less, migrants coming to the UK.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 386 ✭✭Biafranlivemat


    What do you think should be done about it? What do you think this administration is doing which is not working or is the wrong approach?


    Sometimes I'm in favor of illegal immigration, but only if they are moved to the suburbs of Boston, like Cambridge or Arlington or Watertown.
    Plenty of room, just knock down the beautiful single family homes and put in massive concrete 12 floor buildings, that can house 100's of 3 bedroom apartments, for the poor illegals.

    Unless the haters and Racists in those towns object.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 386 ✭✭Biafranlivemat


    astrofool wrote: »
    So apparently the previous administrations walls in the middle of nowhere also built roads into the middle of nowhere as well to facilitate building and are now being used by immigrants to cross previously inaccessible areas. Their incompetency levels had no limit and it will take Biden a while to tidy it all up.

    trump promised a mexican wall, and ended up building them a road at the cost of army childrens education.


    Do you have any idea of how much money is wasted in the US every year for a half assed "Education"
    The wall is a great investment.


Advertisement