Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What exactly is happening with AstraZeneca?

1132133135137138225

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,747 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Yes but that would be your dispute with the dealer and you would have a right to take him to court. However until the case was settled in court you would not be able to prevent him from selling another car to your neighbour or have any claim on that car he has already sold.

    If you were a country you would just impound his lot and all his remaining cars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    The EU would be enforcing its contract with AZ, much the same as the UK is doing preventing the export of doses produced in the UK. It is for AZ to fulfill contracts to all their customers.

    They'll half do it, enough to damage their reputation but not enough to make a difference.

    The EU contract with AZ had no consequence to failure to meet targets, the British one did.

    Basic SME exports contract stuff but the EU were only dealing with a one in a century threat to a 17 trillion Euro economy, so more relaxed approach.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Aegir wrote: »
    ignoring your rather childish jingoism there, that is exactly what the EU should be doing.

    It's what the UK did.

    The EU and India will do the bulk of vaccine manufacturing for this OUS. So the suggestion is the EU should be doing what the EU is doing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I think in this case it is not so much selling another car to your neighbour, it's more like selling the same car to your neighbour which they also sold to you.
    Although I don't entirely agree with your analogy, it still seems to be a matter for the courts. I don't have the right to seize the car off my neighbour.


  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you went to local car dealer and asked him to try to find a particular car and he said "I will try my best and I can guarantee you no one else has first call if I find one, and will call you as soon as anything changes". Then you see it in the showroom the next day and he tells you he sold it to your neighbour because he told him he gets first choice on all cars, do you think you would be happy? And do you think it will be good in the long term for AZ to be known as the dodgy car dealer of big pharma in the worlds 2nd biggest market?

    which is a good analogy if you are buying cars, but this isn't a car.

    however, I guess we could use this follows:

    you go to your local car dealer and tell them you want 200 cars and they should be blue.

    Meanwhile, another customer talks to the same dealer and say they want 100 cars, in red and as red isn't a standard colour, they will arrange for those red cars to be built in their own factory, which the dealer can then use to make whatever cars it likes, but the first 100 cars must be their.

    You then go back to your dealer and due to a shortage of blue paint his factory has only managed to make 50 blue cars so far, so you decide that you want some of the red ones instead, to which the dealer says sorry, those are for someone else. When I have finished making that batch of red ones I can use that factory to make your blue ones as well, but only when the red ones are made. In the meantime, I can carry on making your blue cars in the factories that aren't owned by my red car customer.

    do you then go and complain that the customer buying the red cars is stopping you getting your blue ones?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The EU and India will do the bulk of vaccine manufacturing for this OUS. So the suggestion is the EU should be doing what the EU is doing?

    No, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and SII are doing the bulk of the vaccine production, the EU is twiddling its thumbs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    murphaph wrote: »
    The EU needs to rapidly increase its own capabilities. Mrs. Merkel said the same yesterday and I think she's right.

    Hopefully they'll start to treat it seriously now, no rush though, only 14 months in.

    If Merkel took a measured and committed approach to combatting the 3rd wave in Germany, wouldn't that be fantastic.

    The " it's just a bad flu" and vaccines aren't worth anything attitude again.

    One is a problem but both views together are a crisis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,722 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Aegir wrote: »
    which is a good analogy if you are buying cars, but this isn't a car.

    however, I guess we could use this follows:

    you go to your local car dealer and tell them you want 200 cars and they should be blue.

    Meanwhile, another customer talks to the same dealer and say they want 100 cars, in red and as red isn't a standard colour, they will arrange for those red cars to be built in their own factory, which the dealer can then use to make whatever cars it likes, but the first 100 cars must be their.

    You then go back to your dealer and due to a shortage of blue paint his factory has only managed to make 50 blue cars so far, so you decide that you want some of the red ones instead, to which the dealer says sorry, those are for someone else. When I have finished making that batch of red ones I can use that factory to make your blue ones as well, but only when the red ones are made. In the meantime, I can carry on making your blue cars in the factories that aren't owned by my red car customer.

    do you then go and complain that the customer buying the red cars is stopping you getting your blue ones?

    When you enter into contract with a supplier, the only thing that concerns you is that contract. Any contract that supplier has with another customer or customers is nothing whatsoever to do with you and he / she can't start bringing up those other contracts when explaining to you why they can't supply you with what you ordered.

    Suppliers who run into major difficulties because they have overpromised their customers or overreached themselves are usually regarded as dodgy suppliers or even as 'rogue traders'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,747 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Aegir wrote: »
    No, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and SII are doing the bulk of the vaccine production, the EU is twiddling its thumbs.

    And by extension, the king of twiddlers will be the UK, having failed to get AZ GB production off the floor is relying on AZ EU and Pfizer EU to keep it's vaccinations flowing.

    It's good to see that the spectator has reduced itself to the propaganda wing of the tory party.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Aegir wrote: »
    which is a good analogy if you are buying cars, but this isn't a car.

    however, I guess we could use this follows:

    you go to your local car dealer and tell them you want 200 cars and they should be blue.

    Meanwhile, another customer talks to the same dealer and say they want 100 cars, in red and as red isn't a standard colour, they will arrange for those red cars to be built in their own factory, which the dealer can then use to make whatever cars it likes, but the first 100 cars must be their.

    You then go back to your dealer and due to a shortage of blue paint his factory has only managed to make 50 blue cars so far, so you decide that you want some of the red ones instead, to which the dealer says sorry, those are for someone else. When I have finished making that batch of red ones I can use that factory to make your blue ones as well, but only when the red ones are made. In the meantime, I can carry on making your blue cars in the factories that aren't owned by my red car customer.

    do you then go and complain that the customer buying the red cars is stopping you getting your blue ones?

    Except of the 100 red cars, 50 were made in the blue car factory


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    astrofool wrote: »
    If you were a country you would just impound his lot and all his remaining cars.
    I think in Ireland the State would probably have to take the company to court and win the case before that sort of impounding could take place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,747 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I think in Ireland the State would probably have to take the company to court and win the case before that sort of impounding could take place.

    I was being facetious as the analogy is broken, but the state will impound first, and then let the owner go to court to plead their case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    astrofool wrote: »
    And by extension, the king of twiddlers will be the UK, having failed to get AZ GB production off the floor is relying on AZ EU and Pfizer EU to keep it's vaccinations flowing.
    In fairness we could do with some of that twiddling given that they seem to have injected over half the adult population already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,071 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Dare i say it, if it was clearly undeliverable, does than not simply indicate fraud ? They took orders for something they knew they could not deliver ?


    It's not fraud but it's contrary to the principle of "Good Faith" which not surprisingly is a concept of European Law systems, but much less so or even not at all in English common law.

    A nice long explanation here.

    https://www.eversheds-sutherland.com/documents/services/construction/ConstructionGoodfaithinEnglishlaw.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    josip wrote: »
    It's not fraud but it's contrary to the principle of "Good Faith" which not surprisingly is a concept of European Law systems, but much less so or even not at all in English common law.


    English lawmakers do not act with good faith, so that is hardly surprising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,071 ✭✭✭✭josip


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    If there's such a clear cut case of negotiating in bad faith why haven't the Commission hauled AZ into the courts for contract breach instead of being judge and jury in terms of applying an export ban in terms of their intrepretation of it?


    By the time the courts decide, everyone would be vaccinated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    AZ signed a contract with the EU explicitly stating they had no contracts which would impinge on EU deliveries while at the same time signing an exclusivity contract with the UK. To me, that is negotiating in bad faith, and would justify the EU blocking AZ exports until their contract is fulfilled.
    It wont happen though

    Is it not strange that the EU havent hauled them into a Belgian court?

    Almost like you're completely wrong about that contract...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    So updated figures from the EU meeting today.
    In total, 77mil doses exported from the EU worldwide.
    A total of 21mil to the UK.
    Add the 5mil from SII, means of the ~31mil doses given in the UK, 5mil were produced within the UK.
    Seems the UK AZ plant will be struggling to fill that 100mil order.
    https://mobile.twitter.com/DaveKeating/status/1375104943703478272


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    So updated figures from the EU meeting today.
    In total, 77mil doses exported from the EU worldwide.
    A total of 21mil to the UK.
    Add the 5mil from SII, means of the ~31mil doses given in the UK, 5mil were produced within the UK.
    Seems the UK AZ plant will be struggling to fill that 100mil order.
    https://mobile.twitter.com/DaveKeating/status/1375104943703478272

    The 21mill all AstraZeneca?
    Or a combination of all 3 manufacturers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Call me Al wrote: »
    The 21mill all AstraZeneca?
    Or a combination of all 3 manufacturers?

    It would be just Pfizer and AZ as they are not expecting moderna till April and that comes from Switzerland I believe.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 221 ✭✭Tippbhoy1


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    So updated figures from the EU meeting today.
    In total, 77mil doses exported from the EU worldwide.
    A total of 21mil to the UK.
    Add the 5mil from SII, means of the ~31mil doses given in the UK, 5mil were produced within the UK.
    Seems the UK AZ plant will be struggling to fill that 100mil order.
    https://mobile.twitter.com/DaveKeating/status/1375104943703478272

    This is astounding


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,071 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Man if kept them all like the US did, we'd be nearly out of this now. We'd have what 1.5m people vaccinated or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    Tippbhoy1 wrote: »
    This is astounding

    And concerning for those due their 2nd AZ dose.

    Unless, anticipating this would happen, they've been using UK factories for stockpiling and bleeding everything they could from Halix while they could.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭Tyrone212


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    So updated figures from the EU meeting today.
    In total, 77mil doses exported from the EU worldwide.
    A total of 21mil to the UK.
    Add the 5mil from SII, means of the ~31mil doses given in the UK, 5mil were produced within the UK.
    Seems the UK AZ plant will be struggling to fill that 100mil order.
    https://mobile.twitter.com/DaveKeating/status/1375104943703478272

    If the EU had a vaccine export ban like the US and those vaccines were still sitting in those factories unused Ireland would have a higher % of their population vaccinated than the UK. Pretty mad, for all the jingoistic nonsense from the right wing press in the UK they would be screwed without the EU. India has a vaccine export ban in place now , UK waiting on 5m from them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Tyrone212 wrote: »
    If the EU had a vaccine export ban like the US and those vaccines were still sitting in those factories unused Ireland would have a higher % of their population vaccinated than the UK. Pretty mad, for all the jingoistic nonsense from the right wing press in the UK they would be screwed without the EU. India has a vaccine export ban in place now , UK waiting on 5m from them.

    I know, and the EU are the evil guys in all of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    Bbc News at 6...
    I wonder will this get a mention. :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,071 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Yep I think if any lessons come out of this is to not treat modern UK as a partner and expect civilised cooperation any more but a rogue state which uses its rabid media to spread misinformation.

    Yup, UK and US should just be ignored and do what's best for the EU. Both of them are basket cases that you can't trust.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭Tyrone212


    Yep I think if any lessons come out of this is to not treat modern UK as a partner and expect civilised cooperation any more but a rogue state which uses its rabid media to spread misinformation.

    Boris said the other day their vaccine rollout success
    was down to greed, well that and the EU. Greed, well I don't think they've exported any vaccines.


  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This thread has gone from being a reasonable discussion about Astra Zeneca to yet another “rant about da Brits” thread.

    Sad, but predictable I guess


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭Tyrone212


    Call me Al wrote: »
    Bbc News at 6...
    I wonder will this get a mention. :-)

    Doubt it. When AstraZeneca announced 79% efficacy in the US trials it was the number one read story on BBC news website and plastered all over their media. When the Americans rebuked this figure it didn't feature in the top 10 stories on the BBC website and hardly got covered anywhere if at all.


Advertisement