Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Leo Varadkar story in The Village??? - Mod Notes and banned Users in OP updated 16/05

1239240242244245416

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,576 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    I think Michael has more on his plate for the running of this country rather than worrying whether LV ‘walks’ or not.


    Some folk actually have a genuine concern for their country dude.

    The vast majority have a genuine concern for their country dude, that's why they didn't vote for Leo and his team at the last election.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The vast majority have a genuine concern for their country dude, that's why they didn't vote for Leo and his team at the last election.

    The fact that 78% got FG anyway will have a bearing on future elections if this 'coalescing' to maintain the power is going to be a thing.
    Will the electorate put up with the lying about 'not going into coalition with x' or 'would you put John Delaney back in control of the FAI' rhetoric?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The vast majority have a genuine concern for their country dude, that's why they didn't vote for Leo and his team at the last election.

    Hmmmm........ wonder why they are in Govt. then ?

    I must have slept through the coup when no one would touch the alleged ‘winners’

    Why would no one touch them with a forty foot pole ?

    Has me fierce puzzelated,so it has.

    Any ideas, Bub.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,584 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    I think Michael has more on his plate for the running of this country rather than worrying whether LV ‘walks’ or not.

    It's quite apparent he has too much on his plate when it comes to running this country. Worst ever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Hmmmm........ wonder why they are in Govt. then ?

    I must have slept through the coup when no one would touch the alleged ‘winners’

    Why would no one touch them with a forty foot pole ?

    Has me fierce puzzelated,so it has.

    Any ideas, Bub.

    Because it would have meant the end of the power swap/control Brendi. That is why they didn't.
    Michael did the usual stock thing that FG and FF have done since the foundation of the state. He pretended/lied that he wouldn't coalesce with anyone, then when the count began and it looked like he would have a 50+ majority and would be the largest party he opened the door to SF...then shut it again when it turned out they wouldn't get those seat numbers after all and that he might not get the first go at being Taoiseach.

    Cynical all day long. And he fooled very few but the most blinkered.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Must be the only government in the world that wants to keep Covid going,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    I think Michael has more on his plate for the running of this country rather than worrying whether LV ‘walks’ or not.


    Some folk actually have a genuine concern for their country dude.

    Maybe - but does that not prove my point?

    He was quite prepared for the last govt to collapse over Fitzgerald resigning, her fate and the running of the country was in his hands.

    Will be interesting to learn what this whistleblower has said in his or her protective disclosure Brenner, AGS definitely think whatever it is, and whatever Simon told them is worth looking at.

    Surely must be unprecedented to have a past Taoiseach, sitting Tanaiste to be a suspect in a criminal investigation.

    Months and months of entertainment to look forward to with this one horse. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,461 ✭✭✭Bubbaclaus


    Must be the only government in the world that wants to keep Covid going,

    ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Why didn't Mary Lou demand Gerry Adams stand down while the PSNI arrested him and were investigating him re a crime: Jean McConville’s murder in 2014?
    Double standards?

    Adams claimed he was innocent.
    Varadkar confessed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Adams claimed he was innocent.
    Varadkar confessed.

    I don't think anyone has asked that Varadkar step aside from leading FG either. Many hope FG are going to keep him as leader I would suspect.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    I don't think anyone has asked that Varadkar step aside from leading FG either. Many hope FG are going to keep him as leader I would suspect.

    Oh definitely, and I hope that he leads them into any new election also, his last achievement in that regard was outstanding.

    Think his performance was only topped by one other leader, second worst election result for FG since the party was formed.

    There's a record still to be broken Leo. Go for it chief.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,310 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The fact that 78% got FG anyway will have a bearing on future elections if this 'coalescing' to maintain the power is going to be a thing.
    Will the electorate put up with the lying about 'not going into coalition with x' or 'would you put John Delaney back in control of the FAI' rhetoric?

    We have been there before.
    75% didn't vote for SF yet they claim to have 'won' the election.

    Ireland has had coalition governments since 1977. It will always be thus, so spouting off percentages like that as if they mean anything is just foolish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    We have been there before.
    75% didn't vote for SF yet they claim to have 'won' the election.

    Ireland has had coalition governments since 1977. It will always be thus, so spouting off percentages like that as if they mean anything is just foolish.

    SF got the largest vote that any party got in the election. No amount of standing on your head is going to change that fact. If you wish to see the election as a competition then they 'won' it, hands down.

    Ireland has never had a 'coalition' like the present one. You can stand on your head about that one as well. Everybody else has accepted that it is unique.

    The point is, if it emerges that it doesn't matter if you vote FF or FG, you are going to get them both, I think that will factor hugely in people's choices in the electoral booths and we will see that vote share, which has declined from a high of 86% falling even more into the mid to low 30%'s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    markodaly wrote: »
    We have been there before.
    75% didn't vote for SF yet they claim to have 'won' the election.

    Ireland has had coalition governments since 1977. It will always be thus, so spouting off percentages like that as if they mean anything is just foolish.

    FF won 84 seats in 1977, not a coalition


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,310 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    SF got the largest vote that any party got in the election. No amount of standing on your head is going to change that fact. If you wish to see the election as a competition then they 'won' it, hands down.

    And?
    We have had many instances where the largest party didn't go into government, mainly FF. This has been a feature of our politics for decades. Ignore it if you want, but the largest party doesn't get a 'right' to be in government. That is not how our constitution works. Again, you should really get grips with the basics of how the Dail works.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,310 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    FF won 84 seats in 1977, not a coalition

    Sorry, I should have said after 1977, not since. You get the point. 1977 was the last time we had a single-party government, and likely ever will be the last time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    And?
    We have had many instances where the largest party didn't go into government, mainly FF. This has been a feature of our politics for decades. Ignore it if you want, but the largest party doesn't get a 'right' to be in government. That is not how our constitution works. Again, you should really get grips with the basics of how the Dail works.

    Nobody ever claimed there was a 'right'.

    You guys keep inventing things that are said.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,324 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    McMurphy wrote: »
    Maybe - but does that not prove my point?

    He was quite prepared for the last govt to collapse over Fitzgerald resigning, her fate and the running of the country was in his hands.

    Will be interesting to learn what this whistleblower has said in his or her protective disclosure Brenner, AGS definitely think whatever it is, and whatever Simon told them is worth looking at.

    Surely must be unprecedented to have a past Taoiseach, sitting Tanaiste to be a suspect in a criminal investigation.

    Months and months of entertainment to look forward to with this one horse. ;)

    I think you are going to be a bit disappointed Randle.

    I wouldn’t be looking at stuff like that for entertainment, shaft, get out and get a bit of fresh air after the few days holiday you had.

    It will do you good..........:cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,017 ✭✭✭golfball37


    markodaly wrote: »
    Sorry, I should have said after 1977, not since. You get the point. 1977 was the last time we had a single-party government, and likely ever will be the last time.

    That’s not accurate either. Coalition is defined by more than one grouping represented in cabinet . Pretty sure we had a Haughey govt that was propped up by Tony Gregory and few indos for voting purposes. Not that it matters coalitions are here for eternity


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    I think you are going to be a bit disappointed Randle.

    I wouldn’t be looking at stuff like that for entertainment, shaft, get out and get a bit of fresh air after the few days holiday you had.

    It will do you good..........:cool:

    To be added to the other accurate predictions in this thread, such as:

    Will be forgotten about in a few weeks.
    Already in the public domain.
    Zero craic not really a friend.
    The document wasn't confidential.
    Leo was supreme leader, he could authorise himself to release it.
    No personal advantage to him passing it to his bud.
    The guards are not investigating Leo Varadkar.
    It's a preliminary report.
    Debbie McCann not a reputable source.
    Not a criminal investigation.

    Noted.

    I'll keep it in the back pocket with all those other gems bren.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,912 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    McMurphy wrote: »
    To be added to the other accurate predictions in this thread, such as:

    Will be forgotten about in a few weeks.
    Already in the public domain.
    Zero craic not really a friend.
    The document wasn't confidential.
    Leo was supreme leader, he could authorise himself to release it.
    No personal advantage to him passing it to his bud.
    The guards are not investigating Leo Varadkar.
    It's a preliminary report.
    Debbie McCann not a reputable source.
    Not a criminal investigation.

    Noted.

    I'll keep it in the back pocket with all those other gems bren.

    to be fair with the time dilation effects that the lockdown seems to produce it may only be a few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I still don't get why we are discussing SF in a thread about Leo and FG and his actions (and confession/apology) here. Whataboutery/look over there doesn't address any of that. It's completely OT and probably best suited to one of the SF threads, no?

    Is that the only defence/counter that the pro-Leo/FGers can offer? I'm no FG/Leo fan but no "shinner" either, but I think the best way forward for FG either way is to cut their losses and dump him (and of course that just mean him moving to a cushy role in Europe or the lobby circuit, so it's not as though he'll be joining the dole queue like many others they've pushed there in the last year)

    Of course that means Coveney would likely succeed him which would be worse again.. Hmm, ok I see the dilemma! :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    I still don't get why we are discussing SF in a thread about Leo and FG and his actions (and confession/apology) here. Whataboutery/look over there doesn't address any of that. It's completely OT and probably best suited to one of the SF threads, no?

    Is that the only defence/counter that the pro-Leo/FGers can offer? I'm no FG/Leo fan but no "shinner" either, but I think the best way forward for FG either way is to cut their losses and dump him (and of course that just mean him moving to a cushy role in Europe or the lobby circuit, so it's not as though he'll be joining the dole queue like many others they've pushed there in the last year)

    Of course that means Coveney would like succeed him which would be worse again.. Hmm, ok I see the dilemma! :confused:

    FG party dont want Coveney, they'll give it to Josepha or Heather,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,912 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    FG party dont want Coveney, they'll give it to Josepha or Heather,

    You would think that Josepha's involvement in that other scandal would make her a no-go but it doesn't seem to work that way for FG.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    FG party dont want Coveney, they'll give it to Josepha or Heather,
    :eek: Sweet Christ!! That's the best they have to offer?
    It'll definitely be a woman, as the amount of crying and shouting they have been doing about misogyny, sexism etc.. But one of those two? Thankfully it'll be an era where FG are not in power, and with a bit of luck, with either of those at the helm it will stay that way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    You would think that Josepha's involvement in that other scandal would make her a no-go but it doesn't seem to work that way for FG.

    Someone said a few days ago that they'd invested so much in certain candidates that unless they are caught at the scene of the crime by a high ranking Garda officer and 20 independent witnesses of at least 5 different nationalities it didn't happen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Suckit wrote: »
    :eek: Sweet Christ!! That's the best they have to offer?
    It'll definitely be a woman, as the amount of crying and shouting they have been doing about misogyny, sexism etc.. But one of those two? Thankfully it'll be an era where FG are not in power, and with a bit of luck, with either of those at the helm it will stay that way.

    I would think they'll give it to the other "rising star" Helen in that case? Not that that's any better option.

    FG have the same problem as FF. No one waiting in the wings that you'd see as a natural successor that could both unify the party and get the public behind them again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Suckit wrote: »
    :eek: Sweet Christ!! That's the best they have to offer?
    It'll definitely be a woman, as the amount of crying and shouting they have been doing about misogyny, sexism etc.. But one of those two? Thankfully it'll be an era where FG are not in power, and with a bit of luck, with either of those at the helm it will stay that way.

    Regina hasn't got a seat so its a limited choice


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    I would think they'll give it to the other "rising star" Helen in that case? Not that that's any better option.

    FG have the same problem as FF. No one waiting in the wings that you'd see as a natural successor that could both unify the party and get the public behind them again.

    They went with youth with Varadkar ,cost them too many oldies, middle aged woman to be next FG leader


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,252 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    They went with youth with Varadkar ,cost them too many oldies, middle aged woman to be next FG leader

    That'll cost them anyone who values experience and competence over virtue signalling and quotas.

    As I said, it's quite the dilemma.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement