Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXIII-231,484 ROI(4,610 deaths)116,197 NI (2,107 deaths)(23/03)Read OP

1157158160162163326

Comments

  • Site Banned Posts: 85 ✭✭jackryan34


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    Putting the word fact at the end of a sentence doesn't make it so.

    We would not have had a Lombardy situation, are you serious? For one, we were far more prepared this time around at the coal face, treatment worldwide has improved thanks to knowledge sharing globally.

    Treatments where?

    Hospitals would be full


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,700 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    jackryan34 wrote: »
    Short memory?

    Remember Christmas

    Still a **** load of restrictions in place and still health service was under serious pressure

    Without restrictions we would have been Lombardy, fact

    We'd have 50,000 cases a day in January with no restrictions

    50,000 cases a day? Lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,285 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    Putting the word fact at the end of a sentence doesn't make it so.

    We would not have had a Lombardy situation, are you serious? For one, we were far more prepared this time around at the coal face, treatment worldwide has improved thanks to knowledge sharing globally.

    We're better prepared for sure, but there's a limit to what we can do. Our hospitals would still fill up.

    We were better prepared going into December, low case numbers, low hospital numbers - and yet after a month of loosened restrictions, we had to draw the drawbridge up again super quick in case the system collapsed. And that was a month, with still plenty of restrictions in play.


  • Site Banned Posts: 85 ✭✭jackryan34


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    50,000 cases a day? Lol

    We had 10,000 a day with a load of restrictions in place

    Zero restrictions it would spread like wildfire.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 222 ✭✭Batattackrat


    jackryan34 wrote: »
    Treatments where?

    Hospitals would be full

    Didn't you say in another thread that you won't be taking the vaccine out of choice. Why is that now?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    jackryan34 wrote: »
    Short memory?

    Remember Christmas

    Still a **** load of restrictions in place and still health service was under serious pressure

    Without restrictions we would have been Lombardy, fact

    We'd have 50,000 cases a day in January with no restrictions

    Not fact. Lacks any scientific basis. Withdraw your statement or prove it. List one other EU country with 50k cases.


  • Site Banned Posts: 85 ✭✭jackryan34


    Didn't you say in another thread that you won't be taking the vaccine out of choice. Why is that now?

    Because

    It has side effects
    Its not fully approved ( emergency use only )
    I've had Covid, no symptoms
    I'm not at risk statistically
    Chance of reinfection is miniscule

    All I know is if someone has Covid and is contagious your getting it, mask or no mask, your getting it

    I've seen it spread through a nursing home like wildfire, where staff wore full PPE and had first dose of vaccines and still 90% of staff got it

    Only reason people don't Covid it is because they haven't been infront of a contagious person with the virus

    The restrictions stopped that occuring for most


  • Site Banned Posts: 85 ✭✭jackryan34


    Sobit1964 wrote: »
    Not fact. Lacks any scientific basis. Withdraw your statement or prove it. List one other EU country with 50k cases.

    They all had restrictions

    I'm talking no restrictions here

    Everything open, discos, the lot, people going into work coughing and splurting, no 14 day isolation crap, kids going into school sick, everything goes like before


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    darced wrote: »
    Nonsense

    If we dropped all restrictions and stopped all social distancing it would very quickly turn into a Lombardy like situation save for the nursing homes being shielded by vaccines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    jackryan34 wrote: »
    They all had restrictions

    I'm talking no restrictions here

    Everything open, discos, the lot, people going into work coughing and splurting, no 14 day isolation crap, kids going into school sick, everything goes like before

    Perhaps you could add that we all shift each other in the toilets to your list of implausible stuff that no one serious suggested. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    Turtwig wrote: »
    If we dropped all restrictions and stopped all social distancing it would very quickly turn into a Lombardy like situation save for the nursing homes being shielded by vaccines.

    In your reading, what % of the population have had covid19? Please provide for those that were not tested due to various reasons including being asymptomatic. Consider also those which have recovered and have an immune response.

    Factor in the vulnerable group which have a high % of being vaccinated even at one dose.

    It COULD NOT be like Lombardy - the situation is different. Convince me otherwise.


  • Site Banned Posts: 85 ✭✭jackryan34


    Sobit1964 wrote: »
    Perhaps you could add that we all shift each other in the toilets to your list of implausible stuff that no one serious suggested. :rolleyes:

    True

    The kids in school and college would be back at that as well, as would the office staff at Christmas parties

    Should have included intimacy, without it we wouldnt exist


  • Site Banned Posts: 85 ✭✭jackryan34


    Why are you talking about no restrictions?

    No restrictions we are Lombardy

    Other poster disagrees


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    jackryan34 wrote: »
    No restrictions we are Lombardy

    Other poster disagrees

    Science disagrees that one year on we are Lombardy. You are disagreeing with science, and somewhat howling at the moon. I'd send you some extra soft charmin, but i suspect you might have a stockpile.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,700 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    jackryan34 wrote: »
    No restrictions we are Lombardy

    Other poster disagrees

    I live in a place with not that many restrictions, everything is open. We arent Lombardy and never were. Positivity rate is dropping like a stone, still with everything open. There is no evidence that Ireland would be either


  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 325 ✭✭virginmediapls


    Well, this thread has descended into numpties with extreme opinions shouting at other numpties who have similarly extreme opinions. Neither opinion being remotely close to the truth.

    I am glad we've reached at point that the ending of this pandemic is so close that reasonable people are no longer participating in the discourse, and are instead optimistically looking at the future.

    The only people left behind are the weirdos who have filled up the last few pages of this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,633 ✭✭✭baldbear


    Well, this thread has descended into numpties with extreme opinions shouting at other numpties who have similarly extreme opinions. Neither opinion being remotely close to the truth.

    I am glad we've reached at point that the ending of this pandemic is so close that reasonable people are no longer participating in the discourse, and are instead optimistically looking at the future.

    The only people left behind are the weirdos who have filled up the last few pages of this thread.

    Fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Sobit1964 wrote: »
    In your reading, what % of the population have had covid19? Please provide for those that were not tested due to various reasons including being asymptomatic. Consider also those which have recovered and have an immune response.

    Factor in the vulnerable group which have a high % of being vaccinated even at one dose.

    It COULD NOT be like Lombardy - the situation is different. Convince me otherwise.

    Highest guess for health workers that I've seen was around 25% infected in a Dublin hospital. If we assume that to be representative of the entire community. That would leave approx 3 out every 4 individuals susceptible to infection. One in four with some form of immunity would not prevent rapid spread among the susceptible population.
    The vulnerable in nursing homes are shielded thanks to the vaccines so there'd be less deaths there. Trouble is they don't really make up the hospital admissions population. In a NPHET letter in February to the minister of health Ronan Glynn stated 70% of all hospital cases and ICU admissions were under 70 years of age. Almost none of this population has been vaccinated yet. With no restrictions and social distancing it would only be a matter of time before cases explode followed a few weeks later by hospitalisations and deaths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,633 ✭✭✭baldbear


    I have a 80 year old family member who lives on there on and am planning to visit at the weekend.
    Isn't that ok according to exceptions?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,285 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Sobit1964 wrote: »
    In your reading, what % of the population have had covid19? Please provide for those that were not tested due to various reasons including being asymptomatic. Consider also those which have recovered and have an immune response.

    Factor in the vulnerable group which have a high % of being vaccinated even at one dose.

    It COULD NOT be like Lombardy - the situation is different. Convince me otherwise.

    Truth is nobody knows exactly how many people have been exposed to the virus or would have an immune response.

    AFAIK the only survey of its kind that was carried out here was one based on seroprevalance after wave 1 and it suggested that something 1-3% of the population had been exposed, depending on where you were in the country. Sligo had less than 1% of the population exposed and Dublin slightly over 3%

    You can read the summary here, published in August:

    https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/news/media/pressrel/hse-announces-results-of%C2%A0seroprevalence-study.html

    I know things have changed since then, but if we look at metrics like the amount of deaths since then and now, and we use that as a extremely rough estimate of how much more the virus has circulated since that period, then clearly while there's been a lot more people infected since, I would say it's strongly suggestive that the vast, vast majority of the population haven't been exposed or have any immunity to the virus.

    And, as we know, only 7% of the population have been given one dose of the vaccine - and a proportion of that figure wouldn't be "vulnerable" - they'd be health care workers or care home workers.

    Either way there's clearly an enormous amount of people out there who haven't got the virus or haven't been vaccinated yet.

    If we removed restrictions, right now, there'd be an absolute explosion of cases all over again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭VeVeX


    baldbear wrote: »
    I have a 80 year old family member who lives on there on and am planning to visit at the weekend.
    Isn't that ok according to exceptions?

    Yes. Anyway do it regardless and enjoy yourself. Cherish your family, they wont be around forever.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Arghus wrote: »
    Truth is nobody knows exactly how many people have been exposed to the virus or would have an immune response.

    AFAIK the only survey of its kind that was carried out here was one based on seroprevalance after wave 1 and it suggested that something 1-3% of the population had been exposed, depending on where you were in the country. Sligo had less than 1% of the population exposed and Dublin slightly over 3%

    You can read the summary here, published in August:

    https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/news/media/pressrel/hse-announces-results-of%C2%A0seroprevalence-study.html

    I know things have changed since then, but if we look at metrics like the amount of deaths since then and now, and we use that as a extremely rough estimate of how much more the virus has circulated since that period, then clearly while there's been a lot more people infected since, I would say it's strongly suggestive that the vast, vast majority of the population haven't been exposed or have any immunity to the virus.

    And, as we know, only 7% of the population have been given one dose of the vaccine - and a proportion of that figure wouldn't be "vulnerable" - they'd be health care workers or care home workers.

    Either way there's clearly an enormous amount of people out there who haven't got the virus or haven't been vaccinated yet.

    If we removed restrictions, right now, there'd be an absolute explosion of cases all over again.

    They did an updated seropervalence in Nov /Dec prior to third wave afaik contrasting a hospital in the East (Dublin most likely) to one in the West (Galway).
    Iirc The level of infection in galway staff was less than 5%. In Dublin it was almost 25%.
    Dublin was still goosed by the third wave. Although you could say Galway was proportionately worse during the third wave than Dublin. Would be very interesting to see how many staff were infected in galway during third wave.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,285 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Turtwig wrote: »
    They did an updated seropervalence in Nov /Dec prior to third wave afaik contrasting a hospital in the East (Dublin most likely) to one in the West (Galway).
    Iirc The level of infection in galway staff was less than 5%. In Dublin it was almost 25%.
    Dublin was still goosed by the third wave. Although you could say Galway was proportionately worse during the third wave than Dublin. Would be very interesting to see how many staff were infected in galway during third wave.

    It would.

    Though I would be wary of assuming that those levels of infection could be read as being representative of the rate of infection across the community as a whole - because infection rates for HCW are always bound to be higher.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Arghus wrote: »
    It would.

    Though I would be wary of assuming that those levels of infection could be read as being representative of the rate of infection across the community as a whole - because infection rates for HCW are always bound to be higher.

    You definitely can't assume hcw, who are such a high risk to infection, would be representative of community levels infections. The infection in health care workers can be useful as a proxy to estimate wider trends in the community.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Hospital numbers at 8pm

    Total 345 (down from 371 last night)
    ICU 92 (down from 93 last night)

    Total number now lower than peak of second wave
    349 - 26 October


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,699 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    TheDoctor wrote: »
    Hospital numbers at 8pm

    Total 345 (down from 371 last night)
    ICU 92 (down from 93 last night)

    Total number now lower than peak of second wave
    349 - 26 October
    This is declining faster than I had hoped. We could very well be below 300 by the weekend.

    We're dropping by 100 per week at the minute with no real arresting of decline yet.

    I'd be very interested to see where we are come April 5th.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,081 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    marno21 wrote: »
    This is declining faster than I had hoped. We could very well be below 300 by the weekend.

    We're dropping by 100 per week at the minute with no real arresting of decline yet.

    I'd be very interested to see where we are come April 5th.

    That would be brilliant progress

    ICU bit more stubborn but good decline there too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,567 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    From Independent

    With some primary and secondary school pupils set to return to class in just five days, new figures obtained by the Irish Independent reveal that one in eight of all Covid-19 cases in Ireland were children and teenagers within the year of the pandemic. Also this morning, Philip Ryan reveals that Housing Minister Darragh O'Brien has come under fire for embarking on a nine county tour of the country while Level 5 restrictions are in place.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    jackryan34 wrote: »
    No restrictions we are Lombardy

    Other poster disagrees

    No restrictions when, and where?

    There were very few major restrictions on the continent last summer - and no country went through a 'We Are Lombardy'-experience.

    Are you referring to winter, when respiratory viruses are in their element? That's a different question.

    Are you comparing Europe of January 2020 with no immunity versus some substantial immunity today + 10%-ish vaccinated, including the most vulnerable?

    So throwing around the phrase, "No restrictions and we are Lombardy" doesn't really tell you much at all; it's a simplistic slogan.

    Also, you ignore the fact that even in cases where some restrictions are lifted, many people will adhere to social distancing / masks / washing hands anyway. No government is going to stand up and announce that the vulnerable do not need to do a thing.

    So not only is your statement a worthless slogan. It's also unrealistic and inaccurate on a gigantic scale.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement