Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Western Rail Corridor / Rail Trail Discussion

1131132134136137184

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭eastwest


    ShaneC1600 wrote: »
    Funny thing is the greenway campaign might be louder and have louder supporters than the railway lobbyists and supporters but there seems to be solid support for the railway regardless of what the greenway campaign would have people believe.
    The voice of the public is not all greenway from what I see and here south of Claremorris.
    I think we'd all support the railway, if it was a realistic option. If I was asked whether I'd like a railway from athenry to collooney, of course I'd say yes, even though the likelihood of using it might be slim. It would be grand to have it there though, in case I ever took a notion to see Tuam or Milltown from a train.
    It's not about what people would like to see though, it's what is realistic. And that's the key bit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    ezstreet5 wrote: »
    I'd say there would be good uptake for a Tuam-Galway rail service. Tuam has a population over 9,000, and the bus alone carries over 2,000 passengers per day. Even with the Athenry "detour," a rail service would shave 15 to 30 minutes off of the bus commute, which now stands at 45 to 60+ min (pre-Covid). There will always be a need for Burke's Bus, but for those travelling to Galway city centre, the rail service would be the preferred option.

    One of the major issues of the bus v rail commute is the matter of frequency. If the railway was built what would the frequency of trains be? Maybe one every two hours if you are lucky. Max 6 outbound and 6 inbound a day and not likely to be anything after 6 in the evening. Someone might want to comment on the bus service Galway-Tuam but my guess is there must be buses from early morning to late at night on that route which seems very well served. You claim the rail service will be the preferred option, that is a POV, but do you really believe it when the flexibility of the bus in regard to timetables offers so many more choices. I am not sure about your claim of saving 15 to 30 minutes off timing either, perhaps you could enlighten us all on that claim, I am prepared to see what you mean by that one if you present the facts. I can equally see the train will be "more pleasant" etc etc, but for it to work as an alternative you would need a DART type regulatory, and due to demographics that simply is not going to be on offer.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,410 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    westtip wrote: »
    One of the major issues of the bus v rail commute is the matter of frequency. If the railway was built what would the frequency of trains be? Maybe one every two hours if you are lucky. Max 6 outbound and 6 inbound a day and not likely to be anything after 6 in the evening. Someone might want to comment on the bus service Galway-Tuam but my guess is there must be buses from early morning to late at night on that route which seems very well served. You claim the rail service will be the preferred option, that is a POV, but do you really believe it when the flexibility of the bus in regard to timetables offers so many more choices. I am not sure about your claim of saving 15 to 30 minutes off timing either, perhaps you could enlighten us all on that claim, I am prepared to see what you mean by that one if you present the facts. I can equally see the train will be "more pleasant" etc etc, but for it to work as an alternative you would need a DART type regulatory, and due to demographics that simply is not going to be on offer.

    If you consider what happens on an open railway route, consider the Dublin Wexford line. Both Dublin and Wexford are larger that Tuan or Athenry, so one would expect a very good service. Well first train from Dublin to Wexford arrives at 10:36, having left Connolly at 8:05 am, with three services each way.
    So 2 and a half hours to go 120 km, or 50 km/h.

    Would that satisfy the rail enthusiasts? 20 or 30 buses a day from Tuam to Galway, but only three trains per day to Athenry, with a travel time of an hour to go 30 km.

    How long does it take to go from Limerick to Galway by the train that goes through Ennis? 2 hrs 10 mins or less than 40 km/hr. It is quicker by bus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,537 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    If you consider what happens on an open railway route, consider the Dublin Wexford line. Both Dublin and Wexford are larger that Tuan or Athenry, so one would expect a very good service. Well first train from Dublin to Wexford arrives at 10:36, having left Connolly at 8:05 am, with three services each way.
    So 2 and a half hours to go 120 km, or 50 km/h.

    it hasn't been 3 services each way since 2004.
    4 up and 5 down services, during week days.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    it hasn't been 3 services each way since 2004.
    4 up and 5 down services, during week days.

    Progress!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,410 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    it hasn't been 3 services each way since 2004.
    4 up and 5 down services, during week days.

    The times I quoted are for 1st March. The previous timetable had the earliest arrival in Wexford was after midday - useless for business.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    The times I quoted are for 1st March. The previous timetable had the earliest arrival in Wexford was after midday - useless for business.

    Probably the covid timetable, some services have been trimmed slightly at the moment but the point I made is pretty clear, the actual service that can be provided on a rural line will not provide sufficient service levels for commuting service compared to bus frequencies and there simply isn't the volume there to provide a DART level commuter service. Ergo, as concluded by the independent reports it simply does not stack up as an idea, so why continue fighting for it, what exactly is it going to achieve? A question in all these years of debate that still remains unanswered.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,410 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    It is quite clear looking at the Ennis to Galway times, the service does not get to 50 Km/h. That is an appallingly low speed for a service in this day and age. In comparison, a car (according to Google maps) would average 77 km/h.

    The Ennis to Athenry has been open for over a decade and cannot achieve better than 50 Km/h - how can such a service be considered serious?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭Isambard


    It is quite clear looking at the Ennis to Galway times, the service does not get to 50 Km/h. That is an appallingly low speed for a service in this day and age. In comparison, a car (according to Google maps) would average 77 km/h.

    The Ennis to Athenry has been open for over a decade and cannot achieve better than 50 Km/h - how can such a service be considered serious?

    It's a victim of people campaigning to have their railway back rather than campaigning for a bit more money spent to have a useful railway. At the very least the Athenry reversal should have been eliminated with a direct chord.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,410 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Isambard wrote: »
    It's a victim of people campaigning to have their railway back rather than campaigning for a bit more money spent to have a useful railway. At the very least the Athenry reversal should have been eliminated with a direct chord.

    It needs many more passengers - simples.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭ezstreet5


    The Ennis to Athenry has been open for over a decade and cannot achieve better than 50 Km/h - how can such a service be considered serious?

    You might want to check your math.


  • Posts: 5,250 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ezstreet5 wrote: »
    You might want to check your math.
    ?
    The next Galway to Limerick train service to depart is scheduled to take just under two hours.
    The distance between the stations is appropriately 100km, giving an average of 50kmph.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭Isambard


    ezstreet5 wrote: »
    You might want to check your math.

    takes around 2 hours and is just a bit over 100 km... seems right to me.

    Meanwhile AA routeplanner gives 1 hour 18 minutes for the road


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭ezstreet5


    The claim was that "Ennis to Athenry has been open for over a decade and cannot achieve better than 50 Km/h."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,710 ✭✭✭serfboard


    westtip wrote: »
    Someone might want to comment on the bus service Galway-Tuam but my guess is there must be buses from early morning to late at night on that route which seems very well served.
    20 or 30 buses a day from Tuam to Galway, but only three trains per day to Athenry
    Pre Covid, there were 40 buses per weekday going from Tuam to Galway.

    Once Bus Connects Galway is in place, rail's last possible advantage, of being able to beat traffic once you get to the city, will be eliminated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭ezstreet5


    serfboard wrote: »
    Pre Covid, there were 40 buses per weekday going from Tuam to Galway.

    Once Bus Connects Galway is in place, rail's last possible advantage, of being able to beat traffic once you get to the city, will be eliminated.

    How long do you estimate it will take the train to travel from Tuam to Galway?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭Isambard


    ezstreet5 wrote: »
    How long do you estimate it will take the train to travel from Tuam to Galway?

    I suppose that would depend on the timetable and what connections need to be made at Athenry.


    It would be more attractive if the line into Galway was doubled.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭ezstreet5


    Isambard wrote: »
    I suppose that would depend on the timetable and what connections need to be made at Athenry.


    It would be more attractive if the line into Galway was doubled.

    I believe that is in the cards, as well as removal of the unprotected level crossing beyond Oranmore, which annoyingly causes the trains to decelerate over that segment. Based on that, Galway-Tuam could be 30 - 32 minutes, which would beat all bus services, even with Bus Connects. Again, each bus service seems to make a detour into an industrial estate (not Parkmore), which provides utility, if you happen to work there. So these are complimentary services for a growing region.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    ezstreet5 wrote: »
    I believe that is in the cards, as well as removal of the unprotected level crossing beyond Oranmore, which annoyingly causes the trains to decelerate over that segment. Based on that, Galway-Tuam could be 30 - 32 minutes, which would beat all bus services, even with Bus Connects. Again, each bus service seems to make a detour into an industrial estate (not Parkmore), which provides utility, if you happen to work there. So these are complimentary services for a growing region.

    The problem though is this, who in their right minds is going to build this railway on the arguments that it will save Tuam commuters 15 minutes to get into Galway. Can someone have a reality check here. for all our discussion in this vacuum, take stock for a moment and ask a simple question like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,537 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    westtip wrote: »
    The problem though is this, who in their right minds is going to build this railway on the arguments that it will save Tuam commuters 15 minutes to get into Galway. Can someone have a reality check here. for all our discussion in this vacuum, take stock for a moment and ask a simple question like that.




    it won't be built just to save tuam commuters 15 minutes or more to get into galway, but because galway is choked with traffic and we cannot afford to keep widening the road network to cope with cars and busses both in galway and to the towns around it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭ezstreet5


    westtip wrote: »
    The problem though is this, who in their right minds is going to build this railway on the arguments that it will save Tuam commuters 15 minutes to get into Galway. Can someone have a reality check here. for all our discussion in this vacuum, take stock for a moment and ask a simple question like that.
    There is value of time that can be (and must be) measured.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭Isambard


    ezstreet5 wrote: »
    I believe that is in the cards, as well as removal of the unprotected level crossing beyond Oranmore, which annoyingly causes the trains to decelerate over that segment. Based on that, Galway-Tuam could be 30 - 32 minutes, which would beat all bus services, even with Bus Connects. Again, each bus service seems to make a detour into an industrial estate (not Parkmore), which provides utility, if you happen to work there. So these are complimentary services for a growing region.

    such a lot of unknowns. Connections at Athenry as I said, platform availability at Galway might be another. Better surely to improve the Galway to Dublin service, benefitting the whole region rather than just one small town.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    ezstreet5 wrote: »
    There is value of time that can be (and must be) measured.

    We all know about the value of time, just look how much tourist trade has been lost due to the rail lobby insisting there can be no greenway on "their" route until such time as a railway is feasible. Unfortunately the can kicking by the rail lobby, has stolen time from Tuam businesses in which they could have benefitted from the greenway until the railway happens. That is the crying shame of lost time, and unfortunately with the nonsense we now have to listen to with more diatribes about strategic all island rail reviews. I ask you, what will the can kicking tactic be after that? It never ends so please spare me the ten minutes a Tuam commuter might save in time. Have another coffee from the coffee shop near the station that is crying out for the time to sell breakfasts, coffees and lunches to folk cycling through Tuam on the greenway. It is time to move on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,847 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    westtip wrote: »
    The problem though is this, who in their right minds is going to build this railway on the arguments that it will save Tuam commuters 15 minutes to get into Galway. Can someone have a reality check here. for all our discussion in this vacuum, take stock for a moment and ask a simple question like that.

    Commuting Tuam to Galway is just one single use case. This isolating of use cases has been done to death.


  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Commuting Tuam to Galway is just one single use case. This isolating of use cases has been done to death.

    What other use case is there?

    Pax from beyond Tuam? Won't be built in the next 100 years

    Freight? From who? To where? There is no market worth the spend


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭Isambard


    presumably use by passengers bound for Dublin and Limerick?


  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Isambard wrote: »
    presumably use by passengers bound for Dublin and Limerick?

    Still not a strong enough justification to build WRC phase 2 ahead of other rail projects, not by a long shot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    Still not a strong enough justification to build WRC phase 2 ahead of other rail projects, not by a long shot.

    DC not worth wasting anymore energy on. Its not going to happen and west on track can gloat in the way they have stopped so many people from benefitting from the greenway. its really not worth the energy anymore, not here anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,779 ✭✭✭Isambard


    Still not a strong enough justification to build WRC phase 2 ahead of other rail projects, not by a long shot.

    No I agree. I could list a couple of dozen projects that would be ahead of it in the queue (not going to )


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭ezstreet5


    Isambard wrote: »
    No I agree. I could list a couple of dozen projects that would be ahead of it in the queue (not going to )

    A couple of dozen (24 projects minimum)? I don't think you can create that transport project list!

    But I understand your point. But, I would also be cognizant of the false dilemma logical fallacy. Example: "Athenry-Galway needs to be double tracked, so we should do that rather than reopening the Western Rail Corridor."

    Ireland sadly ranks lowest in Europe in rail investment. More is needed. And there is no requirement that the top-ranked project be progressed first. And there is no obstacle to multiple investments occurring simultaneously.


Advertisement