Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What exactly is happening with AstraZeneca?

15556586061225

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,534 ✭✭✭runawaybishop


    True actually hadn't thought about the volume order aspect in terms of the unit price.

    In terms of the development funding? Nothing I have seen indicates the EU put money in for development?

    If your production costs are funded then logically you can use your cash for development.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    If your production costs are funded then logically you can use your cash for development.

    Even if they did fund it (which they didnt) what difference does it make, they developed a viable drug to negate COVID, then they invested in infrastructure in europe so they could make it - the issue is that infrastructure is not currently outputing the qtys expected which they are working through


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,948 ✭✭✭brickster69


    If your production costs are funded then logically you can use your cash for development.

    That would be true if you were making a profit.

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,201 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    And then during the course of yesterday they absolutely broke the contract re. Confidentiality by publishing parts of the agreement that were agreed to be redacted. It was probably an error on someone's part but still !

    In this situation you would hope that the people involved in making decisions get advice from the companies who are actually trying to fix this disease.

    AstraZeneca broke the confidentiality of the agreement when there CEO started to quote from the contract. Confidentiality is a two way game, when he quoted part of it to gain publicity the EU could publish it all.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    The grave folly was committed by the Irish government last night. Their obsession with the border had them misjudge this situation, overestimate the real implications of what the EU was correctly doing, and so they undermined the EU. While the commission played ball, I am sure they are rightly furious. As am I, and I am sure, most Irish people. It is not for the first time that this preciousness about northern republican sensibilities has provoked the Irish government to make its own people pay a high price.
    What is the problem with the Irish government trying to find out what is going on with regards to the border? Should discussions not have taken place with the various parties involved with the border before this unilateral action was taken by the EU Commission in their dispute with a drug company?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Whether EU funded the development of the Oxford vaccine is irrelevant. Huge amounts of money was poured into developing many potential vaccines, some made it, some didn't. Not every country/union of countries had to put money into each one and the level of contribution to any individual candidate means nothing. Multiple horses were backed world wide, thats why we have several viable vaccines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,948 ✭✭✭brickster69


    The 4 companies subcontracted by AZ in Europe as mentioned by the CEO in his interview as being companies based in Belgium, Holland, Germany & Italy

    Based on the link below it looks like 2 companies in the UK are making the material cobra biologics & Oxford

    Biomedica ( both UK owned ) & Wockhardt Indian Owned - UK branch are finishing.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-30/faced-with-a-vaccine-emergency-the-eu-made-an-enemy-of-everyone

    2 Producing the material

    Novasep - USA Owned Belgium Branch

    Halix - Privately owned Dutch company

    Two companies finishing the product

    Catalent - USA Owned Italian Branch

    Siegfried - Swiss owned German Branch

    Or

    idt biologika - German Owned

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭ThePanjandrum


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    Whether EU funded the development of the Oxford vaccine is irrelevant. Huge amounts of money was poured into developing many potential vaccines, some made it, some didn't. Not every country/union of countries had to put money into each one and the level of contribution to any individual candidate means nothing. Multiple horses were backed world wide, thats why we have several viable vaccines.


    I think that the only reason this has been addressed is because some people have alleged that the EU funded the research.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,948 ✭✭✭brickster69


    What a coincidence after posting the above.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/01/30/exclusive-britain-ready-help-eu-covid-vaccines/

    The Dutch company Halix has supply problems also and last month British Engineers were sent out to speed up delays.

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 526 ✭✭✭The HorsesMouth


    The grave folly was committed by the Irish government last night. Their obsession with the border had them misjudge this situation, overestimate the real implications of what the EU was correctly doing, and so they undermined the EU. While the commission played ball, I am sure they are rightly furious. As am I, and I am sure, most Irish people. It is not for the first time that this preciousness about northern republican sensibilities has provoked the Irish government to make its own people pay a high price.

    No..the Irish government rightly can see past incurring short term gain for long term pain.
    The border and peace between the two nations is and always will be something that needs to be worked at. It's complicated, it needs attention and constant dialogue and harmony. This is the very reason why brexit negotiations went on for years. The government has a duty to their "own" people north of the border, people who identify as Irish as anyone down south. This is the unique and complicated situation in which we live on the island, like it or not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I think that the only reason this has been addressed is because some people have alleged that the EU funded the research.




    UK only left the EU on 31st Jan 2020. The vaccine was already more or less developed by then. They weren't starting from scratch and the Chinese had publicly released the genetic code for the virus.


    What do you think the UK did? Sent over a few suitcases of cash on 1st Feb and the university labs hired and trained up new staff that they didn't have when they had EU funding?



    BTW, some of the first batches for human trials were produced in Italy in April


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    UK only left the EU on 31st Jan 2020. The vaccine was already more or less developed by then. They weren't starting from scratch and the Chinese had publicly released the genetic code for the virus.


    What do you think the UK did? Sent over a few suitcases of cash on 1st Feb and the university labs hired and trained up new staff that they didn't have when they had EU funding?



    BTW, some of the first batches for human trials were produced in Italy in April

    Just becuase you fund something does not give you the right over who gets the final product

    Thats done in your production contract

    They are two different things


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,993 ✭✭✭FileNotFound


    UK only left the EU on 31st Jan 2020. The vaccine was already more or less developed by then. They weren't starting from scratch and the Chinese had publicly released the genetic code for the virus.


    What do you think the UK did? Sent over a few suitcases of cash on 1st Feb and the university labs hired and trained up new staff that they didn't have when they had EU funding?



    BTW, some of the first batches for human trials were produced in Italy in April

    I understood that most of the AZ finish fill release will be done in Italy.

    It's not AZ's site though so that might be why it's not mentioned too often.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,566 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Britain to help us from May onwards with vaccines it's reported tonight.

    Good news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    Britain to help us from May onwards with vaccines it's reported tonight.

    Good news.

    Extract from David Quinn - feels perfect for the above quote and this thread

    "In Ireland we are oblivious to the level of discontent with Brussels elsewhere in Europe. Media coverage follows the commission’s line and blames AstraZeneca. It’s no wonder a new EU survey reveals no one is happier than the Irish with the EU’s response to the pandemic. The poll shows that 72 per cent of us are satisfied, compared with 45 per cent in Germany and 36 per cent in France. The level of satisfaction here is nothing more than a reflection of how woefully ill-informed we are.

    The EU’s vaccine performance has been dire, and will cost further lives and livelihoods. The Irish government must do a better job of defending our interests. That might mean asking the British for surplus supplies. This should be considered, but probably won’t be, because we would have to swallow our national pride and breach EU solidarity.

    For our government, indefinite lockdown may be preferable to annoying the European Commission, or not being seen to wear the EU jersey."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,075 ✭✭✭✭josip


    mista11 wrote: »
    Extract from David Quinn - feels perfect for the above quote and this thread

    "In Ireland we are oblivious to the level of discontent with Brussels elsewhere in Europe. Media coverage follows the commission’s line and blames AstraZeneca. It’s no wonder a new EU survey reveals no one is happier than the Irish with the EU’s response to the pandemic. The poll shows that 72 per cent of us are satisfied, compared with 45 per cent in Germany and 36 per cent in France. The level of satisfaction here is nothing more than a reflection of how woefully ill-informed we are.

    The EU’s vaccine performance has been dire, and will cost further lives and livelihoods. The Irish government must do a better job of defending our interests. That might mean asking the British for surplus supplies. This should be considered, but probably won’t be, because we would have to swallow our national pride and breach EU solidarity.

    For our government, indefinite lockdown may be preferable to annoying the European Commission, or not being seen to wear the EU jersey."


    David Quinn, is that the same David Quinn who's a religious nutjob?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    josip wrote: »
    David Quinn, is that the same David Quinn who's a religious nutjob?
    Writes in the times

    Dont see any references to god in the article so i think you have the wrong man :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,075 ✭✭✭✭josip


    mista11 wrote: »
    Writes in the times

    Dont see any references to god in the article so i think you have the wrong man :)


    Hopefully so; this was the guy I was thinking of, founder of the Iona Institute.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Quinn_(columnist)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    mista11 wrote: »
    Extract from David Quinn - feels perfect for the above quote and this thread

    "In Ireland we are oblivious to the level of discontent with Brussels elsewhere in Europe. Media coverage follows the commission’s line and blames AstraZeneca. It’s no wonder a new EU survey reveals no one is happier than the Irish with the EU’s response to the pandemic. The poll shows that 72 per cent of us are satisfied, compared with 45 per cent in Germany and 36 per cent in France. The level of satisfaction here is nothing more than a reflection of how woefully ill-informed we are.

    The EU’s vaccine performance has been dire, and will cost further lives and livelihoods. The Irish government must do a better job of defending our interests. That might mean asking the British for surplus supplies. This should be considered, but probably won’t be, because we would have to swallow our national pride and breach EU solidarity.

    For our government, indefinite lockdown may be preferable to annoying the European Commission, or not being seen to wear the EU jersey."

    David Quinn has been on the wrong side of every argument he's ever had. If the country is doing the opposite of what he's saying, we're on the right track.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 96 ✭✭Qwertyminger


    Mail on Sunday reporting that Arlene wants us to acknowledge that the EU handled Brexit badly in exchange for vaccines.

    ??!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    David Quinn has been on the wrong side of every argument he's ever had. If the country is doing the opposite of what he's saying, we're on the right track.

    Which points do you think are wrong then? i trust him as much as i trust boris, ursula,Micheal M etc .....which isnt very much

    If the Uk offered us the vaccine would you support getting it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    mista11 wrote: »
    Which points do you think are wrong then? i trust him as much as i trust boris, ursula,Micheal M etc .....which isnt very much

    If the Uk offered us the vaccine would you support getting it?

    Has the UK offered us the vaccine? Are you suggesting that AstroZeneca will have given the UK more than it needs while still not having supplied the EU? Because if not, I'm not sure where these extra vaccines would be coming from?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭85603


    Mail on Sunday reporting that Arlene wants us to acknowledge that the EU handled Brexit badly in exchange for vaccines.

    ??!

    wouldnt put much trust in that.
    the media coverage of the last couple of days has been sensationalist shyte.

    she would be in no position to blackmail the republic anyway, shes just bojos least used puppet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Has the UK offered us the vaccine? Are you suggesting that AstroZeneca will have given the UK more than it needs while still not having supplied the EU? Because if not, I'm not sure where these extra vaccines would be coming from?

    Amazing how AZ said they would deliver to the EU 31mil doses starting the second week of feb and a few days after all the shot blew up, it becomes 39mil doses starting a week earlier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Amazing how AZ said they would deliver to the EU 31mil doses starting the second week of feb and a few days after all the shot blew up, it becomes 39mil doses starting a week earlier.

    Sure, it's often I find 8 million does of vaccine down the back of the couch!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    Has the UK offered us the vaccine? Are you suggesting that AstroZeneca will have given the UK more than it needs while still not having supplied the EU? Because if not, I'm not sure where these extra vaccines would be coming from?

    That wasnt my question - If the Uk offered us the vaccine would you support getting it?

    Would you want to save irish lives first?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    mista11 wrote: »
    That wasnt my question - If the Uk offered us the vaccine would you support getting it?

    The UK isn't offering us the vaccine and if everything is above board with AstroZeneca they won't have any excess vaccines until after the EU's order is fulfilled. So what's to actually answer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭mista11


    The UK isn't offering us the vaccine and if everything is above board with AstroZeneca they won't have any excess vaccines until after the EU's order is fulfilled. So what's to actually answer?

    Silence is golden isnt it, tells far more than being open

    ill answer your question then - i think the UK should release some of their current UK supply (not "more than it needs") earmarked for healtly young UK people with minute risk of serious infection and send that to europeans / Irish at risk of serious illness

    Would you take it if they did?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    mista11 wrote: »
    Silence is golden isnt it, tells far more than being open

    ill answer your question then - i think the UK should release some of their current UK supply (not "more than it needs") earmarked for healtly young UK people with minute risk of serious infection and send that to europeans / Irish at risk of serious illness

    Would you take it if they did?

    But they're not offering that are they? They aren't offering anything at all and no one has asked them to either.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    mista11 wrote: »
    That wasnt my question - If the Uk offered us the vaccine would you support getting it?

    Would you want to save irish lives first?

    Another question, if Germany is not recommending AZ to over 65+, should we swap out pfizer for their AZ so we can vaccinate quicker and Germany can vaccinate quicker?

    Vaccine swaps!


Advertisement