Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2020-21 - Mod Notes in 1st post. [Updated 17/12/20]

1261262264266267326

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,475 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    Abraham is not a top class striker, is a decent player, but not top class. Would do a job for many teams in the EPL, and is OK if Chelsea have 75/80% possession, but when games are tight against top sides he's not good enough.

    At what point does Roman get browned off with Frank? Will he be as ruthless with him as he has been with previous managers, or does Frank's playing career save him, because he has done little on the sidelines to earn any real trust from what I've seen.
    Werner and Havertz just seem like marquee signings. They are both highly talented but need to be properly integrated and become first choice selections. It's bizarre that Abraham and Pulisic should start ahead of them. Chilwell is a poor defender and gets caught out of position too often. The goalkeeper made a dreadful error for the third Arsenal goal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Nunu


    I really like Pulisic. Wouldn’t be dropping him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,954 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Lets not forget we arent as many games in as we would normally be at thsi stage of the calendar year,
    Ots stull very very early for predictions on leauge winners


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,467 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Fitz* wrote: »
    How long before the Chelsea fans turn on Lampard?

    Turned on Mourinho, Solari, AVB, Di Matteo, Sarri, Conte etc. in the recent past.

    Or the players..... They have proven fickle in recent years where managers are concerned, but maybe with the likes of Terry gone from the club and Hazard, then maybe Frank will be safe from that angle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,629 ✭✭✭magma69


    City should have this game wrapped up already.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,954 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    I still think if u finish above City you'll won the league this year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 922 ✭✭✭TheadoreT


    City probably are the best of the poor chasing lot but still havent strung 3 games together in the league this season. Compare them to a few years ago when they had a formidable spine to the side with Kompany and Fernandinho(Yaya before him) and Kun firing on all cylinders. Their top scorer in the league has 4 goals this season, KDB looks a shadow of himself, they're just not that good at the moment


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,611 ✭✭✭✭ERG89


    Everton have probably played better in some of their defeats this season but Sheffield United would need a miracle at this stage to survive. Even with so many single goal defeats their results are matching the performances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    Blow it up ref


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,191 ✭✭✭✭Shanotheslayer


    Everton V City next game should be a decent one


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,932 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    cj maxx wrote: »
    Liverpool, I think, will win this league. And by a comfortable margin because of their consistency. However in the PL there is always a Villa or Fulham etc to pull out an unexpected result. Then you have big teams like City and United who can put runs together and keep it interesting.

    Retaining the league is nearly impossible these days. Pep's City, the best team the league has seen, only did it once, barely, by a single point 2 years ago after a 98pt season.

    Before that the last time the PL was retained Ryan Giggs was PFA Player of the Year, Leicester City were in League One and Tony Adams was a PL manager

    Was an incredibly tall order for Liverpool before a ball was kicked and the injuries have made it even harder


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭thelad95


    Where exactly is the hype over City coming from? Last three games they drew with relegation fodder West Brom beat Southampton in a game that could have gone either way and were somewhat unconvincing tonight against further relegation fodder. I think Everton will take points off them and they'll yet again be outside the top 4.

    This City team is an extremely pale shadow of the 2017-2019 team or even the side that began to falter last season and had handed the title to Liverpool by Christmas.


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    8-10 wrote: »
    Retaining the league is nearly impossible these days.

    By "these days" you mean since it was done by City the season before last?

    Before that it was Chelsea - Leicester - Chelsea. 2 in 3 years.

    Before that it was a sequence of City, Man Utd and Chelsea over 10 years when 1 of them won it twice in a row and another won it 3 times in a row.

    In fact in 15 years Leicester is the only side that has not retained the league.

    So your "fact" is...well...awful...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    thelad95 wrote: »
    Where exactly is the hype over City coming from? Last three games they drew with relegation fodder West Brom beat Southampton in a game that could have gone either way and were somewhat unconvincing tonight against further relegation fodder. I think Everton will take points off them and they'll yet again be outside the top 4.

    This City team is an extremely pale shadow of the 2017-2019 team or even the side that began to falter last season and had handed the title to Liverpool by Christmas.

    It's not from city fans

    If we win the league playing like we have it just confirms how much of a shambles these covid seasons are

    Cannot wait till this is all forgotten about and we get back to normal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,199 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    City do seem a bit more solid defensively these days but they've definitely lost a fair bit of attacking flair. They are not that exciting to watch at the moment even though they are grinding out results.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,855 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Aguero's return may see a return to more free scoring Man City. Especially with their very attractive looking January period fixtures against all bottom half teams - Brighton, WBA, Palace, SHU, Burnley. Would be expecting 15 points there and plenty of goals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,629 ✭✭✭magma69


    8-10 wrote: »
    Retaining the league is nearly impossible these days. Pep's City, the best team the league has seen, only did it once, barely, by a single point 2 years ago after a 98pt season.

    Before that the last time the PL was retained Ryan Giggs was PFA Player of the Year, Leicester City were in League One and Tony Adams was a PL manager

    Was an incredibly tall order for Liverpool before a ball was kicked and the injuries have made it even harder


    Liverpool are 5/6 at the bookies and next are City at 2/1. Other teams are silly odds 13/1, 16/1 and so on.

    I'm not sure what your motivation is behind dishonestly downplaying Liverpool's chances but we both know it's nonsense. It appears to be a two horse race with a City victory considered an upset and anyone else winning it being a shocker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,668 ✭✭✭✭JPA


    Fitz* wrote: »
    Aguero's return may see a return to more free scoring Man City. Especially with their very attractive looking January period fixtures against all bottom half teams - Brighton, WBA, Palace, SHU, Burnley. Would be expecting 15 points there and plenty of goals.

    But what's the story with Aguero? He's only made 4 appearances, no sign of him getting back to real form and fitness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,932 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    magma69 wrote: »
    It appears to be a two horse race

    2 seasons ago it was a 2 horse race. This year there's many more teams involved and the Champions have lost a game 7-2.

    You can pretend there's only 2 teams in it but that's not reality. Chelsea lost today so the kneejerkers will say they're out of the race but they're not. 2 weeks ago everyone was talking about Spurs. United fans on their thread today were talking about winning the title this season, something they haven't done in years, after a draw, with a team that are ahead of them in the table and have won a PL title more recently. And then there's City and Liverpool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,932 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    By "these days" you mean since it was done by City the season before last?

    Did you stop reading my post after the first sentence?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,855 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    JPA wrote: »
    But what's the story with Aguero? He's only made 4 appearances, no sign of him getting back to real form and fitness.

    Being worked back to full fitness is my guess.

    Maybe there's the side issue of a new contract / pre contract with another club. If I remember correctly, his contact expires during the summer.


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    8-10 wrote: »
    Did you stop reading my post after the first sentence?

    No, I laughed at it right through to the end as you tried to make a ridiculous point.

    Here's a better way of phrasing it...

    "Before 2020, 4 clubs won the league in 15 years. 3 of them won it consecutively".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,932 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    No, I laughed at it right through to the end as you tried to make a ridiculous point.

    Here's a better way of phrasing it...

    "Before 2020, 4 clubs won the league in 15 years. 3 of them won it consecutively".

    ...which is very commonly known as retaining the title

    You don't use that phrase to talk about winning multiple ones in non-consecutive years


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    8-10 wrote: »
    ...which is very commonly known as retaining the title

    Yep, we can phrase it that way too...

    "Of all the clubs to win the title over 15 years, only 1 has failed to retain it"

    Man City, Man Utd and Chelsea all won it and retained it in that time...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 922 ✭✭✭TheadoreT


    It's almost a default title for Liverpool this season with most traditional contenders in transition or just plain average...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭d22ontour


    Don't think that Liverpool have any challengers this season, they have been missing some key players and are looking like putting a win streak together.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 996 ✭✭✭amber69


    Liverpool have two challengers this season.. VAR and injuries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 922 ✭✭✭TheadoreT


    I think fans hit peak cringeworthy when they start to assume the role of downplaying their sides obvious chances. I'm unsure whether it's just ultra disingenuous behaviour or they're a bit delusional thinking that not getting ahead of themselves has an influence like they're a manager saying let's take it a game at a time but either way it's baffling to read.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,932 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    TheadoreT wrote: »
    I think fans hit peak cringeworthy when they start to assume the role of downplaying their sides obvious chances. I'm unsure whether it's just ultra disingenuous behaviour or they're a bit delusional thinking that not getting ahead of themselves has an influence like they're a manager saying let's take it a game at a time but either way it's baffling to read.

    And on the flip side you're talking about a 'default' title....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭Brendan Flowers


    TheadoreT wrote: »
    I think fans hit peak cringeworthy when they start to assume the role of downplaying their sides obvious chances. I'm unsure whether it's just ultra disingenuous behaviour or they're a bit delusional thinking that not getting ahead of themselves has an influence like they're a manager saying let's take it a game at a time but either way it's baffling to read.

    My take on it is that some fans know their team are absolute favourites to win the title. But they talk down the teams chances so that when the title is won, they can claim it was a win against all odds, one of the greatest achievements of all time, stuff of legends, etc. Which is bizarre because whether you're red hot favourites or the next Leicester City, winning the title is an fantastic achievement anyways.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement