Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gloucester v Ulster; Sat 19th December, 3.15KO

  • 19-12-2020 04:08PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019
    ✭✭✭✭


    No Carter or Coetzee for Ulster, the pack looks pretty underpowered.

    On the plus side Billy Burns is back at 10.

    Gloucester with Lloyd Evans at 10, also a chance to see Rees-Zammit in action.


Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 launish116
    ✭✭✭


    bilston wrote: »
    No Carter or Coetzee for Ulster, the pack looks pretty underpowered.

    On the plus side Billy Burns is back at 10.

    Gloucester with Lloyd Evans at 10, also a chance to see Rees-Zammit in action.

    Never realised he’s only 19.

    Hopefully O’Connors can give us some/semi parity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019 bilston
    ✭✭✭✭


    I'd like to see that turnover by Gloucester again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 launish116
    ✭✭✭


    Shocking defence there!

    Gloucester just look like making ground every attack

    Our back row getting destroyed already


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019 bilston
    ✭✭✭✭


    McCloskey fell off a tackle really badly there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,556 swiwi_
    ✭✭✭


    That is rubbish defence.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 launish116
    ✭✭✭


    Gloucester really targeting the breakdown


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019 bilston
    ✭✭✭✭


    The Gloucester defence opened up like the red sea there for Burns. He has started really well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,556 swiwi_
    ✭✭✭


    Nice work from burns. His initial wide pass set that try up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,119 UAEguy2020
    ✭✭✭


    Straight through the panama canal there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 launish116
    ✭✭✭


    Gloucesters midfield defence little ropey


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019 bilston
    ✭✭✭✭


    Lovely from Lowry and good feet from McCloskey...shame about the lineout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 launish116
    ✭✭✭


    Real arm wrestle on, really missing Henderson, Coetzee & Carter


  • Administrators Posts: 55,142 awec
    Admin ✭✭✭✭✭


    Going well here :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019 bilston
    ✭✭✭✭


    Hmmmm...

    Did someone from Ulster pish in this ref's corn flakes this morning...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,991 TRC10
    ✭✭✭


    Qualification Hopes slipping away here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,119 UAEguy2020
    ✭✭✭


    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,119 UAEguy2020
    ✭✭✭


    2 yellows and a penalty try all from yet another amateur lineout attempt on the half way line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,991 TRC10
    ✭✭✭


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.

    To be fair, they had a prop throwing in with a 2nd row in the bin


  • Administrators Posts: 55,142 awec
    Admin ✭✭✭✭✭


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.

    Our hooker is in the bin...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,119 UAEguy2020
    ✭✭✭


    awec wrote: »
    Our hooker is in the bin...


    He wasnt in the bin when the penalty was conceded before the PT.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,119 UAEguy2020
    ✭✭✭


    The scary thing is I can barely tell the difference at lineout time...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,991 TRC10
    ✭✭✭


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    He wasnt in the bin when the penalty was conceded before the PT.

    How was that down to a bad Ulster lineout?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 472 Kraftwerk
    ✭✭


    Glad to see that given. Too often players tackle and drag grounded players into touch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 launish116
    ✭✭✭


    Full strength Ulster would have a field day here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,991 TRC10
    ✭✭✭


    It must be said, Ulster have managed this 13 man period magnificently. Gloucester crowd are frustrated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019 bilston
    ✭✭✭✭


    So we won the double sin bin period 3-0


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,836 Clegg
    ✭✭✭✭


    That's a shocker from Cooney


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,119 UAEguy2020
    ✭✭✭


    TRC10 wrote: »
    How was that down to a bad Ulster lineout?


    Ulster screwed up at a lineout that lead to those 2 yellows and PT.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,019 bilston
    ✭✭✭✭


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    The scary thing is I can barely tell the difference at lineout time...

    Huh? The Ulster lineout had been fine before the sin binnings


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 Locke_Lamora
    ✭✭✭


    The lockdown can't come soon enough. Can't disappoint me if we don't play.


Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Advertisement