Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gloucester v Ulster; Sat 19th December, 3.15KO

  • 19-12-2020 4:08pm
    #1
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭


    No Carter or Coetzee for Ulster, the pack looks pretty underpowered.

    On the plus side Billy Burns is back at 10.

    Gloucester with Lloyd Evans at 10, also a chance to see Rees-Zammit in action.


«13

Comments

  • #2
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    bilston wrote: »
    No Carter or Coetzee for Ulster, the pack looks pretty underpowered.

    On the plus side Billy Burns is back at 10.

    Gloucester with Lloyd Evans at 10, also a chance to see Rees-Zammit in action.

    Never realised he’s only 19.

    Hopefully O’Connors can give us some/semi parity.


  • #3
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I'd like to see that turnover by Gloucester again.


  • #4
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Shocking defence there!

    Gloucester just look like making ground every attack

    Our back row getting destroyed already


  • #5
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    McCloskey fell off a tackle really badly there.


  • #6
    swiwi_
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    That is rubbish defence.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Gloucester really targeting the breakdown


  • #8
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    The Gloucester defence opened up like the red sea there for Burns. He has started really well.


  • #9
    swiwi_
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    Nice work from burns. His initial wide pass set that try up.


  • #10
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Straight through the panama canal there.


  • #11
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Gloucesters midfield defence little ropey


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Lovely from Lowry and good feet from McCloskey...shame about the lineout.


  • #13
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Real arm wrestle on, really missing Henderson, Coetzee & Carter


  • #14
    awec
    Administrators Posts: 54,090 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Going well here :rolleyes:


  • #15
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Hmmmm...

    Did someone from Ulster pish in this ref's corn flakes this morning...


  • #16
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Qualification Hopes slipping away here


  • #17
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.


  • #18
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    2 yellows and a penalty try all from yet another amateur lineout attempt on the half way line.


  • #19
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.

    To be fair, they had a prop throwing in with a 2nd row in the bin


  • #20
    awec
    Administrators Posts: 54,090 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.

    Our hooker is in the bin...


  • #21
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    awec wrote: »
    Our hooker is in the bin...


    He wasnt in the bin when the penalty was conceded before the PT.


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    The scary thing is I can barely tell the difference at lineout time...


  • #23
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    He wasnt in the bin when the penalty was conceded before the PT.

    How was that down to a bad Ulster lineout?


  • #24
    Kraftwerk
    Closed Accounts Posts: 472 ✭✭Kraftwerk


    Glad to see that given. Too often players tackle and drag grounded players into touch.


  • #25
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Full strength Ulster would have a field day here.


  • #26
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    It must be said, Ulster have managed this 13 man period magnificently. Gloucester crowd are frustrated.


  • #27
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    So we won the double sin bin period 3-0


  • #28
    Clegg
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,189 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    That's a shocker from Cooney


  • #29
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    TRC10 wrote: »
    How was that down to a bad Ulster lineout?


    Ulster screwed up at a lineout that lead to those 2 yellows and PT.


  • #30
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    The scary thing is I can barely tell the difference at lineout time...

    Huh? The Ulster lineout had been fine before the sin binnings


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    Locke_Lamora
    Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭Locke_Lamora


    The lockdown can't come soon enough. Can't disappoint me if we don't play.


  • #32
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Clegg wrote: »
    That's a shocker from Cooney

    Yeah, ridiculous that he didn't foresee the ball falling off the tee


  • #33
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Brilliant by cooney and Mccloskey


  • #34
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Ulster screwed up at a lineout that lead to those 2 yellows and PT.

    They were Gloucester lineouts man


  • #35
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Ulster screwed up at a lineout that lead to those 2 yellows and PT.

    They got penalised at a maul surely?


  • #36
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Clegg wrote: »
    That's a shocker from Cooney


    Ran down the clock so served its purpose.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Surely that was an earlier drive on O’Connor at last maul


  • #38
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    All things considered, 17-10 at HT is not too bad at all from an Ulster perspective. Big 2nd half needed with qualification Hopes on the line.


  • #39
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Should have taken a 3, within 1 score of leading and Gloucester going in on a low without taking advantage of the extra men.


  • #40
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Should have taken a 3, within 1 score of leading and Gloucester going in on a low without taking advantage of the extra men.

    Used to winning mauls when we have some forward grunt, not with this pack though


  • #41
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Not the start we needed


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Learnt nothing from the PT.


  • #43
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    12-14 points originating from a soft penalty off a lineout from Ulster. Again is lineout work optional at training?


  • #44
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Discipline and set piece really costing us.


  • #45
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    TRC10 wrote: »
    Discipline and set piece really costing us.

    Lack of backup forwards


  • #46
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    5 lineout's lost, not good enough for this level whatsoever.


  • #47
    TRC10
    Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    launish116 wrote: »
    Lack of backup forwards

    Yeah losing your 3 first choice 2nd rows and best ball carrier would hurt any team.


  • #48
    UAEguy2020
    Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    TRC10 wrote: »
    Yeah losing your 3 first choice 2nd rows and best ball carrier would hurt any team.


    I would hope a professional rugby team would still be able to have a functioning lineout at the very least.


  • #49
    launish116
    Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    God Ulster will kill your nerves! Great try!


  • #50
    bilston
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Nice try


  • #51
    Synode
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,967 ✭✭✭Synode


    Brilliant from Cooney


  • Advertisement
Advertisement