Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gloucester v Ulster; Sat 19th December, 3.15KO

  • 19-12-2020 4:08pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭


    No Carter or Coetzee for Ulster, the pack looks pretty underpowered.

    On the plus side Billy Burns is back at 10.

    Gloucester with Lloyd Evans at 10, also a chance to see Rees-Zammit in action.


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    bilston wrote: »
    No Carter or Coetzee for Ulster, the pack looks pretty underpowered.

    On the plus side Billy Burns is back at 10.

    Gloucester with Lloyd Evans at 10, also a chance to see Rees-Zammit in action.

    Never realised he’s only 19.

    Hopefully O’Connors can give us some/semi parity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I'd like to see that turnover by Gloucester again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Shocking defence there!

    Gloucester just look like making ground every attack

    Our back row getting destroyed already


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    McCloskey fell off a tackle really badly there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    That is rubbish defence.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Gloucester really targeting the breakdown


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    The Gloucester defence opened up like the red sea there for Burns. He has started really well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    Nice work from burns. His initial wide pass set that try up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Straight through the panama canal there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Gloucesters midfield defence little ropey


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Lovely from Lowry and good feet from McCloskey...shame about the lineout.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Real arm wrestle on, really missing Henderson, Coetzee & Carter


  • Administrators Posts: 54,087 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Going well here :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Hmmmm...

    Did someone from Ulster pish in this ref's corn flakes this morning...


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Qualification Hopes slipping away here


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    2 yellows and a penalty try all from yet another amateur lineout attempt on the half way line.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.

    To be fair, they had a prop throwing in with a 2nd row in the bin


  • Administrators Posts: 54,087 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    Just compare the lineouts... its not good enough for this level.

    Our hooker is in the bin...


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    awec wrote: »
    Our hooker is in the bin...


    He wasnt in the bin when the penalty was conceded before the PT.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    The scary thing is I can barely tell the difference at lineout time...


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    He wasnt in the bin when the penalty was conceded before the PT.

    How was that down to a bad Ulster lineout?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 472 ✭✭Kraftwerk


    Glad to see that given. Too often players tackle and drag grounded players into touch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭launish116


    Full strength Ulster would have a field day here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    It must be said, Ulster have managed this 13 man period magnificently. Gloucester crowd are frustrated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    So we won the double sin bin period 3-0


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,187 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    That's a shocker from Cooney


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    TRC10 wrote: »
    How was that down to a bad Ulster lineout?


    Ulster screwed up at a lineout that lead to those 2 yellows and PT.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,808 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    UAEguy2020 wrote: »
    The scary thing is I can barely tell the difference at lineout time...

    Huh? The Ulster lineout had been fine before the sin binnings


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭Locke_Lamora


    The lockdown can't come soon enough. Can't disappoint me if we don't play.


Advertisement