Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Traffic at Deansgrange

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭curryman


    The new road layout is causing most of the probs you had 2 straights in both directions now down to 1 lane in both directions at the lights


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    Proper infrastructure can alleviate traffic.
    They did works, traffic is worse.

    The traffic is the same, now it’s just not moving. It’s the lights. I’ll keep repeating it: it’s the lights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    MJohnston wrote: »
    The traffic is the same, now it’s just not moving. It’s the lights. I’ll keep repeating it: it’s the lights.

    When the council do works, changing the lights accordingly should be done. It probably works on a model alright! So yes i agree!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    curryman wrote: »
    The new road layout is causing most of the probs you had 2 straights in both directions now down to 1 lane in both directions at the lights

    This isn’t true. There are no fewer lanes at the Deansgrange crossroads. Movements have been simplified (and they caused massive problems before) and most importantly THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS HAVE BEEN CHANGED.

    * Kill Ln towards DL - one straight and left, one straight and right, merging into one lane immediately after the junction.

    This was an absolute disaster before, particularly thanks to the right turn into the SuperValu car park, now it’s saner as it’s one straight and left, and one right turn only. They need a barrier divider between the bus lane and the general traffic lane here as motorists can’t help themselves. What they can do about SuperValu I’ve no idea, but logically nobody should be able to turn right into the car park there.

    * Kill Ln towards N11 - one straight and left and one straight only (no right turn allowed). Again, merged immediately into one lane after the junction.

    Less of a disaster before, as traffic doesn’t have anything ahead to back up with, but it was still always a mess. Now it’s one left turn and one straight ahead.

    This could allow the pedestrian phase to be modified to allow people to cross at Clonkeen Road while Kill Ln traffic is crossing the junction on an ahead only light. That would be more efficient than the 4-way stop for pedestrians right now.

    Clonkeen and Deansgrange Road lanes are entirely unmodified.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,445 ✭✭✭SeanW


    MJohnston wrote: »
    The traffic is the same, now it’s just not moving. It’s the lights. I’ll keep repeating it: it’s the lights.

    Umm ... okay.

    If there are X number of people trying to get down the road at a certain time one day and they don't encounter serious problems, but the following day, the same number of people trying to do the same thing get bogged down in congestion:

    1) How is the number of motorists the determining factor, if it has not changed?
    2) How is traffic not clearly worse if congestion becomes a serious problem?
    Ben D Bus wrote: »
    "You're not stuck in traffic, you ARE traffic!"
    Is this another example of cyclists gaslighting people? A person most certainly can be stuck in traffic, even if you argue that said person is contributing to the traffic by their mere existence.

    It must be like "there are no accidents, only collisions" despite the likelihood that most collisions are in fact accidental, or "you don't pay road tax" despite Ireland's motor tax regime meeting the dictionary definition of road tax.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    When the council do works, changing the lights accordingly should be done. It probably works on a model alright! So yes i agree!

    They changed the lights at Deansgrange corner long before the works to give pedestrians more time to cross and smaller gaps between pedestrian phases. This was a Covid measure. You can find previous threads from much earlier in the year complaining about it.

    They modified the pedestrian phase at Bakers Corner at the same time as the recent layout change there, although to my eyes it’s no worse on Kill Lane than it usually was. Pottery Road to Abbey Road is same as ever.

    You may only have started noticing the problem because this is basically the first time since then that travel restrictions have been loosened at the same time as schools are back AND at the same time as there’s increased Christmas shopper traffic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    MJohnston wrote: »
    This isn’t true. There are no fewer lanes at the Deansgrange crossroads. Movements have been simplified (and they caused massive problems before) and most importantly THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS HAVE BEEN CHANGED.

    * Kill Ln towards DL - one straight and left, one straight and right, merging into one lane immediately after the junction.

    This was an absolute disaster before, particularly thanks to the right turn into the SuperValu car park, now it’s saner as it’s one straight and left, and one right turn only. They need a barrier divider between the bus lane and the general traffic lane here as motorists can’t help themselves. What they can do about SuperValu I’ve no idea, but logically nobody should be able to turn right into the car park there.

    * Kill Ln towards N11 - one straight and left and one straight only (no right turn allowed). Again, merged immediately into one lane after the junction.

    Less of a disaster before, as traffic doesn’t have anything ahead to back up with, but it was still always a mess. Now it’s one left turn and one straight ahead.

    This could allow the pedestrian phase to be modified to allow people to cross at Clonkeen Road while Kill Ln traffic is crossing the junction on an ahead only light. That would be more efficient than the 4-way stop for pedestrians right now.

    Clonkeen and Deansgrange Road lanes are entirely unmodified.

    Yeah if they added bollards to stop people going into the bus lane heading toward DL that would help.
    People are cutting into the bus lane very early and you have people merging left up where theyre supposed to.
    They should add get in lane signs too maybe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    SeanW wrote: »
    Umm ... okay.

    If there are X number of people trying to get down the road at a certain time one day and they don't encounter serious problems, but the following day, the same number of people trying to do the same thing get bogged down in congestion:

    1) How is the number of motorists the determining factor, if it has not changed?
    2) How is traffic not clearly worse if congestion becomes a serious problem?

    You’re conflating “traffic” with “traffic congestion”, is your first problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    Yeah if they added bollards to stop people going into the bus lane heading toward DL that would help.
    People are cutting into the bus lane very early and you have people merging left up where theyre supposed to.
    They should add get in lane signs too maybe.

    Ironically what would help a lot is a one-way Deansgrange Road too but alas :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    MJohnston wrote: »
    This isn’t true. There are no fewer lanes at the Deansgrange crossroads. Movements have been simplified (and they caused massive problems before) and most importantly THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS HAVE BEEN CHANGED.

    * Kill Ln towards DL - one straight and left, one straight and right, merging into one lane immediately after the junction.

    This was an absolute disaster before, particularly thanks to the right turn into the SuperValu car park, now it’s saner as it’s one straight and left, and one right turn only. They need a barrier divider between the bus lane and the general traffic lane here as motorists can’t help themselves. What they can do about SuperValu I’ve no idea, but logically nobody should be able to turn right into the car park there.

    * Kill Ln towards N11 - one straight and left and one straight only (no right turn allowed). Again, merged immediately into one lane after the junction.

    Less of a disaster before, as traffic doesn’t have anything ahead to back up with, but it was still always a mess. Now it’s one left turn and one straight ahead.

    This could allow the pedestrian phase to be modified to allow people to cross at Clonkeen Road while Kill Ln traffic is crossing the junction on an ahead only light. That would be more efficient than the 4-way stop for pedestrians right now.

    Clonkeen and Deansgrange Road lanes are entirely unmodified.

    Another problem at Deansgrange is the slip road in front of Supervalu. It seems to be everybodys first choice to park in front of the shops so when there are no spaces the resultant overflow of cars waiting for a space spills out onto the main road and this delays traffic from all directions. Far better to remove one side for parking (nearest the shops) and widen the footpath with some seating and planting. Make the other side loading and disabled bays only and force casual shoppers into the main car park behind Supervalu or the Lidl car park. It is ridiculous to effectively have 3 lanes of traffic on a narrow slip road (2 parking and 1 driving)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭micar


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    I cycle to work and pass all the suckers out, that said, its still ****!

    Love it.....love it

    So long suckers!!! I'll be at home with a cup of tea and biscuit and you'll still be in traffic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,365 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    micar wrote: »
    Love it.....love it

    So long suckers!!! I'll be at home with a cup of tea and biscuit and you'll still be in traffic.

    Cmon now everyone in those cars is elderly or disabled or have been priced out of the Dublin market so have to drive in from Navan every day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    Cmon now everyone in those cars is elderly or disabled or have been priced out of the Dublin market so have to drive in from Navan every day.

    Strangely enough the population of the immediate Deansgrange area is probably among the most elderly in Ireland. I live there and observe it daily in the library, shops ect. However the vast majority don't drive and instead rely on the very good 46A bus service to the city and Dun Laoghaire. The most common complaint I hear from them is that there is no bus shelter at the bus stop going to DL. They complain about the traffic in an abstract way but it dosent really affect the vast majority of them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭.anon.


    MJohnston wrote: »
    What they can do about SuperValu I’ve no idea, but logically nobody should be able to turn right into the car park there.

    Is there anything at all to be said for reinstating the roundabout at the Kill Avenue, Mounttown Rd, Oliver Plunkett Rd, Glenageary Rd intersection? That way, you could ban right turns into SuperValu, but people would have an easy option to turn around at the bottom of the hill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    .anon. wrote: »
    Is there anything at all to be said for reinstating the roundabout at the Kill Avenue, Mounttown Rd, Oliver Plunkett Rd, Glenageary Rd intersection? That way, you could ban right turns into SuperValu, but people would have an easy option to turn around at the bottom of the hill.

    Heh: https://twitter.com/yimbyie/status/1266337885323776000


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    .anon. wrote: »
    Is there anything at all to be said for reinstating the roundabout at the Kill Avenue, Mounttown Rd, Oliver Plunkett Rd, Glenageary Rd intersection? That way, you could ban right turns into SuperValu, but people would have an easy option to turn around at the bottom of the hill.

    That is a huge diversion of about 1km each way and includes negotiating a very busy junction (Bakers corner). Twice!!
    I really hate the idea of making roads any wider but to me the easiest solution would be to cpo a bit of the garden of the first cottage beside the Grange pub and possibly a bit of the grange car park. This would at least give enough room for a right turn lane into the car park. However I suppose once there are more than 2 or 3 cars waiting to turn right then traffic couldn't pass anyway.
    The Lidl car park across the road is always almost empty. Maybe some agreement
    with DLR/Supervalu/Lidl to allow parking there for all users of the village without the fear of being clamped (1 hour free ect)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭bigar


    As with all issues with congestion in Dublin there is only one cause: too many cars. As long as the majority is in denial about this, nothing will be solved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    bigar wrote: »
    As with all issues with congestion in Dublin there is only one cause: too many cars. As long as the majority is in denial about this, nothing will be solved.

    Why does traffic modelling software exist then?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    .anon. wrote: »
    Is there anything at all to be said for reinstating the roundabout at the Kill Avenue, Mounttown Rd, Oliver Plunkett Rd, Glenageary Rd intersection? That way, you could ban right turns into SuperValu, but people would have an easy option to turn around at the bottom of the hill.

    No because that roundabouts make traffic flow better which is something the absolute mouthbreathers in DLRCC don't realise. It seems they have been on a crusade over the last ten years to rid the county of every last roundabout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭bbuzz


    GT89 wrote: »
    No because that roundabouts make traffic flow better which is something the absolute mouthbreathers in DLRCC don't realise. It seems they have been on a crusade over the last ten years to rid the county of every last roundabout.

    No, roundabouts are good for moderately busy intersections/junctions. As soon as a roundabout gets busy, it gets choked up and becomes gridlocked, so for car traffic the council are completely right to get rid of them at busy junctions (any civil
    Engineer/road planner will tell you this). Not so good for bicycles though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    GT89 wrote: »
    No because that roundabouts make traffic flow better which is something the absolute mouthbreathers in DLRCC don't realise. It seems they have been on a crusade over the last ten years to rid the county of every last roundabout.

    That's an odd comment, I mean aside from what bbuzz mentioned, there are loads of roundabouts in DLRCC.

    Which ones have they gotten rid of? The only one I can think of was at Leopardstown/Burton Hall Road, but that was very much no longer working as a roundabout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 250 ✭✭easyvision


    MJohnston wrote: »
    That's an odd comment, I mean aside from what bbuzz mentioned, there are loads of roundabouts in DLRCC.

    Which ones have they gotten rid of? The only one I can think of was at Leopardstown/Burton Hall Road, but that was very much no longer working as a roundabout.

    Kill avenue roundabout was great, never tailbacks at that junction. Now regular tail backs and extremely slow to get through that junction now. Maybe wait 15/30 seconds. Lights will now cost you minimum 3-4 minutes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    easyvision wrote: »
    Kill avenue roundabout was great, never tailbacks at that junction. Now regular tail backs and extremely slow to get through that junction now. Maybe wait 15/30 seconds. Lights will now cost you minimum 3-4 minutes

    Tailbacks, or just queues for the lights? Seems to me anytime I pass that junction, it's very unusual to have to wait for more than one phase to get through. I've never seen real tailbacks there (although I avoid driving during school run times)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,663 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    TheW1zard wrote: »
    Why does traffic modelling software exist then?

    no amount of traffic modelling can fit a pint into a half-pint glass. Also, even if your modelling improves the traffic flow, a whole load of people will then think "hey the traffic's not too bad, I'll drive to work instead of getting the bus" and you're quickly back to square one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭TheW1zard


    Cycling through there this morning and as has been pointed out, that right turn into supervalu kills the traffic heading to DL.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 866 ✭✭✭jams100


    loyatemu wrote: »
    I'll drive to work instead of getting the bus" and you're quickly back to square one.
    Probably because unless your working in town, public transport is useless.

    If I was to to take public transport it would be 1hr 15mins.
    If I am to drive its 15 mins.
    Could I cycle? Yes but I don't fancy arriving to work sweaty and more so i don't fancy cycling in the rain and cold.

    When I did go to college there was then the problem of several busses passing because they were full. This idea that people drive purely for convenience is for a large part nonsense. If everyone was to take public transport tomorrow there wouldn't be anywhere near enough capacity but I do agree that we have to try get people out of cars where possible.

    The twitter cycling brigade seem to think that everyone should/can cycle which just isn't dealing with reality that many dont want to cycle.
    Sadly that bus connects has now been watered down significantly and junctions like these probably won't be adequately improved, cpo for gardens to create bus and segregated cycle lanes should be the priority.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    jams100 wrote: »
    Probably because unless your working in town, public transport is useless.

    If I was to to take public transport it would be 1hr 15mins.
    If I am to drive its 15 mins.
    Could I cycle? Yes but I don't fancy arriving to work sweaty and more so i don't fancy cycling in the rain and cold.

    When I did go to college there was then the problem of several busses passing because they were full. This idea that people drive purely for convenience is for a large part nonsense. If everyone was to take public transport tomorrow there wouldn't be anywhere near enough capacity but I do agree that we have to try get people out of cars where possible.

    The twitter cycling brigade seem to think that everyone should/can cycle which just isn't dealing with reality that many dont want to cycle.
    Sadly that bus connects has now been watered down significantly and junctions like these probably won't be adequately improved, cpo for gardens to create bus and segregated cycle lanes should be the priority.

    Whatever about bus transport in the rest of the city, this is absolute nonsense as applied to Deansgrange, which has access to the 46A, one of the highest quality bus routes in Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 866 ✭✭✭jams100


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Whatever about bus transport in the rest of the city, this is absolute nonsense as applied to Deansgrange, which has access to the 46A, one of the highest quality bus routes in Dublin.

    Been over 6 months since I've been to deansgrange is there a bus lane for the 46a on both sides? Has this bike lane taken away from some of the bus lane?

    Are the bus connects plan to create a continuous bus lane on both sides if there isn't already one?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    easyvision wrote: »
    Kill avenue roundabout was great, never tailbacks at that junction. Now regular tail backs and extremely slow to get through that junction now. Maybe wait 15/30 seconds. Lights will now cost you minimum 3-4 minutes

    That roundabout was a nightmare for everything but motorised traffic. Extremely hard to navigate on foot or on a bike. Even if they were to reintroduce a roundabout there it would have too be signal controlled for pedestrians on each of its 5 legs. So it would probably end up just the same.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,733 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    jams100 wrote: »
    Been over 6 months since I've been to deansgrange is there a bus lane for the 46a on both sides? Has this bike lane taken away from some of the bus lane?

    Are the bus connects plan to create a continuous bus lane on both sides if there isn't already one?

    The bus lanes are the same as they always were. I don’t think there’s any space here for extra bus lanes, unless they get rid of car lanes. A bus priority signal at Deansgrange corner heading to DL would be a useful addition.


Advertisement