Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Dominance of Dublin GAA *Mod warning post#1*

1141142144146147323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    I don't know how much of an advantage Croke park is really as most of the top teams playing there often anyway, but for the perception of fairness that the Dubs should play at least half their games away from Croke park including AI semi finals and finals. Cork and Thurles could host these big games, sure there will be less in attendance but as far as I know the GAA haven't any significant outstanding debt on Croke park wheras Cork does and Thurles could use the extra shillings for an upgrade also.
    Whatever about semi finals. Finals shouldnt be moved from the national stadium barring a replay with say kerry v Mayo in Limerick etc
    Its in the hands of all the Leinster counties to get Dubs out of Croke Park more. But the games they should be out of Croke Park shouldnt be the final games of the competition but earlier on in the summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭dunnerc


    Whatever about semi finals. Finals shouldnt be moved from the national stadium barring a replay with say kerry v Mayo in Limerick etc
    Its in the hands of all the Leinster counties to get Dubs out of Croke Park more. But the games they should be out of Croke Park shouldnt be the final games of the competition but earlier on in the summer.


    Yep ive a pain in my face saying the same thing about its in the hands of Leinster Counties to get Dublin out of Croke Park


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,575 ✭✭✭Stacksofwacks


    Whatever about semi finals. Finals shouldnt be moved from the national stadium barring a replay with say kerry v Mayo in Limerick etc
    Its in the hands of all the Leinster counties to get Dubs out of Croke Park more. But the games they should be out of Croke Park shouldnt be the final games of the competition but earlier on in the summer.

    Why would a Leinster semi final in Croker be an advantage to Dublin but an AI final wouldn't? There's no reason you couldn't play an AI final in Cork or Thurles. And it wouldn't be every AI final Dublin are in but rotate it between venues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    Why would a Leinster semi final in Croker be an advantage to Dublin but an AI final wouldn't? There's no reason you couldn't play an AI final in Cork or Thurles. And it wouldn't be every AI final Dublin are in but rotate it between venues.
    Where do you replace all that income from if finals are regularly out of Dublin?
    Replays tend to attract slightly smaller crowds in some cases but its a few million quid considering its 30000 tickets at 80 quid a go and then you have issues with corporate who pay more again and pay for croke park on basis of these finals being played there.
    You dont see FA cup rotating out of wembley?? Its the prestige cup final of the year. Dont move them from your main ground, your best stadium, your biggest stadium


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    dunnerc wrote: »
    Yep ive a pain in my face saying the same thing about its in the hands of Leinster Counties to get Dublin out of Croke Park

    Clubs and counties won't vote to reduce the funding they get from all those Dubs attending home games
    Meanwhile, Dublin are actually treated as a province for funding from central council


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭dunnerc


    Clubs and counties won't vote to reduce the funding they get from all those Dubs attending home games
    Meanwhile, Dublin are actually treated as a province for funding from central council

    So they can but they wont , not Dublins problem


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭Mehapoy


    ShyMets wrote: »
    So how does splitting Dublin get Limerick or Antrim closer to winning a provincial title

    Most of Limerick are quite happy to be winning the provincial title in hurling! Don't worry about us!


  • Posts: 6,581 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Its nice to see more people come around to the idea of splitting Dublin from inside the camp.

    https://i.postimg.cc/ZYVbpGkg/20201210-011746.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,926 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Why would a Leinster semi final in Croker be an advantage to Dublin but an AI final wouldn't? There's no reason you couldn't play an AI final in Cork or Thurles. And it wouldn't be every AI final Dublin are in but rotate it between venues.

    The venues in Cork and Thurles are not big enough...

    So should the GAA pump millions into upgrading a venue in order just to kick Dublin out of Dublin for a couple of games ?

    Capacity of Grounds...

    Croke Park : 76,534

    Parc Ui Chaoimh : 45,000

    Semple Stadium : 45,690


    Croke Park has about 40% extra capacity than those grounds. And for championship games, full, sold out or close.

    Ultimately if you play in Parc Ui Chaoimh, you are depriving a lot of both Dublin supporters and opposition supporters of the ability to go.

    So then, do you pour millions into bringing both the above stadia to a capacity of say 60,000 ?

    About a 30 million investment give or take to facilitate possibly one game a year or two ?

    I’d say plenty of counties would have an issue with the GAA doing that....

    Clubs and counties looking for floodlights, all weather pitches and upgrades to dressing rooms and other facilities but throwing 30 or so million or 60 if both stadia, to facilitate people’s desire to nobble the Dubs ? Doesn’t make sense...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,333 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    how much of the dub population are here because of work? using population to distribute anything is useless without 1st asking why is everyone there.

    how much of the registered gaa pop are from dublin?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    dunnerc wrote: »
    So they can but they wont , not Dublins problem

    Every other county in leinster will have funding affected
    Dublin won't


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    Every other county in leinster will have funding affected
    Dublin won't

    Wow. Could you post a link where you have found out this nugget of information. I have never seen it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭EICVD


    Its nice to see more people come around to the idea of splitting Dublin from inside the camp.

    https://i.postimg.cc/ZYVbpGkg/20201210-011746.jpg

    Poor attempt, must try harder 2/10


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭ooter


    There have been 14 FA cup finals at the new Wembley this century and 11 of them have involved a London club or clubs, probably even more of the semi finals at Wembley involved London clubs, should they all have been moved to another city/venue?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭Cilldara_2000


    Strumms wrote: »
    The venues in Cork and Thurles are not big enough...

    So should the GAA pump millions into upgrading a venue in order just to kick Dublin out of Dublin for a couple of games ?

    Capacity of Grounds...

    Croke Park : 76,534

    Parc Ui Chaoimh : 45,000

    Semple Stadium : 45,690


    Croke Park has about 40% extra capacity than those grounds. And for championship games, full, sold out or close.

    Ultimately if you play in Parc Ui Chaoimh, you are depriving a lot of both Dublin supporters and opposition supporters of the ability to go.

    So then, do you pour millions into bringing both the above stadia to a capacity of say 60,000 ?

    About a 30 million investment give or take to facilitate possibly one game a year or two ?

    I’d say plenty of counties would have an issue with the GAA doing that....

    Clubs and counties looking for floodlights, all weather pitches and upgrades to dressing rooms and other facilities but throwing 30 or so million or 60 if both stadia, to facilitate people’s desire to nobble the Dubs ? Doesn’t make sense...

    Croke Park has a capacity of 82300. There's no guaranteed sell out anymore but usually both finals sell out and maybe one or two other matches, if Dublin happen to be drawn against Mayo other than in the final.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    kilns wrote: »
    What are these professional structures Dublin enjoy over it's competitors like Kerry and Tyrone?

    There is this myth that funding directly benefits the elite teams, the funding provided is essential and goes to the average child in the county whom 99% will never see a county team but people will still bang on about funding, yes other counties deserve funding too but can they be trusted to use it and have the right structure in place

    As for pooling sponsorship, again not a Dublin problem. The biggest objection to that would come from the South West

    The myth is that the money was just for primary school children. That myth has been busted multiple times over. Completely obliterated. Why are you repeating something that has been shown to be false?

    Dublin have paid officers overseeing everything. Strategic development officers, hurling development officers, club development officers etc. Then they have the huge number of paid coaches that they've had for 2 decades now. These are professional structures that no one else has.

    This is before we get to the rest of the money by the way. Do you want to pretend to not know about the long list of sponsors Dublin have?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    ArielAtom wrote: »
    You are wasting your time trying to debate. Tunnel vision on the majority of the posts here from those who have no interest in developing structures. It’s just about stopping Dublin.

    You peddled the myth that the money was just for primary school kids as well until I pointed out the facts to you. Why didnt you inform kilns of them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    dunnerc wrote: »
    Yep ive a pain in my face saying the same thing about its in the hands of Leinster Counties to get Dublin out of Croke Park

    This is another insulting message from some Dubs. First of all, Dublin may be funded like a province but they are still in an already existing one. They are on the Leinster council and have obviously never voted to move Dublin away from croke park.

    Next, it's all well and good having a go at other county boards for voting to have Dublin games in croke park, they don't have millions of euro of taxpayer and sponsorship money backing them. Most county boards struggle with trying to balance the books every year. Dublin fans insulting them for decisions they have to make knowing the money Dublin get every year is really bad form.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,858 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    You dont see FA cup rotating out of wembley?? Its the prestige cup final of the year. Dont move them from your main ground, your best stadium, your biggest stadium

    On the other hand the Super Bowl or the Champions League Final do rotate.
    Why ever have the CL final in Kiev (61K) or Lisbon (61K) when Wembley (87K) or the Nou Camp (90K) are always available? And why did the NFL play the Super Bowl anywhere other the Pasadena Rosebowl with its 103K capacity, at the time dwarfing all other Super Bowl venues by around 25K people.

    I accept that the issue with us is that Croke Pk is just so much bigger and better than the other grounds, but the idea that a final has to be always played in the biggest available stadium is something other sports don't feel the need to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    ooter wrote: »
    There have been 14 FA cup finals at the new Wembley this century and 11 of them have involved a London club or clubs, probably even more of the semi finals at Wembley involved London clubs, should they all have been moved to another city/venue?

    Have the English FA provided a London team with a huge level of resources far beyond every other team in the country and then that team moved to Wembley for them to use it as their permanent home ground?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    On the other hand the Super Bowl or the Champions League Final do rotate.
    Why ever have the CL final in Kiev (61K) or Lisbon (61K) when Wembley (87K) or the Nou Camp (90K) are always available? And why did the NFL play the Super Bowl anywhere other the Pasadena Rosebowl with its 103K capacity, at the time dwarfing all other Super Bowl venues by around 25K people.

    I accept that the issue with us is that Croke Pk is just so much bigger and better than the other grounds, but the idea that a final has to be always played in the biggest available stadium is something other sports don't feel the need to do.
    Whatever about Super Bowl but Champions League is completely different is it not.
    FA Cup, FAI Cup finals always played in national stadium/home of football in the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭gaffer91


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    I think it was decided 37 years ago at Congress that semis would be played in CP.
    If you want it changed put a motion down and debate it.

    Glad you are no longer trying to even argue that isn't an unfair advantage that benefits Dublin
    Countless tournaments havent been ruined because 1 team dominates for a period. Dublins dominance will not last indefinitely. They will drop off. Semi finals and Finals should be played in the national stadium bar some replays where a more suitable venue is available.
    The point about rugby is completely irrelevant and nothing to do with this. The rugby teams always existed and there was identity with the provinces. The games simply were not that interesting to vast majority of people. As the provinces played more and were successful and best players moved to play with them that interest built. The rugby provinces had/have a history that could be built on. A split in Dublin would have none of this.

    Dublin do need to play more championship games outside of Croke Park but its earlier in the competition that they shouldnt be playing there not latter stage of the all ireland.

    There will always be an inter county competition. Mayo, Galway and Roscommon have continuously beat Leitrim and Leitrim field year in year out and dont complain about the vast resources these counties have over them. A split Dublin would have zero impact on how Leitrim do in the championship and the league.

    Countless tournaments have been ruined- Leinster, the All-Ireland. Dublin's dominance will last indefinitely. Five years ago you'd have said five in a row was impossible. All the necessary conditions are there for them to keep winning forever- funding, population, home pitch advantage etc.

    The point about rugby is that it is easy to generate support for new teams.

    All-Ireland finals and semi-finals shouldn't be in Croke Park if Dublin are playing as it's their home pitch and they get an unfair advantage for it.

    There won't be a meaningful inter-county competition in 10 years if Dublin aren't split.
    ShyMets wrote: »
    So how does splitting Dublin get Limerick or Antrim closer to winning a provincial title

    If we don't split Dublin the All-Ireland competition is ruined and it will die. It is currently in the process of dying. No-one will be watching, attending or caring in 10 years as Dublin will keep winning indefinitely built on a platform of unfair advantages. If we split Dublin into four we head off this problem.

    So splitting Dublin helps Limerick and Antrim by ensuring they still have a competition to play in and ensuring the survival of gaelic games at inter-county level. Splitting Dublin also helps Dublin, for the same reasons.
    ooter wrote: »
    There have been 14 FA cup finals at the new Wembley this century and 11 of them have involved a London club or clubs, probably even more of the semi finals at Wembley involved London clubs, should they all have been moved to another city/venue?

    Wembley isn't any London team's home ground. They only play there for the FA cup. Croke Park is Dublin's home ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭ooter


    Enquiring wrote: »
    Have the English FA provided a London team with a huge level of resources far beyond every other team in the country and then that team moved to Wembley for them to use it as their permanent home ground?

    No, but surely it gives the London club an advantage?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    ooter wrote: »
    No, but surely it gives the London club an advantage?

    Which London team uses Wembley as their permanent home ground?

    And why doesnt the English FA fund one club by millions more than any other club?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,769 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Dont have problem with Dublin playing in Croker etc.

    But Hill 16 should be made 50/50 for All Ireland day.. Hill 16 was big advantage to Dubs in that regard

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭ooter


    Croke park is not Dublin's permanent home.
    https://amp.rte.ie/amp/1112567/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,769 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    ooter wrote: »
    Croke park is not Dublin's permanent home.
    https://amp.rte.ie/amp/1112567/

    :pac::pac:

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,853 ✭✭✭Dr. Bre


    Croke park is a neutral venue which happens to be in Dublin . Parnell park is Dublin home ground


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭ooter


    Dont have problem with Dublin playing in Croker etc.

    But Hill 16 should be made 50/50 for All Ireland day.. Hill 16 was big advantage to Dubs in that regard

    I've no idea if it's an equal split but both counties get plenty of hill tickets for the all Ireland final, a lot of non Dublin supporters tend to swap them for seats when it's a final with Dublin involved.
    I have a season ticket in the Cusack and every final since 2011 I've swapped for a hill ticket.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Dick Turnip


    Croke Park is the Dublin football team's de facto home ground. Once they started playing their league games there, I think the question was answered. How can you even debate that still?

    However, AI finals 100% should always be in Croke Park regardless of who is playing. Just not up for debate. Ridiculous to suggest otherwise. Semis should be there too.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement