Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Dominance of Dublin GAA *Mod warning post#1*

1140141143145146323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭gaffer91


    Except interest isnt declining. You have shown nothing to back that up. You keep saying there would be so much interest in these regional sides in Dublin
    Youre completely mad if you think you can compare the provincial rugby teams to these supposed gaa sides.
    There has been provincial rugby teams playing for 130 years. There has been an interprovincial rugby competition ran as a distinct competition since the 1940s. That cant be compared to this.
    Majority of counties will never contest or very rarely will contest provincial finals or get to latter stages of the all ireland.
    Take someone like Leitrim. Dublin being split makes zero positive impact on them and actually would make it harder for them. They have played maybe once or twice in the history of the championship. They wont be playing each other in the league any time soon. They wont be able to compete against a split side either. They wont suddenly get more sponsorship money or anything else.

    You are mad if you think all irelands should be played outside of croke Park. Its the home of the sport. Its the national stadium. Move occasional replays outside if its 2 non leinster counties like galway/mayo v kerry in Limerick but nothing else.

    Every county doesnt have the same chance of success entering the all ireland each year. No sport is like that. Splitting Dublin does nothing for most counties as they still will lose to these Dublin sides and there chances of reaching latter stages is harder with a second dublin side involved. If we are to talk about level playing field then you would need to split multiple other counties as well

    Since the foundation of the GAA when has Dublin not been the biggest county in the country? There will always be counties with much bigger populations. Its a ridiculous point to try and change.

    Interest is declining and evidence has been provided countless times. Take average attendances as a quick barometer. Down even pre-covid.

    The point re rugby sides is that there was no support in the 1990s which then rocketed. Same can happen with Dublin subdivisonal sides. Alternative is that there is no support for any side as interest continues to wane as I have shown.

    Splitting Dublin does help Leitrim- it saves the inter-county competition from being destroyed. They still have a competition to compete it vs none if Dublin are not split, so it helps them.

    Croke Park is HQ but it's also Dublin's home stadium so semi-finals and finals shouldn't be held there if they are playing. They can be held there if they are not. Not fair for one team to have endless home advantage when they already have multiple other opportunities.

    Cork had a bigger population when the GAA was founded. Regardless, this gap has accelerated and is a huge statistical outlier and is now combined with other advantages (e.g funding) so they need to be split to mitigate this.

    To reiterate- splitting Dublin helps all counties, including Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭gaffer91


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    Dublin haven't been beaten in Castlebar since 2007.

    When did they play there in the championship? Home advantage is an advantage. Not fair for Dublin to have home advantage for all consequential games. So they should be taken out of Croke Park.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭gaffer91


    dunnerc wrote: »
    What is confusing you about this ? If the rest of the Leinster counties want Dublin to play there home games in Parnell park they can vote for this and make it happen. :rolleyes:

    What votes were taken on where to host the All-Ireland semi-final and final?

    Dublin play at home for finals. This isn't a fair situation for everyone else. Pretty easy to understand.
    dunnerc wrote: »
    Yes you have had your agenda for years , that is undisputed

    No agenda, I just want what is best for everyone.

    Split Dublin and we save the All-Ireland competition so it helps all counties, including Dublin. Don't split Dublin and the All-Ireland dies so it harms all counties, including Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    What votes were taken on where to host the All-Ireland semi-final and final?

    Dublin play at home for finals. This isn't a fair situation for everyone else. Pretty easy to understand.



    No agenda, I just want what is best for everyone.

    Split Dublin and we save the All-Ireland competition so it helps all counties, including Dublin. Don't split Dublin and the All-Ireland dies so it harms all counties, including Dublin.


    I think it was decided 37 years ago at Congress that semis would be played in CP.
    If you want it changed put a motion down and debate it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    When did they play there in the championship? Home advantage is an advantage. Not fair for Dublin to have home advantage for all consequential games. So they should be taken out of Croke Park.


    Anyone can rent out CP. I'm sure Dub GAA probably have a rental agreement in place for now but if Kerry, Mayo or Cavan want to throw their name into the ring it would have to be considered.
    How feasible that is however is another question altogether.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    Interest is declining and evidence has been provided countless times. Take average attendances as a quick barometer. Down even pre-covid.

    The point re rugby sides is that there was no support in the 1990s which then rocketed. Same can happen with Dublin subdivisonal sides. Alternative is that there is no support for any side as interest continues to wane as I have shown.

    Splitting Dublin does help Leitrim- it saves the inter-county competition from being destroyed. They still have a competition to compete it vs none if Dublin are not split, so it helps them.

    Croke Park is HQ but it's also Dublin's home stadium so semi-finals and finals shouldn't be held there if they are playing. They can be held there if they are not. Not fair for one team to have endless home advantage when they already have multiple other opportunities.

    Cork had a bigger population when the GAA was founded. Regardless, this gap has accelerated and is a huge statistical outlier and is now combined with other advantages (e.g funding) so they need to be split to mitigate this.

    To reiterate- splitting Dublin helps all counties, including Dublin.
    Countless tournaments havent been ruined because 1 team dominates for a period. Dublins dominance will not last indefinitely. They will drop off. Semi finals and Finals should be played in the national stadium bar some replays where a more suitable venue is available.
    The point about rugby is completely irrelevant and nothing to do with this. The rugby teams always existed and there was identity with the provinces. The games simply were not that interesting to vast majority of people. As the provinces played more and were successful and best players moved to play with them that interest built. The rugby provinces had/have a history that could be built on. A split in Dublin would have none of this.

    Dublin do need to play more championship games outside of Croke Park but its earlier in the competition that they shouldnt be playing there not latter stage of the all ireland.

    There will always be an inter county competition. Mayo, Galway and Roscommon have continuously beat Leitrim and Leitrim field year in year out and dont complain about the vast resources these counties have over them. A split Dublin would have zero impact on how Leitrim do in the championship and the league.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    What votes were taken on where to host the All-Ireland semi-final and final?

    Dublin play at home for finals. This isn't a fair situation for everyone else. Pretty easy to understand.



    No agenda, I just want what is best for everyone.

    Split Dublin and we save the All-Ireland competition so it helps all counties, including Dublin. Don't split Dublin and the All-Ireland dies so it harms all counties, including Dublin.

    So how does splitting Dublin get Limerick or Antrim closer to winning a provincial title


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭ooter


    Colm o Rourke used to bang that drum about giving more Dublin lads a chance of playing for their county, as if Colm is genuinely concerned for lads not getting on the Dublin panel. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    ooter wrote: »
    Colm o Rourke used to bang that drum about giving more Dublin lads a chance of playing for their county, as if Colm is genuinely concerned for lads not getting on the Dublin panel. :rolleyes:

    I always found it odd the O'Rouke's concern for giving Dublin lads a chance to play only manifested itself when Meath regressed and Dublin started to dominate Leinster


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭dunnerc


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    Interest is declining and evidence has been provided countless times. Take average attendances as a quick barometer. Down even pre-covid.

    The point re rugby sides is that there was no support in the 1990s which then rocketed. Same can happen with Dublin subdivisonal sides. Alternative is that there is no support for any side as interest continues to wane as I have shown.

    Splitting Dublin does help Leitrim- it saves the inter-county competition from being destroyed. They still have a competition to compete it vs none if Dublin are not split, so it helps them.

    Croke Park is HQ but it's also Dublin's home stadium so semi-finals and finals shouldn't be held there if they are playing. They can be held there if they are not. Not fair for one team to have endless home advantage when they already have multiple other opportunities.

    Cork had a bigger population when the GAA was founded. Regardless, this gap has accelerated and is a huge statistical outlier and is now combined with other advantages (e.g funding) so they need to be split to mitigate this.

    To reiterate- splitting Dublin helps all counties, including Dublin.

    To reiterate -splitting Dublin only helps the top few countys
    and it most definately wont help Dublin


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭dunnerc


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    What votes were taken on where to host the All-Ireland semi-final and final?

    Dublin play at home for finals. This isn't a fair situation for everyone else. Pretty easy to understand.



    No agenda, I just want what is best for everyone.

    Split Dublin and we save the All-Ireland competition so it helps all counties, including Dublin. Don't split Dublin and the All-Ireland dies so it harms all counties, including Dublin.

    Pure and utter nonsense


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    dunnerc wrote: »
    To reiterate -splitting Dublin only helps the top few countys
    and it most definately wont help Dublin

    100% agree. The OP keeps claiming that splitting Dublin will save football. The reality is that any such split will only help a small number of counties. One of which the poster is from.

    The agenda is obvious


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,913 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    The big difference between the Kilkenny and Dublin dominance is that Kilkenny didn’t have the numbers to keep it going indefinitely. Plus while they could blow teams away they’d get a test virtually every year.
    With Dublin’s population it’s far more likely that it will continue indefinitely

    Your prognostication reminds me of this



    ONE NATION.
    UNDER DUBS.


    :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭EICVD


    gaffer91 wrote: »
    Interest is declining and evidence has been provided countless times. Take average attendances as a quick barometer. Down even pre-covid.

    The point re rugby sides is that there was no support in the 1990s which then rocketed. Same can happen with Dublin subdivisonal sides. Alternative is that there is no support for any side as interest continues to wane as I have shown.

    Splitting Dublin does help Leitrim- it saves the inter-county competition from being destroyed. They still have a competition to compete it vs none if Dublin are not split, so it helps them.

    Croke Park is HQ but it's also Dublin's home stadium so semi-finals and finals shouldn't be held there if they are playing. They can be held there if they are not. Not fair for one team to have endless home advantage when they already have multiple other opportunities.

    Cork had a bigger population when the GAA was founded. Regardless, this gap has accelerated and is a huge statistical outlier and is now combined with other advantages (e.g funding) so they need to be split to mitigate this.

    To reiterate- splitting Dublin helps all counties, including Dublin.

    It’s worse this thread is getting with sh1te like this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭dunnerc


    EICVD wrote: »
    It’s worse this thread is getting with sh1te like this

    100% agreed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,115 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    dobman88 wrote: »
    I agree completely and that's why they are played in Croke Park.

    You didn't take Geography for the leaving cert I assume :pac:

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    A lot of people are coming to the conclusion inter county has had its day.

    There has to be more to it for counties like Tipp and Cavan than a day out in Croker, or about 28 other counties.

    About 26 counties are never going to challenge for Sam due to small population, focus on hurling, etc.

    In the last 20 years the teams who could challenge has dwindled from maybe 8 serious contenders to 1 or 2, although in reality only 1.

    Any objective analysis would tell you this competition is dead. And the discussion must now move to what replaces it. And replacing it doesn't mean moving around the chairs on the Titanic.

    The disparities we see today will only increase in future with increased urbanisation.

    Time to consider professionalism. 8-10 professional teams much like with the rugby provinces would maintain a strong interest. And if you played a league competition of about 20 games a season, you'd have more than enough gate, TV and sponsorship revenue to pay for it.

    Amateur intercounty has had its day, its headed down a cul de sac. Time to get rid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,009 ✭✭✭Panrich


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    Dublin haven't been beaten in Castlebar since 2007.

    Not quite that bad but still bad enough. Mayo beat them there in 2012.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,009 ✭✭✭Panrich


    A lot of people are coming to the conclusion inter county has had its day.

    There has to be more to it for counties like Tipp and Cavan than a day out in Croker, or about 28 other counties.

    About 26 counties are never going to challenge for Sam due to small population, focus on hurling, etc.

    In the last 20 years the teams who could challenge has dwindled from maybe 8 serious contenders to 1 or 2, although in reality only 1.

    Any objective analysis would tell you this competition is dead. And the discussion must now move to what replaces it. And replacing it doesn't mean moving around the chairs on the Titanic.

    The disparities we see today will only increase in future with increased urbanisation.

    Time to consider professionalism. 8-10 professional teams much like with the rugby provinces would maintain a strong interest. And if you played a league competition of about 20 games a season, you'd have more than enough gate, TV and sponsorship revenue to pay for it.

    Amateur intercounty has had its day, its headed down a cul de sac. Time to get rid.


    I wonder would that get support. You'd probably be looking at a franchise type system like the NFL and then perhaps have a draft system again like the NFL and AFL for the best minor players each year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    A lot of people are coming to the conclusion inter county has had its day.

    There has to be more to it for counties like Tipp and Cavan than a day out in Croker, or about 28 other counties.

    About 26 counties are never going to challenge for Sam due to small population, focus on hurling, etc.

    In the last 20 years the teams who could challenge has dwindled from maybe 8 serious contenders to 1 or 2, although in reality only 1.

    Any objective analysis would tell you this competition is dead. And the discussion must now move to what replaces it. And replacing it doesn't mean moving around the chairs on the Titanic.

    The disparities we see today will only increase in future with increased urbanisation.

    Time to consider professionalism. 8-10 professional teams much like with the rugby provinces would maintain a strong interest. And if you played a league competition of about 20 games a season, you'd have more than enough gate, TV and sponsorship revenue to pay for it.

    Amateur intercounty has had its day, its headed down a cul de sac. Time to get rid.
    But any professional teams if just picking 8-10 teams wouldnt be like the rugby provinces.
    Amateur intercounty has not at all had its day and its not going to be and cant be got rid of.
    Panrich wrote: »
    I wonder would that get support. You'd probably be looking at a franchise type system like the NFL and then perhaps have a draft system again like the NFL and AFL for the best minor players each year.
    You wouldnt really be able to have a draft and any draft wouldnt be picking minor players. too young. You would be picking players for senior contracts at 20-21


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Let's all remember that a huge list of counties have won provincial titles since the 90's.

    Armagh
    Cavan
    Clare
    Cork
    Derry
    Donegal
    Down
    Dublin
    Galway
    Kerry
    Kildare
    Laois
    Leitrim
    Louth :)
    Mayo
    Meath
    Monaghan
    Offaly
    Roscommon
    Sligo
    Tipperary
    Tyrone
    Westmeath

    That's 22/23 counties. Gaelic football is very much alive. We can see proof of that again this year with Tipperary and Cavan winning provincial titles. Talk of counties not able to compete when playing against other amateur counties is nonsense.

    It's really encouraging to hear others finally coming round to the reality that Dublin must be split. For years people who expressed this view were just labelled as bitter, abuse was thrown their way and of course, a huge amount of deflection. That still happens of course but people now see through that.

    There's genuine anger that this was allowed to happen. One county was given a multi million euro grant essentially. Given free rein to create a player production system that has benefitted all areas of Dublin GAA. It has to come to an end. Yes, other changes also need to be made but this is the first step in the process.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    Panrich wrote: »
    I wonder would that get support. You'd probably be looking at a franchise type system like the NFL and then perhaps have a draft system again like the NFL and AFL for the best minor players each year.

    A draft system would be fair. Fair competition is what should be aimed for.

    A competition where there is little doubt in advance who the winner will be is obviously not sport, I think we can all agree on that.

    Watching the current mess is like watching a carcrash in slow motion. Things are not going to get better only worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭kilns


    Enquiring wrote: »
    Let's all remember that a huge list of counties have won provincial titles since the 90's.

    Armagh
    Cavan
    Clare
    Cork
    Derry
    Donegal
    Down
    Dublin
    Galway
    Kerry
    Kildare
    Laois
    Leitrim
    Louth :)
    Mayo
    Meath
    Monaghan
    Offaly
    Roscommon
    Sligo
    Tipperary
    Tyrone
    Westmeath

    That's 22/23 counties. Gaelic football is very much alive. We can see proof of that again this year with Tipperary and Cavan winning provincial titles. Talk of counties not able to compete when playing against other amateur counties is nonsense.

    It's really encouraging to hear others finally coming round to the reality that Dublin must be split. For years people who expressed this view were just labelled as bitter, abuse was thrown their way and of course, a huge amount of deflection. That still happens of course but people now see through that.

    There's genuine anger that this was allowed to happen. One county was given a multi million euro grant essentially. Given free rein to create a player production system that has benefitted all areas of Dublin GAA. It has to come to an end. Yes, other changes also need to be made but this is the first step in the process.

    Does splitting Dublin bring the likes of Leitrim, Longford or Louth any closer to winning an All Ireland, not a chance. It only benefits the likes of Kerry, Mayo and Tyrone. The gap between these counties and the weaker one remains, you could just see it when Mayo hammer Leitrim routinely.

    Splitting Dublin and thinking this is the solution is the most short sighted thing and it's typically Irish in many ways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    kilns wrote: »
    Does splitting Dublin bring the likes of Leitrim, Longford or Louth any closer to winning an All Ireland, not a chance. It only benefits the likes of Kerry, Mayo and Tyrone. The gap between these counties and the weaker one remains, you could just see it when Mayo hammer Leitrim routinely.

    Splitting Dublin and thinking this is the solution is the most short sighted thing and it's typically Irish in many ways.

    Read to the end of my quote:
    Enquiring wrote: »
    Yes, other changes also need to be made but this is the first step in the process.

    Splitting Dublin is the first step. We can't let a team compete under professional structures while everyone else is competing within amateur structures. Full stop.

    Then of course we need other changes. Like the mad idea that instead of over funding the county with by far the largest population, you fund other counties that really need it. You put structures in place in all counties, give them funding for coaching and so on. Other ideas like pooling sponsorship etc can be discussed but splitting Dublin is the first major hurdle in the process.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭kilns


    Enquiring wrote: »
    Read to the end of my quote:



    Splitting Dublin is the first step. We can't let a team compete under professional structures while everyone else is competing within amateur structures. Full stop.

    Then of course we need other changes. Like the mad idea that instead of over funding the county with by far the largest population, you fund other counties that really need it. You put structures in place in all counties, give them funding for coaching and so on. Other ideas like pooling sponsorship etc can be discussed but splitting Dublin is the first major hurdle in the process.

    What are these professional structures Dublin enjoy over it's competitors like Kerry and Tyrone?

    There is this myth that funding directly benefits the elite teams, the funding provided is essential and goes to the average child in the county whom 99% will never see a county team but people will still bang on about funding, yes other counties deserve funding too but can they be trusted to use it and have the right structure in place

    As for pooling sponsorship, again not a Dublin problem. The biggest objection to that would come from the South West


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    kilns wrote: »
    What are these professional structures Dublin enjoy over it's competitors like Kerry and Tyrone?

    There is this myth that funding directly benefits the elite teams, the funding provided is essential and goes to the average child in the county whom 99% will never see a county team but people will still bang on about funding, yes other counties deserve funding too but can they be trusted to use it and have the right structure in place

    As for pooling sponsorship, again not a Dublin problem. The biggest objection to that would come from the South West
    You are wasting your time trying to debate. Tunnel vision on the majority of the posts here from those who have no interest in developing structures. It’s just about stopping Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,577 ✭✭✭dobman88


    kilns wrote: »
    As for pooling sponsorship, again not a Dublin problem. The biggest objection to that would come from the South West

    Yep. Pooling sponsorship hopefully never happens. What deal a county does between them and a sponsor is a private matter imo. If you're unhappy with things, find a new one or negotiate a better deal but dont start crying about it. Pooled sponsorship is a terrible idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,575 ✭✭✭Stacksofwacks


    I don't know how much of an advantage Croke park is really as most of the top teams playing there often anyway, but for the perception of fairness that the Dubs should play at least half their games away from Croke park including AI semi finals and finals. Cork and Thurles could host these big games, sure there will be less in attendance but as far as I know the GAA haven't any significant outstanding debt on Croke park wheras Cork does and Thurles could use the extra shillings for an upgrade also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭ooter


    Kerry group have been pumping the money in to Kerry for years now and when they win all Ireland's it's fine, not a mention of revenue pooling.
    Some craic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,577 ✭✭✭dobman88


    ooter wrote: »
    Kerry group have been pumping the money in to Kerry for years now and when they win all Ireland's it's fine, not a mention of revenue pooling.
    Some craic.

    Tbf, I doubt you'd find many Kerry people crying for pooled sponsorship.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement