Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

1319320322324325334

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    duploelabs wrote: »
    How do you expect to us to take you seriously when you push this laptop claim?

    Is it to divert attention that your big orange daddy got his PN appeal handed back to him by the USSC?

    "Looks like I need a new computer and a hell of a good lawyer"

    Its written in the description of the campaign. No claim being pushed.

    Trump lost. Fair and square. Hes gone either way in a matter of weeks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,020 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    "Looks like I need a new computer and a hell of a good lawyer"

    Its written in the description of the campaign. No claim being pushed.

    Trump lost. Fair and square. Hes gone either way in a matter of weeks

    Perhaps because they confiscated her laptop during the raid?


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "Looks like I need a new computer and a hell of a good lawyer"

    Its written in the description of the campaign. No claim being pushed.

    Trump lost. Fair and square. Hes gone either way in a matter of weeks

    You don't understand humour either then? She is obviously isn't suggesting that ~ half of the money will be used to buy a new laptop, did you read the title of her GoFundMe page? The fact that this needs to be typed out in words for you is astounding.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Perhaps because they confiscated her laptop during the raid?

    You said I was "pushing a claim"

    As I just said its written in the description. All good


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,114 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42



    No charges laid.

    You appear to be saying this as some item against the person. I assume you simply don't understand how investigations work.

    They raided her house, she needs legal representation to help her through this process otherwise the state have all the advantage.

    The lack of charges is not surprising. They had cause to raid this persons house and take the equipment. They now need to investigate said equipment and try to find evidence with which to build a case. If they find such evidence, it will be presented to her and she will be asked to explain it.

    Her failure to adequately explain may then lead to charges, and possibly court.

    Throughout that, possibly long process, she has to maintain legal counsel, may be unable to work, and given the nature of some in the US atm may need protection.

    So she set up a go fund me scheme to try to prepare for that.

    If the police drop the case then people may look for the money to be returned of used in a specific way.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,969 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Perhaps because they confiscated her laptop during the raid?

    In fact they confiscated every single device in her house - Phones , Computers, Tablets , USB drives etc.

    If that happened in my house I'd be well up into 5 figures to replace it all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,994 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Perhaps because they confiscated her laptop during the raid?

    they took all her hardware during the raid. It explicitly says that in her tweet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Leroy42 wrote: »

    If the police drop the case then people may look for the money to be returned of used in a specific way.

    The campaign was changed from a 150k target to 1 million overnight.

    People will be watching


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,994 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The campaign was changed from a 150k target to 1 million overnight.

    People will be watching

    are you also watching what trump is doing with the hundreds of millions he raised for his crap lawsuits?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    are you also watching what trump is doing with the hundreds of millions he raised for his crap lawsuits?

    Of course.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The campaign was changed from a 150k target to 1 million overnight.

    People will be watching

    It's incredibly cringey reading the things you write and thinking that you've made some sort of point when you haven't and then selectively ignoring all of the other posts that point out how everything you say makes zero sense. I'd love to know how your brain manages to funnel it all out. I assume that the definition of confirmation bias in a dictionary is simply a picture of you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,994 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Of course.

    how are you doing that? how much has he spent so far?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    It's incredibly cringey reading the things you write and thinking that you've made some sort of point when you haven't and then selectively ignoring all of the other posts that point out how everything you say makes zero sense. I'd love to know how your brain manages to funnel it all out. I assume that the definition of confirmation bias in a dictionary is simply a picture of you.

    The campaign was changed from 150k to 1 million overnight.
    And people will be watching to see if there is a court case or not.

    I'm able to post about a topic and make my feelings known. Iv also said that if I'm wrong I will admit it.
    I can do this without making it personal and insulting other posters.

    Some on here dont do same and when they cantforce their opinion through out comes the insults and personal comments.

    I didn't insult you so no need for you to insult me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,169 ✭✭✭The Raging Bile Duct


    The campaign was changed from 150k to 1 million overnight.
    And people will be watching to see if there is a court case or not.

    I'm able to post about a topic and make my feelings known. Iv also said that if I'm wrong I will admit it.
    I can do this without making it personal and insulting other posters.

    Some on here dont do same and when they cantforce their opinion through out comes the insults and personal comments.

    I didn't insult you so no need for you to insult me.

    What exactly is its relevance to this thread? It seems completely off topic to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,109 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    What exactly is its relevance to this thread? It seems completely off topic to me.

    It's a ridiculous attempt to try and deflect attention away from Trump. These posts are an embarrassment not only to the poster in question, but to the entire site as well.

    Silly bloody nonsense.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The campaign was changed from 150k to 1 million overnight.

    And? What's your point? What do you think her legal fees will be? How much do you think the hardware that was taken costs? Perhaps she has talked to some lawyers in the meantime and they have told her their fees? Why do you think she has increased it? Do you know how GoFundMe works at all?
    I'm able to post about a topic and make my feelings known.

    Your feelings known? Go nuts. Make baseless accusations while also incorrectly claiming someone is grifting? You cannot.
    Iv also said that if I'm wrong I will admit it.

    No, you'd said you'll admit that you're wrong if the least likely thing happens. You haven't said you'll admit that you're wrong when the most likely thing happens which would still make you wrong, i.e. that she is charged and uses the money for her legal fees and hardware and doesn't pocket any and either returns the remainder or gives the remainder to charity. Would you like to continue to ignore that possibility or would you instead like to man up and acknowledge that you'll be admit that you're wrong then too?
    I can do this without making it personal and insulting other posters.

    Some on here dont do same and when they cantforce their opinion through they make insults.

    You've insulted this woman and the intelligence of every poster here by suggesting that she is grifting when she isn't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Tony EH wrote: »
    It's a ridiculous attempt to try and deflect attention away from Trump. These posts are an embarrassment not only to the poster in question, but to the entire site as well.

    Silly bloody nonsense.

    I didn't bring it up.

    Posters were talking about Trump wearing a nappy, then the covid response and that lead to this Jones person. That's when I took an interest.

    It's all there.

    Talking about an adult wearing nappies and posting wwe videos trying to prove it is embarrassing to the site.

    But just to be clear. I didn't bring any of it up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,994 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I didn't bring it up.

    Posters were talking about Trump wearing a nappy, then the covid response and that lead to this Jones person. That's when I took an interest.

    It's all there.

    Talking about an adult wearing nappies and posting wwe videos trying to prove it is embarrassing to the site.

    But just to be clear. I didn't bring any of it up

    it was you that said she was grifting. you started that whole thread of conversation with your unfounded accusation.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I didn't bring it up.

    Lol. It was brought up as an example of what Trump's America is like. You decided to attach yourself to it and continue to bring it back up whenever there was the smallest update on it because you thought it made the opposite side look bad when it didn't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    it was you that said she was grifting. you started that whole thread of conversation with your unfounded accusation.

    She definitely is grifting. It could have maybe been argued but now that the target is bumped up to 1 million dollars its grift confirmed in my view.

    Who brought up the Trump wears nappies conversation?
    Who started talking about the covid response?

    All that's wrong here is I have my own opinion on topics and refuse to have it forcibly changed nor do I react to personal insults or the pile on that comes every time someone doesn't follow the herd.

    It's the same scenario on repeat


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    She definitely is grifting.

    I cannot believe you still have not looked up the meaning of the word grifting after all this time. Absolutely amazing.

    And you're still completely ignoring my messages when you can't think of a reply to them. I assume you're not going to acknowledge that you were wrong in the more likely scenario then?

    Also, you make a big deal about it being ok for anyone to post their opinion, but then you go ahead and state your opinion as if it was a fact. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,109 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I didn't bring it up.

    Posters were talking about Trump wearing a nappy, then the covid response and that lead to this Jones person. That's when I took an interest.

    It's all there.

    Talking about an adult wearing nappies and posting wwe videos trying to prove it is embarrassing to the site.

    But just to be clear. I didn't bring any of it up

    You tried to make a claim that the person in question is a grifter, because that's the term that's been used against Trump on this thread.

    The whole sidelining of the thread over this is silly in the extreme.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,578 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Tony EH wrote: »
    You tried to make a claim that the person in question is a grifter, because that's the term that's been used against Trump on this thread.

    The whole sidelining of the thread over this is silly in the extreme.

    The lengths people go to in showing their devotion to Trump is something else. Derailing a whole thread with irrelevant nonsense just to deflect for the Dear Leader. The level of sycophancy is mind boggling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,020 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    I didn't bring it up.

    Posters were talking about Trump wearing a nappy, then the covid response and that lead to this Jones person. That's when I took an interest.

    It's all there.

    Talking about an adult wearing nappies and posting wwe videos trying to prove it is embarrassing to the site.

    But just to be clear. I didn't bring any of it up

    If you've got a problem with it, I suggest you take it up with the mids


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,866 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    Tony EH wrote: »
    You tried to make a claim that the person in question is a grifter, because that's the term that's been used against Trump on this thread.

    The whole sidelining of the thread over this is silly in the extreme.

    It's served its purpose though.

    Nobody is talking about the ludicrous, frivolous lawsuits being brought by the president and his accomplices. Lawsuits with only one function, to damage democracy in the US.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,785 ✭✭✭weisses


    She definitely is grifting. It could have maybe been argued but now that the target is bumped up to 1 million dollars its grift confirmed in my view.

    How much would it cost to take the DOH to court, using a reputable lawyer ?

    Ballpark figure will do


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Hoop66 wrote: »
    It's served its purpose though.

    Nobody is talking about the ludicrous, frivolous lawsuits being brought by the president and his accomplices. Lawsuits with only one function, to damage democracy in the US.

    Plus the secondary purpose of the thread derailment is so that the poster gets a warning or ban and they can then claim to being victimised and can slink off content in the knowledge that boards was out to get them and it's yet more proof that they were right all along.


  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I didn't bring it up.

    Posters were talking about Trump wearing a nappy, then the covid response and that lead to this Jones person. That's when I took an interest.

    It's all there.

    Talking about an adult wearing nappies and posting wwe videos trying to prove it is embarrassing to the site.

    But just to be clear. I didn't bring any of it up

    If your interested in the covid situation you might have commented on the fact that the Rep Gov of Florida has been trying to have their stats manipulated, hence why Jones was fired because they wouldn't go along with that, is ignoring advice on how to best handle the pandemic and hired a Uber driver and sports blogger, who has been posting conspiracy theories about covid as the states data analyst.
    Must be a common trait for the gop to only hire the best people.

    But your not going to do that, if you were you would already have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,383 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,451 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Hoop66 wrote: »
    It's served its purpose though.

    Nobody is talking about the ludicrous, frivolous lawsuits being brought by the president and his accomplices. Lawsuits with only one function, to damage democracy in the US.

    Obviously the concern about US democracy isn't that great.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement