Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

eagle eye · 01-12-2020 05:37PM

Selik wrote:

He claims to know nothing or very little about Qanon when asked. He's doubled down on his bet!

He's getting his news from a bad source. Advise him to read his news from respectable sources like Reuters, the BBC, Washington Post and New York Times.
If he wants more in-depth stuff then Politico is a good place to go.

Cody montana · 01-12-2020 05:51PM

Rudy Giuliani has asked Donald Trump about receiving a pre-emptive pardon before he leaves office - while claiming he can secure him a second term by overturning election results He

duploelabs · 01-12-2020 05:55PM

Cody montana wrote: »

Rudy Giuliani has asked Donald Trump about receiving a pre-emptive pardon before he leaves office - while claiming he can secure him a second term by overturning election results He

Don't know who's dumber

Selik · 01-12-2020 06:18PM

eagle eye wrote: »

He's getting his news from a bad source. Advise him to read his news from respectable sources like Reuters, the BBC, Washington Post and New York Times.
If he wants more in-depth stuff then Politico is a good place to go.

With respect, he would be rolling around laughing at the suggestion of all of those except perhaps Reuters. Then again he probably doesn't trust Reuters either. To be fair the first three are more democrat leaning, not sure about Reuters.

After bitching about the result for weeks now, at least he's putting some dough on the line now. January could be funny and he may go to ground !

eagle eye · 01-12-2020 06:26PM

Selik wrote:

With respect, he would be rolling around laughing at the suggestion of all of those except perhaps Reuters. Then again he probably doesn't trust Reuters either. To be fair the first three are more democrat leaning, not sure about Reuters.

Reuters and the BBC report news without agenda.
You can have whatever opinion you like about the Washington Post and New York Times but I find them great.
I hate biased news media. CNN have become biased as an example and I didn't mention them as a recommendation.

Overheal · 01-12-2020 07:02PM

Cody montana wrote: »

Rudy Giuliani has asked Donald Trump about receiving a pre-emptive pardon before he leaves office - while claiming he can secure him a second term by overturning election results He

Do these people not know how the 5th Amendment works?

Tell me how · 01-12-2020 07:05PM

Overheal wrote: »

Do these people not know how the 5th Amendment works?

They don't know how mail in ballots work and their Supreme Court nominee (who was approved by Senate) couldn't remember the 5 rights afforded by the 1st Amendment so them not understanding the 5th amendment would not surprise me.

everlast75 · 01-12-2020 07:30PM

Overheal wrote: »

Do these people not know how the 5th Amendment works?

At this stage of Rudy's steep legal disintegration, I'd be surprised if he still knows the definition of "plaintiff" and "defendant "....

MeMen2_MoRi_ · 01-12-2020 07:36PM

Uhmmm.. such great people that hired by the greatest business person.

https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/1333822843969302529?s=19

VinLieger · 01-12-2020 07:38PM

Selik wrote: »

With respect, he would be rolling around laughing at the suggestion of all of those except perhaps Reuters. Then again he probably doesn't trust Reuters either. To be fair the first three are more democrat leaning, not sure about Reuters.

After bitching about the result for weeks now, at least he's putting some dough on the line now. January could be funny and he may go to ground !

Imo from reading your descriptions hes deep down the Q rabbit hole but is either oblivious that the conspiracy theories hes into are coming from Qanon or hes too embarrassed to admit it knowing the reaction hed get

nolivesmatter · 01-12-2020 08:04PM

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

Republicans suffering amnesia. The hypocrisy is absolutely mind blowing

https://twitter.com/tamburlaine01/status/1333608377675517952

As someone already mentioned the hypocrisy would go both ways.

How is she perceived by democrat supporters? I don't know much about her and obviously republicans won't like anyone appointed.

nolivesmatter · 01-12-2020 08:06PM

MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: »

Uhmmm.. such great people that hired by the greatest business person.

https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/1333822843969302529?s=19

"<insert name here> should be taken out back and shot" while in poor taste is a commonly used phrase to say someone is terrible at something. It's hardly the same as saying that someone should be shot and killed.

everlast75 · 01-12-2020 08:10PM

nolivesmatter wrote: »

"<insert name here> should be taken out back and shot" while in poor taste is a commonly used phrase to say someone is terrible at something. It's hardly the same as saying that someone should be shot and killed.

With death threats already issued by Trump supporters, plots to kidnap folk in authority and with temperatures running high, at the very least these words are extremely unwelcome and at worst downright dangerous.

What makes matters even worse, this guy is a lawyer and Trump's former lawyer, a profession that calls for choosing words very carefully.

Hence the backlash.

ohnonotgmail · 01-12-2020 08:13PM

everlast75 wrote: »

With death threats already issued by Trump supporters, plots to kidnap folk in authority and with temperatures running high, at the very least these words are extremely unwelcome and at worst downright dangerous.

What makes matters even worse, this guy is a lawyer and Trump's former lawyer, a profession that calls for choosing words very carefully.

Hence the backlash.

is he not still a lawyer for the trump campaign?

mcmoustache · 01-12-2020 08:15PM

nolivesmatter wrote: »

"<insert name here> should be taken out back and shot" while in poor taste is a commonly used phrase to say someone is terrible at something. It's hardly the same as saying that someone should be shot and killed.

That's grand for some regular joe but it's very different when it's a US President's lawyer saying this publicly.

nolivesmatter · 01-12-2020 08:23PM

everlast75 wrote: »

With death threats already issued by Trump supporters, plots to kidnap folk in authority and with temperatures running high, at the very least these words are extremely unwelcome and at worst downright dangerous.

What makes matters even worse, this guy is a lawyer and Trump's former lawyer, a profession that calls for choosing words very carefully.

Hence the backlash.

mcmoustache wrote: »

That's grand for some regular joe but it's very different when it's a US President's lawyer saying this publicly.

Those are fair assessments. But the title on the video tweeted there is "Trump lawyer says ex-cybersecurity chief should be shot & killed". That makes it sound much more sinister than it was and I would argue can only serve to stoke tensions further.

01-12-2020 08:23PM

nolivesmatter wrote: »

"<insert name here> should be taken out back and shot" while in poor taste is a commonly used phrase to say someone is terrible at something. It's hardly the same as saying that someone should be shot and killed.

Bannon also calling for a beheading of Fauci.... There's a noticeable pattern and particularly dangerous.

everlast75 · 01-12-2020 08:41PM

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

is he not still a lawyer for the trump campaign?

Correct, sorry

01-12-2020 09:00PM

There's a man giving evidence at the Michigan 'hearing' now by the name of Randy Bishop.

Sometimes I wonder if the whole Trump era is just an undercover comedy show.

everlast75 · 01-12-2020 09:08PM

https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/status/1333854571676921857?s=19

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1333860018777632770?s=19

Connected or not, i don't know

PopePalpatine · 01-12-2020 09:10PM

Deleted User wrote: »

Bannon also calling for a beheading of Fauci.... There's a noticeable pattern and particularly dangerous.

How else can you live up to the Vanilla ISIS/Y'all Qaeda moniker?

01-12-2020 09:16PM

everlast75 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/status/1333854571676921857?s=19

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1333860018777632770?s=19

Connected or not, i don't know

Trump: "Bill, I want you to go outside, cut your own head off and put it on a stake"

Barr:"Yes Sir."

Selik · 01-12-2020 09:25PM

eagle eye wrote: »

Reuters and the BBC report news without agenda.
You can have whatever opinion you like about the Washington Post and New York Times but I find them great.
I hate biased news media. CNN have become biased as an example and I didn't mention them as a recommendation.

Were BBC not shown to have been quite biased during the Brexit referendum? Maybe that's just brexiteer talk, but it's something I remember reading about a few years, maybe even recently as well.

I would say BBC are more impartial than most, like our own RTE for example. RTE are quite clever about it though, in that they might just leave one piece of important information out about a story - but one that, if reported, changes the whole slant.

drogon. · 01-12-2020 09:29PM

everlast75 wrote: »

https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/status/1333854571676921857?s=19

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1333860018777632770?s=19

Connected or not, i don't know

I guess we will see another personal being fired via twitter later today !

Sparko · 01-12-2020 09:36PM

I dipped briefly into that crazy Sidney Powell's twitter and as expected she's retweeting messages calling for Barr to be fired. Extreme infighting.

eagle eye · 01-12-2020 09:39PM

Barr is clearly looking after his own future by coming out admitting there is no corruption. I'm sure the GOP spoke with him before he made that decision.

Another nail in Trumps coffin.

Probably the most nailed shut coffin in history!!!

drogon. · 01-12-2020 09:48PM

eagle eye wrote: »

Barr is clearly looking after his own future by coming out admitting there is no corruption.

There is nothing to look after, If there is no fraud found - there is no fraud found. It is not like if you tweet about it a million times, it will change anything.

Trump is way too deep into the massive voter fraud saga that he isn't going to give up easily.

The guy never likes to admit he was wrong, so he isn't going to back down anytime soon. Everyone else will move on, but he will still be complaining about it in 4 years time !

listermint · 01-12-2020 10:16PM

I firmly believe the fraud talk was killing the chances of trust in voting in Georgia. Meaning the Dems will come out of it in bigger numbers and the trump or GOP supporters won't because fraud.

You'll see a large about face during December driven from McConnell.

01-12-2020 11:52PM

Selik wrote: »

With respect, he would be rolling around laughing at the suggestion of all of those except perhaps Reuters. Then again he probably doesn't trust Reuters either. To be fair the first three are more democrat leaning, not sure about Reuters.

After bitching about the result for weeks now, at least he's putting some dough on the line now. January could be funny and he may go to ground !

They are more fact leaning which maybe where his issue is with them

everlast75 · 02-12-2020 12:17AM

https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/1333909947042701316?s=19

Please vote below;

Is it

A) Bannon

Briody

C) Rudy

D) Someone else

Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

Comments