Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Reporting restrictions on a murder

Options
2»

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Should be a blanket ban on banking people before convictions - Joe Public has no concept of the phrase 'innocent until proven guilty'.

    After a conviction, sure - no problem.

    It's frightening how many people think that "charged" is just another word for "guilty".


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,550 ✭✭✭Allinall


    What difference does it make, whether the charged party is named or not?

    It certainly has made no difference to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,647 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    Allinall wrote: »
    What difference does it make, whether the charged party is named or not?

    It certainly has made no difference to me.

    No that may well be but I do get the point of been named before your day in court....

    Many a reputation has been destroyed to lies or wrongful arrest....


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    Should be a blanket ban on naming people before convictions - Joe Public has no concept of the phrase 'innocent until proven guilty'.

    After a conviction, sure - no problem.
    It's frightening how many people think that "charged" is just another word for "guilty".

    The phrase ''no smoke without fire'' comes to mind. Not saying in this case, mind you, but in general. Such a dangerous mindset.


Advertisement