Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

1…263264266268269…334

Comments

  • #7952
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Biden is not home and dry you need to understand that.

    But Paddy Power has paid out on the election overall? I thought that that was your source for determining if something is "home and dry"?


  • #7953
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    VinLieger wrote: »
    What people?

    We the people.


  • #7954
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Deleted User wrote: »
    But Paddy Power has paid out on the election overall? I thought that that was your source for determining if something is "home and dry"?

    They jumped the Gun, they shouldn't have paid out on call made by the media.


  • #7955
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    We the people.

    so who is the government bringing a case against? is she a government lawyer now?


  • #7956
    seamus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    That's not what they said. She's not part of the legal team, that does not mean she's not part of the defence. There's a difference.
    A soccer team should try this some day.

    "That 12th man on the pitch is not a part of our team. He's just in the defence".


  • Advertisement
  • #7957
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    and what is this case about? and how do "the people" have standing?

    Ah here you know it hasn't been filed so why the constant questioning of something I or nobody else can answer yet.
    Cool the jets and let justice play out.


  • #7958
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    They jumped the Gun, they shouldn't have paid out on call made by the media.

    But that's the way betting agencies have been paying out on elections around the world for decades?


  • #7959
    km991148
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,277 ✭✭✭km991148


    Serious question DrumMonkey:

    What is your line in the sand. What will it take to accept the result (in either direction)?

    Once all the legal actions are complete?
    If either candidate concedes?

    Where is the line for you?


  • #7960
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    We the people.

    ESm3wSb.png


  • #7961
    Essien
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Essien


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    I absolutely love the way Trump fans call other people sheep for doing sensible things like wearing a mask in the middle of pandemic, while at the same time having no problem at all swallowing baseless conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory from Trump and his right wing loonies. It's amazing really.

    Sure isn't it the foundation for every good conspiracy theory?

    Either this thing is a big lie that's been secretly carried out and covered up by thousands of people around the world while also brainwashing millions into believing it didn't happen.......or maybe I'm just wrong.


    Well I'm not wrong so it must be the other thing.


  • Advertisement
  • #7962
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Ah here you know it hasn't been filed so why the constant questioning of something I or nobody else can answer yet.
    Cool the jets and let justice play out.

    so if it hasn't been filed how do you know who she is representing?


  • #7963
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    seamus wrote: »
    A soccer team should try this some day.

    "That 12th man on the pitch is not a part of our team. He's just in the defence".

    Look at Tipperary yesterday, flew home a chap from Australia for the second half who was not part of the team until then.


  • #7964
    VinLieger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,949 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    We the people.


    Jebus you've really drunk the kool aid haven't you?


  • #7965
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    so if it hasn't been filed how do you know who she is representing?

    Because she said it.


  • #7966
    Cody montana
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    It ain't over. I wouldn't be celebrating just yet if I was a Biden supporter, this is 2020 after all.

    Do you think trump can still win?


  • #7967
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Because she said it.

    but the only lawyers who file cases on behalf of "the people" are government lawyers. what government department is she working for?


  • #7968
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Cody montana wrote: »
    Do you think trump can still win?

    Right now I think anything is possible, as he says himself never bet against him.


  • #7969
    Cody montana
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Right now I think anything is possible, as he says himself never bet against him.

    Is that a yes or no?


  • #7970
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    but the only lawyers who file cases on behalf of "the people" are government lawyers. what government department is she working for?

    Just sit back and relax, wait for it to unfold.


  • #7971
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Right now I think anything is possible, as he says himself never bet against him.

    in his previous life he could strongarm people and they would do what he wants. that isn't working any more.


  • Advertisement
  • #7972
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Cody montana wrote: »
    Is that a yes or no?

    Was that not obvious


  • #7973
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Just sit back and relax, wait for it to unfold.

    Oh I'm very relaxed. She is a QAnon nutcase. If there was evidence that could overturn the election then trumps teams would have produced it in court. That they haven't shows that it doesn't exist. there is no 3D chess playing going on. They couldn't even spell Tom Wolfs name properly in an affidavit.


  • #7974
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Was that not obvious

    Here's a better question to test your delusion. Do you think Trump will win?

    Only answer yes or no.


  • #7975
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Just sit back and relax, wait for it to unfold.

    Absolutely. It's been great entertainment so far, from Trump crying on Twitter to Four Seasons Total Landscaping to Rudy's hair dye melting to Sidney Powell's whacky conspiracy theories. It's been a riot. My favourite part so far is the 34 lost/dismissed court cases. Looking forward to more of that!


  • #7976
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    Oh I'm very relaxed. She is a QAnon nutcase. If there was evidence that could overturn the election then trumps teams would have produced it in court. That they haven't shows that it doesn't exist. there is no 3D chess playing going on. They couldn't even spell Tom Wolfs name properly in an affidavit.

    It takes a while to put a credible case together, no harm throwing a few soft balls while they getting things together.
    I'm happy to just watch it all play out over the next two months.


  • #7977
    Eric Cartman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Theres a suggestion the cases are being intentionally badly argued to get up and argue them in the supreme court where ‘favours will be called in’

    Now im not sure how likely/realistic this is , but could trumps end game be to bring a few of these to the supreme court and have them do his bidding ?


  • #7978
    seamus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Just sit back and relax, wait for it to unfold.
    Coming up on 3 weeks post-election.

    They have produced no evidence that would cast doubt on the result. Not a shred.

    Every claim they have made has either been proven completely false, or been found to have occurred in individual cases, and committed by Republicans.

    One recount has confirmed Biden's victory.

    Another recount is being delayed by Republicans frustrating the process.

    So if you think "winning" is a possibility at this stage, you are aware that the only route now is to cheat. To tamper with the process in such a way that it allows for a wholly undemocratic outcome to occur.

    And you are no doubt happy with that, because it's not cheating if the right person wins, right?

    But if all of the states were to shut down the appeals processes now, certify their results & ban republicans from filing any lawsuits until the electors were selected and cast their votes, you would cry foul. You'd say it's cheating.

    But you'd be perfectly happy for Trump to cheat.


  • #7979
    VinLieger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,949 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Eric Cartman wrote: »
    Theres a suggestion the cases are being intentionally badly argued to get up and argue them in the supreme court where ‘favours will be called in’

    Now im not sure how likely/realistic this is , but could trumps end game be to bring a few of these to the supreme court and have them do his bidding ?


    The problem with that theory is is they have to lose the cases for that to happen, so far the cases are being dismissed with prejudice due to how badly they are constructed and the complete lack of evidence, which basically is the judge telling them to gtfo and never come back.

    Dismissed cases cannot be appealed to a higher court.


  • #7980
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Here's a better question to test your delusion. Do you think Trump will win?

    Only answer yes or no.

    Couldn't call it either way, 50/50 at this stage. I'm 100% sure Biden has not won, the fact your posing the question tells me you have doubts yourself and know Biden hasn't officially won.


  • Advertisement
  • #7981
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Couldn't call it either way, 50/50 at this stage. I'm 100% sure Biden has not won, the fact your posing the question tells me you have doubts yourself and know Biden hasn't officially won.

    Eh no, I have no doubt that Biden has won.

    And I know you don't actually think this because you are going to ignore my next question.

    Charity bet?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement