Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

1…262263265267268…334

Comments

  • #7922
    duploelabs
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,028 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    what did she say?

    She's being sarcastic


  • #7923
    robinph
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    How could it be under the control of Hugo Chavez, I think you're misunderstood what she said.

    Nope, he got mentioned several times by her in that press conference. He's one of the main players in this conspiracy to have Trump lose the election, and all run by someone who died several years before Trump even had the first inkling of running for US president in the first place.


  • #7924
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    VinLieger wrote: »
    They have said very plainly she is not part of his defense team AT ALL.


    That's not what they said. She's not part of the legal team, that does not mean she's not part of the defence. There's a difference.


  • #7925
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    That's not what they said. She's not part of the legal team, that does not mean she's not part of the defence. There's a difference.

    so what is her position?


  • #7926
    Boggles
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,476 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    That's not what they said. She's not part of the legal team, that does not mean she's not part of the defence. There's a difference.

    State of you.

    :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • #7927
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I absolutely love the way Trump fans call other people sheep for doing sensible things like wearing a mask in the middle of pandemic, while at the same time having no problem at all swallowing baseless conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory from Trump and his right wing loonies. It's amazing really.


  • #7928
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    robinph wrote: »
    Nope, he got mentioned several times by her in that press conference. He's one of the main players in this conspiracy to have Trump lose the election, and all run by someone who died several years before Trump even had the first inkling of running for US president in the first place.

    Some man in fairness to be pulling the strings on US elections from beyond the grave.


  • #7929
    Smee_Again
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    That's not what they said. She's not part of the legal team, that does not mean she's not part of the defence. There's a difference.

    This is sad.


  • #7930
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    So now we have drunkmonkey believing that Georgia's Republican governor conspired with the CIA to steal the election from their own party’s president to benefit from election insurance per a scheme created by Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, who died in 2013.

    How much money has he put on this I wonder?


  • #7931
    Leroy42
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    How could it be under the control of Hugo Chavez, I think you're misunderstood what she said.

    What she said was complete and utter nonsense, none of it makes any sense.

    This was an arranged press conference, they called it, to let people know.

    The fact that people haven't a clue what they were on about is 100% on them.

    I know that Trumps press conferences have conditioned us to think that they are not meant to provide any actual information, provide any clarity, and anything that is said at them can be interpreted and reinterpreted later, but that is not the way they are supposed to be.

    They called the national media to meet the strikeforce, talked rubbish and conspiracy for 90 minutes and then blamed the media sitting right in front of them listening to everything they had to say, for not paying enough attention.

    Now we are down another fantasy dead end. Instead of Biden laptop, now its a server in Germany.

    And we have posters making up scenarios where EU GDPR may be avoided or exactly where the database might be located!

    The onus is on Trump to detail that, not simply lob a grenade in the air and then waste everyone's time speculating.


  • Advertisement
  • #7932
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Deleted User wrote: »
    So now we have drunkmonkey believing that Georgia's Republican governor conspired with the CIA to steal the election from their own party’s president to benefit from election insurance per a scheme created by Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, who died in 2013.

    How much money has he put on this I wonder?

    1,000/1 Paddy Power special I'd say.


  • #7933
    Quin_Dub
    Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    ChikiChiki wrote: »
    Surely Kemp has a strong case for defamation in this instance.

    I was thinking about that in the context of the Cyber-security guy , Krebs.

    Trump explicitly said "I'm firing him because he said there was no fraud in the election etc. etc."

    Given that absolutely Zero evidence of fraud , and specifically no "Cyber" fraud has been forthcoming , surely he'd have a case for unfair dismissal or whatever?

    I know that technically all these people "Serve at the Pleasure of the President" or whatever , but surely if the reason given for their dismissal can be proven as an outright lie they have to have some kind of comeback?


  • #7934
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    so what is her position?

    I think she could possibly be called by the defense to represent the people or else she's running parallel cases that won't be effected by the outcomes of Trump's ones.


  • #7935
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    1,000/1 Paddy Power special I'd say.

    I've only two open bets left. Trump to win Georgia and Trump to win Penselvania.
    A lot or people saying Biden won, he hasn't.


  • #7936
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    I've only two open bets left. Trump to win Georgia and Trump to win Penselvania.
    A lot or people saying Biden won, he hasn't.

    You're right. He's won Georgia twice now at this stage. And he'll win it for a third time after the next recount. He'll then win it again in the electoral college.


  • #7937
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    I think she could possibly be called by the defense to represent the people or else she's running parallel cases that won't be effected by the outcomes of Trump's ones.

    who do you mean by "the defense" ? who or what are they defending? what parallel cases is she running and who is paying for them if she is not part of Trumps legal team?


  • #7938
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    You're right. He's won Georgia twice now at this stage. And he'll win it for a third time after the next recount. He'll then win it again in the electoral college.

    It ain't over. I wouldn't be celebrating just yet if I was a Biden supporter, this is 2020 after all.


  • #7939
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    who do you mean by "the defense" ? who or what are they defending? what parallel cases is she running and who is paying for them if she is not part of Trumps legal team?

    There's no donation cap on her if she's not with the Trump team.


  • #7940
    VinLieger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,950 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    I think she could possibly be called by the defense to represent the people or else she's running parallel cases that won't be effected by the outcomes of Trump's ones.


    Literally none of what you posted here makes any sense, i know you think it does but it really doesn't.


    Also im curious what people in your TV version of the legal system would she be representing

    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    I've only two open bets left. Trump to win Georgia and Trump to win Penselvania.
    A lot or people saying Biden won, he hasn't.


    Pennsylvania wont be recounting, Biden won, it is literally not possible for a 2nd Georgia hand recount to give trump 13k votes.


    Biden won, you need to start accepting that.


  • #7941
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,717 ✭ [Deleted User]


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    I've only two open bets left. Trump to win Georgia and Trump to win Penselvania.
    A lot or people saying Biden won, he hasn't.

    Georgia has been certified, Pennsylvania is due to be certified today.


  • Advertisement
  • #7942
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    I've only two open bets left. Trump to win Georgia and Trump to win Penselvania.
    A lot or people saying Biden won, he hasn't.

    what path does trump have to winning these two states?


  • #7943
    Smee_Again
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    I think she could possibly be called by the defense to represent the people or else she's running parallel cases that won't be effected by the outcomes of Trump's ones.

    The more you post the more it becomes clear that you have very little understanding about the topic at hand.

    Why would the defence be calling on a Trump lawyer? Do you even know who the defence is in most if not all of these cases? I'll give you a hint, it's not Team Trump.


  • #7944
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    There's no donation cap on her if she's not with the Trump team.

    how does one donate to her? and try to answer all the questions i asked. who is she representing? what cases is she running?


  • #7945
    namloc1980
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    what path does trump have to winning these two states?

    Hugo Chavez apparently.


  • #7946
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    VinLieger wrote: »

    Biden won, you need to start accepting that.

    Biden is not home and dry you need to understand that. Right at this moment he does not have the required college votes.
    There is also multiple legal challenges happening.


  • #7947
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,042 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    how does one donate to her? and try to answer all the questions i asked. who is she representing? what cases is she running?

    She's representing the people, the main case it yet to be filed, the Biblical one as she referred to it.


  • #7948
    VinLieger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,950 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    She's representing the people, the main case it yet to be filed, the Biblical one as she referred to it.


    What people?

    Also have you ever heard of sunk cost fallacy?


  • #7949
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    Biden is not home and dry you need to understand that. Right at this moment he does not have the required college votes.
    There is also multiple legal challenges happening.

    what are these legal challenges? do you have a list?


  • #7950
    Boggles
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,476 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    She is representing Hugo Chavez, payment may be tough.


  • Advertisement
  • #7951
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,925 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    drunkmonkey wrote: »
    She's representing the people, the main case it yet to be filed, the Biblical one as she referred to it.

    and what is this case about? and how do "the people" have standing?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement