Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXVIII- 71,942 ROI(2,050 deaths) 51,824 NI (983 deaths) (28/11) Read OP

17273757778328

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 979 ✭✭✭Thierry12


    snotboogie wrote: »
    5k deaths in Europe yesterday. Belgium still had 161 deaths yesterday.

    I know its still bad

    Kermit the frog here thought Belgians and French wouldn't make it

    I'm just surprised to see numbers peak on there own basically

    Lockdown wouldn't of had an effect yet

    France went into lockdown 11 days ago


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,627 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Thierry12 wrote: »
    I know its still bad

    Kermit the frog here thought Belgians and French wouldn't make it

    I'm just surprised to see numbers peak on there own basically

    Lockdown wouldn't of had an effect yet

    France went into lockdown 11 days ago

    I’d like to see an accurate comparison between hospital admissions for October and November for the last decade.

    Is there now more people in ICU in hospitals across the EU than ever before?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,587 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Random reports from supposed Facebook groups and WhatsApp groups shouldn't be allowed "fake news" without something to back it up.
    Government, NPHET and the HSE shouldn't be allowed to say schools are safe without definitive proof that it's the case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Government, NPHET and the HSE shouldn't be allowed to say schools are safe without definitive proof that it's the case.
    They've never said it's safe, just a much lower risk, with low positivity rates to back it up. To mitigate that risk there are controls in schools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,550 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Government, NPHET and the HSE shouldn't be allowed to say schools are safe without definitive proof that it's the case.

    They didn't, they said they are not seeing proof of clusters, you always put the burden of proof on the argument you are against, no doubt there will be a cluster at some stage, save your powder till then, the fact at the moment is that there is not proof yet of large-scale transmission in schools, we are not taking a 0 covid approach, we are living with it so a certain amount of transmission is acceptable for the wellbeing of the majority of the country's young people.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 859 ✭✭✭OwenM


    seamus wrote: »
    These things peak naturally, it's why they're called "waves" :)

    It's basically a big pyramid scheme. Eventually the virus runs out of hosts and cases begin to decline.

    This is either because it's run rampant or because people are modifying their own behaviour to reduce contact with others.

    The only thing we can influence is how high the peak is. Like you say, many countries in Europe have been on fire for the last 2-3 weeks.

    People will naturally modify their own behaviour when they see how bad it is, but it's also not correct to say that Europe only started doing anything about it recently. They have been incrementally introducing restrictions over the past six weeks.

    Given the 2-4 week lag between hospitalisations and deaths, it's going to be a grim start to December for many countries.


    The time everyone was predicting a 'Mad Max' scenario seems to have been the peak for Belgium. Median death incidence is 14 days I believe but yet that trend is down too.

    acgis-bg-nov2020.png

    acgic-bg-2020-deaths.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Thierry12 wrote: »
    Why does it seem like Covid has peaked in Europe?

    It was 2 weeks from disaster 10 days ago

    They introduced lockdown but that would be too soon to have an effect

    Honestly Belgium, etc was supposedly on fire 2 weeks ago

    Cases are dropping

    Usually the way with these COVID predictions, always a big exaggerated.All these models seem to predict almost endless growth of COVID when we know it peaks in waves, and with countries like Belgium probably having significant immunity from wave one you'd expect that even more so. However, it wasn't exactly plain sailing for Belgium , ICU capacity in addition to surge capacity was exceeded in several regions of East Belgium where patients were transferred to germany, and the death rate remains astoundingly high with 345 deaths in Belgium today and I think over 800 in France yesterday. Total number of people hospitalised in France and Belgium actually exceeded the first wave as well,so it shows how much better we have gotten at treating patients seeing as the death rate is a bit lower than first wave.

    The lockdown was too soon to take effect but there were other restrictions such as curfews in France which would have had impact by now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Where's the school thread gone that was active every minute 3 weeks ago?

    I think the anti-school gang have finally realised that there is no data to support their apparent view that schools are a hotbed of infection risk. Teachers and school management have done a fantastic job at keeping schools as safe as possible, and all credit to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    I think the anti-school gang have finally realised that there is no data to support their apparent view that schools are a hotbed of infection risk. Teachers and school management have done a fantastic job at keeping schools as safe as possible, and all credit to them.
    With falling community positivity rates they are even less likely to be a hotbed of infection.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    wakka12 wrote: »
    The lockdown was too soon to take effect but there were other restrictions such as curfews in France which would have had impact by now
    It's obvious that the rising numbers and soon-to-be-introduced lockdowns are what reduces the numbers. Even in Ireland we've seen how people's attitudes change in the week or two preceding a lockdown being officially announced. If the news is like it is in Belgium with ICU doctors saying there are no more beds, and nurses and doctors with Covid are still working, people aren't going to wait for a government announcement to start restricting their movements.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Usually the way with these COVID predictions, always a big exaggerated.All these models seem to predict almost endless growth of COVID when we know it peaks in waves, and with countries like Belgium probably having significant immunity from wave one you'd expect that even more so. However, it wasn't exactly plain sailing for Belgium , ICU capacity in addition to surge capacity was exceeded in several regions of East Belgium where patients were transferred to germany, and the death rate remains astoundingly high with 345 deaths in Belgium today and I think over 800 in France yesterday. Total number of people hospitalised in France and Belgium actually exceeded the first wave as well,so it shows how much better we have gotten at treating patients seeing as the death rate is a bit lower than first wave.

    The lockdown was too soon to take effect but there were other restrictions such as curfews in France which would have had impact by now

    Exactly. These models never take into account how, even without any restrictions, people will modify their behaviour. If a pandemic is raging in your community you don't need the Govt to tell you to be careful.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think the anti-school gang have finally realised that there is no data to support their apparent view that schools are a hotbed of infection risk. Teachers and school management have done a fantastic job at keeping schools as safe as possible, and all credit to them.

    A bit unfair, its not an anti school gang.

    Most posters on the schools thread posted in good faith and with genuine concern. The risk associated with schools specifically was hyped beyond what the data showed, but on the the face of it, given what we know about viruses in general, it was not unreasonable to assume that schools would and did cause the peak. The data just did not support that contention, and the fall in cases starting before midterm supports the view that schools were not a driver of our case surge.

    We are now probably in the start the period that the return post mid-term would start to impact the data. No sign of this as yet, however cannot conclude anything for another few days or so. I would fully expect the rate of decline to slow, as so much as schools didn't drive the surge, they were part of the surge, so a slower rate of decline would not be an unreasonable assumption post midterm.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    I think the anti-school gang have finally realised that there is no data to support their apparent view that schools are a hotbed of infection risk. Teachers and school management have done a fantastic job at keeping schools as safe as possible, and all credit to them.

    Absolutely. It is a credit to them.

    Unfortunately we will still get posters pushing the blame on schools and kids without any evidence. These posters have no consideration to the detrimental impacts of closing schools has on our children and especially the vulnerable kids in our society.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭ax530


    I agree schools have done a great job at putting measures in place to minimise the spread of the virus. From what I see they have worked very hard at getting these in place and maintaining.

    One day someone was complaining on the radio that following a positive case no one in the school was identified as a close contact - in my view that was a credit to the school that no close contacts this as been the aim of everyone for so long limit close contacts as much as possible.
    The fact that they are achieving this is great. In cases where close contacts cannot be eliminitaed the pod system of only having a few close contacts is working. At this stage children are all looking forward to christmas break as the pods will be changed after.

    well done to all thankfully in my area people are supporting the schools by keeping anyone with any symptoms (cold or covid) at home and getting tested if required. This is helping greatly too.
    reataurants \ pubs do not have same discipline or authority over customers as schools do due to that it is very difficutl to maintain the standerds to remain open.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    https://twitter.com/based_england/status/1325425769816928258

    Title says Italy, but in the comments somebody pointed out it's in Leipzig (Police unfirm says 'Polizei').


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    Thierry12 wrote: »
    Why does it seem like Covid has peaked in Europe?

    It was 2 weeks from disaster 10 days ago

    They introduced lockdown but that would be too soon to have an effect

    Honestly Belgium, etc was supposedly on fire 2 weeks ago

    Cases are dropping

    Seems to have peaked in central Europe alright but new cases seemed to have plateaued extremely high numbers.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think the anti-school gang have finally realised that there is no data to support their apparent view that schools are a hotbed of infection risk. Teachers and school management have done a fantastic job at keeping schools as safe as possible, and all credit to them.

    Jesus why does everyone have to be pigeon-holed? I doubt anyone is actually 'anti-school', whatever in the world that is supposed to mean. People just didn't see how logically schools wouldn't be a massive risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    AdamD wrote: »
    Jesus why does everyone have to be pigeon-holed? I doubt anyone is actually 'anti-school', whatever in the world that is supposed to mean. People just didn't see how logically schools wouldn't be a massive risk.




    For some reason this pandemic has created such a divide that you can only be anti something or pro something. No grey areas. Very frustrating.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    AdamD wrote: »
    Jesus why does everyone have to be pigeon-holed? I doubt anyone is actually 'anti-school', whatever in the world that is supposed to mean. People just didn't see how logically schools wouldn't be a massive risk.

    There are many posters who contribute on schools, and many of them use logic and data to come to their view. There is, on the other hand, a small number of posters who are rooted to the view that schools are the problem, regardless of what the data shows.

    When using the term "anti-school gang" , I mean only those who refuse to accept the data and keep banging the "it's the schools" drum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,253 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Exactly. These models never take into account how, even without any restrictions, people will modify their behaviour. If a pandemic is raging in your community you don't need the Govt to tell you to be careful.

    Lot of people, unfortunately, do need the government to tell them to be careful and/or remove opportunities for people to mix in crowds.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    AdamD wrote: »
    . People just didn't see how logically schools wouldn't be a massive risk.

    There has been a concerted campaign by a number of posters to blame schools. It was incessant for weeks on end.

    When asked for data they had none but continued to push to schools being a major incubator of the virus. Their feelings trumped the data.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,253 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    There are many posters who contribute on schools, and many of them use logic and data to come to their view. There is, on the other hand, a small number of posters who are rooted to the view that schools are the problem, regardless of what the data shows.

    When using the term "anti-school gang" , I mean only those who refuse to accept the data and keep banging the "it's the schools" drum.

    The bigger issue in September/early october was:
    Returning colleges.
    Large celeabratory gatherings.
    A general relaxation of peoples attitudes to the risks. (Which is natural)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    For some reason this pandemic has created such a divide that you can only be anti something or pro something. No grey areas. Very frustrating.

    There is data and there is feelings. Data should always win


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There has been a concerted campaign by a number of posters to blame schools. It was incessant for weeks on end.

    When asked for data they had none but continued to push to schools being a major incubator of the virus. Their feelings trumped the data.

    Concerted campaign? On Boards?

    Take a break from the internet, you're overestimating everyone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    kippy wrote: »
    Lot of people, unfortunately, do need the government to tell them to be careful and/or remove opportunities for people to mix in crowds.

    I agree with that but the exponential growth models predicting 70% of people getting infected were based on 100% of people continuing as normal. That was never going to happen if your neighbours are dying.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    AdamD wrote: »
    Concerted campaign? On Boards?

    Take a break from the internet, you're overestimating everyone.

    The press conferences were dominated by schools for weeks. It got traction in the media for sure.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,841 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    There has been a concerted campaign by a number of posters to blame schools. It was incessant for weeks on end.

    When asked for data they had none but continued to push to schools being a major incubator of the virus. Their feelings trumped the data.

    Do you really believe that a number of posters got together and planned a campaign to come onto Boards.ie and the blame schools?

    You sure it's not simply people sharing the same opinion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    There is data and there is feelings. Data should always win


    I see your point and I agree 100%, but there's definitely a real effort by everyone to put people in boxes lately. Just a little less of it would be nice, that's all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭leanin2019


    With the midterm and the lockdown coming at much the same time, you can't really draw any conclusions even anecdotical ones on whether that week off school had an impact.

    But surely it had some impact, probably a decent impact, but not as much as the general lockdown; just guessing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,231 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    Nearly 60% of Covid patients in Hospital didn't have it on admission.
    They got it while in Hospital; for other reasons

    https://twitter.com/RiochtConor2/status/1326455354042048513


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement