Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

1…286287289291292…334

Comments

  • #8642
    shaunadennyham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 141 ✭✭shaunadennyham


    Fe1user5555 wrote: »
    Do you think it’s safe to leave out Quistclose trusts for equity tomorrow? Under a bit of time pressure

    Yep it came up as a note in March so I’m leaving it out


  • #8643
    AA247
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭AA247


    Anyone have good notes for tracing? Finding it so confusing


  • #8644
    Fedone
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45 ✭Fedone


    FE1new wrote: »
    Is the following enough for equity do you think? I'm so stuck for time. My other 3 took up too much of my study time and I've left this exam:

    Specific Performance
    Estoppel
    Tracing
    Trustees
    Charitable trusts
    Strong v bird, DMC, Hastings Bass rule
    Recission and undue influence (not well at all)
    Mandatory interlocutory injunctions, QT injunctions.

    Is there anything else that is quick and easy to cover?

    If you haven’t got cy pres in with charitable I’d cover it. It’s short and hasn’t been up since October 2018. Also rectification came up as a problem q mixed with specific performance before so maybe have a few short lines on it just in case.


  • #8645
    bobbinn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7 ✭bobbinn


    Has non-est factum appeared as part of common mistake problem questions or as a standalone essay? My grid is out of date and not too detailed!

    I agree with the topics others have suggested as a bare minimum. I'm also trying to squeeze in void contracts for a little while the night/morning before.


  • #8646
    keelfe1s
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 ✭keelfe1s


    Does anyone know what came up in EU online sitting Aug 2020? Thanks


  • Advertisement
  • #8647
    shaunadennyham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 141 ✭✭shaunadennyham


    Would you include commercial contracts in an essay q on contracts for personal service or limit to employment situations ? Can’t see if including them is allowed from the exam reports


  • #8648
    bobbinn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7 ✭bobbinn


    keelfe1s wrote: »
    Does anyone know what came up in EU online sitting Aug 2020? Thanks

    Hi, I passed EU last year so thank God, I'm no longer familiar with it but here's my guess from looking at the August 2020 paper...

    1 PQ on a fictional directive
    2. EQ re human rights
    3. ?? PQ re medicinal products
    4. EQ on whether the TFEU "currently provides an adequae system of legal protection" for those seeking judicial review (EU acts and third parties)
    5. PQ Dutcnational living in in Belgium -- Citizen question
    6. EQ re 101.1 TFEU and 102
    7. Case note (8 caes). Dorsch Consult appeared and Pringle so prob rule them out for the next one.
    8. FMG problem question re wine. Arts 30 and 110. If anyone's done Brendan's course, it's pretty much the example he used!


  • #8649
    ruby1998
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 143 ✭✭ruby1998


    bobbinn wrote: »
    Has non-est factum appeared as part of common mistake problem questions or as a standalone essay? My grid is out of date and not too detailed!

    I agree with the topics others have suggested as a bare minimum. I'm also trying to squeeze in void contracts for a little while the night/morning before.

    Has come up as standalone essay I believe!


  • #8650
    lsheehaneire
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    keelfe1s wrote: »
    Does anyone know what came up in EU online sitting Aug 2020? Thanks

    Direct Effect + MS Liability
    Human Rights essay
    MEQRs
    ART 263
    Art 101
    Case notes
    Free movement /Educational assistance
    CEEs and discriminatory tax


  • #8651
    CiaraND16
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 ✭CiaraND16


    Contract

    March 2020 Q1 City colleges say it was offer and acceptance but I think it looks like mostly statue of frauds? Memorandum, deposit discussion similar facts to Supermac's case etc. I wish the examiners report was out :(


  • Advertisement
  • #8652
    FE1new
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 214 ✭✭FE1new


    shaunadennyham wrote: »
    Would you include commercial contracts in an essay q on contracts for personal service or limit to employment situations ? Can’t see if including them is allowed from the exam reports

    I think I would list it as a type of specific performance but say for the purposes of the essay I won't be discussing it in detail. There seem to be notes in the reports that they don't like extra bits being added in and they are separate.


  • #8653
    laworlawww
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 ✭laworlawww


    CiaraND16 wrote: »
    Contract

    March 2020 Q1 City colleges say it was offer and acceptance but I think it looks like mostly statue of frauds? Memorandum, deposit discussion similar facts to Supermac's case etc. I wish the examiners report was out :(

    My grid (not sure which company made it as I got sent it) says Q1 was formal requirements so I think you're right!


  • #8654
    FE1Pleb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 ✭FE1Pleb


    Must stop playing Among Us and get some Equity in


  • #8655
    Wonderstruck
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Wonderstruck


    FE1Pleb wrote: »
    Must stop playing Among Us and get some Equity in

    It only counts as Criminal study, sorry. Gotta throw in a reference to the Golden thread every time you're sus'ed


  • #8656
    Al1501
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 ✭✭Al1501


    Would I be covered for contract with:
    Offer and Acceptance
    Consideration
    Estoppel
    Terms
    Exemption Clauses
    Consumer Protection
    Misrepresentation
    Mistake
    Discharge
    Remedies

    Or is there something vital I'm leaving out?


  • #8657
    fe1fi20
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭fe1fi20


    Found this great article explaining the two new cases re. interlocutory injunctions - Merck Sharp and Betty Martin

    https://www.dilloneustace.com/uploads/images/Principles-for-Interlocutory-Injunctions-refined-by-the-Supreme-Court.pdf


  • #8658
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    bobbinn wrote: »
    Has non-est factum appeared as part of common mistake problem questions or as a standalone essay? My grid is out of date and not too detailed!

    I agree with the topics others have suggested as a bare minimum. I'm also trying to squeeze in void contracts for a little while the night/morning before.

    Came up as part of a problem question the most recent time as far as I can remember! More likely as a problem question I would say!


  • #8659
    CoconutHeadMia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭CoconutHeadMia


    Al1501 wrote: »
    Would I be covered for contract with:
    Offer and Acceptance
    Consideration
    Estoppel
    Terms
    Exemption Clauses
    Consumer Protection
    Misrepresentation
    Mistake
    Discharge
    Remedies

    Or is there something vital I'm leaving out?

    More than enough I think - I’m covering the same minus discharge


  • #8660
    tommytimber
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40 ✭tommytimber


    EQUITY

    Do you think this should cover equity tomorrow?

    - 3 Certainties
    - Strong v Bird
    - DMC
    - Rectification
    - Estoppel
    - Charitable Trusts
    - Cy prés
    - Undue Influence
    - Trustees Duties
    - Mandatory, Mareva and Quia Timet Injunctions


  • #8661
    Lozg
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 ✭Lozg


    Timing question- how long are people allowing themselves per question for equity?


  • Advertisement
  • #8662
    FE1new
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 214 ✭✭FE1new


    Lozg wrote: »
    Timing question- how long are people allowing themselves per question for equity?

    35 mins per question then moving on to the next. What ever time left over I can go back.


  • #8663
    shaunadennyham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 141 ✭✭shaunadennyham


    Lozg wrote: »
    Timing question- how long are people allowing themselves per question for equity?

    If you take 10 mins to read the paper you have 40 mins per question - same as any other exam :)


  • #8664
    fe12020oct
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65 ✭✭fe12020oct


    equity

    in a charitable trust q - would promotion of sport in primary schools be considered a valid charitable gift? i know promotion of sport cant be a valid charitable gift but could you extend it to education and say it could be if considered in physical education in the primary schools??


  • #8665
    FE1new
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 214 ✭✭FE1new


    fe12020oct wrote: »
    equity

    in a charitable trust q - would promotion of sport in primary schools be considered a valid charitable gift? i know promotion of sport cant be a valid charitable gift but could you extend it to education and say it could be if considered in physical education in the primary schools??


    If its for physical education facilities yes but if its promotion of a sport then no.


  • #8666
    nicolesd
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭nicolesd


    are people learning interlocutory injunctions themselves or is that likely to come up?

    whats the most important cases to to for QT injunctions?

    really starting to panic now!!!


  • #8667
    fe12020oct
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65 ✭✭fe12020oct


    nicolesd wrote: »
    are people learning interlocutory injunctions themselves or is that likely to come up?

    whats the most important cases to to for QT injunctions?

    really starting to panic now!!!

    I’m wondering the same ! Not sure whether to look at disregarding campus oil principles or not


  • #8668
    CoconutHeadMia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭CoconutHeadMia


    fe12020oct wrote: »
    I’m wondering the same ! Not sure whether to look at disregarding campus oil principles or not

    Are you covering Strong v Bird?


  • #8669
    michaelot97
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 ✭michaelot97


    nicolesd wrote: »
    are people learning interlocutory injunctions themselves or is that likely to come up?

    whats the most important cases to to for QT injunctions?

    really starting to panic now!!!

    I am only learning the campus oil principles and mandatory interlocutory injunctions.


  • #8670
    baloo21
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 ✭baloo21


    nicolesd wrote: »
    are people learning interlocutory injunctions themselves or is that likely to come up?

    whats the most important cases to to for QT injunctions?

    really starting to panic now!!!

    For QT:

    AG(Boswell) v Rathmines
    Szabo v ESAT


  • Advertisement
  • #8671
    FE1Nov20
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 ✭FE1Nov20


    what are people's thoughts on secret trusts showing tomorrow?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement