Trump vs Biden 2020, Day 64 of the Pennsylvania count (pt 5) Read OP

ElitesTeam wrote: »

Do you ever get off?

What??? You've been asked to provide evidence and haven't to date to support your claims.

namloc1980 wrote: »

So you accept observers were present at all times but the dispute is over how close to the count staff they could get?

Yes, because I never claimed observers weren't present. The fact-checkers tried to fact check Trump's point that "They wouldn't allow legally permissible observers." saying there is a 'perceived lack of access' but that poll watchers were allowed to observe the count in both cities. No there was a lack of access and they are fighting it up to the supreme court. So great factchecking.

If you are in a room but so far away (30 - 100ft in some cases) then BBC fact check can't claim there's no issue with observers

DeanAustin wrote: »

Big Trump press conference at 4:30pm. No way he’s conceding. Gonna be more of the same.

Our time or their's?

DeanAustin wrote: »

Big Trump press conference at 4:30pm. No way he’s conceding. Gonna be more of the same.

Fox News reporting that Donald Trump will concede gracefully and congratulate his opponent on his victory.












lol

thecretinhop wrote: »

how come Joe Biden like trump in every state had down ticket numbers except in 4 key states?? it stinks..

ElitesTeam wrote: »

cant concede when its a rigged election

Will there be a separate thread for these baseless fraud allegations or is the imminent Biden Presidency thread going to be ruined by these type of posts from butthurt Trump supporters?

Bringing out the lawyers. It has always been his way. Was listening to his former COO this morning, he said it is a predictable tactic designed to intimidate.
Last desperate roll of the dice, and like his legacy, is going to go down as a failure.
Hopefully Rudi will be there, could do with a laugh

ElitesTeam wrote: »

cant concede when its a rigged election

Rigged from the start - they allowed the american people to vote. Russian system much better

Call Me Jimmy wrote: »

Yes, because I never claimed observers weren't present. The fact-checkers tried to fact check Trump's point that "They wouldn't allow legally permissible observers." saying there is a 'perceived lack of access' but that poll watchers were allowed to observe the count in both cities. No there was a lack of access and they are fighting it up to the supreme court. So great factchecking.

If you are in a room but so far away (30 - 100ft in some cases) then BBC fact check can't claim there's no issue with observers

You said the below
"It also claims poll watchers were allowed observe the counts in both cities, which is itself false."
So you can stop with that nonsense for a start.

They were allowed to observe they just weren't happy with the distance. Not sure where you are getting the 30-100 ft from?

Total non issue.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pennsylvania-judge-permits-campaign-observers-close-view-ballot/story?id=74040279

Penn wrote: »

Yeah, I don't think it's him speaking. He doesn't seem to have left the White House.

Probably Rudy, Eric and the rest of the goon squad.

DeanAustin wrote: »

Had to like that for the blatant baiting. Well played Sir...little bit obvious though.

High-fiving each other now - how bros of you.

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Probably afraid if he leaves they’ll lock the doors and won’t let him back in.

Like when you’re meant to check out of a hotel at 12

Deleted User wrote: »

Probably afraid if he leaves they’ll lock the doors and won’t let him back in.

Don't worry, he'll appear with fakemelania while real Melania stands guard in the apartment.

I mean if Trump and the Republicans had genuine proof and evidence of large scale voter fraud they wouldn't be holding these press conferences or spreading conspiracy theories. They'd be in court and successfully getting counts stopped and invalid votes thrown out. It's just the usual nonsense and grift to try and get gullible people to give money to them.