FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

nicolesd · 27-10-2020 08:22PM

Paula sheedy just replied to my email about 30minutes ago saying they were available and sent me my result but they are also on the website. Sadly wasnt brought up for Tort though which is disappointing! Whats everyone studying for tort i have left it until now as i was sure i was going to be brought up

Reya10 · 27-10-2020 09:16PM

Hi would anyone have the property papers for Oct 2019 and March 2020 please I would really appreciate it!

feliznavidab · 27-10-2020 09:56PM

Hi, does anyone have updated equity and criminal exam grids they could send me? Thank you!

jus_me · 27-10-2020 10:05PM

nicolesd wrote: »

Paula sheedy just replied to my email about 30minutes ago saying they were available and sent me my result but they are also on the website. Sadly wasnt brought up for Tort though which is disappointing! Whats everyone studying for tort i have left it until now as i was sure i was going to be brought up

I wasn’t brought up either 1% was needed ! Any tort advice welcome

Katiemckay60 · 27-10-2020 10:50PM

Anyone else struggling with Constitutional Problem qs? If anyone has sample answer would really appreciate it

Healyjhow · 27-10-2020 10:55PM

Would anyone have any criminal law sample answers ? Or even any advise on structure for answering questions! I’ve EU, tort, equity and property sample answers I can swap for!

illy.m · 27-10-2020 11:13PM

Does anyone have condensed, easy to follow notes on directors' duties.. I went by sample answer and manual - however the city colleges NB notes have more cases that I don't have, and manual refers to a lot of irrelevant cases. My head is all over the place now. Can swap for sample answers.

Creol1 · 28-10-2020 12:42AM

Kenkashin wrote: »

I am thinking that BetterExaminations are going to have a three hour live stream of me crying.

One of the things that stood out to me in the guidelines was that they expressly provided that you were allowed tissues. They must have anticipated that!

Meg! · 28-10-2020 09:56AM

Has anybody who has extra time for the exam been contacted?

lawDani · 28-10-2020 10:29AM

hi there guys, probably a bit late here but does anybody have the EU Legislation to sell me? lastminute.com

Lallers96 · 28-10-2020 10:29AM

I'm assuming there is no point doing this second mock exam if you've done the first? I don't have time to spare really as we're in crunch time now!

lawDani · 28-10-2020 10:30AM

WesternC123 wrote: »

Can we highlight relevant provisions in our legislation? I know we can have it marked but does that include actually highlighting it does anyone know?

pretty sure highlighting is permitted yeah, i had mine highlighted in the exams anyway - just no writing obviously

Aoibhin511 · 28-10-2020 10:39AM

lawDani wrote: »

hi there guys, probably a bit late here but does anybody have the EU Legislation to sell me? lastminute.com

Yeah I do, DM me

Shonagoring123 · 28-10-2020 10:45AM

lawDani wrote: »

hi there guys, probably a bit late here but does anybody have the EU Legislation to sell me? lastminute.com

I do pm me

EM95 · 28-10-2020 11:36AM

Does anyone have any up to date Contract Exam Grid please? Also any advice on this topic would be super appreciated!

fe1fi20 · 28-10-2020 11:54AM

EM95 wrote: »

Does anyone have any up to date Contract Exam Grid please? Also any advice on this topic would be super appreciated!

I have the grid, PM your email

Dliodoir2021 · 28-10-2020 12:00PM

Meg! wrote: »

Has anybody who has extra time for the exam been contacted?

I’m meant to have extra time but they ignored that part of my disability form just saying toilet breaks were allowed! This was via email yesterday.

jus_me · 28-10-2020 12:21PM

What are people covering for tort?

lsheehaneire · 28-10-2020 12:22PM

Do we still have 3.5 hours for the exam ?

Fe1new4 · 28-10-2020 12:33PM

jus_me wrote: »

What are people covering for tort?

I’m doing negligence (usual DOC SOC causation remoteness)
Professional negligence & negl misstatement
Occupiers liability
Vicarious liability
Employer liability
Nuisance
Trespass to person
Damages
Nervous shock
Defamation
Defective products

Also skimming over PEL, concurrent wrongdoers

Open to correction / suggestions on this

rickmatt · 28-10-2020 12:42PM

Hi for Constitutional I have broken my study up like this:

- I am just wondering is this enough like if I have covered all of the below should I be alright?

Potential Essay Q's

- President
- AG
- SOP - general question of it all
- DPP v JC ("This case risks reducing level of protection for constitutional rights in Ireland" - unconstitutionally obtained evidence)
- Since Mallak v Min. for Justice, less onus on decision makers to give reasons for their answers - DIscuss
- Const. law on Equality has failed to reflect its importance as a value in irish law.

Potential PQ's

- SOP (particularly Executive/International Agreements/Principles and Policies test)
- Courts (particularly Special CC)
- Right to silence, Privilege (to not be cross examined) thus Unfair Trial
- Equality, justified discrimination
- Bodily integrity, Right to Life, Right to Privacy, Right to earn a livelihood
- Property rights
- Due course of law
- Religion
- Right to Expression, Assembly, Communication
- Family (de-facto family rights)
- Proportionality
- Vague Offences
- Locus Standi (Jus Tertii)

Jeremiah25 · 28-10-2020 01:01PM

rickmatt wrote: »

Hi for Constitutional I have broken my study up like this:

- I am just wondering is this enough like if I have covered all of the below should I be alright?

Potential Essay Q's

- President
- AG
- SOP - general question of it all
- DPP v JC ("This case risks reducing level of protection for constitutional rights in Ireland" - unconstitutionally obtained evidence)
- Since Mallak v Min. for Justice, less onus on decision makers to give reasons for their answers - DIscuss
- Const. law on Equality has failed to reflect its importance as a value in irish law.

Potential PQ's

- SOP (particularly Executive/International Agreements/Principles and Policies test)
- Courts (particularly Special CC)
- Right to silence, Privilege (to not be cross examined) thus Unfair Trial
- Equality, justified discrimination
- Bodily integrity, Right to Life, Right to Privacy, Right to earn a livelihood
- Property rights
- Due course of law
- Religion
- Right to Expression, Assembly, Communication
- Family (de-facto family rights)
- Proportionality
- Vague Offences
- Locus Standi (Jus Tertii)

Looks like a pretty solid list to me. Religion/Locus Standi can often come up as an essay question also - just a heads up! Would look at sovereignty also if you can.

Hazel774 · 28-10-2020 01:10PM

Dliodoir2021 wrote: »

I’m meant to have extra time but they ignored that part of my disability form just saying toilet breaks were allowed! This was via email yesterday.

They also didn't answer that part of my disability query - but I think now that everyone has 3.5 hours it will probably be the same for everyone

nicolesd · 28-10-2020 01:33PM

anyone know what test is currently used for the granting of interlocutory mandatory injunctions? and how to spot it in a problem question?

fe120202021 · 28-10-2020 01:51PM

Has anyone gotten any clear answers on how the proctoring is going to work regards legislation and eye movements?

Dliodoir2021 · 28-10-2020 01:56PM

nicolesd wrote: »

anyone know what test is currently used for the granting of interlocutory mandatory injunctions? and how to spot it in a problem question?

Here's what I have from 2018 studying.........

Interlocutory mandatory injunctions

Most Irish judges have been reluctant to depart from the Campus Oil principles; however some have suggested that mandatory interlocutory mandatory injunctions require a higher degree of prejudice….
There’s uncertainty in Ireland as to the applicable test regarding the granting of interlocutory mandatory injunctions.
Regardless of whether….. it will still rarely lead to the granting of a mandatory interlocking injunction because it’s only in exceptional circs will the balance of convenience lie in the favour of granting a MII.
Risk of injustice approach developed from the Films Rover case; this was a more flexible approach advocates taking whichever course takes the lowest risk of injustice. If we bear this in mind and we grant it or don’t grant it and should’ve done otherwise, then there will be a low injustice.
In conclusion, there’s a movement towards the strong case approach in this jurisdiction in applications for MII but the addition of the ‘lowest risk of injustice’ from the Tola Capital Mgmt case would act to guard against cases where there isn’t a strong case and yet prevents an injustice to occur between the parties.
If Q about MII, tease out differences between Campus Oil and the strong case approach.

Lawlaw12 · 28-10-2020 02:13PM

lsheehaneire wrote: »

Do we still have 3.5 hours for the exam ?

Yep, that's what it says on the LS website anyway

DUMSURFER · 28-10-2020 03:25PM

Fe1newbie wrote: »

DM me ya

Hey FE1newbie, I've been trying to message you the past couple of days and haven't been able to. It now says I can't because:

"Fe1newbie has exceeded their stored private messages quota and cannot accept further messages until they clear some space."

Could I ask you delete a few messages so I can send you one, please

Lovestolisten · 28-10-2020 03:55PM

Did the exam practice test link become available to anyone? Did anyone do a practice exam ?

I emailed asking about it but guess what !! No reply ðŸ˜†

Aoibhin511 · 28-10-2020 03:56PM

Lovestolisten wrote: »

Did the exam practice test link become available to anyone? Did anyone do a practice exam ?

I emailed asking about it but guess what !! No reply &#55357;&#56838;

It's not until tomorrow right?

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Comments