2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

PropJoe10 · 01-10-2020 12:34PM

Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: »

Okay, is it really bad that I spent much of the debate laughing when I watched it last night? Could not believe the prezzie said to Biden: “YOU’RE a number two” though that was just one amusing moment of MANY. Biden stumbling over the word ‘Chinese’ and it coming out as ‘Chy-nee’ also brought the LOLs. :pac:

It must be great to be so easily amused.

Obvious Desperate Breakfasts · 01-10-2020 12:35PM

duploelabs wrote: »

Is that a parody?

I’m not sure if you are asking if my post is parody or if the debate was.

PropJoe10 wrote: »

It must be great to be so easily amused.

Yes, it is.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 01:16PM

Deleted User wrote:

In fairness, this seems to be you diverting from what you initially claimed was Harris' affair.

I haven't diverted or backed down. I vehemently dispute the allegation that I'm a misogynist.
I want to hear my accusers opinions on Tara Reades accusations on Joe Biden.

Timberrrrrrrr · 01-10-2020 01:21PM

eagle eye wrote: »

I haven't diverted or backed down. I vehemently dispute the allegation that I'm a misogynist.
I want to hear my accusers opinions on Tara Reades accusations on Joe Biden.

Which accusation? The one she made or the one that was changed?

Whats your thoughts on Trump refusing to give his D.N.A? If he gave a sample he would be exonerated after being accused of rape.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 01:23PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote:

Which accusation? The one she made or the one that was changed?

All accusations she made to make it easy for you.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote:

Whats your thoughts on Trump refusing to give his D.N.A? If he gave a sample he would be exonerated after being accused of rape.

I despise Donald Trump, I don't think he'd be exonerated.

Timberrrrrrrr · 01-10-2020 01:25PM

eagle eye wrote: »

All accusations she made to make it easy for you.

I despise Donald Trump, I don't think he'd be exonerated.

Post them here so we know which one(s) you would like discussed.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 01:29PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote:

Post them here so we know which one(s) you would like discussed.

I said all.

Timberrrrrrrr · 01-10-2020 01:30PM

eagle eye wrote: »

I said all.

OK, post them here so we can discuss them

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 01:31PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote:

OK, post them here so we can discuss them

You already know them.

Timberrrrrrrr · 01-10-2020 01:33PM

eagle eye wrote: »

You already know them.

I want you to post the links to claims you have made so I and others can read them.

I want you to let us know what specifically it is you have an issue with.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 01:35PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote:

I want you to post the links to claims you have made so I and others can read them.
I want you to let us know what specifically it is you have an issue with.

I simply want to know your opinion of Tara Reade's accusations of inappropriate touching and sexual assault.

Timberrrrrrrr · 01-10-2020 01:36PM

eagle eye wrote: »

I simply want to know your opinion of Tara Reade's accusations of inappropriate touching and sexual assault.

I havent read them, I'm not aware of them.

Post a link to them and I will give you my opinion.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 01:39PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote:

I havent read them, I'm not aware of them.
Post a link to them and I will give you my opinion.

Well it'll be a while before I do that because this app win let me post links so I'll do it when I get to a laptop at some stage.
I don't believe that you know nothing about them. You've been on these threads all through discussions about them.

Foxtrol · 01-10-2020 02:11PM

eagle eye wrote: »

I simply want to know your opinion of Tara Reade's accusations of inappropriate touching and sexual assault.

So you're back with this nonsense again? This discussion was done to death at the time and it disappeared when it became obvious the accuser wasn't credible at all. Aside from continuously changing her story, she had a history of scamming people (including being charged with check fraud), lying about her life (including under oath in court), and that isn't even getting into her weird fetish about Russia and Putin.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/23/reporting-tara-reade-credibility/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/15/tara-reade-left-trail-of-aggrieved-acquaintances-260771

https://news.yahoo.com/biden-accuser-charged-check-fraud-024332312.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAETRot-CLTqQ21iH0ZXxq0iAyVY6pMbU3k9HAgcy_HhqJXQ9yK3iu4QFFgfw1sd1Lm2Mp5THNH1NamsheQEg0ZiTX0EYhgWFa0G-LlEJUSoNdexITPTpuk4wRnallFzzdI8PE5esM1z8EaWEHSDAuRPOmQN_17XvO87ssxDGD8Zo

01-10-2020 02:15PM

eagle eye wrote: »

I haven't diverted or backed down. I vehemently dispute the allegation that I'm a misogynist.
I want to hear my accusers opinions on Tara Reades accusations on Joe Biden.

Does sound pretty misogynistic to use the term "affairs" and claim that she is in her current position as a result of dating a man over 20 years ago. If anything the fact she continued to rise in the career ladder while not dating anyone in particular, indicates that your theory is nothing more than nonsense. She's an accomplished politician and you've fixated on her late 20s.

Muahahaha · 01-10-2020 02:19PM

Cody montana wrote: »

Presidential debate organizers promise format changes after Tuesday night chaos
The move comes after many criticized the group and the moderator for letting Trump run the show.

They're talking of cutting the candidates microphone if they try to interrupt. That should be funny watching Trump mouthing off and no one can hear him.

osarusan wrote: »

A fair few clips there of Trump denouncing these kinds of groups.

But how do we explain his 'and stand by' comments?

"Stand by" means hold and wait for further instuction. Why is he telling such a group to await further instruction?

They are even selling tshirts with the Trumps Stand By slogan on them. Amazon banned them being sold on their platform yesterday.

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 02:20PM

eagle eye wrote: »

I simply want to know your opinion of Tara Reade's accusations of inappropriate touching and sexual assault.

I'm still waiting for you to point out my hypocritical stance regarding Kamala Harris' private life

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 02:20PM

Deleted User wrote:

Does sound pretty misogynistic to use the term "affairs" and claim that she is in her current position as a result of dating a man over 20 years ago. If anything the fact she continued to rise in the career ladder while not dating anyone in particular, indicates that your theory is nothing more than nonsense. She's an accomplished politician and you've fixated on her late 20s.

I'd didn't say she is in her current position because of it. It's amazing how you just make up stuff.
I said she got promoted twice while with Brown, promoted twice by him.
I'll have more to say on it after I hear your opinions on Reade.

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 02:35PM

eagle eye wrote: »

I'd didn't say she is in her current position because of it. It's amazing how you just make up stuff.
I said she got promoted twice while with Brown, promoted twice by him.
I'll have more to say on it after I hear your opinions on Reade.

OK, cite sources for that claim. And then outline your views on what hypocrisy exists with Tara Reede. There's a good chap

Deshawn · 01-10-2020 02:45PM

Muahahaha wrote: »

They're talking of cutting the candidates microphone if they try to interrupt. That should be funny watching Trump mouthing off and no one can hear him.

They are even selling tshirts with the Trumps Stand By slogan on them. Amazon banned them being sold on their platform yesterday.

That's Christmas sorted.
Proud boys t shirt for the nephew ,antifa hoodie for the niece.

Do you like any of these?

https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=antifa+tshirt&sprefix=antifa+t&ref=nb_sb_ss_i_1_8

Overheal · 01-10-2020 02:49PM

eagle eye wrote: »

Well it'll be a while before I do that because this app win let me post links so I'll do it when I get to a laptop at some stage.
I don't believe that you know nothing about them. You've been on these threads all through discussions about them.

You want to waste someone else’s time addressing “all of them” but are too lazy (or incapable via some excuse) to put in the legwork yourself?

We’ve had users in this thread before who tried these antics and they are no longer allowed to post. Just saying. You might want to match the effort you expect from others.

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 03:28PM

Overheal wrote:

You want to waste someone elseâ€™s time addressing â€œall of themâ€ but are too lazy (or incapable via some excuse) to put in the legwork yourself?
Weâ€™ve had users in this thread before who tried these antics and they are no longer allowed to post. Just saying. You might want to match the effort you expect from others.

Again with ridiculous accusations.

If you read my post I said I'll do it when I get to a laptop.
So I'm going to do it but this app doesn't let me do it on the phone. I explained this as the reason why it'll be later that I do it and not have a guy expecting it pronto.
My advice to you is read a post, take it all in and then respond.

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 03:35PM

eagle eye wrote: »

Again with ridiculous accusations.

If you read my post I said I'll do it when I get to a laptop.
So I'm going to do it but this app doesn't let me do it on the phone. I explained this as the reason why it'll be later that I do it and not have a guy expecting it pronto.
My advice to you is read a post, take it all in and then respond.

Wait, is this some version of 'the October surprise'?

Still attempting to deflect from your misogynistic adjudication of Kamala Harris

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 03:41PM

duploelabs wrote:

Wait, is this some version of 'the October surprise'?

Still attempting to deflect from your misogynistic adjudication of Kamala Harris

Why are you responding to a post which quoted somebody else who made an accusation and I responded to that?
Unless you own the two accounts?

namloc1980 · 01-10-2020 03:43PM

Rudy is after short-circuiting after the debate.

.

Overheal · 01-10-2020 03:43PM

eagle eye wrote: »

Why are you responding to a post which quoted somebody else who made an accusation and I responded to that?
Unless you own the two accounts?

It’s a public thread on a public forum. If you wanted a private back and forth PMs are an option.

Speaking of ridiculous accusations..

duploelabs · 01-10-2020 03:44PM

eagle eye wrote: »

Why are you responding to a post which quoted somebody else who made an accusation and I responded to that?
Unless you own the two accounts?

Nope, just a gentle reminder of what you've dodged. Just to keep it fresh in everyone's minds

eagle eye · 01-10-2020 03:51PM

duploelabs wrote:

Nope, just a gentle reminder of what you've dodged. Just to keep it fresh in everyone's minds

I haven't dodged anything and I'll return to it as well.

Cody montana · 01-10-2020 05:46PM

A CNBC/Change Research poll conducted Tuesday and Wednesday found 53% of likely voters nationwide said Biden did a better job in the debate, compared with 29% for Trump.

RIGOLO · 01-10-2020 05:47PM

Cody montana wrote: »

A CNBC/Change Research poll conducted Tuesday and Wednesday found 53% of likely voters nationwide said Biden did a better job in the debate, compared with 29% for Trump.

You gotta love that NBC , who absolutely loath TRump gave him a couple of hundred million.
Anywhere between $200 million and $450 million , that NBC paid TRump during his time on The Apprentice.

I mean how great is that as a piece of business, to get an organisation to give you hundreds of millions of dollars to sit behind a desk and tell people they are fired.
And to think the looney left say he is a bad business man .

NBC .. first lets give the guy a few hundred million, promote him , give him free advertising for his brand, effectively help make him President .. and then spend 4 years losing viewers as we do 24x7 attack dog mode... epic face plant for NBC.

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Comments