2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

breezy1985 · 26-09-2020 10:30PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

I dunno

The Eurostar trolling Trump with covfefe signs on the train

extra gravy · 26-09-2020 10:51PM

https://www.denverpost.com/2020/09/25/donald-trump-fails-us-national-security-interests/

Robert Cardillo, who served under six presidents and briefed Trump: "I can be silent no longer."

"Four more years would be devastating. We must elect a thoughtful, moral, responsible, respectful leader on Nov. 3. Our current president is not that leader."

The opinion of an experienced, knowledgeable insider... All the Trump supporting experts on here know better though.

Billy Mays · 26-09-2020 11:41PM

Deep state innit

mcmoustache · 27-09-2020 02:30AM

Why are all these people that Trump hired coming out and telling the world how useless and damaging he is?

I don't remember that happening with Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush 2 or Obama.

duploelabs · 27-09-2020 08:58AM

mcmoustache wrote: »

Why are all these people that Trump hired coming out and telling the world how useless and damaging he is?

I don't remember that happening with Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush 2 or Obama.

At least one half are, the other half keep getting locked up

breezy1985 · 27-09-2020 09:04AM

mcmoustache wrote: »

Why are all these people that Trump hired coming out and telling the world how useless and damaging he is?

I don't remember that happening with Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush 2 or Obama.

Shure when Harry and Meghan came out and told people to vote and that "it’s vital that we reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity" Trump fans immediately went nuts which tells you that even they know how bad they are

27-09-2020 09:12AM

breezy1985 wrote: »

Shure when Harry and Meghan came out and told people to vote and that "it’s vital that we reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity" Trump fans immediately went nuts which tells you that even they know how bad they are

That's because they are the most used accusations against Trump administration. Not because they are true. Dogwhistling. Everyone on both sides can read between the lines.

27-09-2020 09:15AM

DrumSteve wrote: »

Look, anyone who sees that Biden clip and gets offended... Is looking to be offended by it.

It's pretty obvious from watching it, he was being facetious.

I am a trump leaning supporter and agree. People need to stop with the gotcha nonsense. Nobody really cares about these "offensive" situations which are 99 per cent of time taken out of proper context.

Leroy42 · 27-09-2020 09:17AM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

That's because they are the most used accusations against Trump administration. Not because they are true. Dogwhistling. Everyone on both sides can read between the lines.

They never mentioned Trump, is the point.

But everyone knows, including Trump supporters, that when calling for people to vote against those using hate, that it us Trump not Biden.

A more obvious example of Trump supporters knowing and accepting what Trump is would be hard to find.

At what point did you feel that supporting hate speech was acceptable? Was it always or just because of Trump?

breezy1985 · 27-09-2020 09:24AM

Leroy42 wrote: »

They never mentioned Trump, is the point.

But everyone knows, including Trump supporters, that when calling for people to vote against those using hate, that it us Trump not Biden.

A more obvious example of Trump supporters knowing and accepting what Trump is would be hard to find.

At what point did you feel that supporting hate speech was acceptable? Was it always or just because of Trump?

It was a brilliant little bait and catch.

27-09-2020 09:24AM

Leroy42 wrote: »

They never mentioned Trump, is the point.

But everyone knows, including Trump supporters, that when calling for people to vote against those using hate, that it us Trump not Biden.

A more obvious example of Trump supporters knowing and accepting what Trump is would be hard to find.

At what point did you feel that supporting hate speech was acceptable? Was it always or just because of Trump?

As I said, that's because they are the most commonly used accusations against the Trump administration. Not because they are actually true.

27-09-2020 09:27AM

breezy1985 wrote: »

It was a brilliant little bait and catch.

No it was a cowardly way of being political while leaving plausible deniability because they didn't name any names. They think they are too clever by half and that the public are too thick to see through the nonsense.

Leroy42 · 27-09-2020 09:49AM

Deleted User wrote: »

As I said, that's because they are the most commonly used accusations against the Trump administration. Not because they are actually true.

Yet when you heard them say it the first thought was that they were talking about Trump. But you know it isn't true, so it is you contention that even by mentioning the very normal call to not vote for hate speech that people would immediately think of Trump.

So again, they didn't mention Trump, although you seem certain that is what they meant (btw Trump supporters do seem to have a unique ability to know what anybody really meant no matter what they said) and instead of applauding the very noble sentiment you take it as an attack on Trump.

So you have chosen defence of Trump over the ideal of decrying hate speech. What a novel position to take.

Do you think nobody should ever call out hate speech on the off chance that it reflects badly on somebody or is it just when you feel it is targeted at Trump?

27-09-2020 10:20AM

Leroy42 wrote: »

Yet when you heard them say it the first thought was that they were talking about Trump. But you know it isn't true, so it is you contention that even by mentioning the very normal call to not vote for hate speech that people would immediately think of Trump.

So again, they didn't mention Trump, although you seem certain that is what they meant (btw Trump supporters do seem to have a unique ability to know what anybody really meant no matter what they said) and instead of applauding the very noble sentiment you take it as an attack on Trump.

So you have chosen defence of Trump over the ideal of decrying hate speech. What a novel position to take.

Do you think nobody should ever call out hate speech on the off chance that it reflects badly on somebody or is it just when you feel it is targeted at Trump?

Anybody no matter their political leanings is against hate speech. The problem nowadays is that hate speech is a pejorative and abused term and can mean anything depending on who defines it. JK Rowling is now a proponent of hate speech apparently. Graham Linehan too. If your opinions differ from mine can I report you for hate speech? Is that ok?

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-09-2020 10:32AM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

That's because they are the most used accusations against Trump administration. Not because they are true. Dogwhistling. Everyone on both sides can read between the lines.

Are you really saying that Trump doesn't use hate speech, misinformation and online negativity? Have you seen his twitter feed?

namloc1980 · 27-09-2020 10:32AM

Man this is embarrassing. Hundreds of people leaving a Trump rally while he's still talking. Obviously not being paid enough to stay for the whole thing. #enthusiasm

.

LessOutragePlz · 27-09-2020 10:33AM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Are you really saying that Trump doesn't use hate speech, misinformation and online negativity? Have you seen his twitter feed?

Can you define hate speech?

breezy1985 · 27-09-2020 10:34AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Anybody no matter their political leanings is against hate speech. The problem nowadays is that hate speech is a pejorative and abused term and can mean anything depending on who defines it. JK Rowling is now a proponent of hate speech apparently. Graham Linehan too. If your opinions differ from mine can I report you for hate speech? Is that ok?

Ya but Rowling or her supporters dont believe what she says is hate speech but with the Markle comments Trump fans jumped straight up and said "thats us" when she was talking about voting against hate

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-09-2020 10:35AM

namloc1980 wrote: »

Man this is embarrassing. Hundreds of people leaving a Trump rally while he's still talking. Obviously not being paid enough to stay for the whole thing. #enthusiasm

.

Its like the Mayo fans leaving croker when the Dubs are 2 goals and 10 points up, they know their side is getting hammered so why bother staying.

biko · 27-09-2020 10:36AM

A top Democratic operative says voter fraud, especially with mail-in ballots, is no myth. And he knows this because he’s been doing it, on a grand scale, for decades.

“You have a postman who is a rabid anti-Trump guy and he’s working in Bedminster or some Republican stronghold … He can take those [filled-out] ballots, and knowing 95% are going to a Republican, he can just throw those in the garbage.”

https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/

namloc1980 · 27-09-2020 10:38AM

biko wrote: »

A top Democratic operative says voter fraud, especially with mail-in ballots, is no myth. And he knows this because he’s been doing it, on a grand scale, for decades.

“You have a postman who is a rabid anti-Trump guy and he’s working in Bedminster or some Republican stronghold … He can take those [filled-out] ballots, and knowing 95% are going to a Republican, he can just throw those in the garbage.”

https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/

An anonymous source in the New York Post. That's the very definition of fake news that Trumpists continue to tell us all about isn't it?

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-09-2020 10:42AM

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Can you define hate speech?

I would consider this to be hate speech

“Other countries” are allowed to shoot migrants, he lamented to supporters back in May as his reelection campaign flooded the internet with ads about an “invasion” on the southern border. “Other countries stand [at the border] with machine guns, ready to fire,” he told Sean Hannity in March, noting that “it’s a very effective way of doing” things.

LessOutragePlz · 27-09-2020 10:47AM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

I would consider this to be hate speech

So you can't define it?

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-09-2020 10:50AM

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

So you can't define it?

I'll let the dictionary do it

abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.

27-09-2020 10:55AM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

I'll let the dictionary do it

abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.

All dictionaries are leftist publications, everyone knows that.
Some serious bottom of the barrel posts from the trump supporters on here lately.

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-09-2020 10:56AM

DubInMeath wrote: »

All dictionaries are leftist publications, everyone knows that.
Some serious bottom of the barrel posts from the trump supporters on here lately.

Desperate times call for Desperate measures.

DraftDodger · 27-09-2020 10:57AM

America's largest police organisation endorse the president for 4 more years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84v8SwytCgE

namloc1980 · 27-09-2020 10:58AM

DubInMeath wrote: »

All dictionaries are leftist publications, everyone knows that.
Some serious bottom of the barrel posts from the trump supporters on here lately.

New talking points have dried up so it's the exact same talking points day after day. They're even posting anonymous source stores from mainstream media outlets now so you know things are getting desperate.

Timberrrrrrrr · 27-09-2020 10:59AM

namloc1980 wrote: »

New talking points have dried up so it's the exact same talking points day after day. They're even posting anonymous source stores from mainstream media outlets now so you know things are getting desperate.

Its like a Trump rally but in text form.

Cody montana · 27-09-2020 11:01AM

DraftDodger wrote: »

America's largest police organisation endorse the president for 4 more years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84v8SwytCgE

Is that not from a few weeks ago?

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Comments